'Trikal' Whisky Denied Sale Permission In Uttarakhand After Outcry Over Name
The Uttarakhand government has denied granting permission for the production, sale, or registration of Radico Khaitan's newly launched whisky brand 'Trikal', amid rising public outcry over the brand name's religious connotation, which has hurt the sentiments of the Hindu community.
Uttarakhand Excise Commissioner Harichandra Semwal said the state has not approved 'Trikal' whisky in any capacity, emphasising that any product using names linked to deities or religious beliefs will not be permitted in the state.
"Such branding hurts the religious, cultural, and social sentiments of our people," he said in the statement.
Harichandra Semwal also described the viral claims suggesting 'Trikal' whisky is being sold in Uttarakhand as "baseless, misleading, and part of a deliberate attempt to malign the image of the state and its administration".
"These rumours are part of a deliberate attempt to mislead the public and damage the image of the state and its administration," he said
Harichandra Semwal said that an FIR would be filed against those spreading the misinformation.
The backlash began after Radico Khaitan, a major Indian liquor manufacturer known for brands such as 8 PM, Magic Moments, Royal Ranthambore, and Rampur Indian Single Malt, launched 'Trikal' as a premium whisky offering.
The name, which is closely associated with Lord Shiva -- a deeply revered Hindu deity --sparked outrage among religious groups and political figures.
The controversy gained momentum on social media, with many users expressing anger over the association of a religious term with an alcoholic product, particularly in a state like Uttarakhand, often referred to as Devbhoomi or "Land of the Gods".
The Excise Department has urged the public not to trust such unverified reports and to inform authorities of any such misinformation.
As of now, Radico Khaitan has not issued a public response to the controversy around 'Trikal', which has gained momentum across religious groups and Hindu organisations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Opening India's agriculture to a free-for-all would have serious repercussions for the sector
It is not enough to say that agriculture contributes only 16 per cent to India's GDP. Nor is it sufficient to state that small farmer households earn about one lakh rupees annually. These statistics do not capture the full extent of the story. For those, particularly outside India, who are unfamiliar with the agricultural and rural heartlands of India, this data conceals a larger narrative. I say this both as a farmer and as a former finance minister: The impacts go far beyond the economy. What is at risk is social stability and what it could bring is a cultural upheaval that we are not prepared for. For instance, 250 million people are directly dependent on farming, and there are 700 million Indians who are directly or indirectly connected to farming and the rural sector. Protecting the farm sector is not just a policy. It is a survival mechanism for millions, crucial to maintaining economic, social, political and cultural stability. The argument around agricultural subsidy and tariffs often centres on the Minimum Support Price (MSP) provided to select crops. In the US and much of the EU, the terminoogy and approach vary, but the issue remains the same. If India has MSP, the US has ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC. Let me elaborate. ERP is the Effective Reference Price, analogous to the MSP. In the US, farmers receive direct payments from the government if market prices fall below this level, and it is called PLC or Price Loss Coverage. Both PLC and ARC (Agriculture Risk Coverage) cover 22 major crops, ranging from wheat and corn to soybean and cotton. These systems are not restricted to farming alone as they also extend to the dairy sector under the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) programme. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides income support via direct payments if prices fall below intervention levels, which are akin to MSPs. The crucial difference is that, while in India, the government procures crops at the MSP, in the US the government does not procure crops but instead pays farmers directly if prices fall below the minimum. Given the literacy levels, or lack thereof, and the paperwork involved with enrolling in these various EU and US policies, asking Indian farmers to transition to these systems would create another level of bureaucracy. Moreover, rolling out the US and EU models in India would take years, if not decades. The pressure on India to dismantle its farm mechanisms, whether MSP or tariffs, and open up to international market forces would be justifiable, if the US and EU were not subsidising their own agricultural sectors. The US spends about $20 billion and the EU about $50 billion on agricultural subsidies. In fact, many of these subsidies remain hidden, while the Indian MSP system is much more transparent. The focus of US subsidies is large farms, whereas Indian farm policy centres on small farmers. US policy priorities include market stabilisation, income protection, and climate adaptation, while India focuses on supporting small farmers and landholderscol, ensuring regular upliftment of the rural economy. EU subsidies are targeted more toward income support, environmental goals, climate and biodiversity targets. In the US and much of Europe, 80 per cent of subsidies go to large farms, while in India, it is the reverse with 80 per cent going to small and medium farmers. The EU, in its latest budget provisions, is trying to move away from the US approach towards the Indian model, by targeting small farmers. In fact, the EU's latest provision in its Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is 387 billion euros ($451 billion) for 2021-2027, and as recently as last month, they proposed a cap of 1,00,000 euros per year per farmer, in an attempt to shift support from larger farmers to smaller ones. That translates to a cap of one crore of subsidy per farmer. For India, the real issue is that of equitable and development-centred agreements. Just as the Indian MSP is clear, transparent and focused on the Indian context, the alphabet soup of CAP, ERP, PLC, ARC and DMC is tailored to the US and EU contexts. This perspective arises not only from economics, but also from society, politics and culture. Opening the entire agriculture sector to a free-for-all, when US and EU subsidies distort the market in their favour, would create a kind of asymmetric warfare, with tumultuous consequences for Indian society. The upheaval would be massive. This stance has been clearly articulated at the highest levels. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently said: 'For us, the interest of our farmers is top priority. India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, dairy farmers and fishermen. I know I will personally have to pay a heavy price but I am prepared for it.' The writer is the former Finance Minister of Punjab
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Prioritise women empowerment this I-Day
Every citizen will have a sense of pride on August 15 when India commemorates its 79th Independence Day on Friday. It is a day when we must remember the struggle and sacrifice of our freedom legends, show a sincere expression of gratitude for our freedom fighters with a spirited display of national pride as a measure of celebrating Independence. Freedom is a basic human right that comes with obligation and compulsion. It is not about being for or against an ideal but creating one's own existence from scratch. This privilege to me means freedom to choose and act and fulfill my desires according to my will, if my freedom does not trespass and impinge upon somebody else's. Freedom to me is annihilation of caste and creating a nation where fellow human beings are treated equally. It is to live and let others live. Being liberated neither means licence to unleash mayhem and carry out anti-national or anti-social activities nor show disrespect to others' sentiments or emotions. Your freedom ends where that of the others' starts. Indians are all seven-day wonders; when a new issue crops up, we conveniently forget the old and move on. We chase shadows, comforts and ephemeral pleasures. It's time we give a clarion call to find meaning, purpose, goals and dreams for ourselves. However, despite significant progress since achieving independence, the country's women still face various challenges. Their slogans stress the importance of freedom from patriarchy. The Indian woman irrespective of her class, caste and society suffer discrimination under the garb of culture. Women-abuse, physical, mental and sexual harassment is everyday headlines in the media. Dowry deaths, honour killings and parading women in a humiliating way to take revenge has become a daily affair in recent times. They are victimized even after crimes against them and suffer silently as they lack support from society and even family members. People should raise a collective voice against all every sort of indiscrimination. The fact of the matter is that freedom for women is still a long way to go. Even today, stepping out of homes, seeking employment or dealing with domestic issues has remained a bigger hurdle for them. Governments change but women still need to think twice before stepping out regarding their safety. Improved safety and security, with stricter enforcement of laws against gender-based violence, harassment and discrimination, is the need of the hour. Access to quality healthcare, including reproductive health care, menstrual health, hygiene and nutrition and mental health support, support for caregivers and working mothers such as childcare facilities and flexible work arrangements need to be addressed by the government. Access to digital literacy, technology and online safety, skill development and entrepreneurship opportunities need priority. It is the responsibility of all of us to bring women power to the fore in the form of national power. Every obstacle that prevents them from progressing needs to be removed. Over the last decades, women voters have turned into a decisive force that can make or break the fate of the electoral contenders. The gap between female voter turn- out and male voter turn -out has not only closed but reversed. After 18 general elections since independence women voter participation now outshines male participation. This is because of self-empowerment, gaining more political knowledge, literacy and media exposure. It is essential to acknowledge the progress made towards women's empowerment, while also recognizing the ongoing challenges and needs. Addressing these will help create a more inclusive and equitable society for all. Let women not be caged birds whose freedom is clipped despite being gifted with wings. The greatness of a country totally depends on the undying ideals of love and sacrifice that inspire the women of the race. A roof over every head, food in every household plate, basic health care and amenities and education for all is what we all want. Respect for women, love and care and educational opportunities for every girl should be the priority of all. Modi's Amrit Kal vision and Viksit Bharat-2047 aim to shape India's future and transform it into a developed entity. Addressing these needs is crucial for women empowerment and inclusive nation building will continue to be the primary focus.
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India ‘a bit recalcitrant' in trade talks, says US treasury secretary amid Trump tariff tensions
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent has claimed that India had been 'a bit recalcitrant' in trade talks with America. Bessent's remarks come days after President Donald Trump threatened additional25 per cent tariffs on Indian imports, citing the country's oil purchase from Russia. Trump has slapped an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods coming from India as penalty for New Delhi's continued buying of Russian oil.(PTI) India and the US are reportedly engaged in trade negotiations ahead of the August 27 deadline for imposition of the remaining half of the import duties Trump has threatened. Bessent has said large trade agreements are still awaited, including with Switzerland and India, reported news agency Reuters, which added that Bessent singled India out, saying the country had been "a bit recalcitrant" in the ongoing talks. He also reportedly told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" that trade negotiations could be wrapped up by the Trump administration by the end of October. "That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he was quoted as saying by Reuters. "I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries," Bessant added. Half of Trump's 50 per cent tariffs threatened on Indian goods have come into force on August 7, and the remaining are set to take effect on August 27. Ahead of that deadline, India is reportedly reviewing the tariff impact in consultation with exporters and other stakeholders, while also exploring alternative trade partnerships. The Union finance ministry informed Parliament on Tuesday that over half of the total export value of India's merchandise to the US will see an impact due to the reciprocal tariffs. 'It is estimated that around 55% of the total value of India's merchandise exports to the US is subject to this reciprocal tariff,' Union minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in a written response to Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee. However, India maintains that the relationship it shares with the US is broad, with trade just being one part of it. Meanwhile, Donald Trump referred to India as Russia's 'largest or second-largest oil buyer', saying his tariff move has dealt a huge blow to the Russian economy. "...They have tremendous potential in Russia to do well. They're not doing well. Their economy is not doing well right now because it's been very well disturbed by this," Trump said.
