Hezbollah chief rejects disarmament as pressure on Lebanon grows
Photo:
AFP / Anwar Amro
Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem says that calls for the Iran-aligned militant group's disarmament served only Israel, as the United States ramps up pressure for steps to remove its arsenal.
"Those who call for submitting arms practically demand submitting them to Israel ... We will not submit to Israel," Qassem said in a televised address.
Hezbollah emerged badly damaged from a war with Israel last year that eliminated most of the group's leadership, killed thousands of its fighters and left tens of thousands of its supporters displaced from their destroyed homes.
The US is now pushing Lebanon to issue a formal cabinet decision committing to disarm Hezbollah before talks can resume on a halt to Israeli military operations in the country, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Hezbollah has publicly refused to hand over its arsenal in full, but has privately weighed scaling it back.
"Those who call for disarmament on a domestic, global or Arab level serve the Israeli project," Qassem said.
He also said the US was demanding a removal of Hezbollah's missiles and drones because they "scare" Israel, accusing US special envoy Thomas Barrack of calling for disarmament for the sake of Israel and not Lebanon's own security.
"Israel will not be able to defeat us and it will not be able to take Lebanon hostage," he added.
In early July, Barrack met Lebanese officials in Beirut to discuss the disarmament proposal. It would see Hezbollah fully disarmed within four months in exchange for the withdrawal of Israeli troops occupying several posts in south Lebanon and a halt to Israeli air strikes.
Hezbollah has been under pressure in recent months both within Lebanon and from Washington to completely relinquish its weaponry.
-
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Donald Trump just revealed his new tariff plan. Here's what you need to know
By Elisabeth Buchwald, CNN An extra edition of Japanese daily newspaper is published reporting that the United States of America and Japan had agreed on a 15 percent tariff in Osaka City. Photo: AFP / Takumi Harada President Donald Trump just set new tariffs for every country around the world, solidifying his extreme break with America's long-standing trade policy. Tariffs on the vast majority of goods America imports are set to rise - even from the handful of countries that negotiated individual trade deals. The higher tariffs continue Trump's reversal of the decades of globalisation that made America's massive services economy the envy of the world - but contributed to its long decline in manufacturing. With just a few hours to go before its self-imposed August 1 trade deadline, the White House provided key details about its new trade policy late Thursday - and, along with it, its new tariff plan. Here's what to know about the latest set of tariffs: The White House announced Thursday that the "universal" tariff for goods coming into the United States will remain at 10%, the same level that was implemented on April 2. But that 10% rate will apply only to countries with which the US has a trade surplus - countries to which the United States exports more than it imports. That applies to most countries, a senior administration official said. A 15% rate will serve as the new tariff floor for countries with which the United States has a trade deficit. About 40 countries will pay that new 15% tariff. That tariff will be lower for many of those nations than the April 2 "reciprocal" tariffs, but it will be higher for a handful. And more than a dozen countries have tariff rates that are higher than 15%, either because they agreed to a trade framework with the United States or because Trump sent their leaders a letter dictating a higher tariff. The senior administration official said those countries have among the highest trade deficits with the United States. The White House identified 26 countries whose goods will be subjected to US tariffs greater than 15%. A senior administration official claimed these countries have excessive trade deficits with the United States. In addition, Mexico and [Canada will continue to face higher tariffs Canada will continue to face higher tariffs] for goods that are not exempt under the US-Mexico-Canada free-trade agreement. Mexico on Thursday agreed to a 90-day continuation of the current 25% tariff rate the US currently places on those items. Non-exempt Canadian goods imported to the United States will face a 35% as of Friday at 12:01 am ET - up from a 25% tariff previously. The new tariff regime will not go into effect Friday, as had been expected. Instead, the tariffs will be implemented on August 7 to give Customs and Border Protection sufficient time to make the necessary changes to collect the new duties. Canada's tariffs are an exception - those will go into effect Friday. The only major trading partners that didn't see tariff rates change on Friday were the United Kingdom, China and Mexico. Trump signed a trade framework with the UK and China. However, the deal signed with China expires in less than two weeks, which means those tariffs could soon increase. With Mexico, Trump had threatened to raise tariffs to 30% at 12:01 am. But after a conversation with Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, on Thursday, he extended Mexico's previous tariff rate for another 90 days. Over the past month, Trump announced a handful of other trade agreements. It's unclear whether they'll be finalized, but it appears those countries might have avoided rates above what's in their deals. For instance, goods from the European Union were set to face 30% tariffs. The agreement reached over the weekend, however, calls for 15% tariffs for most goods. That's the same rate goods from South Korea and Japan will be taxed at. That's still higher than the 10% rate goods have been tariffed at since April, though. That's a question actively being debated. Trump has cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose country-specific tariffs. In May, the Court of International Trade found Trump overreached his legal authority doing so. Oral arguments for the administration's appeal kicked off Thursday, and a panel of judges appeared skeptical that Trump had the power to levy tariffs using those emergency powers. Of particular issue was the unprecedented use of the IEEPA to levy tariffs, especially because the law makes no mention of tariffs to begin with. Several judges also questioned Trump's rationale behind declaring an economic emergency. The president has previously stated that US trade deficits with other countries, that is, when the US imports more than it exports, merit a national economic emergency requiring tariffs to correct. Judge Raymond Chen, however, questioned: "Can the trade deficit be a extraordinary and unusual threat when we had trade deficits for decades?" It may take weeks, or even months, before the appeals court reaches a verdict. After that, it could still be challenged before the Supreme Court. Regardless of the ultimate outcome, Trump has plenty of levers to pull to roll out new tariffs and keep many in place. Technically, he did. New tariff rates were set to go into effect Friday - and they will now mostly go into effect August 7. The president has given no indication he'll pause these tariffs any further, though. However, he's said that about past tariff deadlines only to extend them later on. In short, everything, including the tariff rates that just went in place, is subject to change at the publishing of a Truth Social post. The tariff changes evoke Trump's "Liberation Day" in April, when he similarly hiked import taxes across the board. The move threw financial markets into chaos and stoked fears of a global recession. Trump ultimately delayed the "reciprocal" April tariffs hours after they took effect, later setting August 1 as the new deadline for trade agreements on pain of higher tariff rates. The president told some countries what rates they would face on that day absent new agreements but appeared to leave other nations in the dark. Inflation has stayed relatively tame through Trump's earlier tariff rounds, but that could change as higher rates kick in. Already, companies including Procter and Gamble and Walmart have said tariff-related price increases are underway. - CNN
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Islamic Jihad publishes video of Israeli hostage in Gaza
By AFP Protesters stand with portraits of Israeli hostages Rom Braslavski, Romi Gonen and others during a demonstration by the families of the hostages taken captive in the Gaza Strip by Palestinian militants during the October 7, 2023 attacks. Photo: AHMAD GHARABLI/AFP The armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad has published a video of an Israeli-German hostage who was abducted and taken to Gaza in October 2023 during the attack that sparked the war in the territory. In the six-minute video, the man, Rom Braslavski, speaking in Hebrew, is seen watching recent news footage of the hunger crisis in Gaza. He identifies himself and pleads with the Israeli government to secure his release. AFP was not immediately able to confirm the authenticity of the video nor the date it was filmed, but an organisation representing hostages' families identified the man as Braslavski, 21, a German-Israeli dual national. Islamic Jihad, which said last week it had lost contact with the hostage, repeated that claim in commentary at the beginning of the latest video, suggesting the images were filmed more than a week ago. A previous video of Braslavski was released on April 16. Originally from Jerusalem, Braslavski was a security agent at the Nova music festival, one of the sites attacked in October 2023 by Hamas and other Palestinian fighters, including members of Islamic Jihad. The footage, distributed by a movement considered a terrorist organisation by the United States and the European Union, shows the young man watching an Arabic-language television channel broadcasting a report on hunger in Gaza. "They managed to break Rom. Even the strongest person has a breaking point," his family said in a statement released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum. "Rom is an example of all the hostages. They must all be brought home now." Before his abduction, Braslavski rescued several festival-goers, according to witnesses who managed to escape. Of the 251 people taken from Israel that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, 27 of whom are dead, according to the Israeli army. Israel has been fighting Hamas in Gaza since the kidnappings, but a truce from January 19 to March 17 allowed the return of 33 hostages to Israel, eight of them dead, in exchange for the release of approximately 1,800 Palestinians from Israeli jails. Others were released under a previous truce in 2023. - AFP
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
What would New Zealand recognising Palestinian statehood mean?
Dozens of countries worldwide have recognised Palestine statehood, although New Zealand has not yet made an official declaration. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Explainer - World leaders are moving toward accepting the idea of Palestinian statehood, but New Zealand has not officially recognised the country. What exactly does recognition mean, and what would it change? In the past week, a flurry of major nations have agreed to support Palestinian statehood, including Canada , Britain and France , while Australia is reportedly near making a decision. New Zealand has not yet made that leap, although the government has repeatedly called for an end to violence in Gaza and steps toward a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestine territories. The Palestinian territories have been embroiled in war since Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October, 2023, killing around 1200 people, mostly civilians. The Israel-Hamas war had since left more than 60,000 Palestinians dead, Gaza's Health Ministry said, and widespread famine had broken out as well. At the moment, Palestine is officially recognised by 147 of the UN's 193 member countries , not counting ones that announced plans this week. What exactly is recognising Palestine statehood? Here's the details. 'The world needs to focus' on aid for Gaza, Christopher Luxon has said. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii After Britain's announcement this week that it would recognise Palestine by September unless Israel met certain conditions, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said New Zealand wouldn't be following its lead "at this stage". "Not at this point," Luxon told reporters on Wednesday. "Obviously, I will be talking with Sir Keir Starmer around his position, which is a conditional statehood." In response to questions from RNZ, Luxon said New Zealand had long supported the eventual recognition of Palestinian statehood, but that the immediate focus should be on getting aid into Gaza rather than "fragmenting and talking about all sorts of other things that are distractions". "We need to put the pressure on Israel to get humanitarian assistance unfettered, at scale, at volume, into Gaza," he said. "You can talk about a whole bunch of other things, but for right now, the world needs to focus." In Parliament on Wednesday , Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters said he stood by a statement that "it is a matter of when, not if, New Zealand will recognise Palestine statehood." "Yes, we steadfastly support the establishment of a Palestinian State and the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. We have done so for decades." However, when asked if now was the time to recognise Palestine, Peters said, "we do need to see progress on some of the fundamental issues relating to a Palestinian State's legitimacy and viability, including representative governance, commitments to non-violence, regional support and security guarantees for Israel". "If we recognise the State of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity." University of Otago Professor of Politics and International Relations Robert Patman said while the Luxon-led government did support the two-state solution, "it seems reluctant to show leadership". The government has said New Zealand has limited influence over a conflict on the other side of the world. "This claim does not sit comfortably with New Zealand government's purported support for an international rules-based order," Patman said. "Distance from a conflict clearly should not determine whether flagrant violations of international law such as in Gaza are tolerated or condemned." Former Prime Minister Helen Clark also told RNZ's Midday Report on Thursday that New Zealand was "lagging behind" by not recognising statehood. "If New Zealand can't act in these circumstances, when can it act?" Dozens of protests over the war in Gaza and Palestine's future have been held in New Zealand. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii There's been a groundswell of recent announcements from Britain, France and Canada this week announcing proposals to recognise Palestine timed around the UN General Assembly next month. In 2024, a group of UN experts called on all United Nations member states to recognise the State of Palestine, in order to bring about an immediate ceasefire in Gaza amid the Israel-Gaza war. Australia is believed to soon join that group , with the ABC writing that "Australia will recognise a Palestinian state, it is only a matter of when and how." "My entire political life, I've said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. "That's my objective." Dozens of other countries already recognise Palestine . Some of these recent announcements come with caveats such as ensuring free and open elections and the disarming of Hamas. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said it would recognise Palestine in September "unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza" and other conditions. The UN also held an international conference on the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-state solution in New York from 28 to 29 July. Thousands protest at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on 22 August, 2024, demanding an end to the war on Gaza. Photo: AFP/ JW Hendricks Palestine exists in a peculiar quasi-state limbo. There are no internationally agreed upon borders, no globally recognised capital or army. The conflict between Israel and the Palestinian people dates back centuries. British troops took control of the country from the Ottoman Empire after World War I and ruled it until 1948. The UN proposed partioning Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, but the plan was rejected. Jewish leaders in Palestine declared an independent state known as Israel when British rule ended. That declaration sparked war with Arab nation neighbours and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians became refugees. After the 1967 'Six-Day War,' Israel captured much of the Palestinian territories from other Middle Eastern nations. Israel continues to occupy those territories. In 1988 the State of Palestine was officially declared by the Palestine Liberation Organisation, claiming the territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The state of Palestine has been a non-member observer state of the United Nations since 2012. The two-state solution that has been proposed for years would see an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, with East Jerusalem as its capital, existing alongside Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government rejects the two-state solution. It's more of a symbolic step than anything, but it acknowledges Palestinian self-determination and allows the establishment of full diplomatic regulations. "The big difference with recognising a Palestinian state (as opposed to expressing a willingness to do so sometime in the future) is that it would significantly reduce the scope for diplomatic ambiguity or sitting on the fence," Patman said. Senior lecturer in law at the University of South Australia Juliette McIntyre told the ABC recently that a state has certain defining features under international law. These features include a permanent population, a determinate territory, an "effective" government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. "In some ways, the most important thing is recognition by other states - this enables entering into diplomatic relations, and membership of international organisations," McIntyre said. The recent announcements by Britain, Canada and others come as coverage of death and famine in Gaza has escalated dramatically. "Recognising a Palestinian state also conveys an urgent acknowledgement that the current situations in Gaza and the West Bank have been characterised by acts that constitute war crimes and represent an unacceptable failure by the occupying power, Israel, to live up to its legal responsibilities toward the Palestinian population it has under its control," Patman said. The United Nations would consider Palestine membership if the Security Council did not veto it. Photo: UN / Eskinder Debebe Well, under United Nations rules, it could be. To become a member of the United Nations, Palestine would submit an application to the Secretary-General and accept member obligations. The UN Security Council would vote on the admission, but none of the five permanent members - China, France, the UK, Russia and the United States - can vote against it. If the Security Council recommends admission, it then goes on to the full General Assembly, where a two-thirds majority vote is necessary. South Sudan is the most recent country to join as a member, in 2011. The United States has previously vetoed attempts to grant Palestine membership. The US has had long-standing support for a two-state solution, but hasn't gone so far as to support Palestinian statehood. It does recognise the Palestine Liberation Organisation as the representative entity of the Palestinian people and the Palestinian National Authority as the government of the territories. US President Donald Trump has frequently supported Israel and expressed reservations about recognising Palestine , telling reporters that Starmer's plan would "reward Hamas". "You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded." Trump also threatened a trade deal with Canada over their overtures on Palestine. In a statement this week the US Department of State called the UN's recent two-state conference a "publicity stunt" and "a slap in the face to the victims of October 7", and said France's announcement was "welcomed by Hamas". The US could again veto a motion on Palestinian statehood if it comes before the Security Council. Patman said in his view, "the National-led government may be nervous about offending the Trump administration and by taking incremental steps toward recognition may be seeking to minimise that possibility, especially if it believes Trump may be reconsidering his hitherto staunch support for Netanyahu's stance toward Gaza (and West Bank)." People walking amidst the destruction of houses and streets in Khan Yunis, located in the southern Gaza Strip. Photo: MOHAMED ZAANOUN / AFP New Zealand has just signed a joint statement with 14 other countries expressing a willingness to recognise the State of Palestine as a necessary step towards a two-state solution. New Zealand also recently joined 24 countries in calling for an end to the war in Gaza , and criticising what they called the inhumane killing of Palestinians. New Zealand had announced $37.5 million in humanitarian aid for the conflict, MFAT said. It also recently banned some Israeli politicians from travel to New Zealand. Realistically, Palestine statehood and recognition by the UN won't happen overnight. But the declarations are also being seen as an attempt to revive peace talks and end the violence. "The window for peace through the two-state solution appeared to be locked shut after the collapse of the peace process that started with real hope in the 1990s," the BBC's international editor Jeremy Bowen noted . "Britain's decision to recognise Palestine is a diplomatic crowbar to try to reopen it." New Zealand is a small player on the global scene, but the escalation of major global powers this week chiming in could make Israel more isolated on the issue. "After making such declarations, it will be more difficult for the likes of Britain, Germany and Australia to continue to provide military and intelligence assistance to a Netanyahu government that is using such military force to deny the possibility of a Palestinian state and the outcome of a two-state solution," Patman said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
