NICOLA METHVEN 'New Netflix disaster documentary will make your blood boil'
There won't be many viewers who get to the end of the 90 minutes without their blood boiling as the multiple injustices suffered by those living in Grenfell Tower at that time are laid bare for all to see.
It's a film that should be watched by everyone, so the full extent of the many failings that led to the fire are remembered, at a time when not a single person has been prosecuted.
Grenfell: Uncovered was released on Friday, and many who've watched it have been left - like me - gasping in shock at the way in which those affected by the tragedy were treated both in the run-up, the aftermath and ever since.
The stand-out moment, perhaps, is the unearthing of emails which prove beyond all doubt how cladding company Arconic absolutely knew that its flammable plastic product was unsuitable for a high rise building, or indeed any building over 12metres, but they sold it for Grenell anyway.
The safety tests they'd carried out told them in no uncertain terms about the lethal 'flaming droplets' that would be created in the event of a fire. They knew human life would inevitably be put in danger. But in the dogged pursuit of profit they decided to bury the outrageously bad safety results, hiding behind the fact that the sale of the cladding was at least legal in the UK at the time (it wasn't in many other countries).
The emails, especially those from technical manager Claude Werhle and others from senior Arconic executive Diana Perriah, show how the company's insistence that nothing was concealed from the public or customers or officials in terms of safety testing results is categorically untrue.
In fact they had fire tested the ACM cladding several times and the results were that it was so bad it was deemed upgradeable. The comment to this discovery, sent in an email, was "oops". You've got to wonder how Mr Werhle sleeps at night..
'This product was safe to use as a building material and permissible to sell in the UK,' Arconic insists in an infuriating statement shown at the end of the film. 'AAP [the company's French subsidiary which did the deal for Grenfell] did not conceal information from or mislead any certification body, customers or the public.' It's frankly astonishing, considering the inquiry found them to have "deliberately concealed" the true extent of the fire risk while displaying "systematic dishonesty".
The documentary highlights many shock moments as the survivors and the families of the victims push for justice. These include:
So the next big question is over whether the failings by the cladding companies, by the fire brigade or by the building's owner, the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, constitute criminal negligence. By next year, or perhaps 2027, this will be known, because the Met is carrying out its own investigation. That it could take a full decade for the culprits to be brought to justice - if that is indeed what happens - is yet another travesty, on top of the many that the survivors and bereaved have already endured. Anyone watching the documentary about the avoidable tragedy should prepare themselves for an extremely emotional ride. I do hope Lord Eric Pickles tunes in to see just how badly he comes across - there won't be many who witness his arrogance and aren't left staggered that he was made a life peer in 2018.
And perhaps, just a thought, it's time to remove all flammable cladding from UK buildings? As fire-fighter Dave Badillo sighed in an interview with the Mirror earlier this month - 'just get it off!'
- Grenfell: Uncovered is now streaming on Netflix
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Tottenham issue statement as Mathys Tel subjected to vile racist abuse after Super Cup
Tottenham have come out and said they are "disgusted" after Mathys Tel was subjected to racist abuse on social media following Wednesday night's Super Cup loss to PSG. The Frenchman stepped up in the penalty shootout but missed the target before facing abuse online. Thomas Frank's side had led 2-0 against the Champions League winners before two late goals saw the French outfit level the contest. Tottenham then came out second best in a penalty shootout with Tel among the two players to miss. The forward has just made his move to north London permanent and came off the bench in Frank's first competitive game in charge. The ex-Bayern Munich man failed to hit the target with his effort from 12 yards as the Parisians edged the match to claim the trophy, but Tottenham have been angered by the level of abuse Tel has faced subsequently. A club statement read: "We are disgusted at the racial abuse that Mathys Tel has received on social media following last night's UEFA Super Cup defeat. Mathys showed bravery and courage to step forward and take a penalty, yet those who abuse him are nothing but cowards - hiding behind anonymous usernames and profiles to spout their abhorrent views. "We will work with the authorities and social media platforms to take the strongest possible action against any individual we are able to identify. We stand with you, Mathys."
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kim Kardashian and sister Khloe put detective hats on for unsolved mystery... 27 years after Amy Bradley vanished
Kim and Khloe Kardashian are reportedly trying to help solve the viral Amy Bradley missing persons case. Amy was just 23 when she mysteriously vanished in the early morning hours of March 21, 1998 while aboard a Royal Caribbean cruise ship with her family. The nearly 30-year-old case has garnered renewed interest following the release of the investigative three-part Netflix documentary, Amy Bradley Is Missing. Kim called the documentary 'mind blowing' in an Instagram Story post shared last month with her 355million followers. 'We must find Amy! This is so crazy @netflix,' the SKIMS founder, 44, wrote. The post caught the attention of Amy's distraught brother, Brad, who recently told TMZ that he tried contacting Kim via DM asking her to 'help [raise] awareness.' And now, the outlet is reporting that Kim and her younger sister Khloe, 40, have gotten in contact with the Bradley family directly — specifically, Amy's mother, Iva — in the hopes of aiding them in their ongoing search. Daily Mail has reached out to Kim and Khloe's representatives for comment. Sources claimed that Kim and Khloe personally contacted Iva via phone last Thursday to discuss the details of Amy's case and where the investigation currently stands. According to TMZ's insiders, Kim and Khloe were most intrigued by one suspicious detail in the documentary relating to a Barbados-based IP address, which has reportedly frequented the Amy Bradley Is Missing website. They reportedly spoke to to the Bradley family matriarch for 'about an hour.' The phone call was not filmed for the Kardashians' Hulu reality TV show as the sisters were solely focused on 'listening and brainstorming' with Iva about how they could help. The Bradley family are hopeful that Amy may still be still alive despite her being missing for nearly three decades. Kim involvement could prove beneficial as she's no stranger to the justice system, with the star having successfully advocated for clemency for several inmates along with studying law for the last seven years. The billionaire mogul completed her law program earlier this year, which puts her one step closer to becoming a lawyer like her late father Robert Kardashian. Kim and Khloe's alleged contact with the Bradley family comes shortly after Amy's brother spoke out about her mysterious disappearance 27 years ago. Amy, a recent college graduate, had set off on a seven-day trip with her parents and younger brother Brad from the Puerto Rican capital of San Juan on Saturday, March 21, 1998. Two days later, as they set sail for the island of Curacao, Amy and Brad partied at the ship's nightclub, after which she was seen resting on her balcony. But when her father checked on her early the next morning, she had gone, leaving no trace apart from a polo shirt and some sandals - and she has not been seen since. The case has made headlines once more as it's re-investigated Netflix's new Amy Bradley Is Missing documentary. It arrived on the streaming platform on July 16 and has since opened the floodgates for new theories and speculation over what happened. Amy's brother Brad shared what he believes happened to his sister while speaking on British TV to 'This Morning' hosts Emma Willis and Joel Dommett. The Bradleys have always been adamant that Amy neither fell nor jumped from their balcony, because she was scared of how high it was. Joining the ITV show on via link with his mother, Brad said from Virginia: 'Well obviously we don't know where she is. 'Since the show came out we've gotten thousands of tips, leads and people sending prayers, love and different ideas. 'We think what happened to Amy was that she was targeted.' 'She was seen, taken and removed from the ship and we believe she was trafficked into some kind of sex trade situation,' Brad continued. 'Obviously we need that one person who knows something to come forward and help us. 'Actually, I think there's more than one person who knows but we're waiting on that one call that breaks this thing open.' Before the release of Amy Bradley Is Missing, the family hoped the program would spark more tips, jog some memories and lead to real answers. However, her family have faced cruel trolling and backlash from Netflix viewers. Brad previously told Daily Mail that the documentary has been particularly difficult for his mother. 'Back then, there was no cell phones, there was not a whole lot of internet going on, there was no social media,' he said. 'There was none of that.' 'The upcoming series has been really tough on Mom, mostly, emotionally,' he added. 'And Dad obviously doesn't like that part of it for all of us.'
Spectator
19 hours ago
- Spectator
The small boats crisis is getting worse. What's Labour's plan?
How long it seems since the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid declared a 'major incident' in the Channel on account of the numbers of migrants attempting to cross. In fact, it was December 2018. Javid expressed his deepening concern that 250 people had been intercepted in the Channel between January and November 2018. And the migrants kept coming in the last week of that year. Nine landed near Sandgate in Kent on 26 December and eight more were spotted in a small boat the following day. Yvette Cooper, then the chair of the Commons home affairs select committee, demanded action. 'There is a real risk of tragedy if urgent action isn't taken,' she said. 'The British and French authorities have known for some time about the risks posed by criminal gangs of people smugglers along the coast…much more coordinated French and British action is needed to tackle them.' Six and a half years later, Cooper is the Home Secretary in a government that is breaking records for illegal arrivals. 50,000 have crossed the Channel in small boats in the 13 months since Keir Starmer took office. More than 27,000 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, up from 18,342 for the same period in 2024. According to the figures from Frontex, the EU's border agency, 41,800 'attempts' to reach England were made in the first seven months of 2025, a leap of 26 per cent on the previous year. In other words, about 14,000 'attempts' to cross the Channel have failed for various reasons. Not that this will deter the migrants. The countries most heavily represented in the arrivals in England are Afghanistan, Somalia and Eritrea. These people aren't going to give up and head home to their war-torn countries. They will keep on trying. The cynic might reflect that the determination of the migrants to reach England is in inverse proportion to the determination of the British government to keep them out. This determination to cross the Channel is becoming ever more ferocious. Police reinforcements have been sent to the Channel town of Gravelines between Calais and Dunkirk after a weekend of violent disorder. According to the French press, 'groups of migrants threw stones at parked and moving vehicles in the middle of the night, as well as at homes and even the fire and police vehicles.' A report on the situation in a local newspaper on Tuesday quoted a resident saying: People are fed up. We are starting to hear talk of [vigilante] militias being formed. The population is tense. We can't let this continue. The response of the British government to the news that it has passed the 50,000 migrant mark in just 13 months was to blame the criminal gangs. Baroness Smith of Malvern, Labour's education minister, said it was not Labour's fault but rather the gangs who had 'got an absolute foothold in the tragic trafficking of people across the Channel'. But these are the same gangs Yvette Cooper was talking about in 2018. Shouldn't she have prepared a plan of action to 'smash the gangs' years ago in expectation of coming to power? As if to underline the ineffectiveness of this Labour government, Frontex also released figures for other popular migrant routes into Europe. Most show a marked decrease in the number of irregular entries. The Eastern Mediterranean passage is down 16 per cent for the first seven months of 2025 compared to the previous year; in the Western Balkans it has dropped by 47 per cent and the Western Africa route is down by 46 per cent. Migrants entering via the Central and Western Mediterranean have increased slightly (9 and 11 per cent respectively) but they are small in comparison to the 26 per cent rise in Channel crossings. Frontex attributed the Channel increase to good weather and the use of 'taxi boats' that pick people up from various spots on the French coast to avoid detection by police and coast guards. Furthermore, the gangs who run this taxi service are filling their boats with more migrants, sometimes as many as 100 in one small vessel. Frontex concluded that 'smuggling networks remain active and agile'. In other words, the only thing that changed since 2018 is the numbers. If Sajid Javid called a couple of hundred migrants a 'major incident', one wonders how Yvette Cooper would describe 50,000?
