logo
India's $68 billion question: How to trade with Russia without making America unhappy

India's $68 billion question: How to trade with Russia without making America unhappy

Time of India3 days ago
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The enduring Russia-India axis
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why India won't 'switch off' its Russia ties
Here's the economic risk
The Pakistan oil card
More pressure on the horizon
Diplomatic stress test
India's trade ties with Russia are back in the spotlight after US President Donald Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on Indian exports, effective August 1, 2025. His reasoning? India's high duties on American goods and what he calls 'obnoxious' non-monetary trade barriers.But there's more to it.Trump is also tying these tariffs directly to India's deepening ties with Russia. He is coupling them with what he calls an 'additional penalty' for India's strategic trade relationship with Moscow, especially its oil purchases and military imports.This unspecified penalty, according to The New York Times, is his first test run of what he's branding as 'secondary tariffs' -- a departure from conventional financial sanctions often applied to countries engaging with embargoed nations.The new tariff list is broad, covering products from smartphones and steel to shrimp and jewellery, sectors where India has a strong export presence. These exports now face the risk of losing ground in the US market.Trump, never one to mince words, went a step further.He dismissed both Indian and Russian economies as 'dead,' claiming the US does 'very little business' with either, just as he announced a tariff that could cost India billions. He's also accused India of undermining international efforts to stop the war in Ukraine.This aggressive stance by the US prompts a critical examination of the deep-rooted relationship between India and Russia -- and the growing pressure on New Delhi to recalibrate its foreign policy.Despite everything, India-Russia relations are still going strong.External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, speaking to the Indian diaspora at an event in Moscow in December 2023, described the bilateral relationship as 'the one constant in world politics.'And he wasn't being dramatic.This partnership goes back to the 1950s, when the Soviet Union used its UN Security Council veto in India's favour on Kashmir. Moscow also stood by India during the Cold War and helped mediate with Pakistan more than once.Trade-wise, things are booming.In FY25, bilateral trade hit $68.7 billion. According to the Indian embassy in Moscow, this is nearly 5.8 times higher than the pre-pandemic trade of $10.1 billion.'It comprises India's exports worth $4.88 billion and imports from Russia amounting to $63.84 billion.'The target is $100 billion in bilateral trade by 2030, as Jaishankar reiterated in March last year, and a huge part of that is crude oil. Russia now accounts for around 40% of India's oil imports, up from just 0.2% before the Ukraine war, according to The Economic Times.That shift isn't just dramatic, it's locked in. In December, India signed its biggest-ever energy deal with Russia: a 10-year agreement to supply 500,000 barrels of oil per day to Reliance, worth about $13 billion annually, as Reuters reported.That's 0.5% of global supply, committed for a decade. It shows just how deeply rooted this energy relationship has become.But here's the twist. Indian state-run refiners have reportedly paused Russian oil purchases . With discounts narrowing and US President Donald Trump warning countries against buying crude from Moscow, state refiners like Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum, Bharat Petroleum and Mangalore Refinery haven't placed fresh orders in over a week, according to industry sources cited by Reuters.While private players, Reliance and Nayara, remain the largest buyers of Russian oil, public-sector refiners still control over 60% of India's 5.2 million barrels-a-day refining capacity. Any shift in their strategy matters.And oil is just one piece of the puzzle.India remains the world's largest importer of Russian arms. Reports from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) consistently show India as a top, if not the top, importer of Russian weaponry over various periods.According to the London-based think tank Chatham House, over 50% of India's military equipment is Russian-made. India is trying to diversify under its Make in India initiative, but that kind of dependence doesn't unwind overnight.They're also building nuclear plants together.According to The Moscow Times, Russia's state-owned Rosatom has an agreement to build six reactors in India. And if that's not enough high-level engagement, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has met Vladimir Putin 17 times over the last decade, including two visits to Russia in the past year alone.New Delhi has made it clear: it's not walking away from Moscow just because Washington wants it to.As India's High Commissioner to the UK, Vikram Doraiswami, put it: India can't just 'switch off [its] economy' to comply with Western sanctions. Energy security and defence needs take priority. And when critics question India's continued trade with Russia, Indian officials often point to Europe's own ongoing dealings with Moscow as a counter.'Many of our European partners are still buying rare earths and other energy products from the same countries they're refusing to let us buy from,' Doraiswami told Times Radio last week, following Prime Minister Modi's visit to London. 'Don't you think that seems a little odd?'When asked about India's 'closeness' with Russia and President Vladimir Putin, Doraiswami said the relationship rests on several long-term factors, not least of which is defence.'Some of our Western partners wouldn't sell us weapons but had no problem selling them to countries in our neighbourhood that used them to attack us,' he said, alluding to US-Pakistan arms ties during the Cold War.But this stance isn't winning India any friends in the West.India has stayed studiously neutral on the Russia-Ukraine war. It hasn't condemned the invasion, and it abstained on multiple UN resolutions targeting Moscow. That's drawn criticism, particularly from the US and EU, who've grown frustrated with what they see as strategic ambiguity.There's also concern about India's role in supplying dual-use technologies. As Bloomberg reported last year, US and EU officials now say India is the second-largest supplier of restricted tech to Russia, undermining global efforts to curb Moscow's war capabilities.Meanwhile, Trump's frustration goes beyond Ukraine. He's long complained about stalled US-India trade talks, India's membership in BRICS (which he sees as 'anti-US'), and Delhi's refusal to distance itself from Putin.The US is India's single biggest export market, accounting for nearly 25% of its exports in recent months, ahead of the UAE, Netherlands, China, and the UK.According to Reuters, India exported $87 billion worth of goods to the US in 2024. In May 2025 alone, India posted a trade surplus of over $5 billion with the US, exports stood at $8.83 billion, while imports were $3.63 billion.But that trade advantage could come under pressure.The US currently runs a $45.7 billion goods trade deficit with India. Now, new US tariffs are set to hit Indian goods harder than those from other countries.The import tax on Indian goods is expected to be higher than that on exports from nations like Japan (15%), the EU (15%), Indonesia (19%), and even Vietnam (20%), despite Vietnam being explicitly targeted by the Trump administration.According to Reuters, Citi economists say India's weighted average tariff rate would end up being five to ten percentage points higher than its Asian peers.That could make India a less competitive manufacturing hub at a time when global supply chains are already in flux. Even a modest 5–10% drop in exports to the US would translate into a multi-billion-dollar hit.As if things weren't messy enough, Trump, while announcing a trade deal with Pakistan, stated on Truth Social on Wednesday that the United States would help Islamabad develop its "massive oil reserves" — though the specifics of these reserves remain unclear.But his comments on Truth Social were provocative: "We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves," Trump wrote, adding, "We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!'This comment is hugely significant for India, given that it came the day after Trump announced the 25% tariff on 'friend' India, along with an unspecified penalty for its close ties with Russia.'…They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine, All things not Good!'It's a remarkable juxtaposition: Trump penalising India, a long-time partner, while dangling energy cooperation with Pakistan, a country the US has historically had a rollercoaster relationship with.Former US Assistant Secretary of State and partner at The Asia Group, Nisha Biswal, told ANI: 'These differences, divergences in the US-India relationship are longstanding. Historically, the United States has demonstrated a fair amount of understanding regarding India's legacy relationships and the accommodations for that. I think President Trump is probably less inclined to accommodate and adapt to those legacy relationships..."The next few months will be a serious stress test for India's foreign policy.To complicate things further, a new bipartisan bill in the US Senate is calling for a 500% tariff on goods from countries that keep buying Russian oil and gas while refusing to back Ukraine. If it passes, India will have some hard decisions to make.Called the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, the bill has been introduced by Senators Lindsey Graham (Republican) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat), with support from over 80 co-sponsors across party lines, enough to potentially override a presidential veto.The proposed law would slap steep tariffs, up to 500%, on imports from countries that continue buying Russian crude, gas, petroleum products, or uranium and don't actively support Ukraine.India and China are explicitly named as top targets. Brazil also comes up frequently. There's also talk, largely from Trump's camp, of an additional 100% 'secondary tariff' threat.The bill does include a waiver clause, allowing the US President to choose not to enforce the tariffs even if Congress passes the law -- leaving room for negotiation or strategic exemptions.India has defended its energy deals with Moscow, citing national interest and energy security. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has said India's position has been made clear to Senator Graham and that New Delhi will 'cross that bridge when we come to it' if the bill moves forward.India's Russian oil imports have surged since the Ukraine war began, making up a large chunk of its crude basket. If this bill becomes law, the fallout could hit Indian exports to the US, one of its most important trade relationships.As of July 31, the bill remains at the 'Introduced' stage. The Senate version has been referred to the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee and is still working its way through the legislative process.Even if it doesn't pass, there's more trouble coming.The EU's latest sanctions, implemented in July 2025, ban the import of refined petroleum products made from Russian crude, even if those products are processed in third countries like India.This move directly threatens India's fuel exports to the bloc, which were estimated at $14.3 billion in FY25, according to ICRA.India had emerged as a major hub for rerouting Russian oil to Europe, capitalising on discounts offered by Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine. That backdoor has now been shut.As for Iran, India's official crude imports have remained negligible since 2019 due to US sanctions. But recent American actions suggest some trade may still be happening.On July 30, the US State Department imposed sanctions on six Indian companies, including Alchemical Solutions, Global Industrial Chemicals, and Jupiter Dye Chem, for allegedly engaging in 'significant transactions' involving Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products.India is currently assessing the tariff impact, with a US delegation slated to visit later in August for ongoing trade negotiations. However, the path forward appears fraught with challenges.Russian President Vladimir Putin's anticipated visit to India in the coming months will likely ignite similar discussions.The move by the US marks a sharper turn in pressure tactics to isolate Russia and raises the stakes significantly for India's delicate balancing act between maintaining its strategic autonomy and nurturing partnerships with competing global powers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's erratic behaviour strained most defining partnership of 21st century
How Trump's erratic behaviour strained most defining partnership of 21st century

First Post

time28 minutes ago

  • First Post

How Trump's erratic behaviour strained most defining partnership of 21st century

US President Donald Trump announced on July 30, 2025, that a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods—along with additional penalties over India's continued engagement with Russia—would take effect from August 1, 2025. In a striking contradiction, he simultaneously claimed to have concluded a trade and energy deal with Pakistan—India's traditional adversary. While India has no objection to such bilateral engagements between sovereign nations, Trump went a step further by stating, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' This wasn't merely an offhand comment—it was a calculated provocation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India and Pakistan are archrivals, and the idea of such dependence is not only unrealistic but also strategically unacceptable. By making such statements, Trump is not merely playing geopolitical games—he is striking at the heart of India's national security sensitivities and damaging a relationship that both countries have spent decades nurturing into a consequential partnership for the 21st century. Trump has consistently hyphenated India–Pakistan relations, weakening India's position on cross-border terrorism by boosting Pakistan's strategic confidence through repeated endorsements and by portraying both countries as equals. These actions have granted Pakistan undue strategic legitimacy, disregarding decades of US policy that sought to engage India as an independent and trusted strategic partner. His claim—repeated over 29 times—that he personally brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan has been unequivocally denied by top Indian officials, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh. By drawing false parallels and exaggerating his role, Trump has jeopardised India's core interests and eroded the trust carefully built by successive US administrations. A Diplomatic Liability Recently, India's Parliament witnessed a heated debate in which opposition leaders urged Prime Minister Modi to directly refute Donald Trump's repeated claims that he brokered the recent India–Pakistan ceasefire. But such directness is unlikely to yield results. Trump is not a leader who responds to logic or diplomacy. His erratic, impulsive, and reactive personality makes engagement unpredictable. Even if the Indian prime minister corrects him publicly, Trump may repeat the same claim in the evening—and again the next day. The problem lies in Washington, not New Delhi. This isn't a unique pattern. Trump turned against Elon Musk—a long-time supporter—after a minor disagreement, telling him to 'go back to South Africa' and threatening to revoke federal subsidies supporting Tesla and SpaceX. Notably, Musk was the largest individual donor to Trump's 2024 campaign, contributing between $250 million and $290 million to pro-Trump political action committees. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite this staggering support, Trump turned on him without hesitation—highlighting his transactional nature and readiness to discard even his most generous allies over personal slights. Similarly, Indian-American politician Vivek Ramaswamy had the foresight to distance himself from Trump early on—an act of pragmatism that likely spared him from similar treatment. Trump is not a conventional statesman. He governs through impulse-driven outbursts on Truth Social, his personal platform, bypassing standard diplomatic channels and norms. One cannot expect rational behaviour or consistency from someone so clearly erratic. Even when India's prime minister and foreign minister have privately countered his claims, Trump has continued repeating the same falsehoods, showing a complete disregard for diplomatic engagement. Undermining India's Core Sensitivities By equating India and Pakistan, Trump has granted Pakistan undeserved strategic legitimacy and confidence, despite its entrenched history of sponsoring terrorism against India. Recently, Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, was hosted by Trump at a private luncheon at the White House—an extraordinary and rare gesture, especially considering that only a handful of Pakistani generals have ever received such treatment. Trump went on to lavish praise on Munir, calling him 'extremely influential in stopping the conflict from the Pakistan side' and crediting both Munir and Modi for preventing what he claimed could have escalated into a nuclear war. Adding to this, Centcom Commander General Michael Kurilla described Pakistan as 'a phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world,' blatantly ignoring its well-documented role in nurturing and exporting terrorist proxies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This repeated validation—through White House meetings, public praise, and exaggerated claims of Pakistan's counter-terrorism role—undermines India's diplomatic efforts to isolate state-sponsored terrorism. Praising a country that has itself sponsored terrorism against India is not only absurd but also adds insult to injury. Instead of backing India's fight, Trump's gestures have offered moral and strategic encouragement to Pakistan's military and political leadership—eroding the very trust that should define India–US strategic ties. Deliberate Provocation and Strategic Damage Trump's recent suggestion that India might import oil from Pakistan is not only absurd—it appears to be a deliberate attempt to provoke and humiliate. While this may be part of a broader negotiation tactic aimed at pushing India into a trade deal, the damage inflicted on bilateral relations is severe. Trump has thrown the India–US relationship into a Cold War–like deep freeze, eroding trust and mutual respect that had taken decades to build. This shift is not the result of India's foreign policy. The problem lies squarely with Trump. Unlike his predecessors—who operated with a sense of dignity, stability, and strategic foresight—Trump has pursued a chaotic, transactional approach that alienates allies and undermines shared interests. In one of his recent statements, Trump said: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I don't care if India is buying oil from Russia. I couldn't care less. Let them do whatever they want. They can take their dead economies down together for all I care.' Such a statement is not only undiplomatic—it reflects a complete disregard for the economic realities of global partnerships and disrespects a key strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific. Instead of reinforcing mutual interests, Trump has repeatedly chosen to antagonise, offend, and weaken the very relationship considered vital for regional balance and global stability and widely regarded as the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Moreover, Trump's ignorance of India's crucial moderating role in Brics reveals his blindness to structural realities. India's presence in Brics has ensured the group remains a non-Western coalition rather than an anti-Western alliance. Without India, BRICS could have adopted an anti-dollar currency or an explicitly adversarial posture. But explaining such nuance to an impulsive and transactional US leadership seems futile. Trump is unable—or unwilling—to grasp the strategic logic of true partnerships. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rebuilding Trust: A Long Road Ahead The trust deficit between India and the US has widened significantly. Even those in India who once firmly believed in the potential of the bilateral relationship now feel disillusioned. But India has weathered such storms before. After the 1998 nuclear tests, the United States imposed sanctions on India. Back in 1971, it had deployed the Seventh Fleet to the Bay of Bengal in an attempt to intimidate India during the Bangladesh Liberation War. India didn't bow down then—and it won't now. India will adapt and find its path, just as it has done in the past. As India's leadership has repeatedly stated, every step will be taken to secure national interest. However, the damage inflicted by Trump's erratic and impulsive leadership means that restoring faith in the relationship will take years, if not decades. Moving forward, we can expect a greater degree of scepticism and a likely recalibration of India's foreign policy posture—possibly including greater resistance to US alignment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's presidency has sown the seeds of growing anti-American sentiment in Indian strategic circles. His words and actions—especially repeated endorsements of Pakistan and disregard for India's strategic concerns—have not just weakened the India–US partnership; they have dented the very idea of trust in global diplomacy. As The Economic Times recently noted, doubts over US reliability are once again taking root in Indian foreign policy circles, and that's a serious blow to what was once considered the defining partnership of the twenty-first century. Imran Khurshid is a visiting research fellow at the International Centre for Peace Studies, New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

PM Modi Meets President Murmu Amid Parliament Disruptions
PM Modi Meets President Murmu Amid Parliament Disruptions

NDTV

time28 minutes ago

  • NDTV

PM Modi Meets President Murmu Amid Parliament Disruptions

New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday called on President Droupadi Murmu at the Rashtrapati Bhavan. Details of the meeting were not immediately available. "Prime Minister Shri @narendramodi called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan," the Rashtrapati Bhavan said on X. Prime Minister Shri @narendramodi called on President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan. — President of India (@rashtrapatibhvn) August 3, 2025 The meeting comes in the backdrop of the logjam in Parliament over the opposition demand for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections in the state. Except discussions in both Houses on Operation Sindoor, Parliament has seen little business ever since the Monsoon session began on July 21. The prime minister's meeting with the President also came days after US President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on exports from India and an unspecified penalty because of New Delhi's purchases of Russian military equipment and oil.

PCB pulls out of World Championship of Legends, cites political bias and unfair conduct
PCB pulls out of World Championship of Legends, cites political bias and unfair conduct

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

PCB pulls out of World Championship of Legends, cites political bias and unfair conduct

Islamabad [Pakistan], August 3 (ANI): The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has officially announced that it will no longer participate in any future editions of the World Championship of Legends (WCL), raising concerns about the tournament's fairness, integrity, and political neutrality, The Nation reported, citing the PCB. "The championship's handling of events appeared to be under invisible pressures," the PCB noted. "The apology issued later seemed motivated by a specific form of nationalism, making it difficult for us to continue our participation," it added. The decision was taken during a Board of Governors meeting, chaired by PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi. According to the Nation, the board pointed to "double standards and politically motivated actions." One of the most contentious issues raised by the board was the decision to award points to a team that had voluntarily forfeited a match, a move the PCB claimed as "highly questionable" and against the spirit of fair competition. The board further criticised the press release put out by WCL organisers after the India-Pakistan match was called off. It termed the communication "politically charged and prejudiced." The PCB said it would not take part in any event where the values of neutrality and fair play are undermined. The board made it clear that it will not be associated with tournaments that allow external agendas to dictate the course of the game. Earlier, the EaseMyTrip Co-founder Nishant Pitti has clarified that it will not be associated with any India-Pakistan match in the World Championship of Legends (WCL). The company clarified its stance, stating that despite entering into a 5-year sponsorship agreement with WCL two years ago, it will not associate with or participate in any match involving Pakistan. Nishant Pitti, co-founder of EaseMyTrip, took to his X account to express support for the Indian team, while explaining the company's position. "India vs Pakistan - WCL Semi-Final. We applaud Team India @India_Champions for their outstanding performance in the World Championship of Legends. You've made the nation proud. However, the upcoming semi-final against Pakistan is not just another game. Terror and cricket cannot go hand in hand," Pitti said in his post. He further added, "@EaseMyTrip, we stand with India. We cannot support any event that attempts to normalise relations with a country that promotes terrorism. The people of India have spoken and we hear them. EaseMyTrip will not be associated with the India vs Pakistan match in WCL. Some things are bigger than sport. Nation first, business later. Always. Jai Hind." (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store