
Dreams of hegemony
Hegemony is the political, economic, and military predominance of one state over other states, either regional or global. India is one country that is trying to take advantage of her size, population, and economic prowess and is fixated on achieving her perverted objective of Akhand Bharat.
It occupies a central place in the ideological framework of RSS and further enforced by the RSS long-term insistence on imposing the Hindutva ideology on the nearly 1.50 billion denizens where 14 percent or over 200 million are Muslims. Hindutva is a dominant form of Hindu nationalist politics in India, and it has become a rallying cry for a large segment of the population.
According to RSS ideology, 'These words include the feeling that this entire land from Attock to Cutack, Kutch to Kamrup and Kashmir to Kanya Kumari is not only sacred to us but is a part of us.
The people who have been born in it since times immemorial and who still live in it may have all the differences superficially brought about by place and time, but the basic unity of their entire life can be seen in every devotee of Akhand Bharat.' With the BJP in full control, with the fascist and prejudicial mindset of Narendra Modi, with huge funding by tycoons in India as well as by Indian Diaspora, and with street power and hooliganism of fundamentalists, the RSS has intensified its goal of imposing Hindutva ideology.
Besides RSS, other Hindu nationalist political groups such as Shiv Sena, have sought the repossession of Jammu and Kashmir under the pretence of Akhand Bharat, especially after the abrogation of Article 370 and 35A of the Indian Constitution that removed the semi-autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019.
Hindutva highlights the concept of Akhand Bharat under it and advocates for inclusive Hindu nationhood and religion-centered chauvinism, cultural integration, and hegemony by elite social class.
However, its doctrine is not fully accepted by those who do not subscribe to the exclusion of other religious, caste, or ethnic groups. They are averse to political polarization, economic inequality, and overt religious discrimination, mostly against Muslims, and even Christians, Sikhs, and others.
India, which prides herself as the world's largest democracy, the bastion of secularism, and overarching inclusivity, with universally advertised boasts of Incredible India and Shining India, has lost the razzle-dazzle of such boasting and conceit.
The Akhand Bharat target of bringing neighbours such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and more importantly, Pakistan under its banner has gone off the mark. Pakistan has steadfastly stood as a bulwark against all Indian designs of a jingoistic mentality of Akhand Bharat.
Gradually, the regional dynamics are changing. Today, after the ouster of Hasina Wajed, the government and people of Bangladesh are steering away from their large neighbour. Hasina was a puppet on a string, and her genuflection at the altar of New Delhi was a black stain in the history of Bangladesh.
Indian communication network is still just one mile away from the Indo-Bangladesh border. India had granted easy access to Bangladeshis to cross the border to work, take advantage of medical facilities, and establish Haat Markets at the border.
The Indian influence had brainwashed Hasina against Pakistan, much to the consternation of millions of her country's citizens, who still felt affinity with their former country persons on the other side of India.
The ignominious exodus of Hasina enabled these hidden warm feelings to come out, and the ensuing events and pronouncements are proof positive that Bangladeshis want to be hand-in-hand with Pakistanis.
Bhutan was heavily dependent on India for security, economy, and development. Being a landlocked kingdom, Bhutan was strapped and even received foreign aid from India. Now, Bhutan is reaching out to China, having resolved most of the territorial issues.
Bhutan's China policy also reflects its self-interest that extends to economic self-sufficiency and self-reliance. China can be a strong partner and assist Bhutan through various initiatives that India provided for decades. At the same time, Bhutan is opening up to foreign direct investment, and this is a paradigm shift for a nation that was not comfortable with any foreign influence.
Nepal, another landlocked Indian neighbour, is also dependent on India primarily due to trade, foreign direct investment, and shared cultural and socio-economic ties. India is the largest trading partner and source of investment for Nepal, with a significant portion of Nepal's trade and investment flowing through India.
Nepal and China are bonding their friendship in a strong way and both desire to be more connected, despite some border issues. Although the dependence on India is overarching, there is now a new thinking in Nepal that China can provide substantial investment, allow liberal imports of Nepali goods, give access to Chinese Ports, and finance infrastructure projects. The shift from dependency on India is slowly taking a new trajectory.
Sri Lanka-India relations move from right to left depending on which government is in power in Colombo. India is a major trading partner, and this has resulted in economic dependency on India, primarily due to the proximity between the two nations.
However, China has made, and is vigorously making, huge strides in fostering relations. China financed the construction of Hambantota Port, providing market access, supplying essential raw materials and defence equipment, and loans, especially during the difficult times faced by Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is very important for China since Colombo Port City and Hambantota Port have become flagship projects of the Belt and Road Initiative cooperation between the two countries.
Chinese influence is rising, and it is to the credit of Sri Lankan government that it is delicately balancing ties with both large Asian countries.
India was very influential in Afghanistan, doing large trade, financing many projects, promoting Kabul at world forums, and, at the same time, financing terrorists to attack Pakistan. Come the new Taliban government, the ecosystem changed, and India made an inglorious exit, lock, stock, and barrel.
Trade does continue, and Pakistan even during the recent conflict, magnanimously allows Afghan trucks carrying goods to cross the Wagah Border. Although there were reports that New Delhi was making overtures to Kabul, there has not been significant progress.
The new evolving regional scenario is putting immense pressure on Indian intrigues and machinations to prove that it is still a dominant authority in South Asia. It seems the policymakers in India probably do not realize the futility of obsolete rhetoric and the gravity of its consequences.
The incessant fulminations of Modi and his cohorts have always been provocative and aggressive, and now the world is fully aware of his words and deeds, which are a combination of obfuscation and inaccuracies. His pathetic address to Indians after the ceasefire is a manifestation of his hate harangue.
He is still under pernicious delusions to repeat his misadventure, neglecting to accept that the next conflict would be like a volcano that would erupt and there is no telling how far its fire will spread.
Advice to Modi is to pack bags and go on a long yatra to some remote Ashram. The BJP, RSS, and Hindutva adherents must now realize that their dream of Akhand Bharat and hegemony have been blown to smithereens. It's time to live and let live.
Madam Nadira Panjwani, a renowned philanthropist, recited a prayer that is so essential for all. She prayed that 'May our mothers sleep without fear for their children, may our children wake up to laughter and hope, may the gentle winds of peace sweep across our region and may the people of Pakistan and India walk together towards a future filled with dignity and happiness for both nations.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India's bid to isolate Pakistan at FATF fails
Listen to article India's efforts to push Pakistan back onto the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list have once again failed, as the money laundering watchdog opted instead to keep the country under a "reporting" mechanism rather than downgrading its status, informed sources have revealed. Pakistan was placed on the FATF's increased monitoring list (also known as the grey list) in 2018 due to concerns about its anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CFT) frameworks. However, in October 2022, the country was removed from the grey list following significant improvements and the completion of action items related to AML/CFT. During the latest FATF meeting, the Indian delegation actively lobbied to reinsert Pakistan into the grey list. However, China supported Pakistan, advocating for relief, while Turkey and Japan also extended their full backing. Sources said FATF opted instead to keep the country under a "reporting" mechanism rather than downgrading its status. They further indicated that India, with backing from Israel, sought to use the FATF platform to pressure Pakistan. However, member states dismissed New Delhi's attempts as negative propaganda, choosing instead to recognise Islamabad's progress. Following Operation Bunyamum Marsoos, Indian diplomatic missions had intensified campaigns against Pakistan in various countries but New Delhi's narrative failed to gain traction internationally. Meanwhile, Federal Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb remarked that India has once again faced diplomatic failure on the global stage. He said the World Bank has approved a loan for the development of the Reko Diq mining project in Pakistan. The FATF is the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog. It sets international standards that aim to prevent these illegal activities and the harm they cause to society.


Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SC to hear ‘PTI's reserved seats case' tomorrow
ISLAMABAD: The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court will resume hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) reserved seats case from tomorrow (Monday). It is expected that an 11-member Constitutional Bench, which has been hearing the case since May 6, 2025 will conclude it next week, if the lawyers of Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) complete their argument by June 17. Advocates Faisal Siddiqui and Hamid Khan are representing the SIC in this case. Faisal in the last proceedings had assured the bench that he would conclude his submissions in the next hearing. The PML-N, PPP and the ECP have submitted their written arguments. The ECP has contended that as PTI was evidently not party to proceedings before the ECP; therefore no relief could have been lawfully granted to it vide the majority judgement, even by exercising power under Article 187(1) of the Constitution. Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, who had authored the majority judgment (8 judges), and Justice Munir Akhtar, Justice Athar Minallah, and Justice Shahid Waheed, who agreed with Justice Mansoor are not part of the bench, hearing the review petitions of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). The Supreme Court's 11 judges on July 12, 24 ruled that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf is a political party and entitled to reserved seats of women and non-Muslims to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the National and the Provincial Assemblies. A Full Court of 13 judges had announced five separate short orders. Eight judges comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha A. Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed and Justice Irfan Saadat Khan passed one set of order, while Chief Justice Qazi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel released separate note. Similarly, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin ud Din Khan, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan wrote their own independent notes. The order of eight judges had set aside the Peshawar High Court (PHC) judgment and declared the ECP order on reserved seats ultra vires the constitution. They held that the PTI was and is a political party, which secured or won general seats in the National and Provincial Assemblies in the General Elections of 2024. The two judges' order also set aside the PHC judgment to the extent to exclude the PTI for calculation and allocation of reserved seats. They also held that the PTI as a Parliamentary Party is entitled to the reserved seats. Similar stance was taken by Justice Yahya Afridi in dismissing the SIC appeal against the PHC verdict. However, Justice Amin and Justice Afghan simply turned down the SIC appeal and said detailed reasons be recorded later. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Express Tribune
17 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Fury among Canadian Sikhs as Modi invited to G7 despite alleged threats
PM Carney invites Modi to G7 as guest; first Canada visit in 10 years seen as diplomatic test for the new leader. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article Members of Canada's Sikh community who were warned by police that their lives were at risk and allege the Indian government is responsible for the threat are incensed by Ottawa's invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Modi, although India is not a G7 member, to attend the summit that starts on Sunday as a guest. It will be Modi's first visit to Canada in a decade and a diplomatic test for Carney, a political neophyte. Canada's relationship with India has been tense since former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2023 accused India's government of involvement in the June 18, 2023, murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist leader in Canada. Modi's government has denied involvement in Nijjar's killing and has accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists. "'Outrage' is the kind of term that I've heard from people," Sikh activist Moninder Singh, a friend of Nijjar, said of the invitation. He and other Sikh leaders plan to hold a protest in Ottawa on Saturday. Carney, locked in a trade war with the United States, is trying to shore up alliances elsewhere and diversify Canada's exports. Carney told reporters he invited India due to its importance in global supply chains. India's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a Thursday press briefing that a meeting between Modi and Carney "will offer an important opportunity for them to exchange views on bilateral and global issues and explore pathways to set or reset the relationship." Sikhs faces threats That rationale rings hollow for Singh, who lives in British Columbia. He has received multiple warnings from police that his life was at risk. One such warning forced him from his home for months in 2023 for his children's safety. "On a personal level, and on a community level, as well, it was deeply insulting ... Sikh lives aren't as important as the fifth-largest economy in the world that needs to be at the table," he said. A spokesperson for Carney did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said in October they had communicated more than a dozen threats to people like Singh who are advocating for the creation of a Sikh homeland carved out of India. In October, under Trudeau, Canada expelled six Indian diplomats, linking them to Nijjar's murder and alleging a broader government effort to target Indian dissidents in Canada through killings, extortion, use of organized crime and clandestine information-gathering. India retaliated by ordering the expulsion of six Canadian diplomats and called the allegations preposterous and politically motivated. Canada has said it does not have evidence linking Modi to the threats. The tension has thrust Canada's Sikh community - the largest outside India's Sikh-majority Punjab state - into the spotlight. Singh said there should have been conditions on Modi's invitation. "Any meetings with them should have been under the conditions that Mr. Modi and his government would take responsibility for what has been uncovered and cooperate, but none of that happened." Carney told reporters Modi had agreed to "law enforcement dialogue." Jaiswal said Indian and Canadian law enforcement agencies will continue to cooperate in some ways. Some activists and politicians in Canada have accused Carney of putting economic issues ahead of human rights concerns. But Sanjay Ruparelia, a Toronto Metropolitan University politics professor, said the prime minister is simply being practical. "(Carney's) watchword since he's come to office is pragmatism. And this is very much a pragmatic, realpolitik decision."