TPCC chief praises Telangana's BC quota decision at AICC OBC meet in Bengaluru
Speaking at the AICC OBC Advisory Council meeting held in Bengaluru under the chairmanship of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, Mahesh Goud asserted that the Congress government in Telangana has initiated comprehensive measures — legal, political and administrative — to ensure effective and hassle-free implementation of BC reservations.
The TPCC chief also expressed pride in having played a key role during significant moments in the party's BC empowerment efforts.
'From proposing the BC Declaration in Kamareddy ahead of the Telangana Assembly polls as TPCC working president, to leading the party now as state president while the government is translating that vision into reality — I consider myself fortunate to be part of this historic process,' he said.
He said that Telangana CM A Revanth Reddy, despite belonging to a forward caste, extended full support to the BC reservation initiative. 'Revanth Reddy has shown exemplary commitment by ensuring legal safeguards and institutional frameworks for BC welfare,' he said.
The TPCC president also recalled Rahul Gandhi's emphasis on BC empowerment during the Bharat Jodo Yatra, and said the Telangana government has since operationalised key steps in that direction — including the formation of a BC Commission, a BC Dedication Commission, a caste survey, introduction of relevant legislation in the Assembly, and issuance of an ordinance by the Governor.
'Rahul Gandhi, Revanth Reddy, and I consider ourselves foot soldiers in the mission to uphold BC rights,' he said. The Bengaluru meeting was attended by ministers Ponnam Prabhakar, Konda Surekha, MP Anil Yadav and former MP V Hanumantha Rao, among others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Centre agrees to hold 'special discussion' on Op Sindoor on July 28 in Lok Sabha
New Delhi: A 'special discussion' on Operation Sindoor will start in Lok Sabha on Monday and in Rajya Sabha a day later, with MPs in both Houses allocated 16 hours each to deliberate on the military operations against terror infrastructure in Pakistan following Pahalgam terror attack and subsequent government managers told members of Rajya Sabha BAC that they want to schedule the debate in Rajya Sabha on Tuesday because it enables Prime Minister Narendra Modi to be present when the debate starts in both Houses, sources said after Rajya Sabha Business Advisory Committee (BAC) meeting on Wednesday. The Lok Sabha BAC had met earlier this meeting, which was chaired by Deputy Chairman Harivansh, came after four postponements since Monday and after the dramatic resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, who was the Upper House Chairman, as Vice 'politics' & motion against Justice Varma at heart of Dhankhar's exit as Vice President?.The meeting was first called by Dhankhar on Monday 1 pm but it remained inconclusive and rescheduled to meet at 4:30 pm and again to Tuesday 1 pm. However, the 1 pm meeting on Tuesday, to be chaired by Deputy Chairman Harivansh in the absence of Dhankhar, was rescheduled to 5:30 pm. But, late afternoon, the meeting was postponed to Wednesday 12:30 the meeting, sources said Congress' Jairam Ramesh suggested that they could accord a farewell to Dhankhar, when a suggestion for farewell for retiring MPs on Thursday was made. Though the BJP was supportive of allowing retiring MPs to make their farewell speeches, a senior BJP leader said that there is 'no opportunity left to give Dhankhar a farewell' as he has the meeting, sources said the Opposition also made it clear that the debate on Operation Sindoor should not be on a motion or a resolution and the government informed that it would be a special discussion. .Congress raises 'serious questions' on impact of FTA likely to be signed during Modi's UK demand came as Dhankhar had admitted a notice of BJP MP Samik Bhattacharya under Rule 167 with a motion urging the government to set up a permanent Parliamentary mechanism to support international engagement during national security operations. Congress and Trinamool Congress insisted that the debate should not be on a resolution and was supported by DMK and AAP, as they wanted an unrestricted Congress' Derek O'Brien asked the government managers why they could not start the debate on Thursday 11 am, to which he was informed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is presently on an official visit abroad, cannot be present during the week. At this, sources said, AAP's Sanjay Singh said that the government could then schedule a discussion on Special Intensive Revision on electoral rolls in Bihar. However, sources said, the government indicated that it is not in favour of such a debate.O'Brien, sources said, also demanded that the government take up one each short duration discussion and call attention motions every week on subjects suggested by the Opposition. After the meeting, O'Brien said, "Why is the government delaying a discussion. Parliament is being disrupted because the Prime Minister is in England and he does not want to run Parliament."
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
The Gujarat Model: At a Dangerous Crossing
'He is incorruptible'; the middle-aged founder of a well-known chartered accountancy firm in Mumbai looked palpably thrilled. It was another of Mumbai's social get togethers following a business conference where India's supposedly best minds exchanged political gossip and fulminated on the state of the nation, including its celebrated potholes. 'He is ushering in changes. He looks like a man on a mission.', the exuberant gentleman continued, like a rollercoaster on steroids. I saw a Narendra Modi 'bhakt' long before that dodgy sobriquet became a national meme. The year was 2004. The Gujarat chief minister had already assiduously created a political narrative about himself, even as an ageing PM Atal Behari Vajpayee was selling the chimera of India Shining. But I am not easy pickings; we are not an argumentative nation for nothing. 'These things don't matter. They happen all the time' 'Do you endorse what happened in Gujarat in 2002? Is that okay? Does that not alone disqualify Modi from holding such an august office?'. The gentleman was unperturbed. If at all, he seemed stunned at my apparent naivete. He looked at me with a bemused expression of a laboratory scientist who was about to do a surgery on a trapped cockroach: "These things don't matter. They happen all the time'. Whataboutery would go on to become India's favorite sport on prime-time TV to rationalise the worst of shenanigans, corruption, violence, sectarianism and riots. Fast forward to 2014: Modi was the presumptive prime ministerial candidate of the BJP. He had graduated from being a regional satrap ( as TV anchors brand ambitious provincial leaders) into a national alternative. By that time, I had morphed from being a part-time, quasi-back-office analyst for the Congress to becoming its ubiquitous face on television networks. Modi willy-nilly would become the surname I encountered at every nook and corner. And on every show. 'Mr Jha, Modi stands for development', the popular bespectacled face who had mesmerised the nation with his trademark theatrics, was implacable. 'India needs his Gujarat model'. He sounded like the saffron party's campaigner-in-chief himself. ' Seriously? ', I pushed back. 'Are we saying that we have become a $ 2 trillion economy without development? Are you aware that India has grown at nearly 7.8% average GDP during 2004-14 and lifted over 140 million people out of poverty ? Yes, there are problems, but we are the global sweet spot after China. So what new 'development' are we talking about?'. It was my early discovery that facts, data, statistics and evidence mattered little in the noisy public discourse. Modi's Acche Din ( Happy days) was a precursor to what would be Donald Trump's astonishingly successful Make America Great Again ( MAGA) shibboleth that would transmogrify into a movement, a neo-Republican vote bloc. On every parameter, America was the dominant superpower in 2016, but Trump had altered the political conversation. Both Modi and Trump would go on to annihilate their beleaguered and stunned opponents. On July 11, 2025 , a bridge in Vadodara district of Gujarat collapsed. It killed 20 innocent people for no fault of theirs. Barring a tiny fleeting mention, the news cycle cursorily buried it. They cannot be blamed. When the Morbi bridge fell in October 2022, its death toll of 135 people did not affect the electorate whatsoever. The BJP returned to power in the assembly elections that were held just a few months later with a massive mandate. In Uttar Pradesh's Lakhimpur-Kheri, the son of the local Member of Parliament was arrested for driving his jeep mercilessly into protesting farmers in October 2021. In the assembly elections just five months later, the BJP won all 8 assembly seats in the Lok Sabha constituency with handsome margins. I was reminded of my unforgettable confabulation with the suited-booted corporate schmoozer in 2004: 'These things don't matter. They happen all the time'. But do they? And just because they happened in the past, true or exaggerated, must we silently condone the brazen dismantling of what was once a democratic and secular role model to the world? We were once a newly independent country that had boldly resurrected itself from a pulverised economy and a harrowing bloody partition, to embrace religious diversity and inclusive growth, and become a lighthouse to new societies battling seemingly irreconcilable contradictions. Societies pay a huge price for not just bad choices but even for temporary blind-sidedness. The Congress's underwhelming defense of itself led to an unprecedented wave of support for Modi, enough for its people to shockingly ignore the deadly pogrom of 2002, fake encounter killings, rise of crony capitalism, the ruthless decimation of dissenting voices, the unrelenting intimidation of brutalised minorities. A manufactured cult A cult was born, or more appropriately, manufactured. The Gujarat model is now trumpeted as Modi's India by his acolytes. In his model, all you do is build highways, expressways, metro lines, trains, ports and highways. And even have an eponymous cricket stadium. In her Pulitzer Prize winning book Autocracy Inc, author Anne Applebaum talks of disinformation, surveillance and propaganda as the trifecta of modern-day autocracies, democratically elected leaders who surreptitiously through regulatory and media capture change the destinies of nations. As I write, the Supreme Court calling out India's police state (Why are you fighting political battles, ED?) , and the alleged attempt by the Election Commission to disenfranchise voters in Bihar are a warning; Politicians may love power, but despots will never give it up. Even as Modi continues to boast about his infrastructure push, he has not yet understood the core principle of political leadership; societies need a bridge between communities before they pay their toll-tax for a shimmering patch of concrete. And tragically for Modi, even they are crumbling. And broken. Sanjay Jha is an author and former national spokesperson for the Congress. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Oppn Infighting On Display In Bid To Corner Govt On Pahalgam Attack, Bihar SIR, Dhankhar Issues
Last Updated: As evident in Parliament's Business Advisory Committee gathering, the challenge for the opposition INDIA bloc is to appear united The Business Advisory Committee (BAC) in Parliament convened with a single agenda: discussing post-Operation Sindoor developments. The government agreed to allocate 16 hours for discussions in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The Trinamool Congress, along with the Aam Aadmi Party, insisted there should be no resolution for the discussion. The opposition aims to corner the government on two key points during the debate: 1. Are the claims by US President Donald Trump that he brokered a ceasefire between Pakistan and India true? 2. Where are the terrorists who carried out the April 22 Pahalgam massacre? The government did not disagree on the resolution aspect, but the opposition parties had their differences. Sources indicate that many MPs were displeased with the Congress's insistence that the PM must speak. Other opposition leaders, especially those from AAP, believed this would allow the PM to dominate the discussion for more than an hour and undermine the opposition's efforts. They preferred the Prime Minister to observe while they attacked him. However, the government has different plans, and it is expected that the PM will intervene. The opposition aims to present a strong front but also wants to corner the government on the Bihar SIR electoral roll review issue, which is crucial for the TMC due to the upcoming West Bengal polls in 2026. It has already framed the issue as an attempt to marginalise Bengalis. Trinamool is submitting 11 notices on this matter and demands an immediate discussion. Sources reveal that during the BAC meeting, the issue of Jagdeep Dhankhar's sudden resignation as Vice President was raised by Congress's Jairam Ramesh, questioning why he wasn't allowed to deliver a farewell speech. This drew criticism from several opposition MPs, who believe that since Dhankhar was uncivil to Ramesh and others, no sympathy should be shown to him. In fact, some MPs appeared angry with the Congress and Jairam Ramesh for seemingly being lenient towards Dhankhar. Ahead of the significant discussion next week, the challenge for the opposition INDIA bloc is to appear united, which is easier said than done. view comments First Published: July 23, 2025, 17:27 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
