Pink Tickets Out, Aadhaar-Linked Pass For Delhi Women's Free Bus Rides
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has announced that the current system of pink tickets for free bus rides on Delhi Transport Corporation and cluster buses will soon be replaced with a new Aadhaar-linked Pink Pass, which will allow only women and transgender people living in Delhi to use the benefit.
"Very soon, we will replace the pink ticket with a Pink Pass for free bus travel for women in Delhi," said Ms Gupta. "This benefit will be limited to Delhi residents only."
To apply for the pass, eligible applicants will need to submit Aadhaar, PAN, proof of residence, a passport-size photograph, and complete KYC documentation.
Transport Minister Pankaj Singh confirmed that preparations for the rollout are in progress.
"We are finalising the digital and administrative framework for the Pink Pass," he said, underscoring that Aadhaar will serve as the primary ID for eligibility verification.
The pink ticket scheme, introduced in 2019, has been widely used, with lakhs of women benefiting from free travel daily.
Officials, however, say the open-access nature of the system led to misuse, with non-residents also availing the benefit and allegations of corruption surfacing in recent months.
These include inflated ticket counts, discrepancies in ridership data, and possible revenue leakages, raising questions about transparency and the actual reach of the scheme.
While no official date has been set for the transition, authorities indicate that the Pink Pass system will be rolled out in phases over the coming months.
Further details on the application process and issuance centres are expected to be announced soon. In the meantime, pink tickets will continue to remain valid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
From the Urdu Press: ‘EC must heed SC suggestions on Bihar SIR', ‘In Dhankhar exit, a Satyapal Malik parallel'
After the first week of Parliament's Monsoon Session was washed out due to a standoff over the Election Commission (EC)'s controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, with the Opposition pressing for a discussion on it, both Houses have taken up a special discussion on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack. These stories set the tone for the coverage of the crucial session by the Urdu dailies, which played up the abrupt exit of Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar on its opening day. Referring to the continuing row over the EC's Bihar SIR, the Hyderabad-based Siasat, in its July 29 leader, says that the EC is pushing its contentious drive amid apprehensions that lakhs of names of existing voters would be deleted from the list. It points out that the Supreme Court, while hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the SIR for being arbitrary and unconstitutional, had earlier suggested to the EC that it consider the Aadhaar, voter ID and ration card documents too for the exercise. The editorial says the EC, in its counter-affidavit, did not accept the inclusion of the three as proof for the exercise. 'Now, the apex court, while declining to stay the publication of the draft electoral rolls for Bihar, has again asked the EC to continue to accept Aadhaar and voter ID for the SIR,' it notes. 'The EC's apparent unwillingness to accept the apex court's suggestion reinforces the Opposition's allegations that the Bihar SIR is aimed at targeting electors from certain groups,' the daily states, underlining the top court's observation that the SIR should be aimed at ensuring 'en masse inclusion' instead of 'en masse exclusion'. The Opposition has alleged that the EC's drive could disenfranchise lakhs of voters, especially those belonging to the Dalit, backward and minority communities. The editorial notes that the EC has already indicated that about 65 lakh names from the existing 7.89 crore voters' list could be deleted in the draft rolls. 'This is a huge number, which could decide any election. If so many names are invalid, should past elections conducted on the basis of a list including them be held invalid? Should the 2024 Lok Sabha results be also rejected then? Would the EC roll back their outcomes? The poll body does not have answers to these questions — and all this is not possible,' the edit states. While the rolls should be updated in light of deaths and permanent migration of voters, the EC's exercise to determine eligibility through citizenship proof is 'unacceptable', it says. 'The EC must resolve these doubts, clear the air and accept the apex court's suggestions.' Commenting on Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar's surprise resignation on the first day of the Monsoon Session, the Mumbai-based Urdu Times, in its July 24 editorial, points out that the V-P's decision citing health concerns, which cut short his tenure by two years, has caused a stir. Dhankhar's move came just after he presided over the proceedings of the Rajya Sabha as its Chairman on what turned out to be his last day. 'Dhankhar has been no stranger to controversy. He had recurring face-offs with the Opposition, although at times he also asked questions of the government. He also had runs-ins with the judiciary, questioning the Supreme Court's 2015 judgment to quash the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act,' the editorial notes. What precipitated the crisis leading to Dhankhar's exit seemed to be the 63 Opposition MPs' notice for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma, from whose Delhi house alleged cash was recovered, which the former announced in the House, the daily states. 'This upstaged the government which wanted to initiate the impeachment move against Justice Varma in the Lok Sabha to score political points over judicial accountability,' it says. The editorial notes that while sharing a stage with Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan at an event in Mumbai in December last year, Dhankhar asked him if any promises had been made to farmers and why these had not been fulfilled. He also told Chouhan that farmers were 'suffering' and that they had continued to hold protests. 'The V-P's sudden resignation has raised several questions, with the government coming under a cloud of suspicion over it,' the edit states. Things have since moved at a fast pace, with the EC clearing the decks for holding the poll to elect the next V-P. 'The BJP-RSS seem to be upset with Dhankhar and are looking to quickly ensure his successor,' it says, adding that Dhankhar, a former West Bengal governor, may meet the same fate as former Jammu and Kashmir governor Satyapal Malik, who also had a bitter parting with the government. Flagging a spurt in criminal cases in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections slated for later this year, Siasat, in its July 28 editorial, says that in addition to multiple killings in Patna and other districts, the state has recently seen an increase in atrocities against women, citing the alleged rape of an unconscious woman inside an ambulance in Bodh Gaya while she was being taken to a hospital after fainting during a Home Guard recruitment test. 'This heinous incident reflects lawlessness in the state. However, Chief Minister and JD(U) president Nitish Kumar and his NDA ally BJP have continued to remain silent over these cases,' it says. 'However, their junior ally Chirag Paswan, Union minister and LJP(RV) chief, has kept his guns trained on the Nitish government over the state's law and order situation. On the Bodh Gaya outrage, he said he was sad that he was supporting a government which has completely failed to curb crimes.' The editorial points out that there has been bad blood between Nitish and Chirag for a long time. Even in the 2020 Assembly polls, when he was not part of the NDA but still friendly towards the BJP, Chirag had put up his candidates against the JD(U) nominees across the state. This had damaged the JD(U)'s prospects, bringing down its tally, it says. 'Chirag has been going after Nitish now, which could create trouble for the JD(U) at the hustings. There is a buzz that the BJP may be encouraging Chirag's barbs at Nitish as it looks to undercut him in a bid to claim the chief ministerial position after the polls,' the edit claims. The daily says the BJP could not openly checkmate Nitish as its Central government depends critically on the support of allies like the JD(U). 'However, the Bihar polls would be a different ball game, where if the BJP succeeds in cutting Nitish down to size, it may claim the mantle of leadership. For his part, Chirag seems to believe that Nitish's eclipse would result in his elevation to the centre stage of state politics,' it says. 'During the initial phase of his current term, Nitish had alleged a similar game plan to undermine his party in the 2020 polls. He went on to dump the NDA to cross over to the RJD-led Mahagathbandhan. It is to be seen how things play out for Nitish as well as Chirag, with the Assembly poll results set to have a crucial bearing on their fortunes.'
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court stays trial in two cases involving Azam Khan's son Abdullah
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) stayed an order of the Allahabad High Court directing Rampur's MP-MLA Court to proceed with the trial in two cases linked to former MLA and senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Azam Khan's son Mohammad Abdullah Azam Khan. A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh also issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh Government on an appeal filed by Mr. Abdullah. On July 23, the High Court dismissed two petitions filed by Mr. Abdullah challenging the proceedings of criminal cases against him. The first case is related to Mr. Abdullah's alleged fake passport and the second case to his obtaining two PAN cards. 'Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in my considered view, the instant application is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed,' the High Court said. Mr. Abdullah filed separate petitions in the High Court concerning the two cases requesting it to set aside the entire criminal proceedings of the ongoing trials in Rampur's MP/MLA Court. BJP MLA Akash Saxena had filed a case against Mr. Abdullah in Rampur on July 30, 2019, alleging fraud and violation of the Passport Act for allegedly obtaining the travel document using an incorrect date of birth. According to the complaint, Mr. Abdullah was issued a passport on January 10, 2018. The passport lists the date of birth as September 30, 1990 but his educational certificates say January 1, 1993. Mr. Saxena also filed an FIR against Mr. Abdullah and father Azam Khan at the Civil Lines police station in Rampur on December 6, 2019. Mr. Saxena alleged that Mr. Abdullah had furnished an incorrect PAN number in his election affidavit during the 2017 Assembly elections. Mr. Saxena also accused Mr. Azam Khan of being a fraudster and a liar, claiming that the senior SP leader got two PAN cards made for his son through fraud to enable him to contest elections. According to him, Mr. Abdullah allegedly concealed this fact in the affidavit submitted to the Election Commission of India (ECI). He showed one PAN number in the affidavit, but used another number in his income tax return documents.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Bihar voter roll revision: Will intervene if there is ‘mass exclusion' during exercise, says SC
The Supreme Court on Tuesday warned that it would intervene in the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar if there is any 'mass exclusion' during the exercise, Live Law reported. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi also listed the petitions challenging the special revision exercise for hearing on August 12 and August 13, nearly two weeks after the draft electoral roll is scheduled to be published on August 1. Observing that the Election Commission, being a constitutional authority, will be deemed to act in accordance with the law, Kant assured the petitioners that the court would hear their concerns. 'The moment they [the Election Commission] deviate from the [special intensive revision] notification…we will interfere,' Bar and Bench quoted Kant as saying. On July 27, the Election Commission said that more than 7.2 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore electors had submitted enumeration forms by the July 25 deadline, indicating 'overwhelming participation'. This would mean that the remaining 65 lakh names may not make it to the draft rolls to be published on August 1. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Rashtriya Janata Dal MP Manoj Jha, also told the court that the petitioners would have 'no problem' if the Election Commission were to mention these 65 lakh names in the draft list, Live Law reported. Justice Kant responded, 'If the draft list is conspicuously silent [on these names], you will bring it to our notice. We are here, we will hear you.' On Monday, the Supreme Court had said that the Election Commission should focus on ' mass inclusion ' rather than 'en masse exclusion' while carrying out the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The court also reiterated its July 10 directions asking the poll body to consider accepting Aadhaar cards and voter identity cards as valid documents for the ongoing exercise. However, it declined to restrain the Election Commission from publishing the draft roll on August 1. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. If the officers are satisfied with the details provided, the voters will be re-enrolled to a new voter list by electoral registration officers. If not, they will be removed from the voter lists. A draft roll will be published on August 1 and the final roll will be out on September 30. On July 2, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. Chief Election Commissioner on July 6 defended the exercise, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls.
