Trump trade whiplash sends investors abroad
Why it matters: President Trump's flip-flop on trade with Canada last Friday is the type of policy volatility foundational to the Sell America trade, which is still driving gains in markets outside of the U.S
Strategists see more room to run in the shift to international stocks.
By the numbers: Take a look at the performance of some foreign indices year to date.
The German DAX is up 20%. The Chinese Hang Seng Index is up 24%.
Even Canadian stocks are mildly outpacing U.S. gains, up nearly 7% this year compared to the 5% gain in the S&P 500.
What they're saying: A rotation out of the U.S. into the rest of the world, particularly to Europe and individual countries offering stimulative economic policies, is the consensus for the second half of this year.
"The U.S. itself no longer the safe haven that it was in the past 20 years," says Jay Pelosky of TPW Advisors.
It's not just that the U.S. is fading. The "aggressive fiscal stimulus" adopted by the rest of the world is set to drive further earnings growth elsewhere, he says.
Yes, but: Thanks to big tech, most banks have maintained an overweight rating on both U.S. and European stocks through year end.
About half of the gains in the S&P are driven by large-cap tech names.
You don't have to believe in the entire U.S. to own the S&P. You may just have to believe in the tech trade. That trade is expected to be buoyed by continued earnings growth, cushioned by declines in the U.S. dollar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. FACTORY PURCHASES SLOWED SHARPLY IN JULY, DRIVING GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN SLOWDOWN: GEP GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN VOLATILITY INDEX
U.S. manufacturers slash purchases after front-loading inventories during the 'tariff pause' Asia factories slow, driven by Japan, South Korea and Taiwan manufacturers Europe's fragile recovery stalled in July as German growth weakened ahead of tariff agreements CLARK, N.J., Aug. 13, 2025 /CNW/ -- Global supply chain activity fell in July as U.S. manufacturers sharply tapered purchases of materials and components after building inventories in June ahead of the end of the 'tariff pause,' according to the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index, a leading indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses. The index dropped to -0.35 from -0.17 in June, signaling increased spare capacity worldwide. The U.S. was the main driver, with North America's index falling to -0.33 from -0.06. The reversal follows a surge in June when U.S. factories front-loaded orders to beat anticipated tariff changes. In July, U.S. manufacturers sharply tapered purchases of inputs — materials, components and commodities — signaling expectations of slowing demand going forward. "When we remove companies' front-loading inventories and rerouting goods to avoid tariffs, the underlying picture points to slowing manufacturing demand worldwide," said John Piatek, vice president, consulting, GEP. "The July data shows a clear pullback in orders, with U.S. manufacturers preparing for lower demand going forward." REGIONAL KEY FINDINGS Asian factory purchasing activity remains slightly below trend due to growing weakness in Japan and South Korea. Data was mostly collected prior to these two countries striking double-digit tariff agreements with the U.S. Taiwanese factories also saw an accelerated downturn, weighing on the broader region. Notably, after declining in the two previous months, China's factory buying volumes rose in July. Europe industrial recovery slipped: Its index dropped to -0.30 from 0.01. Germany's rebound slowed, highlighting the fragile nature of the continent's industrial recovery. U.K.: Index declined to -0.58, from -0.41, signaling that the U.K.'s supply chains continue to experience an elevated level of spare capacity. Interpreting the data:Index > 0, supply chain capacity is being stretched. The further above 0, the more stretched supply chains < 0, supply chain capacity is being underutilized. The further below 0, the more underutilized supply chains are. CATEGORY KEY FINDINGS INVENTORIES: Safety stockpiling eased, indicating limited concern over supply bottlenecks or price surges. LABOR & TRANSPORTATION: Staffing capacity and transportation costs were stable, with no signs of inflationary pressure from these sources. For more information, visit Note: Full historical data dating back to January 2005 is available for subscription. Please contact economics@ The next release of the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index will be 8 a.m. ET, Sep. 11, 2025. About the GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index The GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index is produced by S&P Global and GEP. It is derived from S&P Global's PMI® surveys, sent to companies in over 40 countries, totaling around 27,000 companies. The headline figure is a weighted sum of six sub-indices derived from PMI data, PMI Comments Trackers and PMI Commodity Price & Supply Indicators compiled by S&P Global. A value above 0 indicates that supply chain capacity is being stretched and supply chain volatility is increasing. The further above 0, the greater the extent to which capacity is being stretched. A value below 0 indicates that supply chain capacity is being underutilized, reducing supply chain volatility. The further below 0, the greater the extent to which capacity is being underutilized. A Supply Chain Volatility Index is also published at a regional level for Europe, Asia, North America and the U.K. For more information about the methodology, click here. About GEP GEP® delivers AI-powered procurement and supply chain solutions that help global enterprises become more agile and resilient, operate more efficiently and effectively, gain competitive advantage, boost profitability and increase shareholder value. Fresh thinking, innovative products, unrivaled domain expertise, smart, passionate people — this is how GEP SOFTWARE™, GEP STRATEGY™ and GEP MANAGED SERVICES™ together deliver procurement and supply chain solutions of unprecedented scale, power and effectiveness. Our customers are the world's best companies, including more than 1,000 Fortune 500 and Global 2000 industry leaders who rely on GEP to meet ambitious strategic, financial and operational goals. A leader in multiple Gartner Magic Quadrants, GEP's cloud-native software and digital business platforms consistently win awards and recognition from industry analysts, research firms and media outlets, including Gartner, Forrester, IDC, ISG, and Spend Matters. GEP is also regularly ranked a top procurement and supply chain consulting and strategy firm, and a leading managed services provider by ALM, Everest Group, NelsonHall, IDC, ISG and HFS, among others. Headquartered in Clark, New Jersey, GEP has offices and operations centers across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. To learn more, visit About S&P Global S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) S&P Global provides essential intelligence. We enable governments, businesses and individuals with the right data, expertise and connected technology so that they can make decisions with conviction. From helping our customers assess new investments to guiding them through ESG and energy transition across supply chains, we unlock new opportunities, solve challenges and accelerate progress for the world. We are widely sought after by many of the world's leading organizations to provide credit ratings, benchmarks, analytics and workflow solutions in the global capital, commodity and automotive markets. With every one of our offerings, we help the world's leading organizations plan for tomorrow, today. Media Contacts Derek Creevey Joe Hayes S&P Global Market Intelligence Director, Public Relations Principal Economist Corporate Communications GEP S&P Global Market Intelligence Email: Phone: +1 646-276-4579 Phone: +44-1344-328-099Email: Email: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE GEP View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
How Big Tech is paying its way out of Trump's tariffs
Top tech executives are at the forefront of a recent swathe of unprecedented deals with U.S. President Donald Trump. In just the last few days, the White House confirmed that two U.S. chipmakers, Nvidia and AMD, would be allowed to sell advanced chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving a 15% cut of their revenues in the Asian country. Apple CEO Tim Cook, meanwhile, recently announced plans to increase the firm's U.S. investment commitment to $600 billion over the next four years. The move was widely seen as a bid to get the tech giant out of Trump's crosshairs on tariffs — and appears to have worked for now. Altogether, analysts say the deals show just how important it is for the world's largest companies to find some tariff relief. "The flurry of deal-making is an effort to secure lighter treatment from tariffs," Paolo Pescatore, technology analyst at PP Foresight, told CNBC by email. "In some shape or form, all of the big tech companies have been negatively impacted by tariffs. They can ill afford to fork out on millions of dollars in additional fees that will further dent profits as underlined by recent quarterly earnings," Pescatore said. While the devil will be in the detail of these agreements, Pescatore said that Apple leading the way with its accelerated U.S. investment will likely trigger "a domino effect" within the industry. Apple, for its part, has long been regarded as one of the Big Tech firms most vulnerable to simmering trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Earlier this month, Trump announced plans to impose a 100% tariff on imports of semiconductors and chips, albeit with an exemption for firms that are "building in the United States." Apple, which relies on hundreds of different chips for its devices and incurred $800 million in tariff costs in the June quarter, is among the firms exempt from the proposed tariffs. The Nvidia and AMD deal with the Trump administration has meanwhile sparked intense debate over the potential impact on the chip giants' businesses and whether the U.S. government may seek out similar agreements with other firms. Some strategists described the arrangement as a "shakedown," while others suggested it may even be unconstitutional and comparing it to a tax on exports. White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that the legality and mechanics of the 15% export tax on Nvidia and AMD were "still being ironed out." She also hinted deals of this kind could expand to other companies in future. Ray Wang, founder and chairman of Constellation Research, described the Nvidia and AMD deal to pay 15% of China chip sales revenues to the U.S. government as "bizarre." Speaking to CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Monday, Wang said what is "really weird" is there is still some uncertainty over whether these chips represent a national security issue. "If the answer is no, fine OK. The government is taking a cut out of it," Wang said. "Both Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Lisa Su at AMD both decided that OK, we've got a way to get our chips into China and maybe there is something good coming out of it." While investors initially welcomed the deal as broadly positive for both Nvidia and AMD, which once more secure access to the Chinese market, Wang said some in the industry will nevertheless be concerned. "As an investor, you're worried because then, is this an arbitrary decision by the government? Does every president get to play kingmaker in terms of these deals?" Wang said. "So, I think that's really what the concern is, and we still have additional tariffs and trade deals to come from the China negotiations," he added. Looking ahead, Dan Niles, founder and portfolio manager at Niles Investment Management, said the question for investors is whether the Trump administration's "hands-on" approach is positive or negative for U.S. companies. "I think for each company, it is very different. So, it certainly it is something I take into account. The bigger thing for me is do you have some stability of policy? Do you have a policy one week and then it flips the next?" Niles told CNBC's "Closing Bell: Overtime" on Monday. "Right now, that is what concerns me a little bit more."
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Legacy Stock Is Back, Poised for a Major Rebound
Key Points The company is embracing its "Tar-zhay" positioning to focus on superior shopping experiences over rock-bottom prices. Target maintains industry-leading profit margins despite recent revenue challenges. The stock's 4.4% dividend yield is near historic highs and far above other retailer stocks. 10 stocks we like better than Target › Retail stocks have been through a few tough years. The SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEMKT: XRT) posted a total return of 12% over the last year, far behind the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) index's 19%. Stretching the view to a four-year span is even worse. The S&P 500 saw a 44% total return in this period, as of Aug. 11, while the leading exchange-traded fund (ETF) of retailer stocks saw a negative-10% return. Big-box retail veteran and dividend king Target (NYSE: TGT) has lagged behind the broader market and the retail sector in these periods. It's not a close race, and the four-year overview is kind of scary: But I think Target is poised for a robust rebound, starting from this low point. The company is getting back to the brand experience people used to love, under the mock-French "Tar-zhay" banner. Target shouldn't try to out-bargain the low-cost kings Target's management has figured out that the company can't compete with archrivals Walmart (NYSE: WMT) and Costco (NASDAQ: COST) on price alone. That strategy has been tried and abandoned, as the penny-pinching marketing message fell flat. As a result, Target's sales have been swooning since 2022 while Costco and Walmart experienced revenue growth of more than 16%. It's not a complete disaster for Target, though. Balancing out the slower sales, Target's profit margins are among the best in the business. Walmart's and Costco's focus on affordable goods leaves them with slim margins across the board. Target's customers are prepared to pay a little more for a better shopping experience. Target's strong margins are not new, but I'd like to point out that they have stayed in the lead despite the recent revenue challenges. The fancy French twist has deep roots The playful Tar-zhay moniker is also a pretty old idea. I mean that both as a cultural phenomenon and a business strategy. Target embraced the glitzy twist on its name in 2017, along with a new set of store-brand names for different product types. The commitment didn't really stick, as Target never really built its marketing around the Frenchified name itself, but the idea has been explored before. And long before that, I found a lot of people in the upper-crust parts of Miami and Jacksonville using the French-flavored Target name unironically. This was in the late 1990s. So Tar-zhay is a well-known little twist on the Target brand, reflecting a common view of its stores as a nicer place to shop. You don't go to Tar-zhay when you want the lowest price on bananas, jeans, and cat food. That's what Costco and Walmart are for. Here, you're supposed to enjoy the shopping experience in wider aisles with better lighting and maintenance. Human assistance should be easy to find. And the store brands exude a certain je ne sais quoi that even Costco's Kirkland can't always match. Premium Tar-zhay shares at a discount -- where do I sign up? In that sense, the renewed Tar-zhay strategy takes Target back to a proven success story. I mean, it's not a top-shelf luxury store like RH (NYSE: RH) or the Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) store. But it's also a significant step above Walmart's extreme bargain hunt or Costco's overcrowded warehouses. Target's leadership has rediscovered this longtime business advantage, and is busy rebuilding that modestly high-end reputation in 2025. Meanwhile, Target's stock is on fire sale. After years of underperforming the stock market and retail sector, Target shares carry the bargain-bin valuation of 11.4 times earnings and 0.45 times sales. The stock could double or even triple in price and still look affordable next to Walmart or Costco. And if you buy Target shares right now, you're locking in a generous 4.4% dividend yield -- miles ahead of Walmart's 0.9% and Costco's 0.5%, and near the highest yields in Target's dividend-paying history. Turnaround stories don't always have happy endings, but this one is off to a good start. I like the smart-yet-whimsical Tar-zhay focus and this company already runs a profitable business. All Target has to do is inspire people to revisit its stores. I think that's a very achievable goal, making Tar-zhay stock a promising investment these days. Should you buy stock in Target right now? Before you buy stock in Target, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Target wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Anders Bylund has positions in Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Costco Wholesale, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends RH. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Legacy Stock Is Back, Poised for a Major Rebound was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
