In Epstein furor, Trump struggles to shake off controversy his allies once stoked
Trump
still lingered with reporters lined up outside the
White House
on Friday. He was leaving on a trip to Scotland, where he would visit his golf courses, and he wanted to talk about how his administration just finished "the best six months ever."
But over and over, the journalists kept asking Trump about the Jeffrey
Epstein
case and whether he would pardon the disgraced financier's imprisoned accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Finance
Project Management
others
Healthcare
MBA
Data Science
Management
Public Policy
Design Thinking
Operations Management
Others
healthcare
PGDM
Technology
Data Science
Data Analytics
MCA
Product Management
Leadership
Degree
Cybersecurity
Digital Marketing
CXO
Artificial Intelligence
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
7 Months
S P Jain Institute of Management and Research
CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 Months
IIM Calcutta
SEPO - IIMC CFO India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
"People should really focus on how well the country is doing," Trump insisted. He shut down another question by saying, "I don't want to talk about that."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top Public Speaking Course for Children
Planet Spark
Book Now
Undo
It was another example of how the Epstein saga - and his administration's disjointed approach to it - has shadowed Trump when he's otherwise at the height of his influence. He's enacted a vast legislative agenda, reached trade deals with key countries and tightened his grip across the federal government. Yet he's struggled to stamp out the embers of a political crisis that could become a full-on conflagration.
Trump faces pressure from his own supporters
Live Events
The Republican president's supporters want the government to release secret files about Epstein, who authorities say killed himself in his New York jail cell six years ago while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. They believe him to be the nexus of a dark web of powerful people who abused underage girls. Administration officials who once stoked conspiracy theories now insist there's nothing more to disclose, a stance that has stirred skepticism because of Trump's former friendship with Epstein.
Trump has repeatedly denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago. For a president skilled at manipulating the media and controlling the
Republican Party
, it has been the most challenging test of his ability to shift the conversation in his second term.
Landing in Scotland offered no refuge for Trump. He faced another round of questions after stepping off Air Force One. "You're making a big thing over something that's not a big thing," he said to one reporter. He told another, "I'm focused on making deals, not on conspiracy theories that you are."
Republican strategist Kevin Madden called the controversy "a treadmill to nowhere."
"How do you get off of it?" he said. "I genuinely don't know the answer to that."
Trump has demanded his supporters drop the matter and urged Republicans to block Democratic requests for documents on Capitol Hill. But he has also directed the Justice Department to divulge some additional information in hopes of satisfying his supporters.
A White House official, who insisted on anonymity to discuss internal strategy, said Trump is trying to stay focused on his agenda while also demonstrating some transparency. After facing countless scandals and investigations, the official said, Trump is on guard against the typical playbook of drip-drip disclosures that have plagued him in the past.
It's clear Trump sees the Epstein case as a continuation of the "witch hunts" he's faced over the years, starting with the investigation into Russian interference during his election victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton nearly a decade ago. The sprawling inquiry led to convictions against some top advisers but did not substantiate allegations Trump conspired with Moscow.
Trump's opponents, he wrote on social media Thursday, "have gone absolutely CRAZY, and are playing another Russia, Russia,
Russia Hoax
but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM."
During the Russia investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of prosecutors were a straightforward foil for Trump to rail against. Ty Cobb, the lawyer who served as the White House's point person, said the president "never felt exposed" because "he thought he had a legitimate gripe."
The situation is different this time now that the Justice Department has been stocked with loyalists. "The people that he has to get mad at are basically his people as opposed to his inquisitors and adversaries," Cobb said.
It was Trump's allies who excavated the Epstein debacle
In fact, Trump's own officials are the most responsible for bringing the Epstein case back to the forefront.
FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, regularly stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein before assuming their current jobs, floating the idea the government had covered up incriminating and compelling information that needed to be brought to light. "Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are," Patel said in a 2023 podcast.
Attorney General Pam Bondi played a key role, too. She intimated in a Fox News Channel interview in February that an Epstein "client list" was sitting on her desk for review - she would later say she was referring to the Epstein files more generally - and greeted far-right influencers with binders of records from the case that consisted largely of information in the public domain.
Tensions spiked earlier this month when the FBI and the Justice Department, in an unsigned two-page letter, said that no client list existed, that the evidence was clear Epstein had killed himself and that no additional records from the case would be released to the public. It was a seeming backtrack on the administration's stated commitment to transparency. Amid a fierce backlash from Trump's base and influential conservative personalities, Bongino and Bondi squabbled openly in a tense White House meeting.
Since then, the Trump administration has scrambled to appear transparent, including by seeking the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the case - though it's hardly clear that courts would grant that request or that those records include any eye-catching details anyway. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has taken the unusual step of interviewing the imprisoned Maxwell over the course of two days at a courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, where her lawyer said she would "always testify truthfully."
All the while, Trump and his allies have resurfaced the Russia investigation as a rallying cry for a political base that has otherwise been frustrated by the Epstein saga.
Trump's director of national intelligence,
Tulsi Gabbard
, who just weeks ago appeared on the outs with Trump over comments on Iran's nuclear ambitions, seemed to return to the president's good graces this week following the declassification and release of years-old documents she hoped would discredit long-settled conclusions about Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The developments allowed Trump to rehash longstanding grievances against President Barack Obama and his Democratic advisers. Trump's talk of investigations into perceived adversaries from years ago let him, in effect, go back in time to deflect attention from a very current crisis.
"Whether it's right or wrong," Trump said, "it's time to go after people." (AP) AS
AS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
End US visa programs: Why Trump supporters want H-1B visa removed
Once again, the H-1B visa, much loved by Indian professionals, is back in the spotlight—this time, for all the wrong reasons. Amid a fresh wave of layoffs in the US tech sector, questions are mounting over why companies are continuing to hire foreign workers through the H-1B route while cutting jobs at home. After Microsoft laid off around 9,000 employees in phases earlier this year, Intel has now announced plans to slash over 25,000 jobs. The backlash has been swift. US Vice President JD Vance on Friday publicly criticised Microsoft, saying he does not buy the 'bulls**t story' that the company can't find qualified American workers. 'That displacement and that math worries me a bit,' Vance said at a bipartisan event hosted by the Hill and Valley Forum. 'We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bulls**t story,' said Vance. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, a vocal critic of the H-1B system, called for an end to all employment-based visa programmes. 'We need to cut all the visa programs. If we are going to do it, let's do it hard-core and clean it up,' said Bannon on his podcast. He said foreign workers were not better educated, but tech companies wanted 'indentured servants' who would work under pressure for less money. 'The situation in Silicon Valley is a festering sore,' Bannon said, claiming that around 12 million trained IT graduates in the US are unemployed while jobs are given to visa holders. 'There is always a way to get 'Einsteins',' he said, adding that talented individuals should be encouraged to stay in their home countries and 'make them great again like they are doing in Japan'. Vance's remarks were quickly countered by an Indian-origin tech investor who accused him of misleading the public. In a post on X, the investor wrote, 'Microsoft didn't bring in new foreign workers after laying people off, they renewed visas for long-time employees who've been in the U.S. legally for many many years, stuck in green card backlogs.' He argued that companies were simply allowing employees to stay in the roles they had already earned. 'Saying that's 'replacing Americans' is like saying letting a loyal employee stay and renew his visa is the same as hiring someone new off the street,' the post said. The investor also pointed out that many of the 9,000 employees laid off were H-1B holders. 'They got no severance, no safety net, just a 60-day countdown to leave the country. If you care about fairness, fix the backlog. Don't weaponise lies.' US weighs change to H-1B selection system At the policy level, the Trump administration is reviewing changes to how H-1B visas are awarded. The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in a filing to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs earlier this month, proposed replacing the current lottery system with a 'weighted selection process'. The change would apply to the capped portion of the visa programme—85,000 visas per year, including 65,000 for general applicants and 20,000 for those with advanced degrees from US universities. The rule is still under review and the specifics are yet to be made public, but US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is listed as the implementing agency. 'The H-1B is the primary way through which the United States attracts high-skilled immigrants. That it is randomly allocated is insane,' said Connor O'Brien, a research analyst at the Economic Innovation Group. He added, 'Eliminating the H-1B lottery in favour of a system that prioritises higher earners first is a no-brainer... Giving away these visas randomly is an enormous, missed opportunity to attract truly scarce talent.' Federal agency warns against bias in hiring The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a warning to employers, saying that favouring foreign workers over American citizens in recruitment violates federal law. 'Unlawful bias against American workers, in violation of Title VII, is a large-scale problem in multiple industries nationwide,' said EEOC acting chair Andrea Lucas on February 19, 2025. She alleged that some companies had policies that preferred illegal aliens, migrant workers, and visa holders over American workers. 'The law applies to you, and you are not above the law,' she said. 'The EEOC is here to protect all workers from unlawful national origin discrimination, including American workers.' The agency outlined common reasons for such practices: * Lower wage costs through loopholes or off-the-books payments * Assumptions that foreign workers are less likely to raise complaints * Client preferences for foreign workers * Perceptions that foreign workers have a stronger work ethic Counterview: H-1B workers are well-paid and boost US economy The American Immigration Council disputes the notion that H-1B workers harm domestic employment. Its research shows that in 2021, H-1B holders had a median salary of 108,000, more than double the national average of 45,760. Between 2003 and 2021, their median wage rose by 52 per cent, compared to 39 per cent for the general workforce. 'The US economy relies on H-1B visas to address skilled labour shortages, particularly in technology, engineering, and healthcare, where domestic supply is insufficient,' Jidesh Kumar, managing partner at King Stubb & Kasiva, told Business Standard. 'Tech giants and startups alike depend on H-1B professionals for cutting-edge research and product development. Many also go on to become entrepreneurs, creating jobs and boosting the economy.' Kumar warned that tightening the programme could drive global talent to other destinations. 'Restricting the programme could force top global talent to seek opportunities in countries like Canada or the UK, potentially undermining the US's position as a leader in innovation and economic growth,' he said. Indian applicants dominate H-1B pool In the 2023 financial year, about 191,000 Indian professionals were granted H-1B visas. The number rose to approximately 207,000 in FY 2024. Despite this, over one million Indians remain stuck in the employment-based green card backlog due to country-specific quotas and annual limits, according to USCIS data. For FY 2026, USCIS selected 120,141 H-1B registrations—a sharp drop from previous years and the lowest since 2021. Analysts have linked this to increased scrutiny of multiple registrations and a hike in the application fee.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Did EU get a raw deal in Trump trade pact? 7 facts
While the agreement may have averted a full-blown trade war and restored some predictability, many analysts argue the EU signed away too much: steep tariffs, massive purchases and little leverage in return. Whether this fiscal toll brings long-term value or leaves Brussels as a weaker negotiator remains under scrutiny. read more The sweeping trade agreement unveiled Sunday between the United States and European Union, forged under intense pressure from President Donald Trump, has sent shockwaves through European capitals, with many questionings whether the deal leaves the EU at a stark disadvantage. Here are seven crucial facts illustrating the challenges and concessions embedded in the pact: US imposes across-the-board 15% tariff on EU exports The agreement sets a 15% baseline tariff on nearly all EU goods entering the US, a sharp escalation from the previous average US tariff of about 1.6% on a trade-weighted basis for EU products. Core EU exports, including cars, machinery and manufactured goods are now hit by the full 15% rate. While this prevented Trump's threatened 30% or even 50% duties, it remains a dramatic rise and the highest generalised tariff level imposed on the EU in decades. Major EU concessions on US energy A central element of the deal is the EU's agreement to purchase approximately $750 billion in US energy over the coming years, with a particular focus on liquefied natural gas (LNG) to replace Russian supplies. This marks one of the largest single-sector purchase commitments ever included in a transatlantic trade deal and reflects significant US leverage on Europe's energy security. $600 billion in new EU investments in the US Brussels has agreed to direct around $600 billion in additional investments to the United States in forthcoming years, covering green energy, manufacturing, and military equipment. For context, this matches the scale of the recently announced EU investment pledges for China, underlining the magnitude of this concession. Deal struck during Trump's private tour The agreement was finalised on Trump's private golf estate in Scotland outside EU soil while the UK, no longer a member of the EU, secured a different trade arrangement with the US seen as more favourable. The optics highlight a European desperation to avert more punitive tariffs especially as London was exempted from the harshest terms on steel and aluminium. EU pulls back on retaliation, misses broader show of strength In opting for a settlement, Brussels scrapped or dialled back threatened counter-tariffs, unlike China and Canada both of which have previously matched Trump's measures step for step. Some analysts and European commentators argue the EU missed a chance to assert broader strength instead settling under pressure to avoid economic escalation. Trump's core agenda intact: Steel and aluminium tariffs remain unchanged Despite EU negotiating efforts, the deal leaves in place Trump's 50% tariffs on European steel and aluminium, with only vague promises of a future quota-based relaxation. These metals remain an especially sore point among EU industry lobbyists and the longevity of these trade barriers highlights the limited EU leverage in core strategic sectors. Narrow exemptions: Some sectors spared but automobiles face full impact Certain sectors notably aircraft parts, select chemicals and some agri-products won zero-tariff exemption status. However, automobiles, representing a major chunk of EU exports to the US, fall under the full 15% tariff, a significant new cost for German, French and Italian carmakers already grappling with global market headwinds. While European leaders hailed the agreement as 'providing certainty' and averting a full-scale trade war, many in Europe see it as a lopsided settlement extracted at a moment of vulnerability. The tariff levels, energy purchase commitments, and investment pledges all signify a substantial shift in the transatlantic economic balance, one that, at least for now, appears to favour the US and President Trump's tough bargaining tactics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
‘Disappointed' With Putin, Donald Trump Threatens To Reduce 50-Day Ukraine Truce Deadline
Trump had earlier given Russia 50 days to end the fighting or face "very severe" economic sanctions. However, Russia has rebuffed US efforts for a ceasefire with Ukraine. US President Donald Trump on Monday threatened to reduce a 50-day deadline for Russia to come to a settlement with Ukraine or face 'severe" economic sanctions, saying he was disappointed in Russian President Vladimir Putin for not committing to a ceasefire. 'I've spoken to President Putin a lot. We got along really well… We thought we had it settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills people in a nursing home or whatever. Bodies lying all over the street," he told reporters alongside British PM Keir Starmer and his wife in Turnberry, Scotland. This is a developing story. More details are awaited. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
