Ex-Rockstar Games developer reveals he worked on early online mode for GTA 3: 'We pushed for multiplayer again in Vice City
Vermeij dedicated his 14 years to Rockstar Games as a technical director, working on Grand Theft Auto games including Vice City, San Andreas, and IV before leaving the company in 2009. Revealing about the same on X (formerly called Twitter), 'For GTA 3, I developed an initial prototype of a deathmatch mode where players could kill one another, pull each other out of vehicles, and respawn at different spots around the city. It looked very promising...'
Credit: X | @ObbeVermeij
"…but we ran out of time. We needed lobbies, scripts working over the network etc. We decided to cut the effort. #ifdef GTA_NETWORK in the source code is a leftover," he added. Obbe Vermeij, a former Rockstar developer, says he worked on the online mode for GTA 3
Following the launch of the trailer, it became the biggest video launch in history, garnering over 475 million views in its first 24 hours across all platforms.
According to Vermeij, the developers pushed for multiplayer again in Vice City, and he even hired a couple of network coders. But with tight deadlines, it was stopped once more.
GTA1 and 2 had LAN multiplayer. To save bandwidth, they only sent keypresses between machines — assuming the game state was 100% deterministic. That meant every game had to run in perfect sync, at the framerate of the slowest PC.
In practice, this wasn't always reliable. I… pic.twitter.com/Oha4VQvn1q — Obbe Vermeij (@ObbeVermeij) June 18, 2025
For San Andreas, they didn't make an attempt. Since it was the last game of the PS2 era, it didn't seem worth the effort. Instead, they focused on adding local co-op. But, of course, it wasn't quite the same, he added. Fans share mixed reactions to GTA multiplayer evolution
As soon as the post surfaced on the internet, it grabbed the attention of fans online, and one asked, "When doing local multiplayer on San Andreas with my cousin, the cops will always target player 1, CJ, and leave the second player alone. Was this intentional or an oversight?"
GTA1 and 2 had LAN multiplayer. To save bandwidth, they only sent keypresses between machines — assuming the game state was 100% deterministic. That meant every game had to run in perfect sync, at the framerate of the slowest PC.
In practice, this wasn't always reliable. I… pic.twitter.com/Oha4VQvn1q — Obbe Vermeij (@ObbeVermeij) June 18, 2025
In response to this, Vermeij said, "That sounds like an oversight. The code was initially only written for one player and the coop mode bolted on halfway down the project."
it's pretty crazy to think GTA Online was an idea since basically the beginning of GTA but wasn't truly implemented until GTA 5 — Synth Potato🥔 (@SynthPotato) June 18, 2025
"Do you have any knowledge on why GTA 5 didn't have local co-op? Seems like a no brainer for a game with 3 playable protagonists who can all be used for a good number of missions and free play," another said.
I do remember playing GTA2 multiplayer on a coaxial LAN 10mbps setup and see it always go out-of-sync about 10-20 mins in... *shrugs* — Alex Fuller (@boberfly) June 18, 2025
"It's pretty crazy to think GTA Online was an idea since basically the beginning of GTA but wasn't truly implemented until GTA 5." To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending. First Published: Jun 18, 2025, 20:58 IST
Sneha is a dedicated writer with a passion for storytelling that enthrals and inspires the readers. With a background in Health and Wellness, she brings a unique perspective to every narrative. As a journalist, she aims to find solutions with authenticity and credibility. Read More
18/6/2025 21:9:58
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
Is GPT-4o making a comeback after reports of user backlash on GPT-5? Here's what Sam Altman says
After weeks of growing pressure from its community, OpenAI has confirmed that GPT-4o, one of its most popular AI models, is coming back. But there's a twist: you'll need to be a paying subscriber to use it. The decision backed an outcry that began when OpenAI replaced GPT-4o with its new flagship, GPT-5, in the free level of ChatGPT. For many users, the change felt quick and undesirable . GPT-5 may enhance stronger reasoning skills and better performance in difficult tasks, but its style didn't suit everyone. Across Reddit threads, X (formerly Twitter) posts, and community forums, people mentioned the same complaint: GPT-5 felt less friendly, slower in conversation, and more formal compared to GPT-4o's easygoing, quick response personality. Some stated GPT-4o as a 'creative partner' rather than a Sam Altman addressed the criticism. While praising GPT-5's progress, he confirmed that GPT-4o had a special place in the hearts of many. 'We heard you,' he said in essence, promising the model would make a comeback but with a Plus subscription and maintaining multiple cutting edge AI models isn't cheap. By moving GPT-4o into the paid tier, OpenAI says it can make sure the system will remain available without compromising performance. For free tier users, GPT-5 will be default. Launched in May 2024, GPT-4o ('o' for 'omni') was made to manage text, images, and even audio, all in a single model. It became an instant success because it was both fast and personable. Responses received in seconds, and its conversational way felt more natural, sometimes even playful compared to its earlier educators, and other users gravitated towards the GPT-4o for brainstorming, storytelling, and problem solving. It impacted a rare balance: smart enough to manage complex questions, yet approachable enough to feel like you were chatting with a in contrast, has been built for tougher reasoning tasks, longer memory retention, and more organized responses. It's more advanced in specific areas, but hasn't matched GPT-4o's warmth, at least in the eyes of its backlash over the GPT-4o's removal highlighted a crucial truth for AI companies:users don't just care about better performance. Speed, personality, and how the AI talks can be just as important. OpenAI's decision also seems strategic. By keeping GPT-4o for paying customers, the company is testing how much users are ready to pay for personalization and preferences in their AI tools. Other AI companies have already experimented with giving customers a list of model personalities, and this could be OpenAI's version of the only way to use GPT-4o daily is through the Plus plan. It's not yet known if OpenAI will later introduce a cheaper add-on for specific models or let personality customization for all users. What's certain is that GPT-4o showed people can get attached to an AI's 'vibe' and replacing it, with a more advanced version, can upset them.Q1. What is GPT-4o? A1. GPT-4o, launched in May 2024 that handles text, images, and audio in one system. It became popular for its speed, conversational style, and friendly tone. Q2. What's the main difference between GPT-4o and GPT-5? A2. GPT-4o is known for speed, creativity, and friendliness in conversation. GPT-5 is designed for reasoning, longer memory, and structured responses.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Is GPT-4o making a comeback after reports of user backlash on GPT-5? Here's what Sam Altman says
Altman Responds to the Pushback Live Events Why GPT-4o Won Fans in the First Place More Than Just a Model Swap What Happens Next? FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel After weeks of growing pressure from its community, OpenAI has confirmed that GPT-4o , one of its most popular AI models , is coming back. But there's a twist: you'll need to be a paying subscriber to use decision backed an outcry that began when OpenAI replaced GPT-4o with its new flagship, GPT-5, in the free level of ChatGPT . For many users, the change felt quick and undesirable . GPT-5 may enhance stronger reasoning skills and better performance in difficult tasks, but its style didn't suit Reddit threads, X (formerly Twitter) posts, and community forums, people mentioned the same complaint: GPT-5 felt less friendly, slower in conversation, and more formal compared to GPT-4o's easygoing, quick response personality. Some stated GPT-4o as a 'creative partner' rather than a Sam Altman addressed the criticism. While praising GPT-5's progress, he confirmed that GPT-4o had a special place in the hearts of many. 'We heard you,' he said in essence, promising the model would make a comeback but with a Plus subscription and maintaining multiple cutting edge AI models isn't cheap. By moving GPT-4o into the paid tier, OpenAI says it can make sure the system will remain available without compromising performance. For free tier users, GPT-5 will be in May 2024, GPT-4o ('o' for 'omni') was made to manage text, images, and even audio, all in a single model. It became an instant success because it was both fast and personable. Responses received in seconds, and its conversational way felt more natural, sometimes even playful compared to its earlier educators, and other users gravitated towards the GPT-4o for brainstorming, storytelling, and problem solving. It impacted a rare balance: smart enough to manage complex questions, yet approachable enough to feel like you were chatting with a in contrast, has been built for tougher reasoning tasks, longer memory retention, and more organized responses. It's more advanced in specific areas, but hasn't matched GPT-4o's warmth, at least in the eyes of its backlash over the GPT-4o's removal highlighted a crucial truth for AI companies:users don't just care about better performance. Speed, personality, and how the AI talks can be just as important. OpenAI's decision also seems strategic. By keeping GPT-4o for paying customers, the company is testing how much users are ready to pay for personalization and preferences in their AI tools. Other AI companies have already experimented with giving customers a list of model personalities, and this could be OpenAI's version of the only way to use GPT-4o daily is through the Plus plan. It's not yet known if OpenAI will later introduce a cheaper add-on for specific models or let personality customization for all users. What's certain is that GPT-4o showed people can get attached to an AI's 'vibe' and replacing it, with a more advanced version, can upset them.A1. GPT-4o, launched in May 2024 that handles text, images, and audio in one system. It became popular for its speed, conversational style, and friendly tone.A2. GPT-4o is known for speed, creativity, and friendliness in conversation. GPT-5 is designed for reasoning, longer memory, and structured responses.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Apple iPhone 17 Air display size leaked ahead of launch: Here's how it compares to iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple is set to showcase its latest iPhone 17 series soon, with an early September launch window likely for the unveiling. With just weeks left for Apple's biggest launch of the year, rumour mills are running hot with leaks about the expected features from the flagship devices. One thing that is more or less certain is that we will see four new iPhone launches this year, with the iPhone 17 Air replacing the Plus variant from last year. The other three model names will continue from last year, i.e., one standard iPhone 17 and two Pro models. A new leak from tipster Majin Bu on X (formerly Twitter) has revealed the potential sizes of all four upcoming Apple devices. The tipster shared an image of screen protectors of all the upcoming iPhone 17 models, which potentially showcases what sizes they could have. Reportedly, the iPhone 17 is expected to feature a 6.3-inch display, which could also be the same size as the iPhone 17 Pro. The big surprise, however, is the size of the new thin and light iPhone 17 Air, which will likely have a 6.6-inch screen compared to the 6.7-inch screen on the iPhone 16 Plus. This means that the iPhone 17 Air will sit somewhere between the iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max — the former having a 6.3-inch screen and the latter having a 6.9-inch display. Apple's new iPhone 17 Air is expected to be the thinnest ever phone made by the company, with a rumored thickness of around 5.5mm. However, there are notable discrepancies in the various leaks about the thickness of the new iPhone, with Bloomberg's Mark Gurman predicting that the phone will be around 2mm thinner than the iPhone 16 Pro (which stands at 8.25mm thick). Meanwhile, analyst Jeff Fu is predicting a 6mm thickness for the new phone. The phone could weigh in at just 145 grams, making it significantly lighter than all the other iPhones. The phone could feature a bar-shaped horizontal camera bump, which may feature a single 48MP rear camera. There is also expected to be a major hit in the battery department, with the latest leaks suggesting an under-3,000mAh battery on the phone, which could make for much worse battery life than the other iPhones. The phone could be powered by the new A19 chipset, which could also be seen on the standard iPhone. Meanwhile, the phone could have support for 12GB of RAM, up from the 8GB seen on the current iPhone lineup.
