I tried a mushroom coffee and was blown away by the results
Despite starting my day with a cup of coffee, I often find myself feeling quite drowsy, and it's not uncommon for me to clock in a solid 12 hours of sleep if I've had a particularly exhausting day. As a result, people have often recommended adaptogenic blends of coffee, which promise other advantages.
The creators of London Nootropics secured offers from Deborah Meaden and Sara Davies on Dragon's Den in 2022. The brand incorporates special ingredients known as adaptogens that help balance physical and mental stressors. They recently released a fourth blend in their range.
Mush Love is a limited edition blend made in collaboration with Fantastic Fungi, the company behind the viral Netflix documentary. It uses lion's mane, cordyceps, and chaga mushrooms to elevate mornings. The limited edition is retailing at £12 for 12 sachets.
The blends' ingredients are said to counteract side effects like jitters, anxiety, and crashes—something I'm always keen to avoid. I've seen these ingredients in other drink blends, too—like DIRTEA's Cacao Super Blend, which I mixed in with vegan hot chocolate powder. It contains lion's mane (60 Servings) and is available on Amazon for £37.99.
Mushroom Coffee from Protein Works also contains similar ingredients, it's currently £23.99 instead of £39.99. Although I've not tried this one.
In addition to Mush Love, London Nootropics offers a variety of bundles, including the Starter Bundle. Priced at £40, it includes 12 sachet boxes of the brand's Flow Coffee (for focus), Mojo Coffee (for strength) and Zen Coffee (for calmness).
Reach readers can enjoy a 20% discount on London Nootropics with the code REACH20, valid until 11:59pm (BST) on 31/05/2025. This code can be used once per customer and cannot be combined with any other offers.
I've previously tried London Nootropics' blends Flow and Mojo. Mojo uses cordyceps, which is believed to boost energy and stamina, increase oxygen flow to muscles, enhance aerobic capacity, and reduce fatigue. Preparing the drink was straightforward.
I mixed it with hot oat milk, which resulted in a rather bitter taste. However, a dash of caramel syrup quickly fixed this, and I found myself enjoying it just like any other cup of joe.
The effects were immediate, with a noticeable increase in alertness. I found myself taking deeper breaths and feeling physically stronger, which was somewhat unexpected. This could certainly be a beneficial option on workout days.
As a remote worker, I noticed an increase in my typing speed, which I attributed to the coffee. Usually, such an energy surge would leave me jittery, but I experienced none of that.
I didn't feel the need for my customary lunchtime nap or my 5pm snooze, which was quite an achievement. Aside from the slightly bitter taste, the only negative I found with the drink is the long-term cost compared to regular coffee; the packs would make perfect gifts, though, for health-minded friends.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
13 hours ago
- Scotsman
Pure Pet Food: the Yorkshire business serving 66m dog meals nationwide
Daniel Valdur Eha and Mathew Cockroft now head up a multi-million pound business after cooking up a treat for their dog in a West Yorkshire kitchen This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement. What began in West Yorkshire with two graduates and a kitchen counter is now a booming dog food business with 40k subscribers Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Back in 2012, when nearly all the nation's dogs were being given their daily meals in either dried kibble form, or straight from a tin, two Yorkshire lads who were straight out of university had an idea. As Daniel Valdur Eha and Mathew Cockroft poured out dry food for their own dogs each day, they asked themselves why pets were being given the same little brown biscuits every day. "We wouldn't eat these for every meal, so why should our pets," they pondered. And the quandary chipped away at them. So they got to work rethinking the way we feed our dogs. Raw food was starting to become a popular choice among those who could afford to move away from kibble - but its storage, preparation, and cost presented problems. Pure Pet Food air-dries fresh ingredients to make a raw food alternative that can be stored for months | Pere Pet Food In their own kitchen, they started experimenting with recipes and methods, and months of research led them to the technology of air-drying - a centuries-old method of removing the moisture from fresh food, instantly preserving it and allowing it to be stored safely for many months. This method of dehydration uses a carefully-monitored temperature that strikes a balance between removing the risk of any pathogens, and not harming the natural amino acids in the food. The formula was an instant hit, and their company, Pure Pet Food, quickly took off. Just 18 months after it had launched, Daniel and Matthew were so confident in their business's future they took the bold step of appearing on BBC's Dragon's Den, to seek a modest investment from the famous multi-millionaire venture capitalists. Daniel even scoffed a spoonful of the food to impress the dragons | Pure Pet Food Despite two of the dragons competing with one another to secure a £40,000 stake in the company, Daniel and Matthew made the bold move to walk away without an investment, because they weren't happy with the terms. "I think you'll regret that decision", warned Dragons Den mainstay Peter Jones. But the duo never did regret it - because shortly after their brush with the dragons, they secured an investment from the CEO of Pets at Home, which enabled them to set up their first dedicated premises in West Yorkshire. The business boomed, and the company even hosted a royal visit from Her Royal Highness Princess Anne and the success has only continued. From bag to bowl - how a dehydrated dog food becomes a delicious, nutritious meal Pure's award-winning pet food starts off in the factory as a selection of fresh meats and vegetables Through the air-drying process, it's dehydrated down to a coarse powder, ready to be soaked and mixed Just pour out the dried ingredients into a bowl, add a small amount of water, and stir The consistency of the food you serve to your dog is similar to a tinned food, but with all the fresh goodness of a raw food The dried food can remain in an opened bag for up to 12 months and, once rehydrated, can sit in a fridge for up to 48 hours. To find out more, or to tailor a recipe to your dog's specific needs, click here Nowadays, the company is based in Cleckheaton, in Kirklees, and it employs more than 100 people. There are over 40,000 regular subscribers and more than 66 million meals have been delivered to pet owners. And it all started on Daniel's mother's kitchen counter in West Yorkshire.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Meghan Markle's go-to skincare brand launches anti-ageing serum that firms skin in 1 week
A smart new serum has just launched from a celeb-favourite skincare brand, proven to delay visible signs of ageing by reducing senescent skin cell markers that cause this With season two of Meghan Markle's Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, airing next week, it has us thinking about some of the brands and products that the Duchess of Sussex had previously listed as her favourites. Tatcha's famous Dewy Skin Cream was one – and now that Tatcha has just dropped a seriously smart new anti-ageing serum, we wonder if this will be making its way into her bathroom cabinet too. Launching today, 18 August, Tatcha's The Longevity Serum taps into the current longevity trend with some clever science, creating a formula that's proven to reduce ageing skin cells to delay visible signs of ageing. The result is skin that's visibly firmer and smoother after just one week, with the look of fine lines improvements after two weeks. The key ingredient in this Tatcha Longevity Serum, which costs £82, is something called an 'Okinawa Cellescence Complex', a centuries-old blend of Japanese herbs and plants, known for their benefits on the skin. This helps to target senescent skin cells – also called 'zombie cells' – that give off inflammatory molecules and trigger inflammation that can lead to signs of premature ageing, and reduce them by 55%. In Tatcha's tests, 100% showed an improvement in skin barrier immediately and 90% showed an improvement in skin texture and moisturisation, while after one week of use, 100% showed visibly firmer, smoother skin, improved skin texture and softness. And after two weeks, 100% of testers reported an improvement in the look of fine lines. Like a lot of serums, this one is designed to be used morning and night after cleansing and before your moisturiser or SPF. If you have dry skin, Tatcha's iconic Dewy Skin Cream, from £26, gives a gorgeous glowy finish, while its new lighter sister, The Dewy Milk Moisturiser, £61, is better suited to normal-to-combination skin. This Tatcha serum is the latest in a line of smart serums to launch recently, including Medik8 C-Tetra Advanced, £69, and Liquid Peptides Advanced MP, £79, and SkinCeuticals P-Tiox Neuro-Peptide Serum from SkinCeuticals, £130, which contains a multi-peptide complex as well as PHA, niacinamide and laminaria extract to target nine different types of wrinkles, SkinCeuticals claims, from crow's feet to forehead lines. If you're looking for a cheaper alternative, Naturium Multi-Peptide Advance Serum comes highly rated by beauty editors, and is £27. Join our Shopping & Deals WhatsApp for the best bargains and fashion news WHATSAPP: Get the best deals and exclusive discount codes straight to your phone via our WhatsApp group. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. Some of these articles will contain affiliate links where we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from them. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our .
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
How fat-shaming show Biggest Loser ruined lives
What I remember is the anguish. Contestants from The Biggest Loser, perhaps America's most repulsive reality TV show, were often very sick. The Biggest Loser, which ran from 2004 to 2016 on NBC and saw overweight contestants compete to lose the most weight for a $250,000 cash prize, made them sicker. Now some of these contestants have been interviewed for a new and gruesome three-part post mortem for Netflix called Fit For TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser. Psychotherapists would call it re-traumatisation. It began, says Biggest Loser's co-creator David Broome, when he went to the gym one day. Broome has the expressionless face of a man who cannot be emotionally touched. Paddy Chayefsky, who wrote the film Network (1976) which foretold reality TV ('Suicide of the Week, Execution of the Week, The Death Hour!') would know Broome as an authentic television villain. The sign at the gym, Broome says, read 'Help needed. Please help save my life. Obese person seeking trainer'. He then remembered that America is filled with the unhappy and obese, and that they rarely see themselves on TV. He invited them to apply to be The Biggest Loser. Broome did help: he helped himself. He co-invented a show that made hundreds of millions for NBC, made him rich, and arguably damaged the metabolism and mental health of those unlucky enough to appear on it. The contestants were chosen, isolated from their families at a 'ranch', and placed on a punishing regime: hours of gym each day; humiliating stunts involving food and 'fitness'; and suggested calorie intakes (1,500 for men; 1,200 for women. Most ate far less than that when they realised it would help them win. One man ate 800 calories a day and burnt 6,000 calories in the gym). Contestants have reported that their periods stopped; their hair fell out; they had problems with movement afterwards; they often couldn't sleep. (Others, though, still maintain that the show helped them.) Each week they were weighed in front of a live audience, who whooped and howled; the failures – those who had lost the least weight – were sent home. It couldn't happen today, now Ozempic is available and, watching it now, the show is a tableau of every piece of bullying I saw in the schoolyard, and worse. Fit for TV uses gruesome archive footage. Contestants are screamed at in gyms and placed on obstacle courses which appear to have been designed to make them look ridiculous. There are exculpatory interviews with Bob Harper, the show's co-trainer; Robert Huizenga, its doctor, who offers well-dressed contrition; and multiple contestants who, almost without exception, act like they have been in a war. Huizenga now says he didn't approve all the challenges the contestants faced. Harper says they knew it was diet that mattered for weight loss, 'but that becomes boring television. You know what's not boring television? To see us in a gym, yelling, screaming'. Even the contestants seem to understand that obesity is mostly a psychological problem that cannot be fixed by going on television. 'When you have something traumatic in your life,' says one, 'it doesn't go away.' Danny Cahill, the gentle, still-bewildered winner of season eight (he lost 239lb, or 17½st), says of his eating disorder, 'I lived it every day. I was missing life.' Like most of the contestants, he is larger than ever, because obesity is a psychological problem triggered by trauma and self-hatred, which The Biggest Loser compounded, not solved. As the series wound on, medical professionals questioned whether the 'regime' damaged the contestants' metabolic systems. The only things Cahill really lost were his privacy and his pride. The producers wanted exhibitionists of a particular type. It wasn't fat they needed – or not fat by itself – it was pain and ability to express it. Once successful – if we can call it that – they were not allowed to show the contracts they had to sign to a lawyer; or, rather, they were, but it was strongly hinted they would lose their place on the show if they did. Thus disarmed, they were fed into television. It is apt. It was not enough, as respectable doctors advise, to lose 2lb a week with moderate diet and exercise – not to win The Biggest Loser, which at its peak occupied the same studio as the talent show American Idol. The weighing scales, the producers admit, were the real protagonist of the show. Contestants might lose a stone or more in a week, and this was revealed to the screams of the crowd. This was achieved by over-exercise – 'I'm going to take your legs and beat you with them,' one trainer screamed – and, the contestants now say, by self-starvation and depriving themselves of water before the weighing in. One contestant – Ryan Benson, the winner of season one – said he lived on lemon juice for the last 10 days of the show and was so dehydrated he was urinating blood as he appeared on the valedictory talk shows. There is a long segment about Tracey Yukich, also of season eight, collapsing during her first trial, which was to run a mile along a beach. She was evacuated by helicopter. 'No one could have expected that anything like that was going to happen,' a producer says, in mitigation. Really? A disclaimer was aired on screen at the end of every show: 'Consult with your own doctor before embarking on any diet or exercise programme.' All contestants were required to sign a waiver. Yukich now says she thinks she died that day. JD Roth, an executive producer, says the show existed to help people. But this was spin – as the 'temptation challenge' laid bare. The contestants were taken to a room filled with the kind of food – or non-food – they would ordinarily binge on, and invited to eat it. If they ate enough of it, they might win a prize: getting to see their children, for instance. It was coercive bingeing for people who were already ill. When Roth tells us, 'I can't say that 100 per cent of the temptations we got right, but I can say that life is full of temptations,' I want to punch him. The contestants were vulnerable people, but were made to pass doughnuts from mouth to mouth – it's kissing with baked goods – or sing songs about obesity, or were screamed at for vomiting on the treadmill. A woman was weighed on TV. She was 476lb, or 34st. She wept, because she needed a support group, not primetime, which is the opposite. Suzanne Mendonca of season two, a police officer, said the show gave her an eating disorder, and made her a mockery among her colleagues. 'I stopped eating,' she said, of her time after the show, and regained the weight just the same. The nadir was in 2014, when season 15 winner Rachel Frederickson, a former competitive swimmer, walked out to her $250,000 prize money looking dangerously thin: she began at 260lb (18½st) and ended at 105lb (7½st). Even the trainers looked appalled at her appearance. The show went on, and the contestants got larger – how else do you entice the public to watch? It was a miracle that, as parodied in the drama series Unreal, backstage at a version of The Bachelor, no one died. Frederickson was the beginning of the end. In 2016, The New York Times reported that, 'A study of season eight's contestants has yielded surprising new discoveries about the physiology of obesity that help explain why so many people struggle unsuccessfully to keep off the weight they lose… As the years went by and the numbers on the scale climbed, the contestants' metabolisms did not recover… It was as if their bodies were intensifying their effort to pull the contestants back to their original weight.' Now, only when it is too late, we have contrition. Harper looks awkward before the camera now; Huizenga looks ashamed. Jillian Michaels, the co-trainer who wasn't interviewed for Fit For TV, was rebuked for recommending her contestants take caffeine pills, which is the least of the show's evils. The concept itself was dangerous, but reality TV is ever in search of a villain. Its cynicism was boundless. The cynicism goes on. Netflix is still happily airing The Ultimatum: Queer Love (couples on the verge of marriage commit or split) and Love is Blind (get engaged to someone on TV before you actually meet them). The Biggest Loser ended in 2016. The producers of Fit For TV have done to the producers of The Biggest Loser what they did to the contestants, and this is satisfying, but nothing more.
