
The Embarrassing Reason Xi Talks about ‘Great Changes Unseen in a Century'
In front of the cameras – and microphones – of the Western media in 2023, he told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin: 'Now is the moment of change unseen in a century. We are jointly driving it forward.' Of course, Putin could only agree. But agree with what, exactly?
The formulation clearly means something important. Xi enshrined it at the 19th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party in October 2017, and has used it many times in other key speeches and documents. The phrase is even used to describe Xi's approach since taking charge at the 18th National Party Congress in 2012.
But what does it mean?
Maybe Wikipedia can help. The dedicated page on the topic relies on a 2024 European Council on Foreign Relations e-book. The authors trace the origin to Yuan Peng and his 2009 article 'The Financial Crisis and U.S. Economic Hegemony' in the Chinese academic journal Contemporary International Relations.
Wikipedia and the ECFR authors also cite the dedicated entry in the Center for Strategic Translation's glossary, which tells us the phrase was:
… first used by Chinese academics following the Great Recession. The phrase is associated with the dangers and opportunities posed by American decline, and has been adopted by THE CENTER as a programmatic assessment of the trajectory of the current world order. The trends which can be feasibly linked to this trajectory are diverse.
The source for this is Rush Doshi's 2021 book, 'The Long Game.'
Doshi writes, in turn:
The concept first emerged from conversations about Western decline after the Global Financial Crisis. One of its first usages was in a 2009 essay titled 'The Financial Crisis and American Economic Hegemony' written by Yuan Peng… Yuan Peng observed that the United States 'for the first time in the history of its hegemony' was suffering from a series of grave challenges, that these were producing 'great changes unseen in a century'
Yuan's article has an original Chinese version and a translation. Doshi's quotes are his own translation.
As it turns out, both versions mistranslate Yuan. The original Chinese refers to: 'The 'eastward shift of global power' and the rise of emerging powers have brought about changes not seen in centuries.' (emphasis mine)
Earlier in the article, Yuan referred to Henry Kissinger's 'theory' of 'great changes unseen in 400 years' and how Kissinger saw the ''eastward shift of power'' as 'an inevitable trend.'
So is Xi's catchy phrase just one more thing Kissinger gave China, along with decades of what the Chinese call 'strategic opportunity'? Maybe. But why 'centuries' not 'a century'? Why did Yuan write about '400 years' not '100 years'?
In trying to glean the origins of the phrase, we shouldn't be too influenced by the specific Chinese character formulation. Yes, Yuan's quote is exactly the same as Beijing's official phrase with the addition of a shu to specify several centuries and the subtraction of the da that indicates the changes are great. But both follow the famous line (at least in Chinese histro-literary culture) from late Qing Dynasty statesman Li Hongzhang, about 'great changes unseen in thousands of years.' And others have used the same formulation before it became an official slogan, such as a literature professor in 1993.
To establish descent, we want both the focus on great hegemonic changes and a single century. Funnily enough, this brings us back to Kissinger. The first line of the first chapter of his 1994 book 'Diplomacy' stated: 'Almost as if according to some natural law, in every century there seems to emerge a country with the power, the will, and the intellectual and moral impetus to shape the entire international system in accordance with its own values.'
One Chinese paying attention was Liu Mingfu, author of the bestselling book 'China Dream' published in January 2010.
With that quote from Kissinger and references to some other Western scholars as support, Liu asserted something much like an actual natural law. According to Liu, there is a hundred-year cycle of new 'champion countries' rising up to transform the world as they transform themselves, driving historical progress forward for the benefit of humankind. China's dream is its destiny, Liu proclaimed, and it will replace the U.S. as the champion country. Unlike hegemonic Uncle Sam, the People's Republic of China will be a leader, drawing on the Chinese distinction between a bullying hegemon and those who lead the 'Kingly Way.' But military strength is key – the only way to righteously push a selfish U.S. into doing what's best for itself and humanity as whole, starting with stepping aside as Taiwan gets 'unified.'
Strong circumstantial evidence points to Liu as the source of the phrase about 'great changes unseen in a century.' Xi's signature 'China Dream' is the very title of Liu's book. As Xi ascended to power he ordered the creation of a website to educate cadres, which recommended Liu's book in 2013. In his first 2012 meeting with the new military leadership, he pointed to 'great changes unseen before.' Most if not all of the ideas in the book have prominent analogues in Xi's policies. The 2019 'China and the World in the New Era' white paper contained thinly disguised Liu Mingfu. Explainers for internal consumption on 'great changes unseen in a century' and the 'Great Rejuvenation of the Chinese Nation' recapitulate the themes of Liu's book. And in a dog-that-didn't-bark way, they do so without mentioning Liu.
Liu, no fool, understands that it's embarrassing that Xi Jinping Thought is derivative of a popular nonfiction book. Interviewed by the foreign media when Xi unveiled the 'China Dream' slogan, Liu was triumphant (As the BBC put it: 'Colonel Liu Mingfu seems to think that he has more capital than most to tell Xi Jinping his dreams') but careful not to stick his neck out too far:
The world today is undergoing a major change unseen in a century, but this also means we have the opportunity to make major changes. China's national goal is nothing less than to realize the 'Chinese Dream', the great rejuvenation of the Chinese people. Its core strategy is the 'Belt and Road' initiative to connect the world and bring happiness through cooperation. The ultimate goal will be to build a community with a shared future for mankind.
And he needs to be careful. The better connected and more powerful Liu Yazhou, who provided the foreword to Liu Mingfu's book, is reportedly in prison on a commuted death sentence. No wonder Liu wanted a photo showing him smiling as he holds up books on Xi Jinping Thought next to a plate with Xi on it.
But still, he must be satisfied with how his decision to read Kissinger's book turned out. While Xi is driving great changes unseen in a century with Putin and others, Liu knows that he was the first mover in driving great changes in Xi's head.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tokyo Weekender
5 hours ago
- Tokyo Weekender
Two-Tier Pricing in Japan: Why Tourists Are Paying More
In Okinawa's new Junglia theme park, there are two ways to buy a one-day pass. If you land on the park's English-language site, the ticket price is ¥8,000 yen before tax — ¥8,800 after. That's about $59 at today's exchange rate. Switch to the Japanese-language portal, though, and the same ticket costs ¥6,930, tax included — around $47. But you can't just click and buy it. You'll need to enter a Japanese address and phone number. According to Honichi , the policy comes from Katana Marketing, headed by Morioka Tsuyoshi, the man credited with pulling Universal Studios Japan out of a tailspin two decades ago. Katana's reasoning is simple: Inbound tourists spend three times as much as domestic visitors. If they have the means — and the willingness — to pay more, why not let them? This is what's known as two-tier pricing — charging one price to locals and another, usually higher, price to visitors. And in Japan right now, it's showing up in places you might not expect. List of Contents: A Growing Trend The Global Norm Why People Are Talking About Two-Tier Pricing in Japan When It Works — and When It Doesn't The Real Fix Related Posts A Growing Trend Theme parks are one thing, but for some, apparently, restaurants are something else. Japan's largest restaurant review and reservation platform, Tabelog , operates separate booking systems for domestic and inbound customers. On the English, Chinese and Korean versions, users must enter a credit card and pay a ¥440 per person system fee at the time of booking. The domestic site requires no card and charges no such fee. The logic here is that foreign customers bring different transaction costs, and the platform passes them along. Then there's the case of the seafood buffet restaurant in Shibuya that sparked a backlash on Reddit and X earlier this year. The shop, Tamatebako, charges foreign tourists ¥1,100 more than Japanese nationals and foreign residents for its all-you-can-eat course, verifying status by checking if customers can speak Japanese or by requesting a residence card. 'Considering the rise in labor costs due to service costs and time used to serve [foreign customers], we have no other choice but to set the different prices,' the restaurant owner told Yomiuri Shimbun . These explanations didn't land well. On social media, users accused the restaurant of 'being horrible racist, discriminatory xenophobes,' as one commenter put it. Long-term residents voiced a different frustration — the fear of being misclassified. 'And um, how do they know? When I've been here for two decades I'm not a goddamn tourist, despite what everyone thinks,' one wrote . The debate spread beyond Shibuya. When a tonkatsu restaurant in Asakusa announced plans for a 10% service charge 'for foreign tourists,' another thread lit up. 'Imagine the face of Japanese tourists if Paris restaurants started to charge them more than the displayed menu. (A tale that won't happen, as it would be highly illegal here),' a French commenter wrote . The Global Norm Before we get too precious about this, let's acknowledge the obvious: Charging visitors more is normal almost everywhere. India's Taj Mahal charges foreign visitors 1100 RS, or roughly $12 — over twenty times the domestic price. France's Louvre Museum is free for residents of the European Economic Area under 26. Everyone else over 18 pays €22. Many U.S. national parks have lower entry fees for state residents and higher rates for out-of-staters. In Southeast Asia, 'foreigner rates' at attractions are so common they're part of the travel budget. The justification is consistent: Locals help pay for the upkeep of these sites through taxes. Visitors do not, so they make up the difference at the gate. It's not discrimination; it's fiscal logic. Japan already has its own reverse example: the consumption tax exemption . Foreign tourists and temporary returnees can avoid paying the 10% sales tax on a wide range of purchases. It's effectively a nationwide 'tourist discount.' 'We get the 10% tax free benefit on pretty much everything. I don't mind paying a bit more for the food,' said a user on Reddit. Why People Are Talking About Two-Tier Pricing in Japan Two-tier pricing isn't new to Japan — it's just more visible now. The conditions are perfect for it to spread. The yen's slide has made the country absurdly cheap for visitors paying in dollars or euros; that omakase dinner that would cost $250 in New York is ¥12,000 here, and a coffee that's $5 in Paris is ¥400 in Tokyo. Tourism is surging, with over 36 million visitors in 2024 — the highest number ever — and the influx is concentrated in a few already-strained regions like Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Okinawa and Hokkaido. Inbound tourists spend a substantial amount per person, averaging around ¥227,000 in 2024 . Without differentiated pricing, locals risk being priced out of their own neighborhoods as businesses raise prices to match what tourists are willing to pay. Two-tier pricing is, in that sense, a way to keep services accessible to residents. When It Works — and When It Doesn't Hawaii's kamaʻāina discount is the textbook example: Show proof of residency, get a reduced price. It's transparent, consistent and residency-based. It doesn't matter what you look like, what passport you hold or what language you speak — it matters whether you live there. Japan could apply the same logic to attractions, restaurants and services in tourist-heavy areas. For places funded in part by local taxes — museums, gardens, heritage sites — the justification is even stronger. So the problem isn't the principle of two-tier pricing. It's the execution. Too often, 'tourist' is defined by sight alone. If you look foreign, you might be charged more. If you speak accented Japanese, you might be charged more. When tourist prices are decided on sight, long-term residents — people who've lived in Japan for decades, pay taxes and raise children in Japanese schools — can find themselves erroneously paying 'tourist' rates based on their appearance. One foreign resident said on Reddit: 'There are levels to which this is acceptable. But it's a slippery slope and I'm not looking forward to having to explain that I'm not a tourist to restaurants profiling customers.' In other words, it's about more than money. Being treated as a 'visitor' in your own neighborhood cuts deeper than a 10% surcharge. Discover Tokyo, Every Week Get the city's best stories, under-the-radar spots and exclusive invites delivered straight to your inbox. By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy . The Real Fix Let's be clear: Charging tourists more is not scandalous. A ten-percent upcharge on a meal that costs half what it would in London or New York is hardly exploitative. If you're flying across the Pacific for a vacation, you can afford seventy extra yen. As one Reddit user put it: 'I think people coming here in endless hordes to exploit the weak currency can probably afford an extra dollar here and there. This goes especially true for things which I think ought to be giving priority to locals.' For short-term visitors who bristle at paying a bit more, it's worth remembering that Japan's omotenashi — its ethic of generous, anticipatory hospitality — is a cultural offering, not an open invitation to extract maximum value at minimum cost. When pricing is transparent, residency-based and tied to real economic factors like tax contribution, it's a practical tool for balancing tourism and local access. Japan has every right to use it, especially in tourist-heavy areas where demand from abroad distorts the market. The problem comes when the criteria are vague and enforcement is left to a glance at someone's face. That's when policy slides into prejudice. If Japan wants to charge tourists more, it must set clear rules and remove subjective judgment from the equation. A national standard — with definitions, documentation and guidelines — would prevent the current patchwork of ad hoc decisions and awkward confrontations at the counter. Here's the harder truth: If Japanese wages kept pace with other developed economies and the yen regained its purchasing power, the gap between what locals can afford and what tourists are willing to pay would shrink. The whole debate over two-tier pricing would fade into the background. Until then, the question isn't whether Japan can charge tourists more — it's whether it will do so with the clarity and fairness that respects both the residents who live here and the guests passing through. Related Posts Mount Fuji To Double Toll Fees Next Year To Address Overcrowding Mayor Considers Quadrupling Himeji Castle Entry Fee for Tourists


Nikkei Asia
6 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
China promises to address India's rare earth requirements
India's External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, left, shakes hands with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing, July 14. (Xinhua via AP) KIRAN SHARMA August 19, 2025 20:34 JST NEW DELHI -- In a major diplomatic breakthrough, China has promised to address India's concerns regarding Beijing's export curbs on rare earths, tunnel boring machines and fertilizers.

Nikkei Asia
8 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Labubu frenzy quintuples Pop Mart's first-half profit to $636m
Labubu dolls at Pop Mart's flagship store in Shanghai in June. The popularity of the toys has fueled the company's rapid rise. © Reuters WATARU SUZUKI August 19, 2025 18:58 JST SHANGHAI -- The global frenzy over Labubu toys fueled a nearly fivefold rise in Chinese toymaker Pop Mart International Group's net profit in the first half of the year.