Taxpayer ‘risks footing £6bn bill for HS2 Euston overhaul'
British taxpayers risk footing a multibillion-pound bill to turn London Euston station into the new High Speed 2 (HS2) terminus, the site's former owner has said.
A blueprint for the £6bn makeover will not deliver the returns needed to attract the type of private investment promised by Rachel Reeves, according to property tycoon Michael Gross, who owned multiple sites around Euston that were acquired by HS2.
'It's certain to fail,' he said. 'There is no chance whatsoever of raising that money privately. It's propaganda, not fact, and the taxpayer will be left to pick up the pieces.'
Mr Gross, who was part of a group that submitted plans for Euston's redevelopment, said current proposals that envisage a mix of shops, offices, housing and green space fail to exploit the site's true potential.
Only a retail development bigger than Heathrow's Terminal 5 or Westfield London, Europe's largest shopping centre, would stand a chance of raising the required funds, he claimed.
'The station is hugely expensive and the tunnelling is hugely expensive. So you've got to create the highest commercial value you possibly can,' he said.
'You have to build a city within a city. You'll have a captive audience of 100m people a year who you can funnel through shops, an entertainment centre, cinemas and restaurants.'
The Euston plan was stalled two years ago when the previous Conservative government claimed HS2 would end in west London unless private investors rode to the rescue with cash to regenerate the area.
Rather than scrapping the plan, Ms Reeves committed to taking the high-speed rail link the five miles into the centre of the capital and redeveloping the station.
Ms Reeves said in her October Budget that while cash would be provided to tunnel to Euston, the regeneration of the station would be substantively funded by private finance.
The Department for Transport (DfT) later said Euston would be paid for via private financing and receipts from commercial development, topped up by taxpayer and local government funds.
However, the Commons public accounts committee said in February that it was 'sceptical that the private sector will provide this level of contribution'.
Mr Gross said ministers were mistaken in regarding the redevelopment of nearby Kings Cross as a template for Euston, with the former having been a brownfield site of disused railway yards.
The Euston project, by contrast, will see the station itself double in size, its roof replaced with a concrete deck that must support new buildings while existing platforms remain in use.
He said the Hudson Yards complex in New York was the only practical blueprint, having been built above tracks from Penn Station. It features 100 shops and restaurants and 16 skyscrapers – one 200ft taller than The Shard – on a site half the size of Euston.
Andrea Ruckstuhl, of Lendlease, the master developer for Euston, said the firm is working with partners to deliver a planning application for the station and its surroundings.
He said: 'That will include new homes, businesses and community spaces; while also generating significant value for the UK economy.'
The DfT spokesman said the Government was 'working at pace to set out the delivery arrangements and funding for the station' and will provide an update in due course.
Mr Gross said that even if Labour were to rethink its approach, changes in the office and retail sectors since Covid meant redeveloping Euston for HS2 would not be viable.
He urged the Government to admit defeat, halt HS2 in west London and focus on upgrading Euston as a hub for trains on the existing West Coast line to northern England and Scotland.
He said: 'Euston is falling apart. We need to rebuild it as a conventional railway, but they have no plan, no money and no idea how to deal with it.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump plans to punish Newsom
The Trump administration is considering cutting California's federal education funding, as a tit-for-tat battle with Gavin Newsom, the state's governor, reaches boiling point. Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested Mr Newsom should be arrested for his 'bad job' in handling a wave of anti-deportation protests, which erupted on Friday in response to immigration raids. It comes as Mr Newsom on Tuesday accused Mr Trump of a 'brazen abuse of power' when he deployed thousands of National Guard troops and 700 US marines in Los Angeles to quell the protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. The state is suing the president for sending in troops without Mr Newsom's approval, marking the first time since civil rights protests in 1965 that a president sent the National Guard to deal with civil unrest without cooperation from the state's governor. Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said the administration is 'committed to ending this nightmare and restoring the California Dream'. He added: 'No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the administration have been made.' In the wake of the row, White House officials may stop the education department's disbursement of 'formula funds' to California, Politico reported. The state receives $8 billion a year from the education department. Some of the payouts are used towards programs for students with disabilities and from low-income homes. Mr Trump's vow to cut funding to the country's most populous state began before his latest clash with Mr Newsom and his dispatch of Marines and the National Guard. He has already cut $126.4 million in flood prevention projects, and threatened to dilute California's tough vehicle emissions standards. Last month, he said he would halt federal funding after a transgender athlete took part in a sporting event. His pause to visas for students from China would also have an outsized impact on California as it enrols more foreign students than any other state. As the state was ravaged by a series of wildfires in January, Mr Trump directly blamed Mr Newsom for LA's struggling water supply, and threatened to bar California from accepting federal disaster funds unless they changed water policies. Speaking on Tuesday, Mr Trump described the LA protesters as 'a foreign enemy' and vowed to 'liberate' Los Angeles. A curfew has been enforced between 8pm to 6am in the downtown area of central Los Angeles, in what officials say is necessary to stop vandalism and looting. Mr Newsom has urged demonstrators – who have been protesting ICE raids since Friday – to remain peaceful and said Mr Trump's actions were fulfilling 'the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial president' . Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Planet Normal: ‘The numbers don't add up' in Rachel Reeves' spending review
' What we saw today, in terms of the areas under her control, there are big question marks that need to be asked' On the latest Planet Normal podcast, which you can listen to using the audio player below, columnists Liam Halligan and Allison Pearson discuss Labour's spending review with economist Gerard Lyons. Mr Lyons wasn't convinced by the numbers, ' Early in her speech the Chancellor said, is the plan credible, and the answer unfortunately is, no.' 'T he starting position is debt is very high, and I think we're in the early stages of Britain going into a debt crisis. If you're looking for good news, it might be that we're not the only country facing this problem; but today the Chancellor gave a speech that I think lacked a lot of the detail.' Allison is not convinced by the claims the economy is stabilising, ' We know it is not true, and we are already starting to see the impact on employment and on businesses. We know payrolls have fallen, that employment's fallen by over 250,000 since Rachel Reeves' budget. This is not an economy where you should be taking the gambles that she's taking. Where is the growth going to come from?' Planet Normal, a weekly Telegraph podcast featuring news and views from beyond the bubble. Listen on the audio player above or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your preferred podcast app. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spending review could mean cuts in Wales
Some public services are likely to face cuts if the NHS swallows extra funding announced for Wales in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review, experts have said. There is a warning that "tough choices loom", even though the budget is expected to grow over the next three years. Labour said it was investing in public services by boosting the Welsh government's budget. But Plaid Cymru accused Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan of "asking for very little and getting exactly that". The Welsh government can raise taxes, but most of what it spends comes in a grant from the Treasury. Its funding will be £22.4bn a year on average over the next three years as a result of the spending review. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review New stations in £445m 10-year Wales rail plan Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), an independent think tank, said funding for the day-to-day running of public services would grow about 1.2% above inflation. "While an increase overall, that will likely require tough choices and indeed real terms cuts for some services," the IFS's David Phillips said. "Increases in funding for the Welsh NHS could easily absorb most, if not all, of this increase." He said Welsh Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will "have to decide carefully which areas to prioritise and which to cut back". About half the Welsh government's budget is already spent on healthcare. Waiting times for hospital treatment have risen to record highs in recent years. On Wednesday, the chancellor announced a real-terms increase of 3% to day-to-day funding for the NHS in England. That will result in extra funding for Welsh ministers to spend as they wish. However, Guto Ifan from the Wales Governance Centre warned: "If the Welsh government decided to transfer that money to the health service in Wales, which would still be below the historical growth in health spending, it would mean difficult settlements for everything else in the budget. "I would imagine that the Welsh government would have to make cuts to services outside health under this settlement." Reeves' spending review reveals how much funding will be available after next May's Senedd election. She also announced £445m for new rail projects in Wales, following years of complaints that Wales has not had a fair share of spending. She backed plans for five new stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire, and rail upgrades in north Wales. First Minister Eluned Morgan said: "Wales will see significant extra investment in rail infrastructure, coal tips safety and Welsh communities will see real benefits that improve lives and create opportunities." Treasury minister Torsten Bell said there would be "record levels of spending happening in the Welsh government" and said previous Conservative governments "consistently let down Wales" on capital spending which pays for infrastructure. Opponents said the cash fell short of what Wales needed and criticised a ten-year timeline for the scheme - Labour sources said most of the cash would be spent much sooner. Plaid Cymru finance spokesperson, Heledd Fychan, said: "Public services, already teetering on the brink in Wales under Labour face further cuts as a consequence of Labour's First Minister asking for very little and getting exactly that." Welsh Conservative Senedd leader Darren Millar said the amount of rail funding was "shameful". "Today's rail spending announcement is an insult to the people of Wales," he added.