logo
Ruling party should strive for consensus on crucial issues, says Harsimrat

Ruling party should strive for consensus on crucial issues, says Harsimrat

Hindustan Times17 hours ago
As the 18th Lok Sabha completes its first year, here's a look at four-time MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal's performance in the lower House of Parliament and her plans for the constituency. Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal speaks in the Lok Sabha during the budget session of Parliament, in New Delhi . (Sansad TV)
How do you look at your experience in the first year of the 18th Lok Sabha?
Unfortunately, discussions could not be held on key bills. Many bills were pushed through. I feel the ruling party should allow healthy discussions and strive for consensus on crucial issues affecting the nation.
What was the high point of the year for you personally or your party in the House?
I stood up for the farmers, who still have not got justice despite being assured a legal guarantee for minimum support price (MSP) on food grains. I also spoke on the atrocities inflicted on farmers, who were stopped from proceeding to Delhi to make their voices heard by the Haryana government. I also raised the need to build consensus amongst the Muslim community on the Waqf Board (Amendment) Bill and not give an impression that Waqf properties would be usurped for ulterior purposes under the new dispensation. I also called for the release of the Sikh prisoners besides calling for reopening of the Wagah and Hussainiwala border points for trade and grant of a special industrial package for the border belt in Punjab.
Are you satisfied with the number of sittings of the Lok Sabha?
It is most unfortunate that the Lok Sabha sittings are being reduced steadily. We should focus on increasing sittings, and as a single member representing the Shiromani Akali Dal, it is often difficult to get time or opportunity to speak in the present circumstances. MP report card | Ruling party should strive for consensus on crucial issues, says Harsimrat
What is the most effective way to raise issues of public importance in the House?
Members have the liberty to raise emergent issues during zero hour, submitting questions and filing a call attention motion. Unfortunately, due to time constraints as well as the duration of the House, often members do not get an adequate opportunity to raise issues effectively. A via media should be created to ensure more members participate in Parliament.
What difference have you made to your constituency in the last one year, and what do you plan to do in the remaining term as MP?
I am very focused on my constituency and its needs. I have been demanding a 300-bed trauma centre at AIIMS, Bathinda, and the establishment of a State Organ Transplant and Tissue Transplantation Organisation (SOTTO) at the medical institute. Under the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), development works totalling ₹ 9.78 crore have been recommended. I have also demanded the opening of the institute's centre at Mansa and the speedy completion of the Ferozepur PGIMER satellite centre. I will be taking up these issues for redressal.
---------------------------------
Updated GFX
Harsimrat Kaur Badal
Age: 58 years
Party: Shiromani Akali Dal
Constituency: Bathinda
Electoral record: Four-time MP from Bathinda elected consecutively in 2009, 2014, 2019 and 2024
House record
Attendance: 63%
Number of questions asked: 37
Special mentions: 2
Debates participated: 13
Private member's bills: 2
Committee membership
Parliamentary Standing Committee on Agriculture, Animal Husbandry & Food Processing; Committee on Empowerment of Women and Consultative Committee on Home Affairs
How she used MPLAD funds:
Total funds: ₹ 9.80 crore
Spent funds: ₹ 97.56 lakh
Unspent Funds: ₹ 8.82 crore
Sectors where funds were spent:
Streets, drains, dharamshala, shamshan ghat, water supply, mobile water tank, gym, gaushala bhawan, stadium, public shed, for schools and cooperative societies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk-backed Thomas Massie has 10 votes to block Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: Who voted how?
Musk-backed Thomas Massie has 10 votes to block Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: Who voted how?

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Musk-backed Thomas Massie has 10 votes to block Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: Who voted how?

Rep Thomas Massie of Kentucky, backed by Elon Musk, admitted that he has 'enough' votes to block President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act in its final House vote, NOTUS reporter Reese Gorman reported on Wednesday, citing the congressman. The 54-year-old is said to have secured at least 10 House Republican votes. This comes after the Senate passed the bill earlier this week. U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) reportedly said he has enough votes to block Trump's Big Beautiful Bill(REUTERS) According to Gorman, Rep Massie 'enthusiastically' said he has a 'vote bloc of 10' Republican members who will vote against the tax and spending bill. Former Trump adviser, Elon Musk, has publicly supported the Kentucky Republican, calling the bill a 'debt bomb' and vowing to fund primary challenges against Republicans who back it, while endorsing Massie's re-election despite Trump's threats. The House GOP holds a 218-217 majority (assuming full attendance), meaning four defections could sink the bill. Massie's claim of 10 votes suggests a significant rebellion, though no confirmed list of defectors exists. A procedural vote on the House floor is taking place on Wednesday. At the time of writing this story, the amendment to rule from Republican Rep Virginia Foxx had 211 yes votes from Republicans and 212 no votes from Republicans, with nine 'no votes' from Republican members. Earlier, all but five House Republicans, including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), John James (R-MI), and Chip Roy (R-TX), who flipped to 'yes' after revisions. Roy and Ralph Norman (R-SC) initially opposed a procedural vote but supported final passage after Medicaid work requirement changes. All House Democrats, led by Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), plus Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Warren Davidson (R-OH), who cited deficit concerns. Massie called it a 'debt bomb ticking', and Davidson criticized future spending cut promises. Potential defectors for second vote Massie's claimed 10 votes remain unconfirmed, but likely include: Thomas Massie (R-KY), Warren Davidson (R-OH), Andy Harris (R-MD), Chip Roy (R-TX) and Ralph Norman (R-SC). We do not have any confirmations yet. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, eliminates taxes on tips and overtime, raises the SALT cap to $40,000, and funds $175 billion for border security and mass deportations. It cuts $700 billion from Medicaid and SNAP, adding $3.3–$4 trillion to the deficit The Senate's 51-49 vote (with JD Vance breaking a tie) included Medicaid adjustments, but fiscal conservatives like Massie remain unsatisfied.

Storm in Assembly over BJP MLA Lonikar's farmer remark; MVA demands apology
Storm in Assembly over BJP MLA Lonikar's farmer remark; MVA demands apology

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Storm in Assembly over BJP MLA Lonikar's farmer remark; MVA demands apology

Nagpur: The Maharashtra legislative assembly witnessed heated debate on Wednesday over alleged derogatory remarks made by BJP MLA Babanrao Lonikar about farmers. The comments sparked strong reactions from the opposition, with Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) MLAs demanding an unconditional apology from the former minister, accusing him of insulting those who "feed the nation. " Congress legislature party leader Vijay Wadettiwar led the charge, stating, "How can an elected representative make such demeaning comments about farmers? This is an insult to the entire farming community. He must apologise on the floor of the House." Shiv Sena MLA Aaditya Thackeray and other opposition leaders echoed the demand, calling Lonikar's remarks unacceptable and insensitive. In his defence, Lonikar denied the allegations. "What is being circulated is not what I said. I am being misquoted. There is politics behind this outrage," he said. However, his clarification failed to pacify the opposition. As protests intensified, the House echoed with slogans such as "Mafi mango, shetkaryanchi mafi mango (Tender apology to farmers)," disrupting the proceedings. Speaker Rahul Narwekar attempted to restore order but was eventually forced to adjourn the session for ten minutes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Opposition leaders maintained that this was not an isolated incident, pointing to previous controversial statements made by BJP leaders regarding farmers. "The government has failed to provide MSP or loan waivers, and now their leaders insult farmers. This is unacceptable," they said. The episode further deepened the ongoing rift between the opposition and the treasury benches over agrarian distress in the state.

When To Expect WBJEE 2025 Results? Here's Are The Details
When To Expect WBJEE 2025 Results? Here's Are The Details

News18

time44 minutes ago

  • News18

When To Expect WBJEE 2025 Results? Here's Are The Details

Last Updated: WBJEE 2025 Results Soon: Candidates can download scorecards from or using their application number and password or DOB. WBJEE 2025 Results: The West Bengal Joint Entrance Examinations Board (WBJEEB) is likely to announce the WBJEE 2025 results in early July. Candidates who appeared for the exam will be able to download their results by logging in to the official websites at or To log in, they will need their application number along with either their password or date of birth. The WBJEE 2025 result will include important information such as the candidate's name, roll number, overall rank, total marks, and individual scores in Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics. Candidates who qualify in the WBJEE exam can seek admission into various undergraduate courses in engineering, technology, architecture, and pharmacy across colleges in West Bengal. This year, the WBJEE exam was held on April 27, 2025. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court issued an interim stay on several executive orders issued by the West Bengal government. These orders granted reservation benefits to 140 sub-groups within the OBC-A and OBC-B categories. The stay came just days after Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee presented a revised OBC list in the West Bengal Assembly. The opposition BJP strongly opposed the move, claiming that many of the newly included communities on the list were from the Muslim population. The High Court was hearing a petition filed by Amal Chandra Das, who questioned the legality of the new OBC list. A division bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Rajasekhar Mantha ruled that all executive notifications issued between May 8 and June 13 related to the OBC list would be suspended until July 31, pending a detailed review. While the WBJEE Board has not officially stated that the court case is the reason for the result delay, the ongoing legal situation could be affecting the schedule. This is because the results usually include category-wise ranks, which play a key role in admissions under reserved categories. First Published:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store