Street dancer heckled for singing ‘Allah ke bande' at Tripura temple, CPI(M) seeks action
The opposition CPI(M) on Tuesday launched a sharp attack on the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, demanding swift action from the state government and accusing it of fostering an atmosphere of intolerance.
The video of the incident that went viral on social media on Sunday shows the street dancer, Shanu Malakar, is purportedly being threatened by another person (not seen in the video) and questioned him for his choice of song on the temple premises, saying that praise of Allah could not be done at a temple.
In the video, Malakar is seen replying that he does street dance performances to raise funds for donations to the poor.
In reference to the video, CPIM politburo member and leader of opposition Jitendra Chaudhury said, 'A youth, Sanu Malakar, a local singer who also earns money through his street dance performances and displaying physical acrobatics, was seen, in a social media video, singing the song which is devotional as well to appeal for humanity. A person threatened him in front of a huge gathering and questioned him why he uttered Allah. I appeal to the state government and the police to step in at the earliest.'
He further said that the person who threatened Malakar did so by declaring that this is 'Hindustan", claiming that those who worship Allah or follow that faith are 'jihadis", and asserting that such songs have no place on Indian soil.
Asserting that every Indian has constitutionally approved right to express their opinions through devotional songs of any religion, be it Hindu, Muslim, Christian or Buddhist, Chaudhury said the state government and police didn't take any action against the perpetrators till now.
'We often see that several people were arrested with different charges after the Pahalgam terror attack, and harassing them for 10-12 days... Why has no arrest been made here?' Chaudhury asked.
Reacting to the incident, BJP state spokesperson Nabendu Bhattacharya said, 'It's natural that neither Azaan can be performed in temples nor Durga Puja can be performed in mosques.'
A senior police officer stated, 'We have seen the video as well, but so far, no one has come forward to lodge a complaint.'
Last year, the Gomati district magistrate served a notice prohibiting shooting of any such dance, music videos, reels and posting on social media after netizens raise objections against objectionable dance performances by social media influencers in Tripurasundari temple.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
US may hold back secondary tariffs: Trump
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday claimed Russia lost India as one of its oil clients after Washington announced a penalty on New Delhi over the purchases but indicated that he may not impose such secondary tariffs on countries continuing to procure Russian crude oil. The President's remarks came even as New Delhi is yet to confirm any halt in oil purchases from Moscow after Washington announced a 25 per cent duty in addition to a 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods last month. The additional duty is scheduled to come into effect on August 27. The US had threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. "Well, he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a if I did what's called a secondary sanction, or a secondary tariff, it would be very devastating from their standpoint. If I have to do it, I'll do it. Maybe I won't have to do it," Trump said, as he departed for Alaska for a high-stakes meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Dharmasthala: Action based on SIT report, says HM
Bengaluru: Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara on Saturday said the government will take a decision on action against wrong doings or conspiracies in connection with the Dharmasthala case based on the SIT probe report. The Special Investigation Team, formed by the state government, is probing charges of multiple murders, rapes, and burials in different places in Dharmasthala, over the past two complainant-witness, a former sanitation worker, whose identity has not been revealed, has claimed that he worked in Dharmasthala between 1995 and 2014, and that he was forced to bury a number of bodies, including those of women and had alleged that some of the bodies showed signs of sexual assault. He has also given a statement before a magistrate in this regard. 'I can't say anything as of now. Anything can be said only based on the probe report. Whether it is an interim report or a final report. Until the report comes, I cannot comment on the matter,' Parameshwara said in response to a question about taking action against alleged conspiracies or wrong doings in connection with the Dharmasthala case. Speaking to reporters here, he said, 'Once the report comes, we will all sit together, discuss and make an appropriate decision.' As part of the probe, the SIT has been conducting exhumations at multiple locations identified by the complainant-witness in the forested areas along the banks of the Netravathi River in Dharmasthala, where some skeletal remains have been found at two sites so BJP has been critical of the government's handling of the investigation and its inaction against what they called a 'slender campaign' targeting Dharmasthala and the temple demanded an interim report from the government and action against the complainant and others allegedly behind him, claiming the allegations were part of a 'toolkit to denigrate Hindu gods and their places of worship.'Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar has also alleged a 'conspiracy' to tarnish Dharmasthala's image, and has expressed confidence that it will come to light through the ongoing investigation.
Scroll.in
6 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
The illogic of meat bans
This week, several municipal corporations in Maharashtra banned the sale of meat or forced meat shops to close on Independence Day. In neighbouring Telangana, the Hyderabad civic body directed beef shops and slaughterhouses to remain closed not just on Friday, but also a day later for the Hindu festival Janmashtami. The authorities in Kalyan-Dombivli – one of the municipal corporations in Maharashtra – claimed that it was a routine action taken to ensure public order, and to observe important national occasions. But the directives sparked outrage in the state, which is ruled by a Bharatiya Janata Party-led coalition, with the Opposition describing the authorities' actions as 'food policing'. Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leader Aaditya Thackeray said that 'what we eat on Independence Day is our choice' and that the authorities had no right to interfere. 'Instead of imposing vegetarianism on the citizens, focus on improving the terrible roads and broken civic services,' Thackeray said. 'Citizens will eat whatever they want to – vegetarian/non-vegetarian.' Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar) MLA Jitendra Awhad claimed that Maharashtra's ruling coalition was 'fuelling a vegetarian-non-vegetarian divide ' after having 'exhausted other social controversies'. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis pushed back, claiming that the state was not interested in knowing what people eat. But he defended the directives saying that they were issued in line with a 1988 government resolution allowing the shutting of slaughterhouses on certain days. The municipal bodies had taken the decision themselves, he argued. The directive in Hyderabad, in Congress-ruled Telangana, was challenged in the Telangana High Court. The municipal corporation said that its order – which did not ban the slaughter of chicken or mutton – has been imposed for more than two decades because of law and order concerns. Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi said that the decision was 'callous and unconstitutional ', questioning the connection between eating meat and celebrating Independence Day. He said most people in Telangana eat meat and that such bans 'violate people's right to liberty, privacy, livelihood, culture, nutrition and religion'. What Indians eat has been a matter of debate for a long time. But in the last decade it has come to be hotly contested with largely BJP governments deciding to impose meat bans especially during festivals. There has been push back to such bans. Many have pointed out that, contrary to projections by many Hindutva supporters, Hindus are not a homogenous community when it comes to eating meat. And India is not a predominantly vegetarian country. Data proves this. The National Family Health Survey-5 conducted between 2019 and 2021 showed that 83.4% of Indian men and 70.6% of women in the 15-49 age group eat meat. In fact, Thackeray pointed out that it was a family tradition to offer prawns and fish to the deity during the Navratri festival. When Hindutva accounts criticised him, social media users highlighted that it was customary for some in the Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu community – which the Thackerays belong to – to make meat offerings. The community is Hindu, they asserted. Similarly, eating meat during Durga Puja is common among Bengali Hindus and animal sacrifice is an important ritual for some in the community. Even Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar, a crucial ally of the BJP, struck a discordant note. He said food is 'part of an individual's habit, culture and inheritance and geographical conditions', and what a person eats was the individual's choice. But this did not lead to a rollback of the municipal directives. As long as Hindutva is ascendant in India, the illogic of meat bans is here to stay. Here is a summary of last week's other top stories. Jammu and Kashmir flash flood. The toll from the flash floods in the Union Territory's Kishtwar district increased to 60 on Friday. Several were missing as rescue operations continued. A cloudburst took place on Thursday near Chashoti village, which is the last motorable village on the way to the Machail Mata temple. A large number of devotees had gathered in the area for an annual yatra that began on July 25 and was scheduled to end on September 5. Ensuring free and fair polls? The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to publish a district-wise list of about 65 lakh voters whose names were deleted from the draft electoral roll during the special intensive revision exercise in Bihar. The court directed the list be published on the websites of the state's district and chief electoral officers. The bench told the poll panel to specify that those who submit claims for inclusion in the list can furnish Aadhaar cards. The court also said the Election Commission must provide the reason for each deletion. Sharing this will improve 'voter confidence' in the institution, it added. The direction was given while listening to petitions challenging the voter roll revision in Bihar ahead of the Assembly polls expected in October or November. The order on street dogs. The Supreme Court said that the problems related to the street dog population in Delhi are because of the inaction of local authorities. It made the observation while reserving its order on pleas challenging the directions passed by a two-judge bench on Monday to capture and shift street dogs in Delhi, Noida and Gurugram to shelters within six weeks. The suo motu case on stray dogs was shifted to a three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath after some lawyers told Chief Justice BR Gavai that the directions issued on Monday conflicted with previous orders of other benches. The court order on Monday had triggered protests, with demonstrators arguing that shifting the dogs to inhumane shelters would not solve the problem. Follow the Scroll channel on WhatsApp for a curated selection of the news that matters throughout the day, and a round-up of major developments in India and around the world every evening. What you won't get: spam.
