Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz renew vows: A timeline of their feud with the Beckham family
Brooklyn Beckham
and
Nicola Peltz
have reportedly tied the knot, again. The couple, who originally wed in April 2022, renewed their vows on Saturday in what sources described as an intimate reaffirmation of their love.
The news comes amid persistent rumors of a widening rift between the pair and Brooklyn's famous family, the Beckhams.
According to
People
, a source close to the couple said: 'The event is about honouring the love and commitment they've built together over the years, and creating a memory that will stay with them forever.' A second source echoed this sentiment to
Metro
, saying: 'This is a moment to celebrate their love and commitment, and to create a meaningful memory together.'
Despite speculation and family drama, the couple appears focused on each other. In April, they celebrated their third anniversary by posting heartfelt tributes on social media. Brooklyn wrote that he falls 'more in love' with Nicola every day.
Source: X
Wedding dress tensions and early signs of strain
The first public signs of friction between Nicola and the Beckham family appeared soon after the couple's 2022 wedding. Rumors circulated that Nicola had snubbed Victoria Beckham by not wearing a wedding gown designed by her.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Start M.Sc. in Data Science & AI
BITS Pilani Digital
Apply Now
Undo
Nicola later addressed the speculation in August 2022 and again in March 2023, explaining that Victoria's atelier couldn't complete the dress in time. However, reports in May 2025 alleged that Victoria had changed her mind about making the dress.
Following the wedding, the Beckhams and Peltz-Beckhams showed minimal engagement with each other online. Nicola's absence from several family milestones raised further eyebrows, including Victoria's 51st birthday in April 2025 and her Paris Fashion Week show.
In May 2025, reports claimed Victoria had "ruined" part of the wedding reception by hijacking a dance with Marc Anthony that was meant for Brooklyn and Nicola. Nicola reportedly ran from the room in tears.
Missed milestones and social media fallout
Source: X
Perhaps the most public snub came when Brooklyn and Nicola skipped David Beckham's 50th birthday celebration in London, despite receiving invitations. According to reports, Brooklyn was unwilling to be in the same room as Kim Turnbull, the current girlfriend of his brother Romeo, and a woman once romantically linked to Brooklyn.
Reports suggested David prioritized Kim's attendance over Nicola's comfort, which intensified tensions.
In June 2025, Brooklyn and Nicola reportedly hired a "crisis team" akin to the one used by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, aimed at managing growing media scrutiny. That same month, Cruz Beckham drew attention with a pointed Instagram lyric and a sharp TikTok comeback. When someone mocked Brooklyn's frequent career pivots by asking, 'Are you going to stick with this job or going to become a race car driver next or something?' Cruz replied, 'Wrong brother mate.
'
In a separate moment, Nicola Peltz liked a comment that addressed rumors she was "controlling" Brooklyn: 'The fact people are in this comment section talking bs about someone controlling a GROWN man is absurd. The guy is an adult and can make his own decisions, leave them be, and stop blaming women for everything.'
Source: X
Public olive branches, and swift unfollows
In July 2025, Brooklyn appeared to extend an olive branch by publicly wishing his sister Harper a happy 14th birthday on Instagram—and notably tagged Nicola in the post.
Many saw the gesture as a possible first step toward reconciliation. But within 24 hours, Brooklyn unfollowed his brothers Romeo and Cruz on Instagram. Nicola soon followed suit, and both Romeo and Cruz also unfollowed Brooklyn, solidifying the apparent digital divide.
Despite sources telling tabloids that David and Victoria are 'desperate' to repair the relationship, Brooklyn and Nicola have continued to remain absent from major family events, maintain social silence, and take clear steps to distance themselves publicly.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘My ego is too fragile…': Scarlett Johansson opens up about why she doesn't use social media
Navigating this digital age feels no less than walking across a minefield. Struggling with your follower count, watching people upload their highlight reels on their social media accounts and feeling like you're not doing well enough in love, career, and life are feelings too many of us are familiar with. While it might feel like you are going through this journey all alone, Scarlett Johansson showed us that she is in the same boat as us. In an episode of The Skinny Confidential Him & Her podcast, the Black Widow actor opened up about why she avoids using social media, stating anxiety to be a major contributing factor. 'I honestly am too fragile a person to have social media. I can't. My ego is too fragile. I'm like a delicate flower. I like the smell, but..I have enough anxiety that would give me so much anxiety,' she said. Recalling a particularly self-introspective moment, the Avengers actor shared: 'I had Instagram once for three days, and then I started realising that I had spent 20 minutes looking at somebody's Instagram page, who has worked for a friend of mine, I'm like, 'Now I know you have a pitbull and two children, and now you live in Burbank' and I was like, 'What? I just wasted 17 minutes of my time!' 'I now feel like I should move to California, get this specific dog and change my life in all these ways. I felt so bad, like I was missing out on this random person's life. I can't do this,' Johansson added. spoke to counselling psychologist Srishti Vatsa and understood how social media fuels comparison and what can you do to navigate such situations. 'Comparison, in general, can lead to feelings of unhappiness and dissatisfaction. It's important to understand the difference between healthy competition and unhealthy comparison. The constant showcasing of lives on social media is often driven by a need for validation. Social media makes it easy to see what others are doing, which can lead to constant comparisons — especially in relationships,' explained Vatsa. According to her, what people show online is often far from reality, but many end up feeling inadequate in their own lives or relationships while chasing the 'perfect' images they see. This can lead to frustration, sadness, or resentment. Piyali Maity, Clinical Director, Counselling Operations, 1to1help, told that social media fuels comparison in several ways especially with 'selective sharing'. 'The reel v/s reality is the most common, where people share only the best portions of their lives which are far from day-to-day reality,' she said, adding that the widespread use of filters and editing tools further increases the gap between reality and what is portrayed, making others' lives appear more glamorous or perfect. Validation that one gets from increased followers, likes and comments on the posts unconsciously leads to comparing one's popularity or success with others. 'What makes it worse is the constant exposure to updates and fulfilling experiences of others which can trigger one to compare oneself and feel like they are missing out on something better in life,' Maity added. Social media can inspire some people, but it's important to recognize when it starts having a negative impact. If you find yourself constantly comparing, overspending to match trends, or feeling unhappy with your own life, it's time to take a step back and reflect. To avoid these pitfalls, Vatsa suggested setting limits on your social media usage and focus on spending time with people in real life. 'Mindless scrolling, especially when it's used to escape from reality, can be harmful. It creates a cycle of seeking quick dopamine hits, which can hurt productivity and mental well-being,' she concluded.
Scroll.in
11 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Dua Lipa reading Helen Garner may set off a trend. But books have signified taste for centuries
Books and bookshelves as interior decoration are a new trend, according to recent reports. An expert at Etsy, where some sell books by the metre in order to fill shelves, reports a 19,616% increase in searches for 'book-lover decor' over the past three months, compared with the same time last year. Another ' more bespoke service' offers a metre of assorted vintage books, all with orange covers, for £98. 'Bookshelf wealth' is an interior design trend on TikTok, too. According to The Guardian, 'A bookshelf that looks like an heirloom family collection, complete with art and ornaments, suggests you care about literature and art – and have time and money to spend on these things.' Even if you don't read much, you can gesture through your bookshelves to aspirations to culture and good taste. Like all bright and not-so-bright new ideas, of course, the use of books and bookshelves as interior decoration has a much older history than its recent online incarnation suggests. Bookshelves as interior decoration – along with book-of-the-month clubs and discussion of books in popular media – were 19th and 20th-century trends too, though with important differences. Unlike books bought by the metre, those trends could cultivate a genuine interest in reading – as do some 2025 trends, like the celebrity book club. Helen Garner's This House of Grief was recently chosen by musician Dua Lipa for hers. Democratising reading The imposing library in the gentleman's stately house in the 19th century is a familiar image. It was a key element in marking one's arrival in the privileged professional or landed classes. At the end of the 19th century, though, book publishing (and book talk) filtered down to middle-class and working-class readers who began to self-educate or to broaden their reading through accessing new books. These changes were brought about by wider education and employment, but also an increase in publishing activity, especially for new novels. (The later invention of the mass-market paperback, in the 1930s, would be another landmark.) Readers hunted down the classics, followed reading lists set up by reformist associations, or joined newly opened libraries, which also expanded across this period. A new fashion emerged, from the 1920s, for knowing the best, most absorbing or enjoyable of the many new books appearing: modern novels above all. This fashion for the new often existed alongside a desire to know the classics and their authors – and to display them all in the home. Book clubs formed, book programmes on the new medium of radio were introduced, and new essays and advertisements about owning and displaying books appeared. Features in newspapers and magazines highlighting the 'Book of the Week' or 'Book of the Month' became common by the late 1920s. So did essays and advertisements addressed primarily to women readers. Most images, though, showed a man sitting in an armchair surrounded by his homely books. A new language emerged too, describing the emerging book worlds as 'middlebrow', in contrast to the 'lowbrow' (those merely following popular or mass tastes) and the highbrow (those whose tastes were only high, refined and, perhaps, pretentious). All three terms could be terms of abuse: usually in feminised forms. Harvard Classics The volume of new books could provoke anxieties for both established critics and the new readers about 'drowning in a sea of new novels', alongside new enthusiasms for trying to keep up with the latest. Guidance in reading – what to read and how to read – became a new industry. So did guidance on buying and collecting books, and owning them. And, no less important, to displaying them by building a library in your own home. In the United States, in 1909–10, Charles W Eliot, president of Harvard University, edited the Harvard Classics, or Dr Eliot's Five-Foot Shelf: 50 volumes containing selections of classic works, newly packaged for ordinary and aspiring readers. Authors ranged from Plato to Saint Augustine, Dante to Milton, and included Charles Dickens, Robert Louis Stevenson and Edgar Allan Poe. Subjects ranged from Christian texts, to texts from Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam. The total choices were extraordinary (and no doubt daunting for many). Special editions were produced, but cheaper versions appeared over the 1920s and 1930s. Harvard Classics were designed for the home. They could be purchased with a five-foot bookshelf to hold them, as well as a booklet giving plans for reading through the collection in just 15 minutes a day. The mix of high culture and easy access to it was one dimension of what would be labelled the middlebrow. The Harvard Classics were available to Australian readers by the 1940s. Early book clubs The American Book-Of-The-Month Club, launched in 1926, was another outstanding success in attracting a new generation of readers. Henry Handel Richardson's Ultima Thule and Eleanor Dark's The Timeless Land, in their US editions, were among the club's successful monthly choices. In Australia, All About Books, launched in 1928, was produced not by a literary critic, but by a key figure in the book trade, bookseller and editor DW Thorpe. Its aim was to 'sift the grains of wheat out of so much chaff' – sort out the good books from the so many new books. Its readers were 'ordinary readers', not part of the literary community but eager readers, whether in business or the home, keen to know the best of the latest books. It presented recommendations of the best new books (and the rest), plus guides to what was being read in England and the US. All About Books printed short notices, plus slightly longer reviews by noted critics George Cowling and Nettie Palmer on new fiction. Palmer's column was 'A Reader's Notebook', while Cowling's became 'All Sorts of Reading for Everybody'. New habits of reading were also linked to new habits of book buying and book owning. The building of a personal library might begin by purchasing the ten-book Masterpiece Library of Short Stories (each book contained two volumes) from the 1920s, or by discerning consumption – a most important quality to achieve – of the new books appearing. With such abundance, guidance in how to build a personal or 'domestic' library was always needed. All About Books obliged. Australian home libraries The home became the crucial site for this new book culture, and the frequent recommendation that books and bookshelves made attractive living-room furniture was not simply trivial. These should be good books in good bookshelves, well presented in the domestic space. The new book culture was very reader-oriented and often feminised. A weekly book page appeared in the commercial radio paper, The Listener-In, edited and written by Miss J.G. Swain, who also presented a weekly radio programme: 'Living Authors'. A Book of the Week selection appeared on the Women's Page, and readers were invited into close relations with 'living authors'. As leading historian of Australian reading, Patrick Buckridge, has shown, the very successful Australian Women's Weekly also ran extended pages on good books and good reading from the 1930s to the 1960s. Women readers were specifically addressed, and they were the key participants. A worried stenographer wrote to the Weekly, with perfect middlebrow judgement: 'I like biographies, best-sellers, history and travel books and most of the classics, but the girls I have come in contact with cannot be bothered with any of these, and, if they read at all, just read light fiction. (20 July 1940)' In Buckridge's words: 'Good books and good reading [were] defined mainly by negation […] they are what 'light fiction' is not. […] Good books could also be defined […] as the books that should be owned and kept in the home.' This mid-century period in Australia has often been characterised as a period of cultural lack, before the post-war developments in modern literature and art. But looking back now through the vision of reading and publishing history – and the broad range of cultural institutions – we see something else. We see a period of cultural expansion and diversity: of new books, new readers, new cultural and commercial opportunities. Much of this culture around books and reading continued in the post-war decades, in newspaper review pages for example, but criticism was increasingly in the hands of university and other professional critics. The broad public culture around books was divided and much was lost – until its reinvention with the expansion of book festivals, reading groups, and new forms of reading fandom in recent decades 'At home with books' Books for the home, for the domestic reader, for owning and displaying in home bookshelves, were no doubt involved in forms of social distinction and class affirmation. To be 'at home with books' was a demonstrable level of cultural capital. But the spread of books and reading also involved forms of democratisation and new kinds of engagement with modern culture. That many of the ideas and the books themselves came from overseas was not a matter of 'domination', but of wanting to keep up with modern culture as it appeared — much as we do today. In interesting ways, the last two decades have seen something like a resurgence in middlebrow (and 'high pop') cultural enthusiasms. The word 'middlebrow' itself has had something of a revival. Bookshelves as interior decoration are likely to be with us – in ever more complicated and design friendly forms – for quite a long while yet. Bookshelves still have many new and many old stories to tell. Most importantly today, the popularity and public presence of a wide range of reading activity – right across the scale of genres, from literary to popular – has significant potential to further democratise reading.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sunjay Kapur's sister shares a cryptic post on Raksha Bandhan amid bitter Rs 30000 crore property dispute: 'I am protecting what you wanted...'
Mandhira Kapur paid tribute to her brother Sunjay Kapur amidst a property dispute. Rani Kapur, their mother, filed a complaint regarding his death. She alleged pressure and financial restrictions. Sona Comstar denied Rani's claims and sent a legal notice. Sunjay Kapur's death was due to cardiac issues. He was previously married to Karisma Kapoor and later to Priya Sachdeva. Amid a bitter Rs 30,000-crore property dispute and deepening family rifts, Mandhira Kapur, sister of late businessman and Sona Comstar chairperson Sunjay Kapur, marked Raksha Bandhan with a heartfelt yet cryptic tribute to her brother. Sharing a throwback picture of them together along with their monther, she wrote, 'It's taken me all day to write this, as today has been especially difficult. As Raksha Bandhan winds down, placing flowers near your picture, I tried to stay composed while Mum cried.' Check out the post here: 'Protecting what you would have wanted' She added, 'The thread that binds us, invisible yet strong, remains unbroken, as eternal as our memories. I relive the moments spent with you, and now, I find myself protecting what you would have wanted, and what Dad dreamed, though it was always meant to be the other way around. If you were still here, everything would be different, everything would be better, my dear Bhaiya.' 'Today, I tied a thread to the corner of your picture, gazing at your face—handsome, smiling, the brother who shared our dreams. You carried Dad's legacy with strength; I know you would've kept building upon it. Protecting your memory is my sacred duty. We are brave, and I know you'll continue to protect us. Raksha Bandhan reminds me that love transcends time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Our bond is unbreakable, forever intertwined', she concluded. Family feud Mandhira's cryptic post comes at a time of rising tensions at Sona Comstar. The family feud deepened after Sunjay Kapur's death in London, which his mother, Rani Kapur, has described as 'mysterious.' She has filed a criminal complaint with UK authorities, requesting an investigation. Rani Kapur's allegations In her first public statement, Rani Kapur expressed her grief, alleged that she was pressured into signing certain documents, and claimed she faced financial restrictions. She also raised concerns about how the company was managing its legacy. Sona Comstar has denied these allegations, stating that Rani has had no role in the company since 2019, and has sent her a legal notice over what it calls 'false' claims. Cause of death confirmed as natural Sunjay Kapur passed away on June 12 at Windsor's Guards Polo Club, with his death later determined to be from natural causes. Sources familiar with the official postmortem report said he died due to cardiac-related issues, with the autopsy revealing a significantly enlarged heart and thickened left ventricular walls. It also noted mild coronary artery disease, though there was no relevant medical history contributing to his death. Medical experts identified Sunjay Kapur's cause of death as Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Ischaemic Heart Disease. The businessman, who was previously married to Bollywood actor Karisma Kapoor and had two children with her, later wed Priya Sachdeva, with whom he had a son.
