logo
E.l.f. Cosmetics issues statement after Matt Rife ad ignites backlash

E.l.f. Cosmetics issues statement after Matt Rife ad ignites backlash

NBC News20 hours ago
A recent e.l.f. Cosmetics ad featuring Matt Rife has sparked controversy online due to the comedian's contentious past.
In the beauty brand's new commercial, Rife and drag queen Heidi N Closet star as attorneys responsible for protecting consumers from the 'beauty injustice' of overpriced makeup. Following the ad's Aug. 11 release, fans have a lot to say about e.l.f.'s decision to select Rife for the campaign.
The stand-up comedian's appearance in the ad drew backlash from critics who cited his previous comments about domestic violence.
Why are people talking about the ad and how did e.l.f. Cosmetics respond? Here's what you need to know.
What does the e.l.f. Cosmetics ad depict?
In the campaign, Rife and Heidi N Closet star as two lawyers at 'The Law Offices of e.l.f.ino & Schmarnes' defending consumers from expensive cosmetic projects.
The ad, which promotes the brand's best sellers, is a humorous take on typical lawyer advertisements, and seems to parody old commercials from law firm Cellino & Barnes.
The pair, dressed in suits as they pose in an office, tells viewers that as 'affordable beauty attorneys,' they are ready to win their overpriced makeup case.
The duo also asks viewers to call '1-855-COLD-HARD-LASH,' a play on the long phone numbers given during law advertisements.
'E.l.f.ino & Schmarnes has gone to e.l.f. court for millions of clients, helping them to access beauty products they deserve at prices that won't injure their livelihoods,' Rife says in the ad.
'I know a thing or two about red flags. And pricey makeup? You deserve better than that,' he continues.
Why is Matt Rife's feature in the ad sparking controversy?
The e.l.f. Cosmetics campaign caused chatter among viewers due to some 'red flags' fans have pointed out in the comedian's past.
In November 2023, the star made headlines after he joked about domestic violence during his Netflix comedy special 'Natural Selection.'
At the start of the show, Rife joked about seeing a hostess with a black eye at a restaurant in Baltimore.
'And my boy who I was with was like, 'Yeah, I feel bad for her, man. I feel like they should put her in the kitchen or something where nobody has to see her face, ya know?'' Rife said. 'And I was like, 'Yeah, but I feel like if she could cook, she wouldn't have that black eye.''
After he shared the joke, Rife told the audience that he was 'just testing the waters, seeing if y'all are going to be fun or not.'
'I figure if we start the show with domestic violence the rest of the show should be smooth sailing,' he continued.
Many of Rife's followers found the comments insensitive and offensive. A clip of the joke received over six-million views on TikTok, with viewers sharing their thoughts in the comments section.
'Someone let this guy up on stage, filmed it, and it got approved to be put on Netflix?' one user said.
'Got the heebie jeebies ab this man so quickly and I've been continuously proved right ever since,' another added.
The joke also drew the attention of YouTuber Hank Green, who posted about it on X.
'A comedian ruining his relationship with a large portion of his fanbase because he wanted to be like all of the other boring-a-- Netflix Special 'You Cant Tell Jokes Anymore' crowd is actually just depressing,' Green said.
In response to the backlash, Rife shared an Instagram story with a link that he said was his 'official apology,' NBC News reported. However, he linked to a health website that sold special needs helmets.
In an interview with Variety at the time, Rife seemingly defended the jokes he made during the special. Rife shared that 'Natural Selection' was designed to cater to a male audience, as he wanted to show people he doesn't 'pander his career to women.'
Less than two years later, Rife's feature in the e.l.f. campaign has critics questioning the brand's decision to platform the comedian.
'Out of all the people in the world…' one user commented on the brand's Instagram post of the campaign.
'I truly can't believe that not 1 person at ELF did not say...'We should not partner with a man who makes jokes about domestic violence,' added another.
'As a survivor….you all should be ashamed of yourselves. He's not even in your demographic nor is he using your products. You can take your increasing prices and short sightedness somewhere else. I'll never buy from you again,' a third critic said.
Has e.l.f. Cosmetics spoken out about the backlash?
On Aug. 13, e.l.f. Cosmetics posted a statement on Instagram regarding the campaign.
'You know us, we're always listening and we've heard you,' the brand wrote.
'This campaign aimed to humorously spotlight beauty injustice. We understand we missed the mark with people we care about in our e.l.f. community,' the statement continued.
For some, the apology missed the mark.
'I'm sorry but this is a non apology? What exactly is e.l.f. going to do other than say you missed the mark? Now would be a good time to donate to & highlight organization that support dv survivors,' one user commented on the post.
'I'm failing to understand how I know yall you did your research on Matt Rife and still said yeah that's our guy…' added another.
In an Aug. 14 interview with The Business of Beauty, e.l.f. Beauty's Global Chief of Marketing Officer Kory Marchisotto addressed the brand's decision to feature Rife in the campaign.
Marchisotto said that e.l.f. selected Rife because his TikTok audience is largely female and under the age of 34, the brand's 'sweet spot.'
Marchisotto said the backlash was a surprise to the brand.
'Obviously we're very surprised,' Marchisotto told the outlet. 'There is a big gap between our intention and how this missed the mark for some people … We always aim to deliver positivity, and this one didn't. So we find ourselves in a position where, quite honestly, that doesn't feel good for us.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perfect Match's AD and Ollie open up about how they got over their on-screen drama
Perfect Match's AD and Ollie open up about how they got over their on-screen drama

Cosmopolitan

time7 minutes ago

  • Cosmopolitan

Perfect Match's AD and Ollie open up about how they got over their on-screen drama

Going into the latest series of Netflix's Perfect Match, fans already had an idea that things were going to work out between AD Smith and Ollie Sutherland: getting engaged on TV before the season actually airs will do that. But now that reality TV obsessives have watched the entire season, there are some lingering questions. Like, how did AD and Ollie move past all that Perfect Match drama? 'Ollie was in time out for a while,' AD admitted to People in a post-Perfect Match finale interview. And now that we've all watched season 3 of the Netflix dating show, it's easy to see why. AD and Ollie came in second place and were still together when it ended, but they also had a few major pain points that needed tending to. Despite being paired up from the beginning, AD and Ollie had their rough patches on the show, specifically when Ollie went on a date with Love Island USA's Justine Joy and lied to AD about kissing Justine, something she later found out on her own. 'He had a lot of making up to do,' AD continued. 'But we focused on intentionality in our relationship and just being open and honest with each other about what we wanted out of our own personal lives and what we wanted as a couple.' For his part, Ollie told People that their brief split on Perfect Match is actually what made him realize just how strongly he felt for her. 'In that moment, where I was so scared I was going to lose her, I think that made me realise just how important she was to me, and how much I'd never want to be in that position again,' he said. That feeling might help explain how the couple went from reality show to engaged in less than a year. AD and Ollie announced their engagement in March of 2025 during the Love Is Blind season 8 reunion, news that was soon followed up by a pregnancy announcement. They're now enjoying being engaged while they await the arrival of their baby girl. It might seem fast in the normal world, but in the world of reality television, it's actually pretty standard. 'The show expedited things for sure, because from day one, when you're sharing a room with that person, you're waking up and doing challenges with that person,' Ollie explained. 'In the real world, you don't date in that fashion.'

Netflix's split season strategy is ruining my favorite shows — and ‘Wednesday' is the latest victim
Netflix's split season strategy is ruining my favorite shows — and ‘Wednesday' is the latest victim

Tom's Guide

time36 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

Netflix's split season strategy is ruining my favorite shows — and ‘Wednesday' is the latest victim

I would have laughed if you told me I'd one day look back fondly on the summer hiatus angst after one of Dean Winchester's 400 'Supernatural' deaths. Back then, waiting through seasonal breaks felt like torture; now, it feels almost quaint. These 22-episode seasons, split neatly by winter and summer, created a rhythm that made missing an episode almost unbearable. Fast forward to today, and Netflix's split seasons have taken that suffering to a whole new, infuriating level. Take "Wednesday" season 2: Four episodes dropped, ending with a massive cliffhanger until next month. These short, split seasons leave fans dangling instead of letting us fully immerse ourselves in the story. This release strategy has turned what should be entertainment into a test of patience. Let's be real: Most of us barely have one-minute Insta-reel attention spans. Expecting fans to follow this split-season format is cruel — especially now that Netflix has gone from $7.99 in 2011 to $17.99 in 2025. Netflix needs to pick a lane: episodic releases or full-season drops. Both approaches have merits: Episodic keeps fans coming back weekly while full-season drops satisfy instant-gratification cravings that made early streaming so appealing. I could even tolerate an initial two-to-four episode drop followed by consistent weekly releases (which Netflix does with some of its reality shows, like "Love Is Blind"). What I can't stand is giving us breadcrumbs, then forcing another month or more of waiting. For eight-to-10 episode seasons, it's maddening. The hype fizzles during the wait, viewers get distracted, and even clever Easter eggs can't save a fractured storytelling experience. Other Netflix shows — "Bridgerton," "Cobra Kai," "Stranger Things" — have fallen into the same trap, stretching short seasons across months instead of being delivered as a cohesive story. The frequency of steep hikes in monthly costs makes it feel like Netflix users are getting less for more money. Many have already dropped the streamer from their ever-expanding roster of subscriptions. Jerking fans around with transparent bait-and-switch release schedules isn't going to do much to retain their already wavering loyalty. This fractured approach hurts Netflix too. Originals once followed a reliable one-season-per-year model; now, we're lucky to see one every two or three. Short seasons split into multiple drops make it hard to maintain excitement, and viewers increasingly grow jaded. Meanwhile, subscription prices keep rising, alienating fans just as their patience is being tested. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. I sometimes find myself nostalgic for the old-school episodic rhythm — weekly anticipation, fan theories and discussions all added a layer of charm. If Netflix wants to have it both ways — a binge release in batches — it could split seasons over two weeks instead of two months. But their current release schedule? Sorry, Netflix, but it's just not it. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Emma Myers Relaxes With ‘Lord of the Rings' Music
Emma Myers Relaxes With ‘Lord of the Rings' Music

New York Times

time37 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Emma Myers Relaxes With ‘Lord of the Rings' Music

Emma Myers may play a werewolf on the Netflix series 'Wednesday,' but in real life, she lacks the stomach for horror. 'I can do thrillers or zombie movies,' she said, 'but nothing supernatural. I'm not good with ghosts.' ''Get Out'? I can handle that,' she added. 'But I can't handle 'The Exorcist.' I got halfway through 'The Babadook' and I had to turn it off. I was too scared.' That's in line with the blue-and-pink-haired, social media-obsessed student Enid Sinclair whom she plays on the show, which returned for its second season this month. But she might want to watch her back — things get dark for everyone at Nevermore Academy this season, Enid included. 'But,' Myers added brightly, with a note of her character's optimism, 'We get to meet a bunch of fun new characters.' In a call from Bristol, England, where she was shooting Season 2 of the British mystery thriller series 'A Good Girl's Guide to Murder,' Myers, 23, shared her cultural essentials, including the sci-fi novel she couldn't put down while shooting 'A Minecraft Movie' and the 'Lord of the Rings' track she loves to hike to. These are edited excerpts from the conversation. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store