logo
Pritzker's 2026 budget proposal is $500 million short

Pritzker's 2026 budget proposal is $500 million short

Yahoo14-05-2025
CHICAGO (WGN) — With fewer than three weeks to pass a state budget, key lawmakers said Tuesday that cuts from Washington and a slow economy have blown a $500 million hole in Gov. JB Pritzker's proposed budget.
The legislature has been working for months from Pritzker's $55.2 billion blueprint that holds the line on new taxes for most Illinoisans, but the hole has lawmakers looking now at cuts to programs and services.
To raise revenue, the governor is proposing increased tax rates on table games at casinos, excluding those in Chicago, and a pause in the final transfer of state sales tax revenue on gas purchases to the state Road Fund. The state is also expected to save by eliminating a health care program for noncitizen immigrants under 65.
'Not only because of the federal government concerns but also a slow economy has us all concerned here hoping that we don't have to raise regressive taxes,' State Rep. La Shawn Ford (D-Chicago) told WGN.
Even though money is tight, interest groups and local governments are pushing hard to boost funding. The Regional Transportation Authority is pushing for a bailout, saying that without state help, the Chicago Transit Authority, Metra and Pace would be forced to implement deep service cuts. In a March 'doomsday' report, transit officials said those cuts would deal a 'devastating' blow to the regional economy.
Leaders of the Democratic supermajority warn there's not much wiggle room in the budget.
'We've conditioned our members to understand how tight this budget year is going to be,' said Senate President Don Harmon. 'That won't eliminate spending pressures, but I think people understand this is a different year than last year or the year before.'
Republicans point out state budgets have grown from $40 billion in Pritzker's first year to $55 billion for fiscal year 2026. Meeting with reporters in Springfield with a podium sign that read, 'It's time to DOGE Illinois,' the GOP lawmakers urged cuts.
'We don't have a money problem, we've got a focus problem. We've got a priorities problem,' said Rep. Blaine Wilhour (R-Effingham).
A spokesperson for the governor said that Ford 'is not a budgeteer,' and Deputy Governor Andy Manar in a statement said Pritzker and his office of management and budget will continue working closely with legislators 'to deliver a balanced budget that keeps Illinois on a stable fiscal path while safeguarding the services families depend on.'
Harmon and Illinois House Speaker Emanuel 'Chris' Welch both said they're going to pass the budget with the information that they have now, but will adjust if Washington makes drastic cuts. They might even have to return to work this summer.
While Democrats hammer out final budget details, Pritzker was in Washington on Tuesday, fielding questions about his political ambitions. Per his official schedule, the governor has been meeting with CEOs and international trade partners at the SelectUSA Investment Summit in an effort to encourage more businesses to choose Illinois.
During an afternoon interview on CNN, Pritzker again claimed he has yet make a decision about a third term, saying in part, 'the question is how can I best participate in the fight, and so whether that's being governor or not, whether that's, potentially, in the future running for president, it's just, to me, about we've got to win in 2026.'
Pritzker later told CNN's Kasie Hunt: 'My focus is on lifting up the people of the state of Illinois, advancing the cause of the economy for our state, and making sure that I'm bringing what I have been, I think, for the last six and a half years, which is fiscal stability to a state that really wasn't stable for many years before.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is this legal? A look at why North Texas Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier remains in state Capitol
Is this legal? A look at why North Texas Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier remains in state Capitol

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Is this legal? A look at why North Texas Democratic Rep. Nicole Collier remains in state Capitol

A Texas House member from Fort Worth prepares to spend another night inside the Capitol in a political showdown over the rules established by the state legislature. Representative Nicole Collier, who represents District 95 in East Fort Worth, objects to the House speaker's demand that Democrats, who had fled the state to prevent a quorum, sign permission slips to leave and promise to be inside the Capitol on Wednesday morning. SMU political science professor Matthew Wilson explains the rarely enforced rules being applied during this second special session of the legislature. He said once enough Democratic lawmakers returned to the Capitol to meet the quorum for the second special session, the speaker needed only 15 other members, according to the House Rules Manual. "I think both sides in this are playing hardball. Everybody's using all the tools that are at their disposal to achieve the political outcome that they want. I mean, it's worth noting she's the only Democratic legislator who is being subject to this, and it's because of her own decision not to sign the agreement," said Wilson. Collier told CBS News Texas' Jack Fink that she's taking a stand against what she believes are improper efforts by Republicans to control her and other Democrats. "I have a right to resist, I have a right to oppose, just like my voters do, just like Texans have a right to challenge government, and that's what I'm doing," said Collier. Spending a few nights inside the state Capitol may not stop the redistricting plan from passing, but political observers say it will help raise Collier's profile within the Texas Democratic Party.

Democrats, Republicans expect Texas-sized fight over new congressional maps on House floor Wednesday
Democrats, Republicans expect Texas-sized fight over new congressional maps on House floor Wednesday

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Democrats, Republicans expect Texas-sized fight over new congressional maps on House floor Wednesday

The political showdown over new congressional maps in Texas moves to the House floor on Wednesday. While Republicans and Democrats expect multiple amendments and points of order to kill the maps that will give Republicans five more seats, the maps are still on their way to passing. The vote will take place after Democrats returned to the House Monday, which established a quorum for the first time in two weeks. Speaker Dustin Burrows ordered all Democrats who left the state and broke quorum to sign permission slips so they could be assigned a Texas DPS agent to escort them around the clock to ensure they return to the House chamber Wednesday morning for the vote on the congressional maps. But Democratic Representative Nicole Collier of Fort Worth would not sign the permission slip. In a moment made for social media on Tuesday afternoon, Collier waved to supporters standing outside the chamber as other lawmakers visited her. Republicans and Democrats disagree over the need for the permission slips and DPS escorts. Representative Mihaela Plesa, D-Dallas, told CBS News Texas, "I signed it, but I am standing strong with Representative Collier. She is showing Collier courageousness right now. Look, she felt in her heart that what we were signing was wrong. And I say I agree with her." Representative Brent Money, R-Greenville, said, "It's her choice. All her Democratic colleagues have left except for the ones who come back and join her for videos. She can leave now if she wants to. She's decided it's in her best interest to stay." Democrats said their DPS escorts are a waste of money, but Republicans point out the Texas Constitution allows the legislature to enforce a quorum. Watch Eye On Politics at 7:30 Sunday morning on air and streaming. Follow Jack on X: @cbs11jack

Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation
Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Legislative committees advance CA redistricting legislation

(The Center Square) — Legislators, taxpayers and others debated passionately Tuesday for several hours as Democratic-led election committees in the California Assembly and Senate advanced congressional redistricting legislation. The bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act received support from the Democratic majorities in the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee and the Assembly Elections Committee. Ultimately they're expected to land on the floors of the Assembly and Senate on Thursday. They're backed by the Democratic supermajorities in both houses, as well as by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. With their passage certain, the legislation will mean voters on a Nov. 4 special election will decide whether to revise boundaries for congressional districts in response to redistricting in Republican-led states such as Texas. But the Republican minority in the Legislature scored what they called an early victory Monday night by delaying Thursday's floor votes. "The bill was stalled until after 7 p.m., meaning the earliest it can be legally voted on is Thursday evening. That leaves only hours before the special election deadline for passage and Newsom's signature," Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, R-San Diego, posted on X. Democrats and Republicans agree democracy is at stake and that California has a gold standard with its independent, nonpartisan Citizens Redistricting Commission. Republican lawmakers argued the will of voters, who approved a constitutional amendment creating the commission, was being disregarded. But Democratic legislators stressed voters can see the proposed map, which is posted at They also noted that unlike people in Texas, Californian voters will have the final say on whether congressional districts are changed and that the independent commission can resume its work after the 2030 census. "We are not asking California to rubber stamp maps behind closed doors," Assembly Elections Committee Chair Gail Pellerin, a Democrat, told the committee. "As a former election official, I would never stand for that. This is about defending democracy itself, making sure checks and balances our kids learned in government class are alive and well after the 2026 election." Other Democrats on the committee voiced their support. 'Who should have the control of the vast power of the federal government?' asked Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura. 'Our founding fathers agreed hundreds of years ago on a special form of democracy, designed to protect our democracy from power grabs.' If people in power try to change the rules to seize power undemocratically, then democracy advocates must also change their rules in response, Bennett argued. But Assemblymember David J. Tangipa, R-Clovis, who sits on the committee with Bennett, told the committee that Republicans weren't given enough time to review the legislation in advance of Tuesday's hearing. He also noted the proposed congressional map changed at 8 p.m. Monday. Pellerin countered that she understood the map was posted at 8 a.m. Monday. Pellerin and Tangipa clashed during the hearing as the latter asked extensive questions of Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Palo Alto, who spoke on behalf of one of the three bills making up the Election Rigging Response Act. Pellerin said she was trying to keep the meeting moving, and Tangipa stressed the importance of his questions on topics such as funding. A large number of residents throughout California, union representatives and representatives of organizations such as Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association, spoke in favor of redistricting at the Assembly committee meeting. But what appeared to be an even bigger number of taxpayers from throughout the state, as well as representatives of Republican organizations, spoke against the legislation. Comments on the two sides echoed those made by the Democratic and Republican legislators. The Assembly committee rejected a motion by its ranking Republican, Vice Chair Alexandra Macedo of Tulare, that the committee recess until its members could read all 16,000 comments that voters have made in a portal on the Assembly website. "Democratic power bosses want to take the power away from the people," Macedo said. She called the Election Rigging Response Act a coordinated effort to tear down the independent commission and gerrymander districts for political gain at a time California faces severe budget shortfalls. The Assembly Republican Caucus has said the Nov. 4 election will cost voters more than $235 million. Democrats have countered the Trump administration has cost the state much more than that by cutting or withholding funding.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store