CPM, Cong back TMC against Guv's 'recommendation' of Central rule
CPI(M) state secretary and politburo member Mohammed Salim in his statement said that transferring power from the West Bengal government to the Governor under President's Rule would not resolve the state's problems.
'What has been happening in Murshidabad and various other parts of the state clearly shows that Mamata Banerjee has failed in her roles as home minister, and chief minister. The state government has failed to maintain peace, harmony," he said. "However, that does not mean handing over power to the Governor through President's Rule will solve anything,' Salim wrote in his statement.
'The people of this state have had bitter experiences with President's rule. Even after turning a state into a Union Territory, a terrorist attack in J&K's Pahalgam could not be prevented. Now, even the National Security Advisor is untraceable. In Manipur, despite a 'double-engine' government, people's lives remain endangered. It is the elected state government that must take responsibility for protecting the lives of the people here. President's Rule is not a solution,' said the CPI(M) leader.
The Congress, too, strongly criticised the Governor. Terming his statement as, "constitutionally unwanted," "politically motivated" and against the federal structure of the country, the Congress in a written statement, said, 'The recommendation by West Bengal Governor CV Ananda Bose to impose President's Rule under Article 356 is a deeply alarming development that strikes at the heart of India's federal democratic framework. Such a move is not only constitutionally unwarranted, but also politically motivated, violating the basic tenets of cooperative federalism enshrined in the Constitution.'
Alleging that the imposition of President's rule, in its broader objective, is a political design of the BJP and RSS, the Congress statement, said, 'This act must also be seen in the broader context of the ideological objectives of the RSS and the BJP. Both have, in various forums, hinted at the long-term plan of fragmenting West Bengal — culturally rich and politically resilient — into smaller administrative units.'
'The imposition of President's rule, therefore, is not just a question of governance — it is a calculated attempt to undermine Bengal's political autonomy and pave the way for divide-and-rule politics. It must be opposed unequivocally by all democratic forces,' the statement read.
After his visit to trouble-torn Murshidabad, the Governor sent a report to Home Minister Amit Shah on the communal strife in the state where he suggested President's rule if the situation worsens. The report also recommended deployment of Central forces, a judicial inquiry and Central intervention.
Several former members of the Trinamool Congress strongly criticised the Governor's report for suggesting that the Union government consider invoking Article 356, with the party's West Bengal state general secretary calling the report biased and aligned with the BJP's political agenda.
Echoing this view, West Bengal Parliamentary Affairs and Agriculture Minister Sovandeb Chattopadhyay claimed the report's recommendations were made under instructions from the Union government, adding, 'So it is natural that the Governor will say all negative things about West Bengal in his report.'
UNI XC PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn
THE LAWYER representing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in the criminal defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Hindutva ideologue V D Savarkar, on Wednesday submitted a pursis in the Pune court hearing the case, but later made a U-turn, saying he had filed the application without consulting Rahul. The pursis stated that there was 'substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm' in light of his current political stand and Satyeki's 'lineage from Nathuram Godse'. On Wednesday, lawyer Milind Pawar, who is representing Rahul, filed the pursis, which is a formal written submission placed before court. Pawar had earlier said the court had admitted the pursis after he filed it in the afternoon. 'Rahul Gandhi has condemned the present government by raising the slogan 'Vote Chor Sarkar'. He has produced documentary evidence alleging serious electoral irregularities, directly implicating the Election Commission in actions which, by their very nature, provoke hostility from those whose political power and ideological interests stand challenged. The apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi is neither abstract nor unfounded. In light of the documented history of violent and anti-constitutional tendencies linked to the complainant's lineage, and considering the prevailing political climate, there exists a clear, reasonable, and substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm, wrongful implication, or other forms of targeting by persons subscribing to the ideology of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar,' it stated. 'Prudence demands that this apprehension be placed on record at this stage. The complainant himself has asserted descent from the associates of Mahatma Gandhi's assassins. In view of the grave history associated with such lineage, the defence harbours a genuine and reasonable apprehension that history must not be permitted to repeat itself,' it stated. However, in the evening, Pawar issued a press statement, 'The pursis dated August 13 was filed by me in the court without instructions from the client. The contents of the pursis were drafted by me without consulting my client Rahul Gandhi. My client has taken strong exception to filing of this pursis and has expressed his disagreement with the contents. I shall file a formal application tomorrow for withdrawal of the said pursis before the court.' When contacted earlier after the pursis was filed, Satyaki Savarkar had said, 'The statements made by defence in the pursis are completely baseless and appalling. They have claimed apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi which is baseless because he has been exempted from physically attending the proceedings. The defence has been filing such frivolous applications and pursis every now and then and are trying to delay the entire case.' Meanwhile on Wednesday Satyaki Savarkar's lawyer Sangram Kolhatkar moved the court seeking action against Rahul alleging he had committed perjury. 'In the past, all relevant documents have been duly provided to the advocate representing the accused, who has acknowledged the receipt. Despite this, the accused is now falsely claiming that no such material was received. This is a clear attempt to mislead the court. We therefore urge the court, in the strongest terms, to initiate appropriate action against the accused for this deliberate misrepresentation and committing perjury,' Kolhatkar said.
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
DUSU polls to be held on September 18, results next day
The Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) polls will be held on September 18, DU Registrar Vikas Gupta announced in a notification on Wednesday. As per the notification, the last date for submitting nomination papers is September 10. On the same day, the list of duly nominated candidates will be published. The withdrawal of documents has been scheduled for September 11, and the final list will be issued on the same day. Polling will take place on September 18 and votes will be counted on September 19. The announcement comes amid protests by student outfits against the university's decision mandating that the candidates deposit a ₹1-lakh bond at the time of filing nomination promising not to deface public properties while campaigning. The ₹1-lakh bond is part of DU's anti-defacement measures, issued a year after the Delhi High Court came down heavily on the university for property defacement. Student groups, such as RSS-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Congress-backed National Students' Union of India (NSUI) and Aam Aadmi Party's Association of Students for Alternative Politics (ASAP), have opposed the move and termed it 'undemocratic'. Earlier in the day, the ABVP submitted a memorandum to the university demanding the withdrawal of the bond. 'Imposing a ₹1-lakh bond to contest the elections is not only undemocratic but also a malicious attempt to limit the elections to only the affluent students,' it said. ABVP national media convener Harsh Attri said they held a meeting with the Registrar, and he assured them of 'looking into their demands'. Reviewing options: DU The Registrar told The Hindu that they are considering alternatives to the anti-defacement measure. 'We are in the process of looking into possible alternatives, such as a guarantee from students instead, after multiple requests from students. We had introduced the measure in pursuance of the Delhi High Court's recommendations,' he said. Terming the anti-defacement measure a 'Tughlaqi farman', Kuldeep Bidhuri, the Delhi unit president of ASAP, described it as a 'conspiracy to directly block middle-class students from contesting elections'. Meanwhile, the NSUI staged a demonstration on the campus demanding 12 days of menstrual leave per semester for women students.
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Oppn-ruled states cry foul as Andhra Pradesh gets semiconductor project
Synopsis The Union Cabinet's approval of a semiconductor facility in Andhra Pradesh has sparked controversy, with Opposition-ruled states alleging biased investment allocation towards NDA-governed regions. Telangana claims it offered prime land and subsidies, while Karnataka suggests investors were diverted to BJP-led states after expressing initial interest in their state. New Delhi: The Union Cabinet's nod for a semiconductor facility in Andhra Pradesh has triggered a political controversy, with Opposition-ruled states accusing the Centre of weaning away investments and directing them to NDA-ruled states. The Centre's nod to a semiconductor manufacturing facility by Advanced System in Package Technologies Private Limited with an expected investment of ₹1,500 crore in Andhra Pradesh under Indian Semiconductor Mission (ISM) has run foul of Opposition-ruled states. Telangana's industries and IT minister Sridhar Babu Duddilla had stated on X, "The Telangana government has done everything a proactive state should do, from allotment of 10 acres of prime land at Maheshwaram to all subsidies being approved... The company has been waiting only for the India Semiconductor Mission approval. Yet, in a baffling display of bias, the Union Cabinet has greenlit a similar project in Andhra where not even a single acre of land has been allotted... A state with ready infrastructure, investor commitment and a clear execution plan has been sidelined in favour of an unprepared proposal existing only on paper."Andhra government sources, however, told ET that the state offered "superior package, including better-priced land and fast-track approvals".Karnataka minister MB Patil told ET: "Several players came to Karnataka and were quite eager to invest here but when they went to Delhi they were diverted to BJP-ruled states." Earlier, in an interview to this correspondent, Kerala minister P Rajeev said that the Centre had withdrawn permission given to a GIFT city in the state.
