$30,000 challenge: which crossover SUV is best for the price?
Every large automaker builds a subcompact crossover SUV competing for your dollar. In many ways, these SUVs have replaced hatchbacks, small wagons, and daily commuters simultaneously. While not many of these vehicles have serious off-road capability, most are quite good at driving through adverse conditions like snow.
This group of three directly competes with each other, offering high value and usable all-wheel drive (AWD) systems. They are all four-cylinder, naturally aspirated vehicles, and offer plenty of standard features for the money.For this comparison, the pricing is based on their online MSRP, with our goal being an approximate $30,000 price tag. All have standard Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, along with second-tier options that can push the price just over $30,000.
Remember that these are manufacturer suggested retail prices, and they depend on a variety of conditions including your location, dealership and incentives.
Often lauded for its competent AWD capability, safety and rugged image, the 2025 Subaru Crosstrek is a bit of a bargain when you include its Premium trim. You get an 11.6-inch STARLINK Multimedia touchscreen, as opposed to the tiny 7-inch screen in the base model, and the usual standard EyeSight driver-assist system.
This trim includes a 182 horsepower 2.5-liter horizontally-opposed four-cylinder engine paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT). The EPA estimates the fuel economy at 27 mpg city and 33 mpg highway. I recommend the "Premium" trim because it has the 2.5-liter engine, as opposed to the 2.0-liter engine in the "Base" model, which is a bit anemic and not that much more efficient.
I recommend Option Package 14 for $2,245, which includes the All-Weather Package, with heated seats, heated exterior mirrors, and a heated windshield wiper de-icer. It also gives you a power driver's seat, power moonroof and blind-spot detection with rear cross-traffic alert. With that package, your total MSRP will be approximately $31,000.
For the money, you will be hard pressed to find a more capable snow-country vehicle with this equipment. There's just enough grunt from the 2.5-liter to give the Crosstrek enough power to overcome the CVT, and Subaru's AWD and traction control systems work well on just about every surface. With 8.7-inches of ground clearance, mild-mannered commuting performance, and a maximum 54.7 cu. ft. cargo capacity, the Subaru Crosstrek is an excellent deal for an outstanding all-arounder.With a 191 horsepower 2.5-liter I4 bolted to a six-speed automatic transmission, the CX-30 is the athlete of the bunch, at least on tarmac. This powertrain has an EPA rating of 24 mpg city and 31 mpg highway.
Along with standard safety features like rear cross-traffic alert and blind spot monitoring, the "Select Sport" package gives you Alexa built-in, heated side mirrors, and dual-zone climate control.
If you opt for the "Preferred" trim, it will bump the total to about $31,000. For the extra cash, you get a power sliding-glass moonroof, a power driver's seat, and heated front seats. However, you still get the 8.8-inch screen, as the 10.25-inch screen is available on more expensive trims.
With 45.2 cubic feet of storage with the rear seats folded down, the Mazda CX-30 is by far the smallest of the bunch, and its 8-inches of ground clearance trails the Subaru, but it's on par for the rest of the competitors.
What makes the 2025 Mazda CX-30 compelling is its snappy performance and beautifully designed interior. The attention to detail and quality inside and out make it a class leader, and the overall driving feel is spot on.The HR-V comes with a 158 hp 2.0L four-cylinder engine mated to a standard CVT. The EPA has rated the HR-V at 25 mpg city and 30 mpg highway, which is all a bit less than the competition. Still, the HR-V makes up for it with a decent value, utility, and excellent commuting behavior.
I selected the "Sport" trim as it gives you heated cloth seats, heated mirrors, a 6-speaker, 180-watt audio system, nicer wheels, and an outstanding list of safety features. While the other competitors come standard with AWD, you can save some money and get an HR-V with front-wheel drive only.
The Honda HR-V holds the most cargo of the group, with a maximum cargo space of 55.1 cu. ft. and more usable space throughout. The Sport model has a slightly higher ground clearance than the other trims, at 7.3 inches.
The EX-L trim will net you more goodies, like a 9-inch touch screen rather than the standard 7-inch and an 8-speaker 180-watt sound system for approximately $32,000. The HR-V EX-L is a great little car for daily driving, but it falls a bit short of the overall capabilities of the Crosstrek and CX-30.No, these crossovers are not equal. They all have their positive points and their downsides, but the Mazda CX-30 and Subaru Crosstrek are the ones competing for first place.
I believe the Subaru will satisfy more consumers as it does many things well. Its off-road chops are the best of the bunch, it holds a lot, it's comfortable and affordable, and its economy is more than competitive. It looks adventurous, too.
On the other hand, for those who want to enjoy their daily drive and have some off-road capability, the Mazda CX-30 is hard to beat. It's a lot more engaging to drive and a nicer place to spend time in. I also think it looks pretty sleek, no?
The Honda will appeal to people who want something less flashy, with a lot of space. It's a very easy car to commute in, and the overall spaciousness makes it a nice place to get comfortable.
What do you think? Which of these would you pick for your driveway? Let us know in the comments below!
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who Needs an RV? Turn Your Car Into the Ultimate Budget Camping Rig
Who says you need an expensive RV or a fancy camper to hit the road? The team behind Operation Adventure proves that with a little creativity and less than $200, you can turn a regular car (in this case, a Subaru) into a surprisingly comfortable camping setup. It's all about working with what you have, using space wisely, and getting outside without breaking the bank. The key to a great car camping experience isn't money—it's smart planning. Operation Adventure highlights easy, affordable modifications that make a huge difference in comfort. Think foldable sleeping setups, clever storage solutions, and small changes that turn a car into a cozy retreat for the night. One of the biggest challenges of car camping is limited space, but that's where good design comes in. The video shows how organizing gear efficiently—using stackable containers, collapsible furniture, and multi-purpose tools—can create a surprisingly spacious setup. Every inch matters, and with the right approach, even compact cars can feel roomy. Forget hauling a trailer full of gear. Operation Adventure proves that simple camping is not only possible but incredibly rewarding. Traveling light means less hassle, quicker setup, and a more direct connection with nature. With just the essentials, you can explore more and worry less. The biggest takeaway? You don't need a fortune to enjoy the outdoors. Car camping is an accessible, budget-friendly way to experience adventure. Whether you're testing the waters before investing in a larger setup or just love the idea of keeping it simple, this approach proves that getting out there is easier than you think.
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
One Million Drivers Told To Avoid Gas Stations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Indiana residents are being advised to minimize visits to gas stations today as smoke from Canadian wildfires continues to worsen air quality across the state. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) has extended an Air Quality Action Day through Saturday; fine particulate levels are reaching unhealthy thresholds, particularly in northern, northeastern, and northwestern regions, as reported by WNDU, potentially affecting at least a million people. Newsweek contacted IDEM for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters EPA reports that Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are chemicals that easily evaporate into the air and are released from sources like petrol stations, vehicle exhaust, paints, and industrial processes. At gas stations, VOCs escape during refueling and contribute to air pollution even with vapor recovery systems in place. When VOCs react with nitrogen oxides (NOx) in sunlight, they form ground-level ozone—a major component of smog, the United States Environmental Protection Agency reports. EPA advises that this ozone can aggravate asthma, trigger respiratory symptoms, and harm people with existing heart or lung conditions. File photo: The price of gasoline is displayed on a pump at a gas station on March 6, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. File photo: The price of gasoline is displayed on a pump at a gas station on March 6, 2025 in Chicago, To Know The smoke originates from over 200 wildfires burning across Canada, as reported by the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center, with plumes stretching thousands of miles and affecting air quality throughout the U.S. Midwest. In some areas, air-quality indexes have reached levels deemed "very unhealthy," prompting widespread advisories. Reducing vehicle emissions can help mitigate ozone formation during such alerts. Residents are encouraged to limit driving, avoid refueling vehicles during daylight hours, and postpone the use of gasoline-powered equipment. To reduce pollution and protect public health, it is recommended to avoid gas stations during air-quality alerts or refueling in the evening, when ozone formation is less likely. As reported by Newsweek, at least two people have died and tens of thousands have been evacuated in Canada as a result of the blazes. WDNU reported that the following cities in Indiana will be most affected by the air quality: North Central Indiana: Including the cities of Elkhart, Goshen, Knox, Logansport, Plymouth, Peru, South Bend, Warsaw, Winamac, and all other cities within the area. Northeast Indiana: Including the cities of: Angola, Auburn, Decatur, Fort Wayne, Hartford, Huntington City, LaGrange, Marion, Portland, Wabash and all other cities within the area. Northwest Indiana: Including the cities of: Crown Point, Gary, Hammond, Kentland, LaPorte, Michigan City, Portage, Rensselaer, Valparaiso, and all other cities within the area. IDEM has issued some recommended actions that the public can take. These include: Walk, bike, carpool or use public transportation. Avoid using the drive-through and combine errands into one trip. Avoid refueling your vehicle or using gasoline-powered lawn equipment until after 7 p.m. Turn off your engine when idling for more than 30 seconds. Conserve energy by turning off lights or setting the air conditioner to 75 degrees Fahrenheit or above. A National Weather Service (NWS) air quality alert said that fine particulate levels are expected to be in the Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups range. Active children and adults, and people with respiratory disease, such as asthma, should limit prolonged outdoor exposure. What People Are Saying The American Lung Association warns that wildfire smoke poses significant health risks, especially for children, older adults, and individuals with respiratory conditions. They recommend staying indoors, using air purifiers, and keeping windows closed to reduce exposure. The American Lung Association stated on its website: "Areas throughout the Midwest, including parts of Indiana, will see their air quality impacted by smoke from wildfires burning in Canada this weekend. The smoke is prompting several communities to issue air-quality alerts. "It is unhealthy to breathe and can be especially harmful to sensitive groups, including children, older adults, and people with lung diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease." What Happens Next Residents are advised to monitor local air-quality reports and take necessary precautions to protect their health during this period of elevated pollution.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
In distracting times, rumble strips are saving lives — and money — on rural Maine roads
The honeymoon was almost over for Steven Lavrenz and Sandhya Madan. After sightseeing in Acadia National Park, the newlyweds from Michigan woke early and started a long drive back to Boston Logan International Airport on the gray morning of June 3, 2019. But they wouldn't get very far before their trip — and their lives — were nearly upended. Heading north on Route 102, Lavrenz noticed a red pickup truck on the other side of the thoroughfare veering toward his Subaru rental car. Growing up in Iowa, Lavrenz had always held his breath on these kinds of two-lane rural roads, keeping one eye on oncoming traffic to ensure passing cars stayed in their lane. So when the Nissan crossed the centerline, Lavrenz was quick to react, swerving away from the approaching vehicle. The maneuver may have saved his life: The truck crashed into the door just behind Lavrenz, totaling the car but leaving him physically unscathed. Madan and the truck's driver also escaped the incident without injury, which is fortunate after what transit experts call a 'lane-departure crash.' While representing just 30 percent of Maine's traffic collisions between 2010 and 2022, lane-departure crashes accounted for 73 percent of fatalities. These head-on and sideswipe collisions are especially deadly in Maine, where researchers say that extreme weather, an aging population and infrastructure and a preponderance of winding, two-lane rural roads contribute to the highest crash fatality rate of any state in New England. Though Lavrenz was physically unharmed, the crash rattled him for a different reason than most. As a transportation safety researcher, he'd spent years thinking about lane-departure crashes and trying to prevent them from happening. But it was the first time the Wayne State University professor had ever personally faced the life-or-death consequences of his profession. Lavrenz had once worked with the Federal Highway Administration to add rumble strips to rural roads. Transportation departments around the country have gradually installed these grooved lines to jolt drivers who are asleep or distracted, the most common causes of lane-departure crashes. The strips vibrate the vehicle when it passes over the centerline or into the shoulder. Yet there were no rumble strips on this stretch of Route 102 that could have stirred the distracted truck driver, Lavrenz observed after their destroyed Subaru sputtered to a stop next to a Maine Department of Transportation facility. The next morning, after they secured another rental car and caught their flight, he decided to tweet at the agency. 'Centerline rumble strips could've prevented this,' he wrote, linking to a dashcam video of his crash. Research from a bevy of states backed his assertion at the time. But a new study led by civil engineers at the University of Maine provides the most relevant data yet for the effectiveness — and cost-effectiveness — of centerline rumble strips on Maine's sprawling network of rural roads, many of which remain without these life-saving grooves. In a before-and-after analysis, the researchers found that installing centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane roads reduced head-on and opposite sideswipe collisions by anywhere from 28 to 48 percent. By limiting these dangerous crashes, the state saves not only lives but money, according to the authors, who estimated that 'the benefits of the rumble strip installations are at least 14 times the cost.' 'They're one of our most cost-effective safety countermeasures that we can deploy out there — and also one of the most effective,' said Bob Skehan, the director of MaineDOT's Office of Safety and Mobility. Jhan Kevin Gil-Marin, one of the study's co-authors, started working on the paper as a master's student in civil engineering at the University of Maine. With guidance from Ali Shirazi, who was then the principal investigator of the Maine Transport Lab based at the school, Gil-Marin used data from MaineDOT to compare crashes on similar roads with and without rumble strips. Unlike some past analyses in Maine and elsewhere, however, the study examined before-and-after crash data on roads specifically with centerline rumble strips. And it used these figures to model how many crashes would ensue if the grooves had never been installed on them, allowing the researchers to better determine the safety measure's true effectiveness. It also enabled them to perform a cost-benefit analysis, calculating this number based on MaineDOT's reported installation cost ($3,500 per mile, according to the study, though Skehan said it can now be higher) and the Federal Highway Administration's assigned costs for different types of crashes. Even using a very conservative service life for rumble strips of seven years, the study showed the strips pay for themselves and then some. 'I think rumble strips are a very good idea,' said Gil-Marin, who's now pursuing his PhD at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Before uprooting to Maine from Colombia to work with Shirazi, Gil-Marin had never seen rumble strips. On a quiet road, he guided his car over the grooves and felt the vibration for the first time. It wasn't long ago that many Mainers may have had the same experience. Getting ready to rumble When Per Gårder arrived in Maine in 1992, there were no rumble strips in the state. During the Swedish engineer's interview for a position at the University of Maine, however, he met John Alexander, a fellow engineer who'd taken a personal interest in the safety measure. A neighbor of Alexander's had died after driving off the interstate and hitting a tree. 'He started talking to me about installing rumble strips by driving a bulldozer down the highway and roughing up the shoulder so that people would wake up before they go off the road,' recalled Gårder, a professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering and co-author of the new study. Road safety was personal for Gårder, too. As a kid, he recalls one trip when his sleepy father ceded the wheel to his mother late at night. When Gårder woke up, they were in a ditch — his mother had dozed off. 'We didn't hurt ourselves, but that was probably the first time I started thinking there should be waking you up when you are drifting to sleep, and that it actually could happen to everybody,' Gårder said. After Gårder joined the faculty, he made shoulder rumble strips a focus of his research. There were few studying it at the time. In the U.S., 'singing shoulders' debuted on the Garden State Parkway in New Jersey during the 1950s, but they were rarely seen elsewhere for decades. MaineDOT and the Maine Turnpike Association didn't start installing rumble strips along the edges of Interstate 95 in Maine until 1994. In his early years at the school, Gårder photocopied and analyzed police reports of fatal crashes on Maine's interstates between 1989 and 1993, which revealed that nearly half of them involved drivers falling asleep. Yet, after the installation of hundreds of miles of continuous shoulder rumble strips along Maine's interstates, driver drowsiness was no longer as deadly; an analysis co-authored by Gårder in 2006 showed that the safety measure had reduced sleep-induced 'run-off-road' crashes by 58 percent. That same year, MaineDOT began installing rumble strips on the centerline of state roads. While the addition of the safety measure to the shoulders of interstates had helped prevent drivers from veering off the interstate, implementing rumble strips in the middle of rural thoroughfares could reduce the often lethal head-on collisions between cars in opposite lanes. 'When you have two vehicles traveling at 50 miles an hour that hit head on, essentially, it's the same as being in a 100 mile an hour crash and hitting a fixed object, like a tree, if you went off the side of the road,' Skehan said. 'So they're definitely our biggest risk from a safety perspective.' Initially, the agency targeted corridors with a speed limit of at least 45 miles per hour and a traffic volume of more than 8,000 vehicles per day to add rumble strips. The pilot produced excellent results: the new rumble strips on these roads cut head-on crashes in half and eliminated fatal collisions entirely during an initial period, Skehan recalled. That level of effectiveness wouldn't quite hold up over the long term. And as MaineDOT installed more rumble strips in areas where head-on crashes were common, there were still some deadly collisions even after the safety measure was implemented. But time after time, the little grooves significantly reduced crashes and fatalities. 'It's still, by far, our biggest lifesaver with regards to two-lane, rural, head-on collisions,' Skehan said. He pointed to a 20-mile stretch of Route 202 between Lewiston and Manchester where head-on and sideswipe collisions dropped precipitously in the three years after the installation of centerline rumble strips about a decade ago. 'It was pretty remarkable,' he said. Still, part of what made rumble strips so effective also disturbed more than a few neighbors when they were first installed on rural roads. 'There were some noise concerns,' Skehan said. After MaineDOT added rumble strips to Route 302 in Bridgton, neighbor Bill Muir compared their clamor to a tractor trailer 'going down a steep grade and shifting into low gear.' 'I know from personal experience that it could be heard inside our home quite clearly even with all windows closed,' Muir wrote to The Bridgton News in February of 2017. The next year, MaineDOT began exclusively using sinusoidal rumble strips, colloquially known as 'mumble strips.' When they're driven over, the quieter, shallower alternatives to rectangular rumble strips create slightly less sound inside the car but drastically decrease the noise outside of the vehicle, according to Skehan. 'That has pretty much eliminated all noise calls that I've received.' Looking down the road Rumble strips now line the edges of all interstate highways in Maine. But centerline grooves remain absent from most roads in rural areas, particularly in the northern part of the state. MaineDOT aims to add about 100 miles of rumble strips to state roads every year, according to Skehan. The agency prioritizes areas with high traffic and fresh pavement to maximize the service life of the grooves. MaineDOT allocated about $750,000 for these projects annually, per Skehan, with about 90 percent of this funding coming from the federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funding, and the remainder from the state. Route 102 doesn't have rumble strips yet. It's a candidate to receive them, according to Skehan, but the area where a truck crashed into Lavrenz and Madan's rental car is less of a priority than other corridors. The state also doesn't manage town and city roads that thread through communities. Bar Harbor police chief David Kerns doesn't see much of a need for rumble strips on these generally lower-speed roads. 'Really, those in-town streets are so narrow anyway, people tend to go center of the road more to get away from parked cars and open doors,' Kerns said. Still, he's noticed a rise in collisions he attributes to the distraction of cell phones and displays in cars. The town of Bar Harbor received a federal grant to make its streets safer after five fatal and 17 incapacitating crashes between 2019 and 2023. Additional signage and collapsible line delineators are among the interventions under consideration. At the same time, Kerns recognizes that technology can also be part of the solution. Some cars are now built with sensors to detect when the vehicle has left its lane. And though Gårder doesn't advocate checking your phone while driving, he stresses glancing at displays every once in a while to stave off sleep, which is still a common cause of crashes. 'Like in an airplane, pilots are supposed to have certain tasks every now and then,' he said. 'They are not supposed to be completely inactive.' For Lavrenz, it's simple: 'Human drivers are always going to make a mistake.' And instead of waiting for crashes like his to happen, transportation departments can address the problem proactively by deploying low-cost safety measures like rumble strips across many miles. 'Let's go out and try to treat a broad swath of these two-lane rural roads because we know that they're a major risk factor,' he said, 'and hopefully prevent a lot of these crashes from happening in the first place.'
