logo
Astronomers discover 196-foot asteroid with 1-in-83 chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Astronomers discover 196-foot asteroid with 1-in-83 chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Yahoo29-01-2025

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
A newly discovered asteroid, designated 2024 YR4, has a 1-in-83 chance of striking Earth in December of 2032. The asteroid is estimated to be 196 feet (60 meters) wide, and it is currently 27 million miles away.
The near-Earth object (NEO) discovered in 2024, which is around half as wide as a football field is long, will make a very close approach to Earth on Dec. 22, 2032. It's estimated to come within around 66,000 miles (106,200 kilometers) of Earth on that day, according to NASA's Center of NEO Studies (CNEOS). However, when orbital uncertainties are considered, that close approach could turn out to be a direct hit on our planet.
Such an impact could cause an explosion in the atmosphere, called an "airburst," or could cause an impact crater when it slams into the ground.
This is enough to see asteroid 2024 YR4 leap to the top of the European Space Agency's NEO impact Risk List and NASA's Sentry Risk Table.
"Odds have slightly increased to 1 in 83," Catalina Sky Survey engineer and asteroid hunter David Rankin wrote on BlueSky. "This is one of the highest probabilities of an impact from a significantly sized rock ever."Amateur astronomer Tony Dunn shared a simulation of the asteroid approach on his X feed.
The asteroid is rated three on the Torino risk scale, which indicates a close encounter that warrants close attention from astronomers and an over 1% chance of impact.
Asteroid 2024 YR4 was initially found by a NASA-funded project called ATLAS, using the project's telescope located in Rio Hurtado, Chile. Rankin was then able to recover the asteroid from data collected by the Catalina Sky Survey.
Space.com reached out to Rankin to learn more about asteroid 2024 YR4. His initial message was clear: "People should absolutely not worry about this yet," Rankin told Space.com. "Impact probability is still very low, and the most likely outcome will be a close approaching rock that misses us."
Rankin added that, currently, the "risk corridor" for impact runs from South America across the Atlantic to South Africa. "It is just important to keep in mind that its orbit is still too uncertain to know if it will hit, and right now, the most likely outcome is a miss," he said. "This impact corridor estimation will eventually go stale with new observations and better orbit calculations."
And, he says, even if 2024 YR4 does hit Earth, this isn't an immediate cause for great concern. There is still a great deal astronomers don't know about this asteroid, and many of these characteristics have a significant influence on the damage it could cause.
"Size and composition are big players in possible damage, along with impact location," Rankin said. "It's hard to constrain size and composition with the current orbital situation, as it's outbound. Typically, the best way to constrain size is with radar observations and those are not possible right now."He says that astronomers will have a shot at estimating these characteristics in 2028 when 2024 YR4 will make a less risky close approach to Earth, passing within around 5 million miles (8 million kilometers) of our planet. Astronomers can calculate the size of a distant asteroid based on the amount of light it reflects, or its "absolute magnitude." The problem is, however, that asteroids have varying surface compositions. They can be dark or shiny, and that impacts light-related size estimates."Based on the calculated absolute magnitude, it's about 196 feet (60 meters) wide, but that assumes a certain surface reflectivity," Rankin said. "If the asteroid has a darker surface, that number is too small; if it has a more reflective surface, that number is too high."That is why they need that radar data to be more sure of the size of asteroid 2024 YR4.
Let's say the data we have on asteroid 2024 YT4 is currently correct. What kind of risk does an impact by this asteroid pose to Earth?
"It is likely around the same size as the 1908 Tunguska rock or the Meteor Crater rock," Rankin said. "So, while impact effects would be more localized than regional, it certainly has the potential to do serious damage to the area it hits."
Tunguska is currently the largest recorded asteroid strike event in human history, though we know of many greater impacts in prehistoric times. The most notable of these is the catastrophic Chicxulub impact, which happened around 66 million years ago and wiped out two-thirds of life on Earth and ended the reign of the dinosaurs.
Tunguska was less dramatic, but was no slouch in terms of damage. Releasing the same energy as the detonation of up to 50 million tons of TNT when it exploded in the atmosphere over a sparsely populated region of Russia, the blast flattened an estimated 80 million trees over an area of 830 square miles ( 2,150 square km) and possibly killed three people.
"If [asteroid 2024 YT4] is made of stony material, it could cause a significant air burst and fireball reaching the ground," Rankin said. "If made of iron, it will punch right through the atmosphere with little trouble and make an impact crater. This is why understanding not just the orbit but also the composition and size are so critical."
Related Stories:
— Earth's mini-moon has finally departed. Will it ever return as a 'second moon?'
— Asteroid the size of 3 million elephants zooms past Earth
— Astronauts could mine asteroids for food someday, scientists say
Rankin and astronomers across the globe will now endeavor to learn as much as they can about asteroid 2024 YT4 before 2032.
"We will have the opportunity to continue to track this rock through February with 8-meter class telescopes, which we plan on doing at Catalina Sky Survey," Rankin said. "It is possible that even after February, we will not know for sure if it will hit or miss in 2032. We should be able to determine that better by 2028, when it should be visible again."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HRL Laboratories Unveils SPARES: A Revolutionary Approach to Structural Reliability Assessment
HRL Laboratories Unveils SPARES: A Revolutionary Approach to Structural Reliability Assessment

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

HRL Laboratories Unveils SPARES: A Revolutionary Approach to Structural Reliability Assessment

MALIBU, Calif., June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--HRL Laboratories is introducing SPARES (Surrogate‐accelerated, Physics‐guided Assessment for the Reliability of Structures), a breakthrough project that leverages the layer-by-layer nature of additive manufacturing to deliver faster, smarter and more efficient structural reliability analysis for metal parts, providing fatigue performance data without destructive testing. About SPARES SPARES combines physics-based modeling with machine learning-driven surrogate models to dramatically reduce the time and computational effort required to evaluate structural integrity, without sacrificing accuracy. SPARES is a DARPA-funded effort under the SURGE (Structures Uniquely Resolved to Guarantee Endurance) program, recognizing HRL's leadership in advancing structural reliability assessment. SPARES is developed in collaboration with: Boeing, Purdue University and the University of Utah. SPARES leverages Fringe Inspection™, a real-time, layer-by-layer topology inspection product from Phase3D, that provides objective data of the additive manufacturing process. What you need to know Reliability assessments are critical for industries like aerospace, automotive and civil engineering, where materials and structures must withstand extreme conditions over time. Traditional methods rely on complex simulations or large-scale physical testing, both of which can be slow and expensive. SPARES tackles this challenge by: Collecting sensor data and in-situ monitoring during the additive manufacturing process. Using surrogate models, which are streamlined, AI-assisted versions of full-scale simulations, to rapidly predict how structures will perform under stress. These models are informed by real physics to ensure that results remain reliable even as computational effort is reduced. "SPARES is about efficiency without compromise," said Eric Clough, Principal Investigator at HRL Laboratories. "By embedding advanced physics principles into AI-driven models, we're able to speed up the reliability assessment process while maintaining the accuracy engineers need to make critical decisions." Dig deeper This hybrid approach makes it possible to assess failure risks, predict material performance and optimize designs in a fraction of the time required by conventional methods. Whether evaluating aircraft components, vehicle frames or infrastructure items, SPARES provides engineers with fast, physics and data-driven insights to enhance safety and durability. HRL Laboratories, alongside its esteemed partners, is committed to developing innovative solutions that address real-world engineering challenges. SPARES is a testament to that mission, pushing the boundaries of structural reliability research and paving the way for smarter, more resilient designs. HRL Laboratories, LLC, California ( pioneers the next frontiers of physical and information science. Delivering transformative technologies in automotive, aerospace and defense, HRL advances the critical missions of its customers. As a private company owned jointly by Boeing and GM, HRL is a source of innovations that advance the state of the art in profound and far-reaching ways. View source version on Contacts media@ 310-317-5000 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

SpaceX rocket launch in Florida uses Falcon 9 booster that launched former NASA admin pick
SpaceX rocket launch in Florida uses Falcon 9 booster that launched former NASA admin pick

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

SpaceX rocket launch in Florida uses Falcon 9 booster that launched former NASA admin pick

The first of back-to-back SpaceX launches took off on time June 10, and the Falcon 9 booster supporting this launch was an interesting choice. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket lifted off at 9:05 a.m. carrying 23 Starlink internet satellites to orbit from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. The first-stage booster that powered this mission was the same booster that launched the Polaris Dawn crew. The Polaris Dawn mission was commanded and funded by President Trump's former nominee for NASA administrator, Jared Isaacman. The Polaris Dawn mission, which also included two SpaceX employees, performed the first spacewalk by a private company and traveled the furthest into space since the Apollo moon missions. Isaacman was Trump's pick to serve as NASA administrator, but on May 31 Trump dropped Isaacman, saying he needed someone more aligned with this goals. A new choice for NASA administrator has yet to be announced. "After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space." The change came just days before a public feud erupted on X between Trump and SpaceX CEO, Elon Musk, who was close to Isaacman. On June 9, Isaacman posted the following to X in a discussion on what his plans would have been for NASA, which faces steep budget cuts in President Trump's proposal to Congress. "Spent the last few months assembling a pretty extensive plan—shaped by insights from a lot of smart, passionate people. No shortage of input — everyone loves NASA and wants to help. Maybe I will write an op-ed someday — but I didn't love being inundated with plans from people who thought they were uniquely NASA's savior — and I have little interest in doing the same," wrote Isaacman. "In short, I would have deleted the bureaucracy that impedes progress and robs resources from the mission (this is not unique to NASA it's a govt problem). I would flatten the hierarchy, rebuild the culture— centered on ownership, urgency, mission-focus alongside a risk recalibration. Then concentrate resources on the big needle movers NASA was meant to achieve," he wrote. When is the next Florida rocket launch? Live updates: 1st of back-to-back launch days to see SpaceX launch from Cape Canaveral Previous missions this Polaris Dawn booster flew include: NASA's Crew-8, CRS-31, Astranis: From One to Many, IM-2, and six other Starlink missions. Overall, it was the 12th flight of the booster. Just over eight minutes after liftoff, the booster landed on the Just Read the Instruction drone ship, which was stationed out on the Atlantic Ocean. Tuesday's launch was the first of what may be back-to-back SpaceX launch days. The launch of the Axiom Space Mission 4 (Ax-4) astronauts is set for no earlier than 8 a.m. on June 11 from NASA's Kennedy Space Center pad 39A. Originally set for June 10, the launch was postponed due to poor weather in the ascent corridor. Commanded by former NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, the international crew of four astronauts will spend two weeks on the International Space Station. With the mission traveling to the space station, the mission must lift off on time or scrub for the day. The SpaceX booster from the Axiom mission will return to Cape Canaveral, creating an early morning Space Coast sonic boom. The FLORIDA TODAY Space Team will provide live updates beginning two hours prior to launch at Brooke Edwards is a Space Reporter for Florida Today. Contact her at bedwards@ or on X: @brookeofstars. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: SpaceX rocket launch in Florida used booster that launched Isaacman

For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were.
For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were.

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were.

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Strange signals coming from the Arctic in 2023 were assumed to be a seiche (trapped water with waves sloshing back and forth), but this was never confirmed. Previous instruments used to measure seismic weather phenomena were not able to pick up enough information, but NASA's SWOT satellite eventually found that the signal actually was from a seiche caused by a landslide. Reconstructions of what the weather was like during the days SWOT picked up the signal also show that it couldn't have been anything but a seiche. As fascinating as bizarre signals from other planets can be—teaching us about earthquakes on Mars or auroras in the skies of Jupiter—sometimes even weirder signals come from weather extremes happening right here on Earth. For nine days in 2023, an unknown seismic pulse was generated by the Earth every 90 seconds. It first appeared that September, vanished, and then returned in October. The signals began after a landslide triggered by a megatsunami in Dickson Fjord, Greenland, and was thought to have been produced by a seiche, or standing wave. This wave had probably been stirred up by the tsunami and then trapped by ice in the fjord—but there was no way to prove it. Satellite observations were able to document avalanches and the tsunamis they caused, and scientists collected further data in a research station. There was just one problem—the hypothesized seiche was eluding detection. It remained a mystery, even though studies at the time found seismic data that seemed to align with the sloshing motions of standing waves. So, researcher Thomas Monahan of Oxford University decided to take a closer look. Using data from the KaRIn (Ka-band Radar Interferometer) instrument on board NASA's Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite—an international collaboration capable of high-resolution measurements that extended into Dickson fjord—Monahan and his team finally found evidence for a seiche whose waves were slowly losing intensity. 'Based on the seismic attribution, and systematic ruling out of other dynamic phenomena, we conclude that the observed variability in the SWOT data is consistent with that of a slowly decaying seiche,' the team wrote in a study recently published in Nature Communications. Seiches can occur in lakes and other enclosed (or partially enclosed) bodies of water. The tsunami unleashed in Dickson Fjord had enough strength to leave powerful winds and sudden atmospheric pressure shifts in its wake, pushing water from one end of the enclosure to the other. The water then sloshed back and forth, oscillating for anywhere from hours to days after winds ceased. Tsunamis are often seismic phenomena, and the very long period (VLP) seismic signal that came from the fjord was the aftermath of a tsunamigenic landslide. Previous attempts at recording evidence for this particular seiche had been thwarted by the limitations of satellite altimeters, which did not pick up data during extended gaps between observations. They were also not able to record the differences in the height of waves beyond the area directly under the satellite. They were, however, able to get an especially accurate read on the water below. The landslides in Dickson Fjord happened right when SWOT was transitioning to its Science phase, during which it would orbit and survey most of the planet's surface from an altitude of 890 km (553 miles) for 21 days. This orbit was purposely out of sync with the Sun to lower the chances of misidentifying signal frequencies. The researchers went through the data from every pass the satellite made over the region for the weeks in September and October and used this data to create maps of the fjord, modeling it how would have behaved during different times after the landslide and the height differences between waves (which reached up to two meters, or about 6.5 feet). Reconstructions of weather conditions ruled out all other possible causes behind the signal, and convinced scientists that it could only have been caused by a seiche. 'This study shows how we can leverage the next generation of satellite earth observation technologies to study these processes,' Monahan said in a recent press release. 'SWOT is a game changer for studying oceanic processes in regions such as fjords which previous satellites struggled to see into.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store