
A Soviet-era spacecraft that failed to reach Venus is due to crash back to Earth this week
A piece of a Soviet vehicle that malfunctioned en route to Venus more than 50 years ago is due to crash back to Earth as soon as this week.
Much about the piece of space debris, called Cosmos 482 (also spelled Kosmos 482), is unknown.
Though most projections estimate that the object will reenter the atmosphere around May 10, unknowns about its exact shape and size — as well as the unpredictability of space weather — make some degree of uncertainty inevitable.
It's also unclear which portion of the vehicle is set to reenter, though researchers believe it to be the probe, or 'entry capsule,' which was designed to survive the extreme temperature and pressure of landing on Venus — which has an atmosphere 90 times more dense than Earth's. That means it could survive its unexpected trip back home, posing a small but non-zero risk to people on the ground.
While space junk and meteors routinely veer toward a crash-landing on Earth, most of the objects disintegrate as they're torn apart due to friction and pressure as they hit Earth's thick atmosphere while traveling thousands of miles per hour.
But if the Cosmos 482 object is indeed a Soviet reentry capsule, it would be equipped with a substantial heat shield, meaning it 'might well survive Earth atmosphere entry and hit the ground,' according to Dr. Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist and astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who shared his predictions about Cosmos 482 on his website.
The risk of the object hitting people on the ground is likely minimal, and there's 'no need for major concern,' McDowell wrote, 'but you wouldn't want it bashing you on the head.'
The Soviet Space Research Institute, or IKI, was formed in the mid-1960s amid the 20th-century space race, which pitted the Soviet Union against its chief space-exploring competitor, the United States.
The IKI's Venera program sent a series of probes toward Venus in the 1970s and '80s, with several surviving the trip and beaming data and images back to Earth before ceasing operations.
Two spacecraft under that program, V-71 No. 670 and V-71 No. 671, launched in 1972, according to McDowell. But only one made a successful voyage to Venus: V-71 No. 670 operated for about 50 minutes on the planet's surface.
V-71 No. 671 did not. A rocket carried the Venera spacecraft into a 'parking orbit' around Earth. However, the vehicle then failed to put itself on a Venus transfer trajectory, leaving it stranded closer to home, according to NASA.
Beginning in the 1960s, Soviet vehicles left in Earth's orbit were each given the Cosmos name and a numerical designation for tracking purposes, according to NASA.
Several pieces of debris were created from V-71 No. 671's failure. At least two have already fallen out of orbit. But researchers believe the one set to plummet back to our planet this week is the cylindrical entry capsule — or Cosmos 482 — because of the way the vehicle has behaved in orbit.
'It is quite dense, whatever it is, because it had a very low point in its orbit, yet it didn't decay for decades,' said Marlon Sorge, a space debris expert with the federally funded research group, The Aerospace Corporation. 'So it's clearly bowling ball-ish.'
And though the Venus probe was equipped with a parachute, the vehicle has been out of service in the harsh environment of space for the past few decades. That means it's highly unlikely that a parachute could deploy at the right time or serve to slow down the vehicle's descent, Sorge and Langbroek told CNN.
The chances of Cosmos 482 causing deadly damage is are roughly 1 in 25,000, according to The Aerospace Corporation's calculations, Sorge said.
That's a much lower risk than some other pieces of space debris. At least a few defunct rocket parts reenter Earth's atmosphere each year, Sorge noted, and many have carried higher odds of catastrophe.
But if the Cosmos 482 object does hit the ground, it is likely to land between 52 degrees North and 52 South latitudes, Langbroek said via email.
'That area encompasses several prominent landmasses and countries: the whole of Africa, South America, Australia, the USA, parts of Canada, parts of Europe, and parts of Asia,' Langbroek said.
'But as 70% of our planet is water, chances are good that it will end up in an Ocean somewhere,' Langbroek said via email. 'Yes, there is a risk, but it is small. You have a larger risk of being hit by lightning once in your lifetime.'
Sorge emphasized that if Cosmos 482 hits dry land, it's crucial that bystanders do not attempt to touch the debris. The old spacecraft could leak dangerous fuels or pose other risks to people and property.
'Contact the authorities,' Sorge urged. 'Please don't mess with it.'
Parker Wishik, a spokesperson for the Aerospace Corporation, added that under the 1967 Outer Space Treaty — which remains the primary document outlining international space law — Russia would maintain ownership of any surviving debris and may seek to recover it after landing.
And while the global space community has taken steps in recent years to ensure that fewer spacecraft make uncontrolled crash-landings back on Earth, the Cosmos 482 vehicle highlights the importance of continuing those efforts, Wishik added.
'What goes up must come down,' he said. 'We're here talking about it more than 50 years later, which is another proof point for the importance of debris mitigation and making sure we're having that that dialogue (as a space community) because what you put up in space today might affect us for decades to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
For 9 Days, Earth Was Sending Out Mysterious Signals. Now We Know What They Were.
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Strange signals coming from the Arctic in 2023 were assumed to be a seiche (trapped water with waves sloshing back and forth), but this was never confirmed. Previous instruments used to measure seismic weather phenomena were not able to pick up enough information, but NASA's SWOT satellite eventually found that the signal actually was from a seiche caused by a landslide. Reconstructions of what the weather was like during the days SWOT picked up the signal also show that it couldn't have been anything but a seiche. As fascinating as bizarre signals from other planets can be—teaching us about earthquakes on Mars or auroras in the skies of Jupiter—sometimes even weirder signals come from weather extremes happening right here on Earth. For nine days in 2023, an unknown seismic pulse was generated by the Earth every 90 seconds. It first appeared that September, vanished, and then returned in October. The signals began after a landslide triggered by a megatsunami in Dickson Fjord, Greenland, and was thought to have been produced by a seiche, or standing wave. This wave had probably been stirred up by the tsunami and then trapped by ice in the fjord—but there was no way to prove it. Satellite observations were able to document avalanches and the tsunamis they caused, and scientists collected further data in a research station. There was just one problem—the hypothesized seiche was eluding detection. It remained a mystery, even though studies at the time found seismic data that seemed to align with the sloshing motions of standing waves. So, researcher Thomas Monahan of Oxford University decided to take a closer look. Using data from the KaRIn (Ka-band Radar Interferometer) instrument on board NASA's Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite—an international collaboration capable of high-resolution measurements that extended into Dickson fjord—Monahan and his team finally found evidence for a seiche whose waves were slowly losing intensity. 'Based on the seismic attribution, and systematic ruling out of other dynamic phenomena, we conclude that the observed variability in the SWOT data is consistent with that of a slowly decaying seiche,' the team wrote in a study recently published in Nature Communications. Seiches can occur in lakes and other enclosed (or partially enclosed) bodies of water. The tsunami unleashed in Dickson Fjord had enough strength to leave powerful winds and sudden atmospheric pressure shifts in its wake, pushing water from one end of the enclosure to the other. The water then sloshed back and forth, oscillating for anywhere from hours to days after winds ceased. Tsunamis are often seismic phenomena, and the very long period (VLP) seismic signal that came from the fjord was the aftermath of a tsunamigenic landslide. Previous attempts at recording evidence for this particular seiche had been thwarted by the limitations of satellite altimeters, which did not pick up data during extended gaps between observations. They were also not able to record the differences in the height of waves beyond the area directly under the satellite. They were, however, able to get an especially accurate read on the water below. The landslides in Dickson Fjord happened right when SWOT was transitioning to its Science phase, during which it would orbit and survey most of the planet's surface from an altitude of 890 km (553 miles) for 21 days. This orbit was purposely out of sync with the Sun to lower the chances of misidentifying signal frequencies. The researchers went through the data from every pass the satellite made over the region for the weeks in September and October and used this data to create maps of the fjord, modeling it how would have behaved during different times after the landslide and the height differences between waves (which reached up to two meters, or about 6.5 feet). Reconstructions of weather conditions ruled out all other possible causes behind the signal, and convinced scientists that it could only have been caused by a seiche. 'This study shows how we can leverage the next generation of satellite earth observation technologies to study these processes,' Monahan said in a recent press release. 'SWOT is a game changer for studying oceanic processes in regions such as fjords which previous satellites struggled to see into.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Harvard AIDS Research, Affiliated Hospitals Hit by Trump Feud
The Trump administration's funding battle with Harvard University is starting to impact projects at affiliated hospitals and has crippled the school's Center for AIDS Research, one of the largest backers in the US for emerging studies on the condition. Harvard funnels a portion of its federal grants to research partners, including the Mass General Brigham hospital system, and that money has now largely stopped flowing after the government froze more than $2.6 billion in support. Mass General researchers whose work is affected should 'stop all activity and spending' unless they have found alternative funding, Paul Anderson, the hospital group's chief academic officer, said in a message to staff late last week.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Northern Lights Alert: Aurora Borealis May Appear In These 8 States Tuesday
A selection of states in the northern U.S. may have an opportunity to view the northern lights Tuesday, as auroral activity is expected to be calmer through the week, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Auroral activity will likely be calmer through the week, forecasters said. Auroral activity is forecast with a Kp index of three on a scale of nine for Tuesday night, indicating the northern lights will be visible farther from the poles and could be 'quite pleasing to look at' for anyone in the right areas. No geomagnetic storms or increased solar radiation are expected through Thursday night, NOAA's projections suggest, after earlier coronal mass ejections created 'minor' storms that pulled the northern lights to more states. Tuesday night's forecast is the strongest over the next two days, with a maximum Kp index of two projected for Wednesday and Thursday, according to NOAA's three-day forecast. A view line marking a minimal opportunity of viewing the aurora borealis is forecast just south of the Canadian border, with a lesser chance projected for parts of northeastern Washington, northern Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, northern Minnesota, northern Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Most of Canada and Alaska have a higher chance. (See map below.) Tuesday's view line. NOAA suggests traveling between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. local time to an unobstructed, north-facing and high vantage point away from light pollution to see the northern lights. NASA recommends enabling night mode, disabling flash and selecting a slower shutter speed if using a smartphone. With a regular camera, the agency suggests using a tripod to stabilize the image, a wide-angle lens, an aperture or F-stop of four or less and a focus set to the furthest possible setting. More people in the U.S. have had opportunities to see the aurora borealis over the last year, after activity on the sun's surface reached a 'solar maximum.' This peak, which marks an increase in solar events like solar flares and coronal mass ejections, occurs periodically during the sun's 11-year cycle. Electrons from these events are responsible for the northern lights, as they release energy in the form of colorful, swirling lights after colliding with oxygen and nitrogen in the Earth's atmosphere.