logo
Trump-Japan deal cheers markets, but may be ephemeral

Trump-Japan deal cheers markets, but may be ephemeral

AllAfrica23-07-2025
A year ago, the notion of a 15% tariff on Japanese cars entering the US would have ignited uproar, with both sides braced for economic upheaval.
Today, with US President Donald Trump unveiling a sweeping trade pact that halves previously threatened levies and secures a US$550 billion Japanese investment in America, we're seeing a recalibration, not capitulation, in global commerce.
This deal, which trims auto tariffs from 25% to 15%, represents a pivotal shift. It reassures markets while signaling a tactical win for US trade strategy, though it does not resolve every friction point, especially those tied to agriculture.
Nonetheless, the immediate response from Tokyo's stock markets—Japan's top automakers' shares rallied with double-digit gains while the Nikkei leapt—speaks volumes about investor confidence.
Yet, this breakthrough comes amid political upheaval in Japan. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's governing coalition has just lost control of the Upper House, marking the first time since 1955 that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party lacks a majority in either chamber.
Despite Ishiba's vow to stay on 'to see this through,' internal pressure is mounting, with whispers that he may resign by late August. The timing raises a delicate question: is this deal a lifeline for Ishiba, or a political anchor weighing him down?
By lowering tariffs to 15% and landing a headline 90% profit allocation for the US, Trump has reshaped a looming trade war into something more akin to a managed retreat. It safeguards American manufacturing and investors while preserving Japan's access to critical export markets.
Global equity markets reacted well, not because tariffs vanished, but because certainty arrived. They may still shudder slightly at 15%, but at least there's clarity on when they'll fire. Japan's economic engines, automakers, especially, can now plan with confidence instead of fear.
Ishiba's weakened mandate complicates ratification of any deal. Without Upper House control, the LDP will face tussles within its own ranks. Should a backlash arise, especially over rice and farm exports, perhaps the most sensitive component, Tokyo could renege.
Even Ishiba's own standing might simmer into a career-defining crisis.
This deal proves tariffs aren't just economic weapons; they're tools of negotiation. The US wielded the threat of 25% duties to extract unprecedented investment pledges. It's a reminder: trade policy is foreign policy in disguise. When leverage is applied, balance sheets follow suit.
So is the Japan deal a template for the region? A 15% benchmark now exists not just for Tokyo, but for Seoul, Taipei and beyond. Also, with gas deals lined up with Europe reported on the table next, this may mark a new strategic scaffold under Trump's trade architecture.
The deal is significant and a far more balanced compromise than had been anticipated. Yet, it's also fragile, dependent on domestic support in Tokyo, and must be implemented quickly enough to meet an August 1 deadline. Without parliamentary control, Ishiba's political capital is limited; without political cover, the deal could stall or collapse.
In the end, markets applauded the outcome—but politics in Japan will determine its longevity. The outcome isn't simply whether the deal is made, but whether it endures amid political turbulence.
Last year, 15% tariffs were unthinkable. Today, we're living with the fallout and the opportunities. This isn't just a trade truce; it's a strategic pivot. However, pivots only matter if momentum holds. But in Tokyo, momentum just lost its majority.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former special counsel under investigation
Former special counsel under investigation

RTHK

time6 hours ago

  • RTHK

Former special counsel under investigation

Former special counsel under investigation Jack Smith resigned as special counsel in January, weeks before Donald Trump took office. File photo: AFP US officials have opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who led two federal criminal cases against President Donald Trump, US media reported on Saturday. The Office of Special Counsel told The New York Times it was investigating Smith for potentially violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal workers from engaging in political activity while on the job. Republican Senator Tom Cotton had reportedly asked the agency to investigate whether Smith's actions had been designed to influence the 2024 election. Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022, and charged Trump with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House. Trump denied both charges and sought to frame them as politically motivated, accusing the Justice Department of being weaponised against him. Neither case ever came to trial, and the special counsel – in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president – dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election. Smith then resigned before Trump could fulfil his campaign pledge to fire him. The most severe penalty under the Hatch Act is termination of employment, which would not apply to Smith as he has already resigned. (AFP)

Trump keeps feeding uncertainty over Powell
Trump keeps feeding uncertainty over Powell

RTHK

timea day ago

  • RTHK

Trump keeps feeding uncertainty over Powell

Trump keeps feeding uncertainty over Powell Donald Trump inspects renovations at the Federal Reserve with with Jerome Powell, right, amid suggestions he was looking to fire the chairman over cost overruns. File photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump has said Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell will "most likely" stay in his position even amid his sharp criticism of the central bank's policies. In an interview with Newsmax that aired on Friday, Trump said he would remove Powell "in a heartbeat" and said the Fed's interest rate was too high but added that others have said Powell's removal would "disturb the market". "He gets out in seven or eight months and I'll put somebody else in," he said. Also on Friday, Trump called for the Fed's board of governors to usurp Powell's powers and criticized him for not cutting short-term interest rates. Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump called Powell 'stubborn". The Fed chair has been subjected to vicious verbal attacks by the Republican president over several months. The Fed has the responsibility of stabilizing prices and maximizing employment. Powell has held its benchmark rate for overnight loans constant this year, saying that Fed officials needed to see what impact Trump's massive tariffs had on inflation. If Powell doesn't 'substantially' lower rates, Trump posted, 'THE BOARD SHOULD ASSUME CONTROL, AND DO WHAT EVERYONE KNOWS HAS TO BE DONE!' Two of the seven Fed governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, issued statements on Friday saying they see the tariffs as having a one-time impact on prices and the job market as most likely softening. As a result, the two dissented at the Fed meeting on Wednesday and pushed for slight rate cuts relative to what Trump was seeking. Even though Trump, who nominated Waller and Bowman, has claimed the US economy is booming, he welcomed their arguments and what he called their strong dissents. After the Fed announced later in the day that governor Adriana Kugler will step down next week, Trump said Powell should follow her lead and leave, too. 'She knew he was doing the wrong thing on Interest Rates. He should resign, also!' Trump said on social media. Friday's jobs report showed a rapidly decelerating economy, as just 73,000 jobs were added in July and downward revisions brought down the June and May totals to 14,000 and 19,000, respectively. Trump sees the rate cuts as leading to stronger growth and lower debt servicing costs for the federal government and homebuyers. He argues there is virtually no inflation, even though the Fed's preferred measure is running at an annual rate of 2.6 percent, slightly higher than the Fed's 2 percent target. Trump has called for slashing the Fed's benchmark rate by three percentage points, bringing it down dramatically from its current average of 4.33 percent. The risk is that a rate cut that large could cause more money to come into the economy than can be absorbed, possibly causing inflation to accelerate. The Supreme Court suggested in a May ruling that Trump could not remove Powell for policy disagreements. This led the White House to investigate whether he could be fired for cause because of the cost overruns in the Fed's US$2.5 billion renovation projects . Powell's term as chair ends in May 2026, at which point Trump can put his Senate-confirmed pick in the seat. (AP/Reuters)

Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban
Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban

RTHK

timea day ago

  • RTHK

Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban

Appeals court upholds LA immigration arrests ban US federal officials are barred from detaining people based solely on 'apparent race or ethnicity', speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a 'bus stop ... or day laborer pick up site'. File photo: Reuters A US federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring US government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel late on Friday ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity", speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc". Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region." (Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store