Legal proceedings initiated over cancelled social housing
Mr Browne said legal documents were received by the department on Friday in relation to legal proceedings over the Social Housing Public Private Partnership (PPP) Bundle 3 project.
The project involved the delivery of around 486 social homes across six sites in Dublin, Wicklow, Kildare and Sligo.
However, the Department of Housing decided not to proceed with the homes due to value for money concerns.
Social Democrats TD Rory Hearne raised the issue at the Oireachtas Committee on Housing this afternoon, asking the minister if he was aware that legal proceedings had been initiated by the preferred bidder for the project.
Mr Browne initially said he was not personally aware of any legal proceedings against his department.
However, he later said department officials had made inquiries and clarified that legal proceedings had indeed been initiated.
"My department was notified of it. I wasn't aware of that, but I can confirm that legal documents were received by my department in relation to the judicial review proceedings in relation to the PPP project.
"If I was aware of it, I wouldn't have made some of my comments earlier, because with legal proceedings hadn't commenced, it was not appropriate for me to make any comment in relation to matters under legal proceedings.
"But perhaps, just like my legal background and my commentary might indicate, I actually was not aware of it," Mr Browne told the committee.
Earlier, Mr Hearne told reporters that the legal threat could result in High Court action and had the potential to further delay related projects.
He said: "I was speaking to Dublin City Council officials yesterday, you will remember we've been raising concerns about the collapse of the PPP projects which are in a number of constituencies from Wicklow to Sligo to Dublin.
"We found out yesterday that it is our understanding that the preferred bidder in the PPP is taking the Department of Housing to the High Court to challenge these projects.
"Now, what that is likely to mean, we understand from the meeting, is that these projects are unlikely to proceed in other avenues being tendered even though they have planning permission.
"This is an absolute mess.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Palestine Action's UK high court challenge can go ahead, judge rules
Palestine Action's co-founder has won a bid to bring a UK high court challenge over the group's ban as a terror organisation. Huda Ammori made a bid to challenge British home secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring the High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an 'unlawful interference' with freedom of expression. And in a decision on Wednesday, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said that two parts of the arguments on Ms Ammori's behalf were 'reasonably arguable'. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, previously told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK 'an international outlier' and was 'repugnant'. Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' The Home Office is defending the legal action. James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was 'squarely' within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription. He said: 'There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.' Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7m (€8.1m)) of damage, was 'disgraceful'.
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Court of Appeal rules in State's favour over rights of International Protection applicants
The Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of the State after it challenged a High Court ruling regarding the rights of International Protection applicants to have their basic needs, including accommodation, met by the State. The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) used its legal power under the 2014 Act - under which it was established - to commence a judicial review in respect of International Protection applicants who were not offered accommodation when they made their asylum claim. A year ago, the High Court ruled that the men had their right to human dignity breached by the State, through its failure to provide for their basic needs and it found that the Charter of Fundamental Rights under European law had been breached. The State appealed the decision on a number of grounds, including the interpretation and/or the application of the 2014 Act by IHREC; the standard and the burden of proof that the High Court applied; and failure regarding relevant considerations, such as the additional needs payment made available which amounts to €113.80 per week. In his judgement published this morning, Mr Justice Anthony M. Collins acknowledged the commission's "express statutory entitlement" to commence proceedings for the purpose of obtaining relief in respect of any matter concerning the human rights of any person or class of persons. The court found that the evidence provided by IHREC from a small sample of homeless IP applicants was insufficient to prove that those conditions of extreme material poverty undermined the physical and mental health of the 2,800 IP applicants who were subject to the case, to the degree that it breached their right to human dignity.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
OPW spent €17,000 on consultants for committee hearings, more than any other State body
The Office of Public Works ( OPW ) spent more on external consultant advice preparing for Oireachtas committee hearings last year than any other State body or government department has since 2021, according to new data. The total spend of €17,211 came as the OPW faced rolling controversies over the €336,000 Dáil bike shed, the €1.4 million security hut at the Department of Finance and a €490,000 bill for rebuilding a wall outside the Workplace Relations Commission . Figures released to Social Democrats TD Aidan Farrelly show that in total, public bodies spent €155,532 to outside firms helping to prepare them for visits to Oireachtas committees between 2021 and earlier this month – with a handful of consultancies getting the lion's share of the spending. The OPW outlay was the highest single-year spend by any body covered by the data released. It was split between two communications specialist firms – €3,731 for RGH Consultancy and €13,480 for Gibney Communications. RGH Consultancy is led by Gerard Howlin, who is an Irish Times contributor. READ MORE Mr Farrelly said he was not surprised to see the OPW top of the list given the controversies it has faced. He criticised the use of outside consultants, saying: 'The witnesses are all seasoned officials and should be well able to respond openly to elected representatives without third-party interventions.' The OPW faced four committee hearings in 2024 – three of which occurred after the cost of the bike shed emerged in September. The OPW said in a statement that it has a wide remit and an annual budget of €700 million, dealing with a large volume of projects across flood-relief management, heritage and managing 2,500 State properties. It said staff appearing at committees 'are expected to succinctly address a wide range of topics, including all information relating to the OPW's expenditure, as well as detailed accounts of the significant variety of projects under its remit'. The OPW said the spend was on 'communication support' for staff appearing before committees rather than assisting with further queries or correspondence. The next highest annual cost for external advice was for the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER), which purchased general training from PR firm The Communications Clinic to the value of €16,950 in 2022 – although this covered training for officials from other departments as well. The OPW also had some of the highest bills in previous years, including another €9,610 to Gibney Communications and €610 to RGH Consultancy in 2022 – again for general training. Overall, it spent €28,489 on external consultants, making it one of the highest-spending bodies overall, as well as having the single most expensive year. DPER had the highest overall spending across the period covered by the data, spending €31,220 in total – although again, some of that picked up the tab for civil servants in other departments. Horse Racing Ireland spent €12,950 for advice in advance of visits to the Public Accounts Committee and agriculture committees, with consultancy firms Teneo and Vulcan Consulting, led by former minister for European affairs Lucinda Creighton , providing services. Pobal , the social inclusion agency, spent €12,764 preparing to face TDs and senators, all to Dublin firm MKC Communications across 2021-2024. Pobal said the work related to four committee appearances covering training for nine senior managers and strategic preparation for the hearings. Meanwhile, the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman spent €10,612 preparing for various committees in 2023 and 2024. The data show that two firms accounted for the majority of the spend by state bodies preparing to visit Leinster House committee rooms: Gibney Communications, which was paid a total of €46,902 across the period concerned, and The Communications Clinic, which was paid €51,254.
