&w=3840&q=100)
Reddit post on layoff during pregnancy: Know your rights and legal remedies
The Redditor's story has struck a chord with working women, sparking conversations on legal protections around maternity leave and termination. Experts say Indian labour law is clear, employers cannot dismiss or disadvantage a woman because she is pregnant or on maternity leave. Here's what the law says, and the legal remedies available to women in
Can a woman employee be sacked during pregnancy?
'No, it is illegal,' says Tushar Kumar, advocate at the Supreme Court of India.
'Section 12 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 explicitly prohibits the dismissal or discharge of a woman during maternity leave. If such a termination occurs, it is deemed void ab initio, and carries both civil and criminal consequences,' Kumar said.
These protections apply to all private and government establishments with at least 10 employees. Additionally, constitutional provisions like Articles 15(3) and 42 bolster maternity safeguards as part of fundamental rights.
Samayra Adhlakha, advocate at Delhi High Court, adds, 'Maternity benefits have been elevated to a fundamental right under Article 21 by the Supreme Court. Any action against a pregnant employee for taking leave is unlawful.'
What legal action can a woman take?
'If an employee is terminated during pregnancy, she remains entitled to full maternity benefits,' says Abe Abraham, partner, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas.
'This includes salary, medical bonus, and job protection, unless the employer can prove gross misconduct,' he added
Kumar explains that women can approach:
-The Labour Commissioner or Inspector under the Act (who has quasi-judicial powers)
-Labour Court (if classified as a 'workman')
-Or file a civil suit (if in a managerial role).
-They may also explore redress through the National Commission for Women.
Alay Razvi, managing partner, Accord Juris, outlines remedies like:
-Reinstatement with backlog wages
-Compensation for wrongful termination
-Civil or writ petitions under Articles 14 and 15
-Criminal proceedings against the employer
Suspect pregnancy discrimination? Do this first
'If a woman feels her pregnancy was a reason for her layoff, she must act swiftly,' says Kumar.
'Keep written records, termination letter, emails, performance reviews, pregnancy-related communication. Send a formal grievance to HR invoking Section 12 of the Act,' he said.
Adhlakha suggests approaching the Regional Labour Commissioner first. 'The inspector's decision can be appealed before the Labour Court within 30 days.'
Razvi adds, 'Maintain all records and seek written responses. These will be key to proving discrimination, either directly or through timing and circumstantial evidence.'
While the Reddit post originated outside India, it has brought into sharp focus the universal vulnerability faced by women during pregnancy. In India, however, as these experts affirm, the law is firmly on the side of the expecting employee, provided she knows her rights and takes timely action.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
NGT takes suo motu cognisance of illegal quarrying behind ACTREC
Mumbai: The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on August 4, took suo motu cognisance of the alleged illegal quarrying behind the Tata Memorial Hospital's Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in Cancer (ACTREC) in Navi Mumbai. The NGT took up the matter at its own initiative following news reports, triggered by complaints from residents, activists and the hospital authorities. New Delhi, India - May 31, 2016: General View of National Green Tribunal in New Delhi , India, on Tuesday, May 31, 2016. (Photo by Arvind Yadav/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) The principal bench of the NGT in Delhi said that the quarrying matter suggests that it violated the Maharashtra Minor Mineral Rules, the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, and the Environment (Protection) Act. The NGT directed the Raigad collector, the state pollution control board, the Nagpur directorate of geology and mining, and the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) to respond to them in an affidavit within a week. The case was then forwarded to the Pune western bench and scheduled for hearing on September 17. The director of ACTREC, Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi, had written to chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on July 10 highlighting the health hazards of the quarry blasting on the northwestern hill adjacent to the hospital. In his letter, Chaturvedi said, 'The dust blankets the residential areas and infiltrates the sterile treatment zones within the hospital. This poses an acute threat to the immunocompromised patients undergoing life-saving treatment such as bone marrow transplant and proton therapy.' The letter added that the hospital's equipment was under constant risk of contamination due to airborne particulate matter. Founder of the NatConnect foundation, a not-for-profit company campaigning for the issues of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), BN Kumar, said, 'The quarrying work could also jeopardise the construction work for the Kharghar-Turbhe tunnel.' According to the aerial measurements, the quarrying stretch extends for more than half a kilometer along a stretch where dozens of trucks travel daily. Responding to a Right to Information query by Kumar in July, the NMMC and the Raigad collector confirmed that they had not given any permissions for the quarrying works at the eco-sensitive location. The convenor of the Kharghar Wetlands and Hills forum, Jyoti Nadkarni, raised concerns for the people who will be travelling through the tunnel. 'There cannot be a quarrying activity taking place close to a tunnel. The blasting is so loud that when people pass through it, one can feel the earth shaking,' said Nadkarni. She added that such stone work should not take place in the monsoon because it could destabilise the land and even cause landslides.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Lok Nayak Hospital ex-director booked by CBI for irregularities
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case against Dr Suresh Kumar, former medical director of Delhi government-run Lok Nayak Hospital (LNH), and others for alleged criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, and misconduct by a public servant, officials said on Monday. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables. (File photo) The FIR, filed on July 30, comes three years after a preliminary enquiry (PE) was initiated by the CBI in 2022 following reports of administrative lapses during Dr Kumar's tenure. According to officials, the PE has now led to the registration of a regular case (RC) after prima facie evidence was found. 'Prima facie offences under IPC Section 120-B read with Section 409 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act have been disclosed against Dr Suresh Kumar and other former staff,' the FIR stated. HT has accessed a copy of the document. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables, including macerators — machines used for hygienically disposing of human waste. The FIR alleges that only one firm was favoured repeatedly over an extended period, from the original contract period in 2017 until 2021, leading to 'undue benefits' to the firm and corresponding losses to the government. Eight macerators of 'inferior quality' were allegedly purchased at inflated prices, despite better-quality alternatives being available at lower costs. 'No fresh open tender was floated during the extended period,' the FIR adds, 'and extensions were granted to the same firm without justification -- from January 29, 2020, to July 13, 2021.' It also notes that the Covid-19 pandemic, often cited for emergency procurement, only began affecting India in mid-March 2020 -- two months after the original tender expired. The PE further flagged violations in medicine procurement norms. Under government policy, generic medicines -- which are more affordable and equally effective -- are to be prioritised over branded drugs. However, the FIR alleges that between April 7 and September 16, 2022, LNH procured medicines worth ₹32.23 crore from a local authorised chemist, of which ₹25.17 crore (approximately 80%) was spent on branded drugs, and only ₹7.05 crore on generic ones. 'This resulted in avoidable expenditure and reduced access to essential medicines for the public,' the FIR states. CBI officials said CCTV footage, procurement records, and other evidence are being examined to identify the officials involved in the decision-making process. So far, no arrest has been made in the case. Dr Kumar has not responded to messages and calls requesting comment on the matter till the time of going to print.


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Fake doc in ward: Nursing home's licence suspended
Kolkata: The West Bengal Clinical Establishment Regulatory Commission (WBCERC) has directed the health officials to suspend the licence of nursing home on Diamond Harbour Road after a person who was not a doctor attended to a pregnant woman, who ultimately suffered a miscarriage. A penal amount of Rs 1 lakh has also been imposed on the nursing home. According to the complaint lodged with the health panel, Alka Roy was taken to Bellona Nursing home in Mominpore with severe abdominal pain at night. At the emergency ward, she was attended to by Avinash Kumar, who introduced himself as a resident medical officer. Kumar prescribed a pain relieving injection and administered it to the expecting mother. She subsequently suffered complications and miscarriage. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "When we got a response from the nursing home, we were taken aback. This Avinash Kumar is not a doctor but an assistant to the medical director of the nursing home, who would check blood pressure of patients," said WBCERC chairperson Justice (retd) Ashim Banerjee. The commission also found that Kumar had prescribed the medicine on a signed letterhead of the medical director. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Historic Cars Every Enthusiast Should Know Undo The medical director said that at that time, he was conducting a procedure in the OT. The health panel said that while not going into whether the injection caused the miscarriage or not, Kumar posing as a doctor, and prescribing and administering an injection itself was a criminal offence. The commission also asked how the medical director could leave blank prescription letterheads bearing his signature which Kumar could access. "We have asked the police to take Kumar into custody and come to a logical conclusion," Banerjee added. Till health officials submit a complete report on the case to the commission, the nursing home has been barred from admitting any new patient. However, it can continue treatment of patients who are already admitted.