Employee steals Dhs119,000 from workplace in UAE, told to return the money
Specifically, a company initiated legal proceedings against an individual who had previously been employed by it. The final requests made by the plaintiff were limited to a ruling obliging the defendant to return the sums he had embezzled, amounting to Dhs128,966. The plaintiff also requested the costs of issuing a consulting report detailing the sums embezzled, legal interest at a rate of 5 per cent from the date of the lawsuit until full payment, and fees, expenses, and attorneys' fees.
The company initiated legal proceedings on the basis that the employee had been employed by it for approximately nine years, receiving a total monthly salary of Dhs5,500, with a basic monthly salary of Dhs3,300. The termination of the employment relationship had indeed occurred, however, the employee had declined to remunerate the company accordingly.
The Court ordered the assignment of an expert to audit the accounts, the results of which were submitted in a report. The report concluded that the employee had owed amounts as a result of failing to pay instalments that he had collected in cash from the company's clients. Following the company's review of the employee's objections, the auditor determined that the outstanding debt owed by the employee for documents he had issued and collected in cash instalments from clients, but not deposited with the company, amounted to Dhs119,965.
In its ruling on the employee's request to return the amounts he had embezzled from the company's clients, the court explained its decision. The court established that there was a business relationship between the employee and the company, and that the outstanding debt owed by the employee for documents he had issued and collected cash instalments for from clients, but had not deposited with the company, amounted to Dhs119,965. Therefore, the court ruled that this sum should be returned to the company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
14 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Sara Duterte accuses Marcos administration of working with ICC to detain ex-president Duterte
Vice President Sara Duterte accused the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC) to arrest and detain her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte. In a speech during the 'Free Duterte Now' rally in The Hague, Sara Duterte claimed the Marcos administration colluded with the ICC in pursuing charges of crimes against humanity against the former chief executive in connection with his war on drugs. 'Gamitan tayo dito. Kailangan nyo ng kaso. Kailangan namin palayasin yan dito kasi talong-talo na kami sa politika,' she said. Vice President Duterte alleged that the ICC's decision to prosecute her father lacked basis and was driven by political motives. She also accused the ICC of interfering in Philippine governance, claiming the court is advancing a foreign agenda. Rodrigo Duterte was arrested in the Philippines on March 11 based on a warrant issued by the ICC and is currently detained at the Scheveningen Prison in The Hague. The ICC has not responded to Duterte's claims directly. 'We can't comment on political statements. The Court is a judicial institution and any challenges raised before the judges would be decided on by the ICC Judges,' ICC spokesperson Fadi El said in a statement sent to GMA News Online. Malacañang has yet to issue a statement on the matter.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Employee steals Dhs119,000 from workplace in UAE, told to return the money
The Al Ain Civil, Commercial and Administrative Cases Court ordered an employee to pay Dhs119,965 to his employer . It was established that the accused had accumulated monetary sums during the period of his employment, yet he had not disbursed the aforementioned amounts. Specifically, a company initiated legal proceedings against an individual who had previously been employed by it. The final requests made by the plaintiff were limited to a ruling obliging the defendant to return the sums he had embezzled, amounting to Dhs128,966. The plaintiff also requested the costs of issuing a consulting report detailing the sums embezzled, legal interest at a rate of 5 per cent from the date of the lawsuit until full payment, and fees, expenses, and attorneys' fees. The company initiated legal proceedings on the basis that the employee had been employed by it for approximately nine years, receiving a total monthly salary of Dhs5,500, with a basic monthly salary of Dhs3,300. The termination of the employment relationship had indeed occurred, however, the employee had declined to remunerate the company accordingly. The Court ordered the assignment of an expert to audit the accounts, the results of which were submitted in a report. The report concluded that the employee had owed amounts as a result of failing to pay instalments that he had collected in cash from the company's clients. Following the company's review of the employee's objections, the auditor determined that the outstanding debt owed by the employee for documents he had issued and collected in cash instalments from clients, but not deposited with the company, amounted to Dhs119,965. In its ruling on the employee's request to return the amounts he had embezzled from the company's clients, the court explained its decision. The court established that there was a business relationship between the employee and the company, and that the outstanding debt owed by the employee for documents he had issued and collected cash instalments for from clients, but had not deposited with the company, amounted to Dhs119,965. Therefore, the court ruled that this sum should be returned to the company.
Gulf Today
4 days ago
- Gulf Today
Court orders company to pay a former employee Dhs280,000 in compensation
The Abu Dhabi Labor Court-First Instance has ruled that a company be obligated to pay Dhs280,156 in compensation to one of its employees. The latter had worked for the company for approximately 25 years. However, there was a delay in the payment of the monthly wages, and the end-of-service gratuity was also unpaid despite the termination of the employee's contract. Specifically, an employee initiated legal proceedings against his employer requesting that the court order the defendant to pay him the following sums: the outstanding balance of his wages, expenses incurred in the course of the legal action, and the costs of the enforcement process. The employee initiated legal proceedings on the basis of his claim that he had been in the employ of the company for a period of approximately 25 years, receiving a monthly basic salary of Dhs7,000, and the full salary is Dhs14,000. The employee demanded an end-of-service gratuity of Dhs165,667 and back salaries of Dhs205,900. The Court determined that the case documentation did not contain any evidence to suggest that the company was not liable for the requested wages, thereby affirming the employee's right to receive the delayed wages amounting to Dhs212,433. Following the acknowledgement by the employee of payment amounting to Dhs91,411, subsequent to the deduction of the aforementioned amount, the employee would be left with a remaining balance of Dhs121,022. In view of the fact that the individual in question specified his request at Dhs114,489, the court was obliged to rule on this amount. The Court further explained that Article 51 of the Labor Law stipulates that an employee who has completed one year of continuous service with their employer is entitled, upon the end of their service, to a gratuity. The amount of this gratuity is determined in accordance with the standards and cases stipulated in the aforementioned article. Given the aforementioned facts, and in consideration of the employee's 25-year and two-month tenure with the company, the employee is eligible to receive a compensation amounting to Dhs165,667.
