Fears over unlikely Egypt-Iran alliance in changing political landscape
The surprise friendship is placing the two powerhouses in a position to stymie Israel's pursuit of domination in an increasingly violent region, sources have told The National.
It's an unlikely partnership on many levels. Until recently, Egypt had routinely condemned what it viewed as Iran's meddling in the affairs of its Arab neighbours, as well as its support for proxies such as Lebanon's Hezbollah, Shiite militias in Iraq and the Houthis in Yemen, which Cairo sees as dangerous.
The two countries have emerged from decades of fraught relations and, at times, outright enmity that date back to the 1979 Islamic revolution and the refuge Cairo afforded the Shah of Iran when he fled.
The alliance has transcended the religious persuasion of the two nations, with Iran being the world's largest Shiite nation, and a history of evangelistic activity in the region. In contrast, Egypt is predominantly Sunni and home to the 1,000-year-old Al Azhar Mosque, the world's foremost seat of Islamic learning.
The association is also fraught with peril. Egypt is a close ally of the US, Iran's nemesis, receiving billions of dollars in economic and military aid from Washington over the past 50 years that it can ill afford to lose. It also has a US-sponsored 1979 peace treaty with Israel in place, which regards the clergy-led regime in Tehran as an existential threat.
The dangers are more foreboding considering that the Cairo-Tehran alliance comes at a time when Egypt's relations with Israel are at their lowest ebb in decades over the Gaza war, with officials in both countries occasionally adopting sabre-rattling rhetoric. Cairo's relations with Washington have also been tense in recent months, again over Gaza.
The regional sources said a significant component of the Cairo-Tehran alliance is Egypt's wish to stop what it sees as Israel's bid to dominate the region through its military might and the virtually unconditional support it receives from the US.
Diplomacy to bridge gap
Egypt's opposition to Israel's perceived goal is a matter of public record in a country that has, in recent days, taken to calling its war in Gaza genocidal.
'It's not acceptable to allow any single party to dominate the region or to engineer what is called the restructuring of the region,' said Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty.
'We are quite capable of imposing our view within the regional and Arab frameworks and will not allow any single party to impose its will on the area,' he said in a thinly veiled reference to Israel.
It is towards this end that Egypt had sought to use diplomacy to bridge the gap between Iran and the US during weeks of fruitless negotiations that preceded the Israel-Iran war in June.
During those Oman-mediated negotiations, Mr Abdelatty frequently spoke on the telephone to his Iranian and Omani counterparts, as well as the US chief negotiator, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
Official Egyptian statements at the time spoke of Egypt's efforts to defuse the tension and spare the region a destructive conflict.
Separately, Egypt has been engaged in intense talks with the Iranians and Rafael Grossi, head of the IAEA – the UN's nuclear oversight agency – since the end of the 12-day war with Israel, the sources said.
Those contacts, they said, were designed to promote a peaceful settlement of the dispute over Iran's nuclear programme and to find a mechanism to rid the Middle East of nuclear weapons.
Mr Abdelatty has also frequently cited Israel's refusal to sign the nuclear non-proliferation agreement as a major contribution to tension in the region, while emphasising the freedom of every nation in the area to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.
Newly minted alliance
Mr Abdelatty has held talks with his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi, in person or by phone, at least a dozen times this summer, an unusually large number over a relatively short time given the rapprochement between the two nations is so recent.
'Egypt wants Iran to stay strong and united as a deterrent to Israel's expansionist designs,' said one of the sources. 'It does not want it to be subjected again to strikes by Israel and the US that could cause the country to come unhinged.'
During a visit to Egypt in June, Mr Araghchi visited Cairo's medieval district and joined three former Egyptian foreign ministers for dinner at a restaurant in the Khan El Khalili bazaar, activities rarely allowed by Egyptian authorities and tolerated only when hosting a special guest.
'We constantly consult with Egypt and we have a wish for these consultations to continue,' Mr Araghchi said. 'Relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Egypt are close and are founded on mutual respect.'
Egypt's objectives in this newly minted alliance reach beyond the nuclear file, said the sources.
The most populous Arab nation with 107 million people, Egypt is looking to the day when a sanctions-free Iran would potentially be a reliable source of oil and gas to meet the needs of its rapidly growing population, the sources added.
Egypt is also eyeing the large Iranian market for at least two million pilgrims annually to visit religious sites housing the tombs of members of the Prophet Mohammed's family, along with those of revered saints, they said.
Further afield, Egypt is also looking to Iran to continue to counter Israel's growing influence in Africa, parts of which are seen by Cairo as an extension of its national security sphere, they added.
Militarily, Egypt stands to benefit from Iran's drone technology, a field in which Iran has excelled to a degree that has reportedly allowed it to supply the weapons to Russia for use in its war against Ukraine, according to the sources.
But despite the potential benefits Egypt hopes to gain from its close relations with Iran, it has to tread carefully.
One concern is that Egypt must ensure relations with Iran bring about improved ties between Tehran and its Arab neighbours in the Gulf.
Another is that Cairo should never be seen to be involved in any attempt by Iran to develop nuclear weapons – which Tehran denies it intends to – or to develop an atomic energy programme outside the oversight of the IAEA.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Hamas negotiators in Cairo to discuss blueprint for 'comprehensive' Gaza deal
A Hamas delegation led by chief negotiator Khalil Al Hayah was in Cairo on Tuesday to discuss a 'comprehensive' deal to end the Gaza war and ensure the release of hostages held by the militant group, sources told The National. Israel 's declared plan to reoccupy Gaza, however, is casting a dark shadow on the discussions in Egypt, with the sources entertaining little hope that their outcome could persuade Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's government to change course. US President Donald Trump appeared to cast doubt on the prospect of any deal to end the war, saying he did not believe Hamas will release Israeli hostages unless the situation in Gaza changed, according to American news website Axios. The Israeli plan to reoccupy Gaza has drawn international condemnation and many have cast doubts on its effectiveness in both stopping Hamas and freeing the hostages. But Israeli officials have said the offensive could take several weeks to begin, which could leave a window for a renewed push in ceasefire talks. Mr Trump stopped short of directly endorsing Israel's plans to expand its offensive, but said he agreed with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's argument that more military pressure on Hamas was required. He told Axios it was going to be 'very rough to get them' because Hamas 'are not going to let the hostages out in the current situation'. A Hamas official told The National that a delegation from the group led by Mr Al Hayah was in Cairo for talks with Egyptian mediators. 'We in Hamas deal positively, with full flexibility and responsibility, with the mediators, but what is obstructing the agreement is Netanyahu and his fascist government, as well as the American administration,' said the official, Mahmoud Taha, who is based in the Lebanese capital, Beirut. On Tuesday, sources told The National the proposed comprehensive deal provides for the release of all 50 hostages still held by Hamas – only 20 of them are believed to be still alive – and Palestinians detained in Israeli prisons. Also covered are the laying down and storage of Hamas's weapons under international supervision, the governance of postwar Gaza, and reconstruction, according to the sources. The flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza is also provided for in the proposed deal, they added. They said the departure of Hamas leaders from Gaza to live in exile abroad with their families is also on the table. The proposed deal also envisages the training by Jordan and Egypt of up to 150 Palestinian security and intelligence operatives to patrol Gaza, as well as providing basic training for a new Palestinian police force, they said. An Arab force made up of personnel from Egypt, Jordan and possibly Gulf Arab nations would also be sent to Gaza to ensure that the terms of a deal are observed, said the sources. That force, which would operate under the UN umbrella, would remain there until legislative and presidential elections are held. Mr Taha, the Hamas official, rejected the proposals for an Arab force. 'Talk about bringing in Arab military forces … is not official. We have seen it in the media, but it is not official,' he said. 'The Palestinian factions and the Palestinian people alone decide who is in Gaza … We do not accept external interference, and this is Hamas' position.' Hamas-Egypt dispute Tuesday's talks between the Egyptian mediators and Hamas negotiators were the first public face-to-face contact between the two sides since a row erupted late between them late last month, over what Cairo viewed as criticism by the militant group that it was not doing enough to alleviate the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. The sources said a Turkish mediation led by Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, who visited Cairo last week, has ended the row. They gave no details. The first salvo in the row came from Hamas's aid arm – the Central Emergency Committee – which said Egypt's account of its aid efforts for Gaza was 'essentially an excuse to cover its negligence in assuming a humanitarian, moral and Arab duty towards Gaza'. The statement, parts of which were mocking, added: 'It's time that Egypt, with all its weight and prestige, shift away from the logic of 'neutral mediation' to a decisive moral position on the side of Gaza.' The accusations were repeated by Mr Al Hayah. Writing on the group's Telegram account, he said: 'People of Egypt, its leaders, army, clans, tribes, scientists, Al Azhar, churches and elite: Will you let your brothers in Gaza die of hunger when they are near you across the border?' The accusation that Egypt is not doing enough for the Palestinians in Gaza has been publicly countered by President Abdel Fattah El Sisi and a slate of pro-government pundits and talk show hosts, who angrily accused Hamas of being a tool of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist group outlawed in Egypt since 2013. The essence of the Egyptian argument is that Egypt's Rafah land crossing with Gaza is controlled from the Palestinian side by Israel. Nothing can go through the crossing without Israel's advance approval. Egypt has, over the past two weeks, taken part in air missions to deliver humanitarian supplies to Gaza, joining several other countries, including Jordan, the UAE, Italy and the UK. The Gaza war was sparked by an October, 2023 attack led by Hamas against southern Israeli communities, killing 1,200 people and taken another 250 others hostage. Israel responded with a devastating military campaign that has to date killed more than 61,000 Palestinians and wounded more than twice that number, according to authorities in the coastal enclave.


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How Syria became the battleground for Israeli and Turkish influence
Watching the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East in recent months, it would be tempting to conclude that Israel's strategic position has improved. The same could be said for Turkey. Could this situation constitute a recipe for stability, or presage further troubles ahead? Although engaged in conflict on multiple fronts - Gaza, the occupied West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iran - Israel appears to have prevailed for the time being, while the Tehran-led 'axis of resistance' seems in disarray. Iran's military leadership and infrastructure were severely hit during the June war, which also damaged the state's nuclear programme, although how much it has been set back remains unclear. The Iranian response was muted after the US bombed the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites on 22 June. Syria, meanwhile, is now ruled by a former al-Qaeda militant whose reputation was laundered at record speed by western democracies. Decades of American and European mobilisation against extremist groups such as the Islamic State and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham were tossed into the garbage within days, further confirming western double standards. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Iran's main logistical route to support Hezbollah in Lebanon has thus been severed. As for the Lebanese movement itself, it has been severely weakened with the loss of leader Hassan Nasrallah and other top figures. It is now under strong pressure, both internal and international, to give up its military arsenal. At the same time, Israel's ruthlessness in Gaza, which has been turned into a massive killing field as starving civilians queue to receive limited humanitarian aid, has degraded much of its international support. But Israel's extremist government does not really care about the world's opinion, as long as western nations continue to provide support (and others, such as Russia and China, remain inexplicably neutral). Unprovoked strikes As for Turkey, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan recently succeeded in neutralising the main security threat along its southeastern border, the Kurdistan Workers' Party. It also prevailed in its long-sought objective to remove Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria, replacing him with Ahmed al-Sharaa. And last but not least, Ankara has bolstered its global reputation as the go-to mediator in the Russia-Ukraine war. Alongside Israel, Turkey has become a top regional actor. In this context, any path towards stability in such a volatile setting must now inevitably involve both Israel and Turkey - and both are prepared to rebuff US pressure, in ways few other American allies could dream of doing. Unsurprisingly, suspicions about Washington's real intentions run deep in Turkey. Ankara believes that ultimately, the US will always prioritise Israel Syria could become one of the most important stress tests for this dynamic. Last month, Israel carried out air strikes against Syrian regime positions amid clashes between Druze and Bedouin communities in southern Syria. While Israel said its goal was to protect the Druze, its actual policy seems to be focused on disarming the area south of Damascus to expand its own 'buffer zone'. This is not even to mention how, in the immediate aftermath of Assad's collapse, Israel launched a series of unprovoked air strikes on Syria, levelling the state's military infrastructure - to the usual deafening silence of western democracies. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and other regional states have expressed their support for Syria's unity, while Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has warned that Turkey could intervene if separatist groups - such as the Druze, viewed by Ankara as an agent of Israel - attempt to divide and destabilise Syria. There has also been speculation that Israel may try to void its 1974 ceasefire deal with Syria, in search of a new security arrangement that would give Israel a presence beyond the Golan Heights for a five-year transitional period, according to a regional security source. Considering how easily Israel turns transitional periods into permanent ones, it would be normal to expect such a move to ignite serious concerns in Damascus, and possibly also Ankara. Suspicions run deep At the same time, the Syrian government's recent attempt to subdue Druze areas has caused concerns among the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who fear that in such a scenario, they could become the next target - although so far, they have benefitted from US protection. In this context, Turkey does not appear ready to come to Sharaa's defence, and it is unclear as to whether it would be able to compromise with Israel on agreed spheres of influence. In a hypothetical division, the southern part of Syria up to the outskirts of Damascus could fall under Israeli influence, and the rest - except for the SDF heartland east of the Euphrates - under Turkish influence. In such a configuration, the SDF would count on American support as a bulwark against Turkish attacks. How this would work in practice would be an open question. Syria after Assad: How Israel and the US are accelerating plans to partition the country Read More » Another significant stress test may soon come into play with regard to US diplomacy in the area. The US ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, an American of Lebanese origin, has a significant advantage in Washington: a direct line to President Donald Trump. He is also the special envoy for Syria, with a mandate to stabilise the political situation in Lebanon. This is quite an extensive mandate for a single figure in a highly volatile region - a clear signal that Washington might be aiming for a comprehensive approach. Unsurprisingly, suspicions about Washington's real intentions run deep in Turkey. Ankara believes that ultimately, the US will always prioritise Israel. But the future remains uncertain. Can Washington rein in two of its major regional allies to avoid a scenario in which a deeply divided Syria, pulled in different directions by competing spheres of influence, could be the spark that ignites another major conflict? The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


Al Etihad
5 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Arab Parliament highlights youth's pivotal role in achieving sustainable development
12 Aug 2025 15:10 CAIRO (WAM)Mohammed bin Ahmed Al Yamahi, President of the Arab Parliament, underscored the pivotal role of youth as a fundamental pillar in the progress of Arab nations and a driving force for achieving sustainable a statement marking International Youth Day, observed annually on August 12, Al Yamahi stressed the need to harness the potential of young people and empower them through training, capacity building, and encouragement of efforts, he noted, would directly contribute to enhancing economic and social development while helping to address current reaffirmed the Arab Parliament's support for initiatives aimed at developing youth skills, calling for stronger Arab cooperation to provide an enabling environment that offers youth opportunities for employment, education, and innovation. This, he added, would allow them to showcase their talents and creativity, with tangible benefits for the development of their communities.