Crypto bounces on renewed optimism House could pass key stablecoin legislation this week
Bitcoin was last higher by 2% at $119,114.79, according to Coin Metrics, while ether rose 3% to $3,156.
Shares of stablecoin issuer Circle added more than 1% premarket and crypto services firm Coinbase gained about 0.5%, after both closed lower in the previous session. Ether treasury stocks continued their rally: BitMine surged 24%, while SharpLink jumped 14% and Bit Digital gained 5%.
On Tuesday, prices dipped briefly after the House failed to advance two key pieces of legislation for the crypto industry: the stablecoin bill known as the GENUIS Act, which has already passed the Senate, and the broader and far more complex market structure known as the CLARITY Act. Industry players including Coinbase hoped to see these bills move forward together, despite the latter one still awaiting a vote in the House.
Oppenheimer analyst Owen Lau told CNBC the stock reaction was overblown and framed the passage of the bills as a matter of "when" rather than an "if."
"It's not such bad news which is why the stocks [Coinbase and Circle] recovered in late trading," he said. "Both stocks may be under pressure until we get the vote but these bills will eventually get passed after these negotiations."
It doesn't ultimately matter how they get passed – separately or bundled – "in terms of the terminal value … but the stock could react more positively if all three bills get combined," and the market "would lose three or four months of uncertainty," Lau added.
President Donald Trump said in a social media post Tuesday night that several of the House Republicans who kept the bills from advancing had changed their minds following a White House meeting and will now vote to move the legislation forward.
In its current form, the GENIUS Act would restrict stablecoin issuers from paying users interest, which would reinforcing the importance of Ethereum – a network favored by institutions that supports a significant amount of activity and applications, including stablecoins – in the ecosystem.
However, ether's recent rally, driven by momentum and speculative positioning among the boom in stablecoin interest and ether treasuries, has not been supported by fundamentals.
"Active addresses remain flat, network revenue is unchanged, and gas [transaction] fees have only ticked up slightly," according to 10x Research's Markus Thielen. Ether has doubled in price in the last three months.
Bitcoin, whose price slipped this week due to more than $360 million in long liquidations Monday, also dropped after the crypto bills were halted, but recovered soon after. On Monday, the flagship cryptocurrency reached an all-time high above $120,000.
Bitcoin ETFs saw $402.99 million in inflows from institutions on Tuesday, while ether funds raked in $192.3 million, according to SoSoValue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Gabbard's claims of an anti-Trump conspiracy are not supported by declassified documents
Advertisement Those investigations either concluded — or accepted the conclusion — that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election. The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up: Russian election interference CLAIM: 'The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. Advertisement The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems. President Barack Obama's administration never alleged that voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, the administration said Russia ran a covert influence campaign using hacked and stolen material from prominent Democrats. Russian operatives then used that information as part of state-funded media and social media operations to inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts. Republican-led investigations in Congress have affirmed that conclusion, and the emails that Gabbard released do not contradict that finding. Shift in assessment? CLAIM: 'There was a shift, a 180-degree shift, from the intelligence community's assessment leading up to the election to the one that President Obama directed be produced after Donald Trump won the election that completely contradicted those assessments that had come previously.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. There was no shift. The emails Gabbard released show that a Department of Homeland Security official in August 2016 told then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.' The public assessment the Obama administration made public in January 2017 reached the same conclusion: 'DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.' Putin's intent CLAIM: The Obama administration 'manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.' — Gabbard on Truth Social Wednesday. Advertisement The material declassified this week reveals some dissent within the intelligence community about whether Putin wanted to help Trump or simply inflame the U.S. public. That same question led to a partisan divide on the House Intelligence panel when it examined the matter several years later. Gabbard's memo released last week cites a 'whistleblower' who she says served in the intelligence community at the time and who is quoted as saying that he could not 'concur in good conscience' with the intelligence community's judgment that Russia had a 'decisive preference' for Trump. Such dissent and debate are not unusual in the drafting of intelligence reports. The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee examined whether there was any political interference in the Obama administration's conclusions and reported that 'all analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content, and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper.' In 2018, Putin directly addressed the question of whether he preferred Trump at a press conference in Helsinki even as he sidestepped a question about whether he directed any of his subordinates to help Trump. 'Yes, I did,' Putin said. 'Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.' Steele dossier CLAIM: 'They used already discredited information like the Steele dossier — they knew it was discredited at the time.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. The dossier refers to a collection of opposition research files compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, whose work was funded by Democrats during the 2016 election. Those files included uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia, but the importance to the Russia investigation has sometimes been overstated. Advertisement It was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the Justice Department's inspector general found. Some of the records released by Gabbard this week also reveal that it was a Central Intelligence Agency human source close to the Kremlin that the agency primarily relied on for its conclusion that Putin wanted to help Trump and hurt Clinton, not the Steele dossier. FBI agents on the case didn't even come to possess the dossier until weeks into their inquiry. Even so, Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to undercut the broader Russia investigation. Many of Steele's claims have since been discredited or denied. It is true, however, that the FBI and Justice Department relied in part on the Steele dossier to obtain surveillance warrants to eavesdrop on the communications of a former Trump campaign adviser, the inspector general found. FBI agents continued to pursue those warrants even after questions arose about the credibility of Steele's reporting. The dossier was also summarized — over the objections of then-CIA Director John Brennan, he has said — in a two-page annex to the classified version of the intelligence community assessment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Media becomes fifth largest Bitcoin treasury company amid $2bn splurge
Trump Media is now a Bitcoin whale. On Monday, Trump Media, the parent company behind US President Donald Trump's social platforms, announced the purchase of a massive $2 billion worth of Bitcoin, officially joining the expanding list of corporate Bitcoin holders. The investment outlay means the company deployed into Bitcoin most of the $2.5 billion it raised earlier in the year from stocks and convertible note sales. The choice, the company's CEO Devin Nunes said, is not just about returns — it's about freedom. 'These assets help ensure our company's financial freedom, help protect us against discrimination by financial institutions, and will create synergies with the utility token we're planning to introduce across the Truth Social ecosphere,' Devin Nunes, Trump Media's CEO, said in the announcement. The size of the investment outlay puts Trump Media in rarefied air: it's now the fifth-largest public holder of Bitcoin, ahead of Japanese firm Metaplanet's roughly $1.9 billion stash. The investment follows a booming trend: dozens of companies are now loading up on Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Some companies have even turned their attention to cryptocurrencies like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. Pioneers like Michael Saylor's Strategy and Metaplanet have proven that the model can supercharge a company's share price and attract investors, effectively turning a company's stock into Bitcoin exchange-traded fund proxies. Strategy's share price has risen 12-fold in the five years since the company began stockpiling Bitcoin. It now holds about $72 billion worth of Bitcoin, the most by any publicly-traded company. But not every Saylor copycat has been successful. Semler Scientific, a biotech firm, adopted a Bitcoin reserve strategy in May 2024. It's the 14th-biggest corporate holder with over $570 million worth of Bitcoin. But its share price is down 26% this year. The culprit? NAV, or net asset value, which for a Bitcoin reserve strategy company measures the value of the holdings against its share price. Because these companies sell their shares at a premium to fund their Bitcoin buys, the stock value becomes tied to an inflated price of Bitcoin, investment manager Jim Chanos said in May. Metaplanet's stock, for instance, is valued by investors at almost seven times the market price of Bitcoin, according to analysts at 10x Research. For now, Trump Media is up 5% following Monday's announcement, while Bitcoin is trading at $118,000. Osato Avan-Nomayo is our Nigeria-based DeFi correspondent. He covers DeFi and tech. Got a tip? Please contact him at osato@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How insiders are cashing in on a ‘complicated' crypto treasury trend
Bitcoin treasuries are having a moment, but the buzz is hiding how insiders are quietly cashing in while retail investors foot the bill, according to some market stakeholders. Rob Hadick, general partner at crypto venture capital firm Dragonfly, reckons that the sudden wave of companies launching corporate Bitcoin vehicles is a sign of trouble, not triumph. 'The crypto treasury trend is complicated,' Hadick said in a July 21 interview with Coinage Media. 'I got six calls about new treasury vehicles over the weekend. That tells you the froth.' And it's precisely that fervour that's creating distorted incentives, he argued. Bitcoin treasury companies have just one overarching business model and it's to raise money, buy Bitcoin, and hope the stock trades at a premium. It's a playbook popularised by Michael Saylor. The stock of his software company, Strategy, has soared more than tenfold since it began swapping cash for crypto at the end of 2020. That success has triggered crypto's latest gold rush — drawing in everyone from hotel chains to US President Donald Trump's Trump Media to stock up on Bitcoin. More than 150 public companies now hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, with 24 new firms joining the trend in the past 30 days. Buying a dollar for $1.20 It's not just the volume of deals — it's also how they're structured. Many of these vehicles include 'promotes,' the cut taken by asset managers or early investors before any gains reach shareholders, Hadick said. 'Traditionally, a promote is 10%,' he said. 'I've seen some now where they're up to 20% or more. That's dilution — you're paying $1.20 for $1 of Bitcoin.' Even if Bitcoin performs well, investors could still lag because a sizable chunk of the upside is carved out for insiders. A high promote rewards hype and fundraising over long term value creation, because it lets insiders lock in upside before the asset even performs. The more capital they raise, and the more buzz they generate, the more they earn, regardless of whether the Bitcoin bet actually pays off. Hadick isn't a fan of the model. 'Some of them look like they're just meant to extract value,' he said. Unsustainable valuations He's not the only one concerned. Eliezer Ndinga, head of research at says that while Bitcoin treasuries are becoming more common, the quality varies widely. 'Some of these companies lack products or a vision to support the broader Bitcoin network,' he told DL News on July 17. 'Those firms risk unsustainable valuations and won't trade at significant premiums in the future.' 'Me too' Famed short seller Jim Chanos, who called Enron's collapse in 2001, recently said the crypto market is reliving the 2021 SPAC boom — only this time, it's Bitcoin on the balance sheet instead of blank-check mergers. 'We are seeing SPAC-like 2021 numbers in the Bitcoin treasury market right now,' Chanos said on the Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast last week. 'Hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars a night.' He's shorting the premium between Strategy's stock — the company formerly known as MicroStrategy — and its underlying Bitcoin holdings. 'I believe it's over 130 companies already — and growing,' he said. 'The market can only absorb so much issuance.' Pedro Solimano is DL News' Buenos Aires-based markets correspondent. Got at a tip? Email atpsolimano@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
