logo
US willfully ceding the energy innovation race to China

US willfully ceding the energy innovation race to China

AllAfrica5 days ago
During the Cold War, the US and Soviet Union were locked in a desperate race to develop cutting‑edge technologies like long-range missiles and satellites. Fast forward to today and the frontiers of global technology have pivoted to AI and next‑generation energy.
In one domain, AI, the US has far outpaced any other nation – though China looks to be closing the gap. In the other, energy, it has just tied its shoelaces together. The reason isn't technology, economics or, despite the government's official line, even national security. Rather, it is politics.
Since returning to the White House in January, Donald Trump has handed out huge wins to the coal and oil and gas industries. This is no great surprise. Trump has long been supportive of the US fossil fuel industry and, since his reelection, has appointed several former industry lobbyists to top political positions.
According to the Trump administration, national security requires gutting support for renewable energy while performing political CPR on the dying coal industry.
The reality is that, since 2019, the US has produced more oil, gas and coal annually than Americans want to use, with the rest exported and sold overseas. It is currently one of the most prolific exporters of fossil fuels in the world.
In short, the US does not have an energy security problem. It does, however, have an energy cost problem combined with a growing climate change crisis. These issues will only be made worse by Trump's enthusiasm for fossil fuels.
Over the past six months, the Trump administration has upended half a decade of green industrial policy. It has clawed back billions of US dollars in tax credits and grants that were supercharging American energy innovation.
Meanwhile, China has roared forward. Beijing has doubled down on wind, solar and next‑generation batteries, installing more wind and solar power in 2024 than the rest of the world combined. To China's delight, the US has simply stopped competing to be the world's clean energy powerhouse.
Roughly one-in-five lithium‑ion batteries, a key component in clean energy products, are made in China. Many of the newest high‑tech batteries are also being developed and patented there. While Trump repeats the tired mantra of 'drill, baby, drill', China is building factories, cornering the market for critical minerals such as lithium and nickel, and locking in export partners.
At the same time, household energy spending in the US is expected to increase by $170 each year between now and 2035 as a result of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The bill, which includes sweeping changes to taxes, social security and more, will raise energy costs mainly because it strips away support for cheap and abundant renewables like wind and solar.
Household energy costs could go up even more as Trump threatens to make large‑scale clean energy development much more onerous by putting up bureaucratic hurdles. The administration recently issued a directive requiring the Secretary of the Interior to approve even routine activities for wind and solar projects connected to federal lands.
Meanwhile, climate change is hitting American communities harder with each passing year. As recent flooding in Texas and urban fires in California and Hawaii have shown, fewer Americans still have the luxury of ignoring climate change.
As the cost of these disasters mount – $183 billion in 2024 – the grifting of the oil and gas industry will become an increasingly bitter pill for the nation to swallow.
China, with its authoritarian government, is less susceptible to the petroleum-obsessed dogma fueling the Republican party. It does not have prominent leaders like US politician Marjorie Taylor Greene, who previously warned that Democrats are trying to 'emasculate the way we drive' by advocating for electric vehicles. Rather, China's leaders are seeing green – not in the environmental sense, but in a monetary one.
It is generally cheaper nowadays to build and operate renewable energy facilities than gas or coal power stations. According to a June 2025 report by Lazard, an asset management company, electricity from new large-scale solar farms costs up to $78 per megawatt hour – and often much less. The same electricity from a newly built natural gas plants, by comparison, can cost as much as $107 per megawatt hour.
Across the world, utilities are embracing clean energy, choosing lower costs for their customers while reducing pollution. China saw the writing on the wall decades ago, and its early investments are bearing a rich harvest. It now produces more than half of the world's electric vehicles and the vast majority of its solar panels.
The US can still compete at the leading edge of the energy sector. American companies are developing innovative new approaches to geothermal, battery recycling and many other energy technologies.
But in the battle to become the world's 21st-century energy manufacturing powerhouse, the US seems to have walked off the playing field. In Trump's telling, the US may have simply exited one race and reentered another. But the fossil fuel industry – financially, environmentally and ethically – is obviously a dead end.
Stephen Lezak is program manager at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon
Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon

AllAfrica

time2 minutes ago

  • AllAfrica

Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon

The big news is that US President Donald Trump has pronounced the Special Envoy Steven Witkoff's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as very productive. He has further announced he will meet with Putin face-to-face as soon as next week. He spoke to Putin by telephone today (August 6). Trump also says that he intends to follow up on his meeting with Putin with a three-way meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. We have no official word from Russia, but the Trump announcement is in line with predictions coming from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that there will be 'big surprises.' We have no readout from either side on the terms discussed between the parties, only that there were two subjects: Ukraine and US-Russia strategic cooperation. It may be that the Russians are uncertain about how much political or strategic support they can expect from China, suggesting maybe the Chinese leadership is in flux. Likewise, we also know, at least in part, that preliminary talks took place between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Lavrov and between Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, acting as a mediator with Trump, and Putin. The Russians have promised a readout of the conversation, although I am not sure it will be enlightening. Certainly, this is a very big development, but it carries plenty of risk for all sides, especially for Trump. The US president will need to control Zelensky, a difficult task because Zelensky has nowhere to go, as he cannot easily make significant concessions. Washington allegedly wants to get rid of him because he is an obstacle to a deal, so we can't rule out a melodrama involving Zelensky's status. Meanwhile, Trump slapped India with a 50% tariff, in part because of its purchases of sanctioned Russian oil. This is a mistake because India will have to fight back and the US will find itself in a position of strengthening the military alignment between India and Russia. Ideologically, it is also counterproductive, as India is a strong democratic country and the US is treating it as a pariah. India will likely quickly make a deal to buy Russia's new Su-57 fighter jets instead of the F-35, something that has been trending anyway. There are other potential 'disrupters.' One potential is the UK. I doubt the UK and French, along with Estonia and some others (maybe not the Germans) will be enthusiastic in supporting a brokered deal on Ukraine. The Russians report the UK is planning a so-called shadow-fleet incident (probably in the Baltic or Sea of Finland) that will trigger a UK and potential NATO response, forcing the US to support a hard anti-Russian position. So some sort of provocation can't be ruled out, notwithstanding whether the Russians have real intelligence on UK planning, or if they are faking it. The 'shadow fleet' are ships carrying Russian oil that are not insured by the London exchange. However, other insurance instruments are available in the maritime trade, so the terminology is intended to characterize these ships in a pejorative manner and does not describe the status of these tankers. Meanwhile, the Estonians and Finns have attempted to thwart the transit of these tankers and have tried to pull them into port for 'inspections.' The Russian Navy is now escorting them, putting a stop to these provocations. More yet may happen. There are many other wild cards, including moves that Ukraine may make. The last time there was a ceasefire that stopped flights of aircraft and drones, the Ukrainians kept up attacks anyway on Russian territory. There are plenty of other possibilities. Even so, it looks like the diplomatic track may, at last, be leading to concrete results in ending the conflict in Ukraine. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.

How this red cap saved US-South Korea trade deal
How this red cap saved US-South Korea trade deal

South China Morning Post

time32 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

How this red cap saved US-South Korea trade deal

A red golf cap embroidered with the slogan 'Make America Shipbuilding Great Again' (Masga) has emerged as an unlikely symbol of progress in recent US South Korea tariff negotiations. Advertisement Behind the scenes, the urgent production of the hat by a small Seoul-based manufacturer shows how symbolism and speed converged in diplomacy. The order came suddenly. 'The US and South Korean flags must be stitched side by side above the Masga slogan on the front of the cap,' a Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy official told the Seoul-based hat maker, Moja Factory, located in Dongdaemun district. The design was intended not just as merchandise, but as a key visual aid in high-level talks. The hat was designed to echo Donald Trump's iconic red Maga cap. Photo: Moja Factory The Masga slogan, created by the ministry staff as part of a strategic policy proposal for bilateral shipbuilding cooperation, had helped break a stalemate in tariff talks.

I won't have 'humiliating' talks with Trump, says Lula
I won't have 'humiliating' talks with Trump, says Lula

RTHK

time2 hours ago

  • RTHK

I won't have 'humiliating' talks with Trump, says Lula

I won't have 'humiliating' talks with Trump, says Lula The Brazilian president says he plans to call the leaders of China and India to discuss a joint Brics response Donald Trump's tariffs. Photo: Reuters As US tariffs on Brazilian goods jumped to 50 percent on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters in an interview that he saw no room for direct talks now with US President Donald Trump that would likely be a "humiliation." Brazil is not about to announce reciprocal tariffs, he said. Nor will his government give up on cabinet-level talks. But Lula himself is in no rush to ring the White House. "The day my intuition says Trump is ready to talk, I won't hesitate to call him," Lula said in an interview from his presidential residence in Brasilia. "But today my intuition says he doesn't want to talk. And I won't humiliate myself." Despite Brazil's exports facing one of the highest tariffs imposed by Trump, the new US trade barriers look unlikely to derail Latin America's largest economy, giving Lula more room to stand his ground against Trump than most Western leaders. Lula described US-Brazil relations at a 200-year nadir after Trump tied the new tariff to his demands for an end to the prosecution of right-wing former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is standing trial for plotting to overturn the 2022 election. The president said Brazil's Supreme Court, which is hearing the case against Bolsonaro, "does not care what Trump says and it should not," adding that Bolsonaro should face another trial for provoking Trump's intervention, calling the right-wing former president a "traitor to the homeland." He also said he was planning to call leaders from the Brics group of developing nations, starting with India and China, to discuss the possibility of a joint response to US tariffs. "There is no coordination among the Brics yet, but there will be," Lula said. "What is the negotiating power of one little country with the United States? None." Separately, he said Brazil was looking at lodging a collective complaint with other countries at the World Trade Organization. "I was born negotiating," said Lula, who was raised in poverty and rose through union ranks to serve two terms as president from 2003 to 2010, then re-entered politics in the 2022 election to defeat the incumbent Bolsonaro. But he said he was in no rush to strike a deal or retaliate against US tariffs: "We need to be very cautious," he said. (Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store