APEC trade ministers' meeting kicks off in South Korea
Seoul: A trade ministers' meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) member economies kicked off on Thursday on South Korea's southern resort island of Jeju to discuss challenges facing global trade, with many bilateral meetings held on the sidelines highlighting the countries' efforts to address such issues stemming from growing trade protectionism.
The APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT) Meeting will be held through Friday at the International Convention Center in southern Jeju, under the theme "Building a Sustainable Tomorrow: Connect, Innovate, Prosper," according the Seoul's Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.
Top trade officials from the 21 APEC members are taking part in the two-day event, as well as senior officials from the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), reports Yonhap news agency.
Soon after its start, the venue for the APEC ministers' meeting bustled with a series of bilateral meetings as many major APEC member countries, including South Korea, Japan and China, are currently undergoing trade negotiations with Washington over U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff measures.
South Korean Trade Minister Cheong In-kyo was set to hold talks with US Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer later Thursday on the sidelines of the MRT meeting. The scheduled meeting follows Greer's bilateral talks with China's top trade envoy, Li Chenggang, held earlier Thursday.
A separate one-on-one meeting between the USTR and South Korean Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy Ahn Duk-geun is planned for Friday.
Greer's meetings with South Korean officials come after their countries agreed in Washington last month to craft a "package" deal on tariff and other economic cooperation issues by early July, when the 90-day pause on the Trump administration's country-specific reciprocal tariffs, including 25 percent duties on South Korea, will end.
Seoul has proposed expanding bilateral cooperation in the shipbuilding and energy sectors as part of efforts to lower U.S. tariffs on Korean goods, according to government officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After Harvard and Columbia, Trump admin continues to target over 60 universities
As the Trump administration continues its crackdown on US universities and colleges, the president has signed a ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University. Donald Trump has signed into a place a six month ban on foreign student visas for Harvard University amid its row. Furthermore, the Trump admin has also targeted Columbia University and threatened to strip the fellow Ivy league college of its accreditation. ALSO READ | Trump suspends entry of international students studying at Harvard These efforts come as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on DEI-related initiatives across universities and its response to the pro-Palestinian protests that swept US campuses last year. With Harvard and Columbia in the spotlight, the US Education Department has opened over 104 investigations against universities and colleges across the 50 states. As per a report by Education Week, the Department of Education has opened at least 104 investigations against universities, school districts and colleges as of June 3. Of this, 70 have been against higher education systems such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown University and more. These 70 names also include the various out-of-state branches of universities. As per the Education Week report, 52 universities have been targeted for the DEI-initiatives, which Trump alleges promotes admissions based on race. The remaining have been targeted for their role in the 2024 pro-Palestinian protests. Universities and colleges across the US have been targeted for several reasons stated by the Trump administration such as antisemitism, race based programming, services for students with disabilities and disclosure of foreign contracts and gifts. Universities have also been targeted for their policies for transgender students, which as per the Trump administration, goes against the president's executive order which declaring only two genders. Universities such as Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, Northwestern, Pennsylvania and Princeton are among the list of higher education systems targeted by the Trump administration. (Based on notices issued by the US Education Department)
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
India, US push to finalise interim tariff deal as Trump's deadline nears
Indian and U.S. are holding high-level talks this week, aiming to finalise tariff cuts in sectors such as farm and automobiles as part of an interim deal, two government sources said, with an announcement likely later this month. A U.S. delegation led by senior officials from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) began closed-door, two-day discussions in New Delhi on Thursday with Indian trade officials headed by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, the sources said. "During the current round of talks, negotiators are discussing tariff cuts on specific sectors including agriculture and autos, and proposed benefits for Indian companies," one Indian government source, said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar The deal may be formally announced by month end, before the self-imposed deadline of July 9 by President Trump, but a statement is expected once meetings wrap up, possibly by Sunday, a second official said. Trade Minister Piyush Goyal, currently in Italy, may return to meet the delegation, the official added. Live Events The officials said spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions. Indian trade ministry didn't immediately respond to requests for comments. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in Washington on Monday that trade negotiations were progressing and a deal could be finalised soon. India and the U.S. agreed in February to work on a phased deal, aiming to lift bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. Officials said, India, buoyed by recent trade pact with the UK, and EU talks, is resisting U.S. demands to open its farm and dairy markets, citing potential rural backlash. "We are ready to offer a better deal than the UK pact, with average tariffs down to 10%, matching the U.S. base rate , and near-zero duties with quotas in exchange for market access and supply chain linkages," a third official said. Washington has flagged India's average farm tariff of 39%, with some duties reaching 45-50%. It is also pushing India to allow corn imports for ethanol production. Bilateral trade with the U.S., India's largest trading partner, rose to $129 billion in 2024, with India posting a $45.7 billion surplus.
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How the new Trump travel ban on 12 countries differs from his previous ‘Muslim ban'
Effective Monday (June 9), citizens from 12 nations, primarily from Africa and the Middle East, will be denied entry into the US, following a proclamation signed by President Donald Trump on Wednesday (June 4). The move revives an effort from his first term (2017-21) to ban entry to vast numbers of immigrants and visitors. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be banned from entry. The proclamation also announced restrictions on people travelling from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. While Trump has batted for banning entry to Muslim migrants and visitors during his first term, his efforts to institute a travel ban faced a Supreme Court challenge before it was implemented in a limited capacity. This ban was revoked by Joe Biden when he became President in 2021. The current ban, while expected, is expected to hold up against court challenges, and builds on an executive order signed on his first day, authorising US national security agencies to conduct 'a robust assessment of the risk that countries posed to the United States, including regarding terrorism and national security.' The present move comes on the heels of a terror attack by an Egyptian man in Colorado earlier this week, with the Trump administration officials promising a crackdown in its aftermath. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said while announcing the travel ban. 'We don't want them.' Here is what to know about the new ban, and how it compares to his efforts from his first term. In a Fact Sheet shared by the White House, the Trump administration said that the country-specific bans would 'encourage cooperation with the subject countries in recognition of each country's unique circumstances'. This opens the possibility for each country to seek bilateral talks and discussions with the US to ease the restrictions, in an effort similar to the trade deals following Trump's tariff announcements. The countries thus far have been identified based on: This rationale has also been used to restrict entry to people from seven nations, without instituting an outright ban. Countries Identified Travel Ban State-sponsored terrorism, or a safe haven for terrorists Iran, Somalia, Libya, and Afghanistan Cuba Lack of a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents Afghanistan, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen Venezuela High visa overstay rate Afghanistan, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Haiti, Sudan Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Venezuela Not accepting their removable nationals Burma (Myanmar), Eritrea, Iran, Somalia Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Venezuela The fact sheet explicitly calls Iran and Cuba state sponsors of terrorism, and Somalia a terrorist safe haven. Interestingly, it recognises that Afghanistan is controlled by the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group, without outright condemning them. The fact sheet also sees 'hundreds of thousands of illegal Haitian aliens' who entered the US during Biden's term as a national security threat. It also notes that the governments in Yemen and Somalia lack command and control of their territories, with Somalia in particular standing out for the extent to which this is the case. The ban exempts certain categories of individuals from the travel ban: For one, the current ban must be viewed in the context of Trump's larger, systematic crackdown on immigration. Since his return to the White House in January, he imposed a national emergency at the country's southern border, denying entry to asylum-seekers, has authorised nationwide immigration raids, and barred international admissions to Harvard University. Legal experts cited in a report in The New York Times believe the current iteration of the travel ban would withstand legal scrutiny better than the efforts in his first term. 'They seem to have learned some lessons from the three different rounds of litigation we went through during the first Trump administration,' Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center told the NYT. 'But a lot will depend upon how it's actually enforced — and whether it's applied in ways that are themselves unlawful or even unconstitutional.' Vladeck noted that the announcement came after several months of Trump's inauguration, compared to the ban in the first term that came into place just a week after he became President. In the run-up to the 2016 US elections and after becoming President in 2017, Trump repeatedly expressed his desire to impose a 'Muslim ban', a 'total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.' This was accompanied by incendiary rhetoric, with Trump saying 'Islam hates us' and that the US was 'having problems with Muslims coming into the country.' Further, this iteration of the travel ban does not single out Muslim nations, but focuses on administrative issues like visa overstay, or a threat to national security from political instability from the other nation. Trump enacted his first travel ban on January 27, 2017, barring entry to citizens from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for a 90-day period. This was overturned by a federal judge the next month. A second attempt at a travel ban on all these countries, barring Iraq, was made that March, and spared individuals with an existing green card or valid visa. This was overturned by two federal judges that month, who ruled that it was illegal to ban travel from half a dozen countries. A third travel ban was announced in September 2017, barring entry to most citizens of Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. The move exempted Iranian nationals with valid student and exchange visitor visas. Chad was subsequently removed from this list after its administration reached out to the US. This ban was finally upheld by the Supreme Court in June 2018, which said the president has authority over national security concerns relating to immigration. A fourth travel ban was announced in January 2020, banning entry to immigrants from Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania. Tourists and visitors entering the US temporarily were exempted. All travel bans were subsequently revoked by Biden, upon assuming the presidency in 2021.
