President returns West Bengal's Aparajita Bill, flags harsh rape penalties
Governor of West Bengal Dr CV Ananda Bose had reserved 'The Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024' for the consideration of the Hon'ble President of India. The Government of India has since conveyed its observations on certain amendments proposed to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 through this Bill, highly placed sources in Raj Bhavan informed.
'One of the proposed amendments seeks to enhance the punishment for rape under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023, raising it from the existing minimum of 10 years to life imprisonment for the remainder of one's life or death. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has termed this change as excessively harsh and disproportionate,' sources said.
Another proposed amendment seeks to delete Section 65 of the BNS, 2023.
'Thereby it is removing the distinction in punishment for rape of women under 16 and 12 years of age. The MHA has observed that the removal of such classification violates the principle of proportionality in sentencing,' sources revealed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
Delhi Assembly's maiden paperless session conducted 19-hour legislative deliberations: Speaker
New Delhi: Delhi Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta on Saturday said that the maiden paperless session of the House concluded after legislative deliberations which lasted 19 hours and 40 minutes and included passage of key Education and GST Bills. 'The Third session of Eighth Legislative Assembly concluded, total matters discussed in 19 hours and 40 minutes,' said Gupta while addressing the media. The session commenced on August 4 and was adjourned sine die on August 8 after five sittings, he said. Gupta stated that summons for the session were issued on July 28 and the sittings were held on August 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. He stated that the House conducted extensive deliberations on legislative, financial, and public welfare matters during this period. During this period, 171 Special Mention notices were received under Rule 280, of which 62 matters were raised on the floor of the House. Gupta said that these matters, covering a wide range of civic, administrative, and policy concerns, have been referred to the departments concerned with directions to furnish replies to the members within 30 days. He added that three significant legislations were passed during the session. These included The Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, introduced by Ashish Sood, Minister of Education, which was discussed over two days with participation from 24 members before being passed by voice vote. He informed that the Delhi Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and The Delhi Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Bill, 2025, both introduced by Chief Minister and Minister of Finance Rekha Gupta, were also passed by voice vote after due consideration. Gupta added that several important papers and reports were laid on the table of the House during the session. These included the Finance and Appropriation Accounts of GNCTD for 2023–24, the reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Finance and Appropriation Accounts, State Finances, and Welfare of Building and Other Construction Workers. He said reports from regulatory and educational bodies such as the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, Geospatial Delhi Ltd., Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University Delhi were also laid on the table. He informed that the CAG report on the welfare of construction workers was referred to the Public Accounts Committee for further examination. The Speaker informed that the House passed congratulatory motions under Rule 114 to honour astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla for his mission to the International Space Station and to mark the launch of the NISAR satellite on July 28. He said during the sittings congratulations were extended to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and the armed forces, security agencies, and intelligence agencies for the successful execution of Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev. He said that a total of 20 members participated in the related discussion, including Abhay Verma, Chief Whip, and the Chief Minister.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Revised New Income Tax Bill 2025: What are the changes suggested by Select Committee? Explained in 10 points
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman moved to withdraw the New Income Tax Bill, 2025, on Friday, after a Parliamentary Select Committee led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda suggested host of changes to the legislation. The revised New Income Tax Bill, 2025, will be introduced in the Parliament on August 11, sources said. The House approved the withdrawal of the Bill amid uproar by Opposition members. The 31-member Select Committee had made a number of recommendations and suggestions to the original Bill. 1. The report of the parliamentary panel on the New Income Tax Bill was presented in the Lok Sabha on July 21. In the report, the Select Committee suggested changes including tightening of definitions, removing ambiguities, and aligning the new law with existing frameworks. 2. After comprehensive deliberations, the Committee submitted 285 recommendations focused on simplifying the tax regime and making the Income Tax legislation simplified and lucid. 3. The Committee in its report identified several drafting corrections based on stakeholder suggestions, which they believe are essential for clarity and unambiguous interpretation of the new bill. 4. In total, the parliamentary panel has made a total of 566 suggestions/recommendations in its 4,584-page report. 5. One of the changes suggested by the Select Committee relates to income tax refund, which seeks to remove the provision that denies refund if ITR is filed past the due date. The earlier version of the Bill required a person seeking refunds to file ITR within the due date. 6. Another change suggested by the Select Committee is section 80M deduction, (under clause 148 of the new bill) for inter corporate dividends for companies that avail the benefit of special rate under section 115BAA. 7. The Committee also suggested to allow taxpayers to avail NIL TDS certificate in its report on the New Income Tax Bill. 8. The Income Tax Department however had clarified that no rates of taxes have been recommended to change, as opposed to news reports that suggested change in tax rates on LTCG for certain categories of taxpayers. 9. Other recommendations of the committee include aligning the definition of micro and small enterprises with the MSME Act. 10. The report also recommended amendments in the bill for clarity on advance ruling fees, TDS on provident funds, low-tax certificates, and penalty powers.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Sharad Pawar claims offer of 160 Assembly seats before Maharashtra polls, says he and Rahul Gandhi declined it
Nationalist Congress Party (SP) chief Sharad Pawar Saturday said two people had approached him ahead of the Maharashtra Assembly elections, claiming they could guarantee 160 out of 288 seats. Speaking to reporters in Nagpur, Pawar said he facilitated a meeting between these people and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, but the two leaders ultimately dismissed the offer, stating, 'This is not our way'. 'We did not give it the attention it perhaps required. But I still remember — before the Assembly elections were announced, two people came to meet me in Delhi. They told me that Maharashtra has 288 Assembly seats, and out of those, they would guarantee us 160 seats. I was surprised. To be clear, even though they claimed such a guarantee, I had no doubts about the Election Commission. But such people do show up, so I ignored them.' 'I arranged their meeting with Rahul Gandhi. They told him whatever they wanted to. However, both Rahul Gandhi and I felt that we should not pay attention to such things. This is not our path. We decided we would go before the people and find ways to earn their support,' Pawar told reporters in Nagpur. Pawar lauded Rahul Gandhi's recent presentation on alleged polling irregularities and criticised the Election Commission of India (ECI) for seeking a separate affidavit from him. 'The Election Commission is an independent body. Rahul Gandhi said he has already taken an oath in Parliament, so there is no need for a separate affidavit. If the Election Commission still insists on such a thing, that is not right. Rahul Gandhi's allegations need to be probed in depth. The truth must come out. My only point is that the objection was regarding the Election Commission. Then why do BJP leaders or the chief minister need to respond? We want an answer from the Election Commission, not from the BJP,' said Pawar. Referring to the recent INDIA bloc meeting in Delhi, Pawar dismissed speculation over Uddhav Thackeray's seating position, comparing it humorously to movie-goers avoiding the front row. 'First, I must say I have been seeing since yesterday that there is politics over where Uddhav Thackeray was seated in Delhi. When you watch a presentation, you don't sit in the first row just as when you go to watch a movie, you don't sit in the first row, you sit further back. Similarly, I, too, was seated at the back. The point is, you don't sit close to the screen; you keep some distance. Unfortunately, politics is being done over where Uddhav Thackeray was seated,' he said. Hours after Pawar's comments, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said the Opposition has a habit of lying and running away. 'Although Rahul Gandhi has often raised doubts about the EVM machines, Sharad Pawar has never said so. In fact, Sharad Pawar has often taken a clear stand that it is wrong to blame the EVMs. However, now, after Rahul Gandhi's meeting, Sharad Pawar has suddenly started talking about changes in the voting process. This is the result of Rahul Gandhi's meeting,' said Fadnavis. 'No matter how much confusion the Opposition creates, elections are not held anywhere as transparent and free as in India. Those who accuse EVMs and the Election Commission speak in public. But they are not ready to give an affidavit. They say that we have taken an oath in Parliament. But is the oath in Parliament valid in the Supreme Court and the high court? They know that if they are caught lying, criminal action can be taken against them tomorrow. Therefore, these are cowardly people who lie and run away every day,' criticised Fadnavis.
