Seagate Stock To $85?
Question: How would you respond if you owned Seagate (NASDAQ: STX) and its value plummeted by 60% or more in the upcoming months?
While this may seem extreme, it is not without precedent. Seagate's stock has experienced such severe declines previously, and based on its current valuation, history might repeat itself.
Up to this point in 2025, Seagate has achieved an impressive 65% return year-to-date, significantly exceeding the S&P 500's 5% increase. This rise has been driven by structural improvements in the company and a timely shift towards next-gen technologies like HAMR (Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording). Seagate is currently benefiting from a upswing in the data-storage market, which is being bolstered by the increasing demand for generative AI and cloud infrastructure.
However, behind the AI enthusiasm and operational improvements lies a more cautionary narrative. Separately see, What's Next For Nike Stock?
Here's the point: The main takeaway is that during a downturn, Seagate stock could suffer considerable losses. Data from 2020 shows that STX stock lost around 35% of its value within just a few quarters, experiencing a peak-to-trough drop of about 58% during the 2022 inflation crisis, underperforming significantly compared to the S&P 500. This raises the question: Could the stock see a sell-off and potentially fall to $85 if a similar scenario were to occur? As a rule, individual stocks tend to be more volatile than diversified portfolios. Consequently, if you seek growth with decreased volatility, you might want to investigate the High-Quality portfolio, which has outperformed the S&P 500 and yielded returns over 91% since its launch.
Why Is It Relevant Now?
Seagate produces high-capacity HDDs (hard disk drives)—essential infrastructure for storing the immense datasets necessary for training and deploying large language models (LLMs). While SSDs (solid-state drives) are the go-to choice for fast-access storage, HDDs remain dominant in cold storage and hyperscale cloud archives—key applications for companies such as Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon.
Seagate introduced its Mozaic 3+ platform last year, which achieves 3 TB per platter through HAMR technology and incorporates it into its Exos 30 TB+ drives, which have already begun shipping to hyperscale cloud clients. At its June 2025 investor conference, Seagate announced that engineering samples of 40 TB HAMR drives (10×4 TB platters) have already been delivered, with mass production anticipated in the first half of FY 2026. The company intends to launch Mozaic 4+ with 40 TB+ capacity in 2026, followed by Mozaic 5+ providing 50 TB+ drives by 2028, and is aiming for 100 TB HDDs by 2030 as part of its larger HAMR roadmap. While this technological advancement positions Seagate for long-term growth, it also introduces execution risks if demand does not scale as expected.
Seagate forecasts Q4 adjusted EPS (June fiscal year) to be between $2.20 and $2.60, with revenue expected between $2.25–$2.55 billion. Consensus is predicting 38% revenue growth in FY 2025 and 13% in FY 2026. Nevertheless, even solid growth expectations cannot safeguard the stock from macroeconomic shocks, valuation declines, or operational setbacks. With very little margin for error, any misstep could lead to a steep correction.
How resilient is STX stock during a downturn?
STX stock has performed worse than the benchmark S&P 500 index during several recent downturns. While investors remain hopeful for a soft landing for the U.S. economy, how severe could it get if another recession occurs? Our dashboard How Low Can Stocks Go During A Market Crash illustrates how key stocks performed during and after the last six market crashes.
• STX stock decreased 58.2% from a high of $116.02 on 4 January 2022 to $48.49 on 3 November 2022, compared to a peak-to-trough decline of 25.4% for the S&P 500
• The stock fully recovered to its pre-Crisis peak by 27 May 2025
• Since then, the stock has risen to a high of $141.44 on 29 June 2025
• STX stock fell 35.6% from a high of $63.23 on 24 January 2020 to $40.73 on 20 March 2020, vs. a peak-to-trough decline of 33.9% for the S&P 500
• The stock fully recovered to its pre-Crisis peak by 4 December 2020
• STX stock dropped 89.1% from a high of $28.60 on 2 November 2007 to $3.11 on 23 January 2009, compared to a peak-to-trough decline of 56.8% for the S&P 500
• The stock fully recovered to its pre-Crisis peak by 18 April 2012
Valuation
Currently, Seagate trades at 18x consensus 2025 earnings, significantly above its three-year average of only 5x. Its price-to-sales ratio has escalated to 3x, rising from 1.2x in FY 2022. Even its forward P/S of 3x surpasses the three-year average of 2.8x. In comparison, Western Digital (NASDAQ: WDC), a direct competitor, typically trades around 1x P/S during market downturns. Investor confidence is evidently reflected in the stock's elevated valuation—but with greater height comes a steeper potential fall. The average analyst price target of $125 suggests an 11% downside, even without factoring in a market correction.
Considering the wider economic uncertainties, ask yourself this: Do you plan to hold onto your Seagate stock now, or will you panic and sell if it starts to drop to $100, $90, or even lower? Hanging onto a declining stock is never an easy task. Trefis partners with Empirical Asset Management—an investment firm in the Boston area—whose asset allocation strategies produced positive returns during the 2008-09 period when the S&P lost over 40%. Empirical has integrated the Trefis HQ Portfolio into its asset allocation framework to offer clients better returns and less risk compared to the benchmark index—a smoother journey, as evidenced in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
Bull market enters the 'anything goes' phase. Should you follow?
"Hey, you never know" was the catchphrase of New York State Lottery ads through much of the 1990s. An old friend in advertising who worked on another state's lottery account once told me his creative team couldn't get that line out of their minds, failing to improve upon the way it so perfectly captured the awareness of long odds that make the notion of winning that much more enticing. "I'll probably lose – but what if I don't?" Without belaboring a clumsy and reductionist analogy between negative-sum lottery games and positive-sum investing, the recent re-embrace of meme-stock trading, proliferating short-squeeze stampedes and the alt-coin crypto revival has that "Hey, you never know" flavor. And, frankly, the thing about markets is you truly never do know what stocks will work, or why, or how much good or bad news is priced in at a given moment. The best professional investors of all time get it right maybe 55% of the time, so why wouldn't amateurs shoot for low-probability/high-payout bets? We've already been citing the rushing torrent of speculative adrenaline in racier, gamier stocks for weeks, and now we appear firmly in the "Anything goes" phase of this bull market. The question is whether to view this outbreak of frothy fun as a warning that the broader market has grown euphorically risky, or as a sort of "rationally reckless" impulse that can help energize an otherwise sturdy and poised bull market. An enormous proportion of last week's trading volume was in zombie 2021-era busted momentum plays such as OpenDoor and GoPro , along with heavily shorted household names Kohl's and Krispy Kreme . Last week JPMorgan calculated that the investor crowding into the most volatile and often lower-quality "high-beta" stocks has essentially never been more extreme over the past 35 years. The firm is also tracking retail-trader buying in high-short-interest stocks, now showing its sixth frenzied outburst since 2020. Such excitement has quickly drawn the tut-tutting of the spoilsports and voices of moderation, though I tend not to scold those playing these games. For one thing, this is a lot closer to how Wall Street started – a game of telephone among pods of speculators before the invention of the telephone – than is represented in any academic version of sober capital formation. For another, how would one expect profit-motivated, low-information traders to behave after the S & P 500 has been compounding at a 115% annual pace since April 7 and the Goldman Sachs basket of retail-favorite stocks is up 50% over that time? It's possible for this activity to be both foolhardy for those participating and not particularly dangerous to the broader $60 trillion in U.S. market capitalization. It's likely, for one thing, that many of those involved are in on the joke, to a large degree. They perhaps see a surge in social attention toward certain tickers or identify asymmetric advantage in stocks burdened by many complacent short sellers. Most will lose money and many will lose interest, and that's ultimately how many buy-and-hold index investors are born. Measuring the speculation surge One thing for sure, this overheated activity is motivating market researchers to devise new, better-tuned analytical thermometers to measure it. Goldman last week introduced a Speculative Trading Indicator based that's now in its sharpest three-month upswing ever outside the late-1990s tech mania and the original meme-stock/SPAC fever of 2020-2021. The indicator captures trading volumes in penny stocks, unprofitable companies and those with the most extreme valuations. Volume in penny stocks is now running in the 98 th percentile of all periods since 1990, and turnover in stocks with enterprise-value-to-sales ratios above 10 is in the 96 th , the firm says. (This harkens to a known lottery phenomenon called "jackpot fatigue" – a given level of payout fails to excite players after a while, requiring more juice to activate their interest.) Fascinatingly, similar rushes for the risky fringe of the markets have in the past had positive implications for S & P 500 returns over the ensuing 3-, 6- and 12-month periods, Goldman says, but beyond a year they have tended to lead to significantly worse performance. "The trend is your friend until the end when it bends," indeed. 3Fourteen Research co-founder and CIO Warren Pies unveiled a new Daily Sentiment Composite last week as well, comprising ETF flows, options activity, systematic-hedge-fund behavior, surveys and more. It's now above 70 on its zero-to-100 scale, with 60 being the threshold for "excessive optimism." This dampens the outlook for market returns while the composite stays in the upper range. Pies, who is holding to a 6,800 year-end S & P target, nonetheless expects a tougher couple of months from here due to less demand from "automatic buyers" (corporate buybacks and volatility-targeting hedge funds); weaker seasonal patterns; potential cracks in the economic-growth narrative; and the aforementioned sentiment setup. Pies also goes deep on the broad-scale, society-wide "fear of losing ground" to the acceleration in assets that have run higher on what he calls "debasement" forces – persistent fiscal deficits and political pressure to lower interest rates that are benefiting stocks, real estate, crypto and gold, while undercutting housing affordability and lifting longer-term market-based inflation expectations. "In this new world, an increasingly large number of (particularly young) citizens believe that leveraged speculation is the only way to break out of the American caste system. It is no surprise that online gambling has boomed in this new era," he says. "It is hard to blame the young speculators who have embraced financial nihilism." It's common for financial-wellness types to lament the way consumers of modest means spend on lottery tickets (more than $300 a year per capita in states that have lotteries), when they could build a cushion more safely by saving that money. But research shows that saving such sums is rarely enough to materially change a person's financial reality, whereas the longshot windfall could. Similarly, we can talk to young people who trade short-dated stock options or leveraged ETFs or penny stocks about the power of long-term compounding and clockwork retirement contributions, but good luck having it penetrate when homes are out of reach for most and we've just seen trillions in crypto wealth pile up in a few years, as bitcoin was all the while derided (with good reason) as economically unnecessary. Financial guardrails being removed These are tidal shifts in societal behavior lapping around the edges of the capital markets. There's a broader story to tell these days about the urgent removal of financial guardrails and the gradual buildup of structural excesses now underway: Congress is greenlighting stablecoins and blessing crypto-ownership expansions. Banks are being urged to lend to consumers against their crypto assets. Robinhood is tokenizing high-value private startups to let smaller investors own them. Regulators are reportedly close to lowering minimum-balance levels for so-called "pattern day traders" while opening 401(k) plans to alternative assets. The AI buildout boom is taking on financial leverage, with Meta Platforms and xAI tapping private credit to build data centers. Advocates for such measures can surely argue that the removal of frictional barriers is beneficial to enabling capital flows among risk takers, perhaps raising the economy's metabolism. Still, it's tough to make the case that U.S. capital markets – featuring the deepest credit markets and the world's most stoutly valued equity indexes – have been stymied all that much by bureaucratic overreach. The peddlers of prudence will no doubt eventually find something in all this to say "I told you so" about, but who knows when. The implications will likely emerge sporadically over a span of years and are not particularly useful for handicapping the market's immediate prospects from here. It remains notable that for all the wild action in the spicier parts of the market, the core of the equity complex has scarcely made a misstep in months. The furious springtime rebound rally has given way to a calm, low-drama grind – a "boring is bullish" mode. The S & P 500 was nearly static on multiple days last week, reflecting some groups cooling off and others playing some catch-up, a so-far orderly rotation that nonetheless bears monitoring. The benefit of the doubt remains with the bullish overall trend, even while the case for a tactical pause or retrenchment builds. Stock reactions to earnings have been slightly net negative for the companies reporting even as the aggregate "beat rate" has been expectedly high. The Nasdaq 100 is getting pretty stretched relative to its longer-term trend and has put in a significant multi-month peak in the second half of July the past two years. Arguably, the consensus is now a bit complacent regarding the potential impact of tariff outcomes, lulled by a slow-and-steady economy helped by a torrid tech capex binge. Valuation is not much of a tactical help, but I'll note that Microsoft – an excellent measuring tool given it's been near the top of the index and at the front lines of tech trends for more than a generation – is again trading above 33-times forward 12-month earnings. Its P/E has been no higher than 34 since the early 2000s, all in the past few years. Elevated, sure, and reflective of a market pricing in plenty of positives. But not exactly bubbly – the stock traded above 50x in the two years before the March 2000 peak of the tech mania, a time when the public intoxication with risk reached genuine historic extremes that the current speculative wave has not yet even closely approached.
CNBC
15 minutes ago
- CNBC
These overbought stocks could take a dip after the market's record gains
Stocks including Northrop Grumman and Advanced Micro Devices appear overbought after this week's rally, according to one widely used technical metric. The three major U.S. indexes notched strong gains this week, powered by a slew of positive earnings reports and developments on trade deals. The S & P 500 rose 1.5% in the period after recording five record closes this week alone and notching 14 total record closes this year. The 30-stock Dow gained roughly 1.3% this week, and the Nasdaq Composite rose 1%. Stocks that popped during this winning run could be on risky ground moving forward, though. Using the CNBC Pro stock screener tool , we identified the most oversold and overbought stocks this week by their 14-day relative strength index. An RSI above 70 suggests that a stock is overbought and could see a decline, while a result below 30 indicates a stock could be oversold and may be due for a boost. Take a look at the overbought names below, which were each up at least 5% this week. Chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices made the list this week with an RSI of nearly 77. Shares rallied 6% this week. Earlier this month, the company said it will soon resume shipments of its MI308 artificial intelligence chips to China, once license applications are approved by the U.S. Commerce Department. Defense and aerospace company Northrop Grumman jumped 9.8% this week, putting the stock in the overbought group with an RSI of about 73. Northrop on Tuesday posted a second-quarter revenue beat along with a guidance raise for the full year. CEO Kathy Warden said on a conference call with analysts that the company believes revenue from its B-21 stealth bomber could potentially exceed 10% of total revenue "in the future." Other stocks that have high RSIs and could see their shares dip include Block , Newmont and GE Vernova . GE Vernova shares rallied about 12% this week on strong second-quarter results, which led analysts from firms including Citi and Bank of America to raise their price targets on the stock. International Business Machines , Texas Instruments and Philip Morris International are considered some of the broader market's most oversold companies, per their high RSIs. IBM shares slid more than 9% this week after the tech company's second-quarter software revenue came in below expectations, even though its overall revenue and earnings topped analysts' forecasts, per LSEG. The stock has an RSI of around 26. Tobacco giant Philip Morris fell on the back of lackluster results, which missed second-quarter revenue expectations. Wall Street was also disappointed by the company's Zyn nicotine shipments. Shares dropped almost 10% this week, and the stock had an RSI reading of about 29.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer.
Key Points The S&P 500 is seeing a surprising turnaround from the pervasive bearish sentiment that plagued the stock market earlier this year. Record highs are more common than investors might think. Buying an S&P 500 index fund only on days when the index hit a record high has historically yielded better returns than buying on any random day. 10 stocks we like better than S&P 500 Index › The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has rocketed through five record highs in five days as of Friday, July 25. That strong upward momentum stands out in stark contrast to the pervasive bearish sentiment that plagued the stock market earlier this year. Is it smart to buy stocks with the S&P 500 roaring by record highs? Historical data gives a shocking answer. Record highs in the stock market are relatively common The S&P 500 is one of several major stock market indexes in the United States, but it is generally considered the best benchmark for the overall U.S. market due to its breadth. The index includes 500 large-cap companies that cover more than 80% of domestic equities by market capitalization. The S&P 500 hits all-time highs more frequently than investors may realize. The index has historically closed at a record high on one in 15 trading days, which is approximately 7% of the time, according to JPMorgan Chase. Moreover, the index often keeps climbing (or at least holding its level) with little to no backtracking. If we define "market floor" as incidents when the S&P 500 never declines more than 5% following a high, then nearly one in three record highs since 1988 have been market floors. In other words, about 30% of the time, the S&P 500 never fell more than 5% after hitting a high. The stock market tends to perform better following record highs Many investors get nervous when the stock market reaches an all-time high. The little voice in the back of your head may tell you to stop buying stocks, or even to sell existing positions. However, history says that this instinct is more likely to backfire than to prevent losses. Goldman Sachs analysts recently explained: "Contrary to conventional wisdom, investing in the S&P 500 exclusively on days when the market hit an all-time high has historically outperformed investing on any given day, producing stronger returns over the next 1, 3, and 5 years." The chart below expands on that information. It compares the average forward return in the S&P 500 when money is invested (1) unconditionally on any given day, and (2) exclusively on days when the index reached a record high. Time Period S&P Forward Return (From Any Given Day) S&P 500 Forward Return (From Record Highs) 6 Months 6% 6% 1 Year 12% 13% 2 Years 25% 29% 3 Years 40% 46% 5 Years 75% 81% Data source: JPMorgan Chase. Forward returns include dividend payments. Data collected between January 1988 and December 2024. The data shown above comes from JPMorgan Chase. It verifies Goldman's conjecture that an S&P 500 index fund would have generated better returns had money only been invested at all-time highs, rather than on any random day. In short, investors have no reason to fear record highs in the S&P 500. Quite the opposite, in fact. History says those days are good opportunities to add money to the stock market, no matter how counterintuitive it may seem. However, I would be remiss not to add this disclaimer: Historical data is never a guarantee of future returns, because every situation is different. In this case, the S&P 500 currently trades at 22.2 times forward earnings, a meaningful premium to the 10-year average of 18.4 times forward earnings, according to FactSet Research. The economy also has yet to feel the full effect of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which introduces downside risk. Indeed, the S&P 500 has a median year-end target price of 6,300 among 17 Wall Street analysts, which implies about 1% downside from its current level of 6,378. That does not mean investors should avoid the market. Rather, they should err on the side of caution by focusing solely on high-conviction ideas. Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now? Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Trevor Jennewine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends FactSet Research Systems, Goldman Sachs Group, and JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Really Buy Stocks as the S&P 500 Roars by Record Highs? History Gives a Shocking Answer. was originally published by The Motley Fool 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
