Walmart Layoffs: Who is Suresh Kumar, the Indian-origin CTO in news amid latest job cuts
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Earlier this week, Walmart announced plans to lay off 1,500 employees at its headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, as it looks to cut costs and weather economic uncertainties, affecting the global technology team, ecommerce fulfillment in US stores and advertising business, Walmart Connect.The job cuts are meant to accelerate decision-making and reduce complexities, a memo by chief technology officer (CTO) Suresh Kumar and Walmart US chief executive officer (CEO) John Furner read, as reviewed by Bloomberg News. While eliminating some roles, Walmart is also creating new positions, they said.The latest round of layoffs has drawn criticism from US tech workers. One user on X claimed the vacancies in the Walmart tech team will be filled by H-1B visa holders. One post with Kumar's image claimed without proof that 40% of Walmart's IT department comprises H-1B visa holders from India.Over three decades of his experience, Bengaluru-born Kumar has worked with Microsoft Google and Amazon in various leading capacities. He has been working with Walmart for nearly six years, currently serving as global CTO and chief development officer. In this role, he leads Walmart's technologists across its global businesses, including Walmart US, Sam's Club, and Walmart International. He also oversees global shared services, data, cloud, infrastructure, and information security organisations for the retail major.Before joining Walmart, Kumar was the vice president and general manager at Google. In this role, he oversaw display, video, app advertising, and analytics, managing the advertising revenue and bottomline across platforms like the Google Play Store, Gmail, and YouTube. He led product and engineering teams for key advertising and analytics products including AdSense, AdMob, DV360, AdManager, and Google Analytics (both standard and 360). During his tenure, he drove business growth, introduced new product features, and significantly cut infrastructure and traffic acquisition costs.Before joining Google, Kumar held a senior role at Microsoft as corporate vice president of cloud infrastructure and operations. He led the global planning, delivery, and management of Microsoft's physical cloud infrastructure, including data centres, networks, servers, supply chains, and automation systems. Under his leadership, Microsoft doubled its global cloud footprint and tripled capacity. He also transformed the company's cloud supply chain and operations to enhance scalability, agility, and safety through automation.Prior to Microsoft, Kumar spent 15 years at Amazon in multiple leadership roles. As vice president of technology for retail systems and operations, he played a key role in scaling Amazon's retail business tenfold by automating functions like forecasting, pricing, merchandising, and vendor management. He also oversaw Amazon's retail operations, catalog management, and competitive analysis. Earlier, he led Amazon's retail supply chain and inventory systems.Kumar began his career at IBM's Thomas J Watson Research Center, where he worked on collaborative supply chain planning and shock protection technologies for portable hard drives.Kumar holds a PhD in engineering from Princeton University. He completed his BTech in aerospace, aeronautical and astronautical engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras in 1987.Kumar earned $15.98 million last year at Walmart, according to a regulatory filing. This included base salary of $1.1 million and stock awards worth $12 million.Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump lashed out at Walmart , accusing the retail giant of using tariffs as an excuse to raise prices and urging the company to absorb the cost increases instead of passing them on to American consumers.'Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Big Tech is eating itself in talent war
Big Tech's insatiable thirst for AI talent is threatening to kill its golden goose. Tech companies are paying AI researchers billions of dollars and using unorthodox tactics to grab the brightest minds. Their moves might help them near-term in the battle for AI supremacy, but they could also stifle a Silicon Valley innovation engine they badly need. Alongside job offers worth as much as $1 billion, Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and Google-parent Alphabet have all indulged in some version of what has come to be called the 'reverse acquihire": Instead of acquiring startups, they have hired away founders and top AI researchers—or licensed startups' technology—and left the husk of the businesses to either find new missions or be acquired by someone else. Microsoft did it with Inflection AI last year, bringing in its chief executive Mustafa Suleyman to manage its Copilot AI business, and paid a $650 million licensing fee to the company. Meta did it in June with AI data-labeling specialist Scale AI, proffering a $14.8 billion investment in the company in exchange for CEO Alexandr Wang and a team of Scale employees. Such moves suit the needs of the top tech companies in the current moment. The hires are pulled off quickly during an AI race that the companies see as a once-in-a-generation opportunity. They are relatively uncomplicated, with companies getting the talent and technology they want without the hassle of a post-acquisition integration effort. Perhaps most important, they don't need regulatory approval in an era when all of the companies are under some form of antitrust scrutiny. There are incentives on the startup side, too. Poached researchers are in some cases getting pro-athlete-level salaries. Venture-capital funders largely aren't getting big returns in these deals, industry executives say, but they aren't totally losing their shirts. The problem is that the moves challenge Silicon Valley's cultural foundations. Silicon Valley's basic bargain has always been rooted in taking enormous risk in the hope for an equally enormous reward. Most startups fail, but those that succeed can be wildly successful, generating hundredfold or higher returns for their venture-capital backers and making employees—many lured with the promise of equity—rich. It is an especially risky business for rank-and-file employees of venture-backed startups who are tied to the success of one company at a time, not a diversified portfolio of them. But for many employees of startups hollowed out in reverse acquihires or passed over in Big Tech hiring sprees, the rewards haven't been very handsome. When Google gutted a startup called Windsurf in a $2.4 billion deal in July, some of the remaining staff cried in the startup's office. The remainder of the company was quickly snapped up by another AI startup, but those employees almost certainly didn't get the kind of payday they were expecting. Before the Google deal, OpenAI had been in talks to buy Windsurf for $3 billion in what would have been a standard-issue Silicon Valley acquisition. A bunch of tech employees losing out on a payday might not seem all that significant. But Silicon Valley's innovation machine only works if it has an army of people who aren't founders or leading researchers moving its gears, the employees who handle sales, marketing, human resources or are part of large engineering teams. That's who's getting the short end of the stick. 'There are a ton of employees who are bought into this system, and the history and the tradition is you come out here, you try to make something of value and if it works out, everybody wins," said Jon Sakoda, the founding partner of Decibel, a venture-capital firm. 'If you thought you had a share of a company and you actually didn't have a share of a company, there's a loss of trust." If the reverse acquihire trend persists, there is a reasonable chance many people who would have been bold enough to join a risky startup will give more weight to their other options. They might instead go directly to big tech companies, in what might be a safer route for themselves but one that makes the pool of available startup talent shallower. Big tech's hiring tactics could ultimately prove problematic not only for venture capitalists and startups but for the titans themselves. Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta and Amazon collectively have acquired more than 100 companies outright since 2020, and have invested in hundreds more, according to Dealogic figures. Android was hardly a household name when Google paid $50 million for it back in 2005, but it has become the centerpiece of the company's mobile-phone strategy. Amazon's acquisition of Annapurna Labs for $350 million in 2015 laid the foundation for its wide-ranging custom-chip effort. It is clear enough why Big Tech is using its current playbook in the AI craze. But every time it does so, it erodes the very startup culture that has made Silicon Valley an unparalleled source of tech innovation. Write to Asa Fitch at
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Trump's Tariff Threat Tests India-US Relations
Published : Aug 16, 2025 19:25 IST - 6 MINS READ There is a distinct souring of sentiment in the narrative across India's 24-hour news channels. A news anchor opens her piece with a sarcastic diatribe on how, if only Trump were president of the USA in the past, so much could have been avoided through history; the First World War, the Second World War, all of it. The screen behind her displays an image of the US president with the text 'Earth is spinning better, thank Trump!'. The title of this video op-ed piece is 'Why Trump Should Never Win the Nobel Peace Prize'. It is a marked departure from the rapturous reception a second Trump term got only nine months back. A statement released then by India's External Affairs Ministry described how the two leaders had reaffirmed their commitment to a mutually beneficial and trusted partnership and agreed to remain in touch and meet soon. Social media and news coverage were awash with praise both for this sweeping victory and the warm and cordial relations between Mr Trump and Mr Modi. President Trump's decision and threat to now impose a 50 per cent tariff by the end of August because of India's purchase of Russian oil has escalated a stand-off over trade and led to a spiral of news flow; the US will regret treating India this way, warns one piece; US-India relations are at their worst, bemoans another. The social media clarion has sounded—it is time to ditch American products and companies like McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon; although how exactly that will be done remains unclear. All this unfolding while a fresh deadline to this hefty tariff clocks down. So much has changed in nine months. India has for now been steely in its response; but both choices present hard outcomes. Global commodity data shows India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, which is about 37 per cent of its total imports. Since 2023, India has been the biggest market for Russian crude, and between the two largest buyers of Russian crude, India and China, it is India that is clearly more dependent. According to data and analytics company Kpler, India imported 89 million tonnes (seaborne crude) last year, which was more than China's import. Switching crude oil varieties and buyers is neither going to be easy nor practical for India's refineries, aside from the fact that it also threatens to ratchet up prices. Also Read | America's melting ice cube and other tariff fairy tales On the flip side, the collateral damage of a 50 per cent tariff slap will be large. There are a number of export-oriented industries that are already feeling jittery; textiles, for one, the gems and jewellery sector, another, where the US makes up 30 per cent of its exports. Many export-oriented industries are in fact also labour-intensive industries, and a hit to their fortunes will have a massive knock-on effect on jobs. The list of vulnerable companies includes the big gun, Reliance Industries, which signed a 10-year contract to buy nearly 5,00,000 barrels a day of crude from Russia's state-owned Rosneft, making it the biggest-ever energy agreement between the two nations. Reliance has been exporting its refined products to both Europe and North America. A breakdown in ties with Western countries will mean significant changes in its business and perhaps its profitability in the months to come. India's domestic advantage with a large consumer market has been pointed to, but whichever way you cut it, a tariff hike of this quantum will see economic damage and dented investor sentiment for the country. There are counter-arguments to the possibility of a grim reset in Indo-US ties. One, that this will be yet another flip-flop by the US President, where a resolution of some sort will be cobbled together before the end of August, which is the deadline set by him. Two, that the two countries are now intertwined across too human and financial capital strands; Indian tech firms have long been present in America's industry through its services and its engineers. Money now flows both ways through venture capital and significant equity market exposure. Ripping all that apart will take more than tariff sabre-rattling. All or some of this may prove to be true. But there are also two clear questions here that need to be reckoned with. India was used to being the 'pick me' candidate when it came to China, where there was tactical and strategic advantage in building strong relations with India to offset China's growing strength in the region. Many nations, the US included, are having a rethink about that approach. China is no longer taboo, and India is no longer the counterfoil to China's regional dominance. Worse yet is the distinct turn in relations between the US and India's other neighbour, Pakistan. What started with a rather embarrassing display of cornering credit, President Trump claimed he was the one to put a stop to an imminent war between India and Pakistan—a claim that has been consistently repeated while speaking on the subject. While Indian diplomatic channels frantically tried to belie that take, Pakistan not only concurred with the US President's statement, it went on to nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Relations between the US and Pakistan have been on the upswing since then, ranging from private lunches with Pakistan's top military brass and talks about potentially boosting trade and commercial ties. It has left the Indian government with egg on its face and a disgruntled domestic mood. India and Pakistan, to America's mind are now firmly re-hyphenated. Also Read | Modi's foreign policy in shreds as non-alignment becomes multi-alignment How did it all turn sour so quickly when the singular narrative so far has been Prime Minister Modi's outstanding personal equation with Trump—from walking out hand in hand to address a rally in Houston, Texas a few years ago, to what is now being termed the lowest point in Indo-US ties in many decades; the 'great friendship' has not yielded any joy on economic ties. Perhaps the first lesson then is when policies—foreign, national, or economic—are built around personalities rather than nations, egos tend to get in the way. Especially when there is a domestic fan base that has been cheering the 'strongman' approach to cater to. There is also a view that this could be the moment India dives into structural reforms. In other words, this will be the catalyst for the great reset. As we wait on that outcome to emerge, it gives rise to the second question: Was that not the plan with the 'Make in India' campaign launched a decade ago? What has gone so sorely wrong ten years into its launch, where is the performance audit on the promised nation-building initiatives, the manufacturing thrust, more jobs for more people? This present round of tariff threats and ultimatums could go in any direction. Frankly, it does not even matter. The economic ground is shifting beneath the feet of both leaders. Time to see who has feet of clay. Mitali Mukherjee is the Director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. She is a political economy journalist with more than two decades of experience in TV, print and digital journalism. Mitali has co-founded two start-ups that focussed on civil society and financial literacy and her key areas of interest are gender and climate change.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Supper Clubs Bring Global Tastes to Chennai Homes
With 'Table for Four' Motchamary Pushpam (in orange) and daughter Anita hope to revive dishes disappearing from Puducherry Supper clubs may be trending on Instagram, but try telling Fiammetta Maggio Pereira and Anita de Canaga that. Their reaction? 'Oh, it's a 'thing' now, is it?' Fiammetta, an Italian-born Chennai resident, and Anita, a Puducherrian with a French backstory, have been hosting supper clubs at their homes way before it became a hashtag — Fiammetta to help guests enjoy the present, Anita to let them savour the past. Fiammetta says it began when her Italian cooking classes became a hit. 'The supper club was a natural progression,' says the textile entrepreneur, who runs home furnishing outfit Bottega Pereira. From the verandah of her Madhavaram home, she started hosting al fresco lunches for 12 to 20 guests, serving authentic Sicilian and Ligurian dishes. 'Then Covid hit, and the lunches stopped, but I'm back to hosting,' says Fiammetta. Anita's 'Table for Four' in Puducherry is a blend of French, Tamil and Vietnamese flavours, drawn from recipes passed down through generations. She began the supper club with her mother, Motchamary Pushpam, a decade ago, to revive dishes disappearing from Puducherry. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Gold Rates Today in Chennai | Silver Rates Today in Chennai 'There are also Cambodian and African influences in the food,' says Anita, adding that her grandfather, part of the French administration, spent 40 years in Cambodia and Vietnam, bringing home a mélange of flavours that feature on their menu. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo One such inspired dish is 'mutton margandam sambhar', seasoned with vadouvan, a French-Tamil spice blend made with sun-dried ingredients. While Anita and Fiammetta built their guest lists over years, Madhumitha Sriram joined the supper club brigade when the concept began trending. The 22-year-old started Casa Savore a month ago, and now hosts six guests at a time every week in the dining room of her Alandur home. 'We offer a six-course tasting menu, and the cuisine is decided by popular demand,' says Madhumitha. Most supper clubs, including hers, charge upwards of Rs 1,000 a head. Bookings come via Instagram, where guests fill out a Google form to get on the waiting list. 'It's great when strangers come together over a shared love for food but we do the form-filling for safety reasons,' says Madhumitha. Auditor Nithya Kaushik says she signed up for a Casa Savore evening to 'step out of the usual mall-and movie routine'. Her table was a mix of young professionals and graduates on summer break. 'It was a lovely evening of conversations about Chennai. It's nice to hear different perspectives, especially since I've spent all my life here. The food too was interesting — pani puri with a kiwi infusion, for example,' says Nithya. 'In Italy, the pleasure of eating is as much about lingering at the table and talking about food as it is about the food itself. India is similar, and that's what a supper club recreates, that sense of being in the moment and enjoying it,' says Fiammetta Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
