
"That's One Of The Worst Financial Decisions You Could Possibly Make": 7 Things A Personal Finance Expert Wants You To Know About The Trump Tariffs
Last week, President Trump announced blanket tariffs on imported goods from over 180 countries around the world.
Shortly afterward, panic rippled through the market as stocks plummeted, and economists have been saying that we're now more likely to experience a recession and higher inflation (again, ugh) in 2025.
What does this news mean for you and me? Last week, I spoke with an economic analyst about how the tariffs are likely to pan out, and the tl;dr is "not great." So, this week, I reached out to personal finance expert Ramit Sethi to get his advice for surviving a bad economy.
Ramit Sethi is the author of I Will Teach You To Be Rich, host of the Money For Couples podcast, and host of the Netflix series How To Get Rich.
One of the things I love about Ramit's work is how he emphasizes that a " rich life" isn't about buying status symbols and hoarding wealth. Instead, Ramit talks a lot about how we can use our money as a tool to live more meaningful and enjoyable lives. Lately, he has also been answering viewer questions on Instagram and talking more about how money is inherently political.
Here's what we talked about:
1. First, Ramit said that the tariffs will impact middle-class and poor Americans far more than wealthier people.
Ramit Sethi: Tariffs are going to hit the poor and middle class quite dramatically. There is good data showing that on an annual basis, these tariffs will hit the median American household, costing them over $2,500 per year. Trump's tariffs are directly a tax on the poor and middle class.
All of this for no reason, so that wealthy people can get a big fat tax cut. These tariffs make no sense for America. Tariffs have very specific surgical uses, but putting a blanket tariff on essentially the entire world, minus, of course, Russia, for very conspicuous reasons, is unprecedented and unexpected, and as a result, the market dropped dramatically.
2. Declining 401(k) balances and retirement worries are dominating headlines, but Ramit cautions against taking drastic action right now, especially if you're still decades away from retirement age.
RS: If you are in your 20s, 30s — even 40s — you can reasonably expect that the market will go up some years and it will go down some years, and because you have the ultimate luxury, which is time that allows continued compounding. And what that means is, stop looking at your investment accounts and in general, keep investing consistently.
Now, I think this is a really important point because people make very poor life-changing decisions during chaos like this. I saw it happen in 2001, I saw it happen in 2008, I saw it happen in 2020. You can literally cost yourself millions of dollars if you make a panic decision. And the most common type of panic is that people see those charts in the red for one day, one week, one month, and they finally can't take it anymore, and they log in, freak out, and sell everything.
That's one of the worst financial decisions you can possibly make in your entire life. That will cost you more than all the coffees, all the vacations, all the unscrupulous 1.5% AUM fees that you will ever pay is selling in a panic. There are so many other ways to protect yourself besides selling.
But just to circle back, if you have the benefit of time, historically, the market has recovered and done very well through multiple World Wars, through pandemics, through oil crises. So I will tell everybody, I'm not selling. I plan to be continuing to invest, and if you do the same, it will give you a very good shot at living at a very rich life.
3. Instead, he says your number one financial priority right now should be beefing up your emergency fund.
RS: I have an aggressive recommendation that I'm making, and that is to focus on assembling a 12-month emergency fund. That's not typical. Most, a lot of financial experts recommend three to six months. I'm recommending 12. The only time, the only other time that I have recommended a 12-month emergency fund was when COVID hit, which should suggest the seriousness of the situation that we are in.
Let me explain: Yes, the fact that the market dropped this dramatically in a matter of three days is extremely dangerous. This isn't normal ups and downs of the market. This is one dangerous dictator who, on a whim, decided to wreak havoc across trillions of dollars, and he cost most Americans tens of thousands of dollars in a single day. This isn't a joke. It's not something to be made light of.
It's not something that just disappears. The toothpaste is out of the tube, meaning other countries now regard America as an unstable partner. And even if Trump waved his hands and undid the tariffs tomorrow, they would still treat America like an unstable partner because, frankly, we are.
So, what does it mean for individual investors? That is why I say a 12-month emergency fund because I see a lot of uncertainty ahead of us. And when there's uncertainty in the market, companies re-branch, they lay people off. That's very dangerous. You do not want to get in a situation where your back is against the financial wall, and you have to make really bad decisions. Those can haunt you for decades.
4. If you, like a lot of Americans, don't have much in savings at the moment (much less a fully-stocked emergency fund that could cover your basic living expenses for a full year), Ramit offered a five-step plan for socking away cash.
RS: First, I would take a look at my discretionary spending, and I would get serious about tamping down or eliminating most of it. Discretionary spending is the fun stuff. It's stuff like going out, travel, drinks, eating out those kinds of things, and I would immediately redirect that toward savings.
Second, I would pause and stretch out expenses as I could. A simple example would be any major plans to move, to buy a major purchase, like a car, home renovation, anything that can be paused. I would pause it and anything that can be stretched out, for example. You know, even if you were able to stretch out, say, regular purchases that you make, for example, let's say, any type of self-care, even if you stretch that out one month over the course of a year, you can save hundreds of dollars.
Next, I would consider decreasing [payments toward] any low-interest debt that I am overpaying. For example, if I have a 3% mortgage and I'm paying an extra $200 a month, not anymore, I'm sending that $200 a month straight to my savings account to build that emergency fund up.
Number four is, if necessary, I would consider decreasing my 401(k) [contributions] just to get the match. I would really try hard not to eliminate it altogether, but I would consider decreasing it for the time being.
And then finally, and I really, really try not to get to this, but it's an option if necessary. If you're aggressively paying high-interest debt, like a credit card debt, I might, in the worst case, consider decreasing the amount I am paying towards that to build up a savings account, but I would try as hard as possible not to get to that level.
5. If you're torn between paying off debt and building your savings, Ramit explained that paying it all off could come back to bite you in the ass if you don't also have an emergency fund you can draw on.
Seksan Mongkhonkhamsao / Getty Images
RS: In America, most people are taught that debt is like a snakebite. You do anything you can to avoid it, and so the way that people think about debt is like they have two pedals in their entire financial life. Pay off debt or not. That's a very simplistic way of looking at the world.
There's a different way to look at it. If you have low-interest debt in usual times, mathematically, you can pay the minimum and maybe invest any extra money you have, because you can probably make more investing than you would paying off a 3% mortgage or student loan.
But in times like this, when you have people who take who just hate debt, and they pay it off as fast as they can. The problem is, you might end up debt-free, and then you might get laid off the next month, and now you're in a real pickle. You have no money in a savings account, and because you thought you were doing the right thing, "Oh, I'm paying my debt off." Well, you need to build a savings account as well because times are very chaotic, and if you end up getting laid off, you need to have money to survive.
6. To make your savings do the most work for you, Ramit advises keeping your emergency fund in a very specific type of savings account that offers higher-than-average interest rates.
D3sign / Getty Images
RS: A high-yield savings account is the place to put it. There are a number of great accounts. Pick a great account, store your money there.
The important thing is not agonizing over which account to open. They're all fine. The point is to set your money up to automatically go there every single month. That's the most important thing you can do. And then second is to take a very critical look at your spending right now, eliminate expenses that you can and be sure to redirect that money to savings.
7. Finally, Ramit gave his take on one of the most common questions people have been asking him about the tariffs.
Bloomberg / Bloomberg via Getty Images
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘General acceptance': A year of banning cellphones in Canadian classrooms
EDMONTON - Sixteen-year-old Roha Akram was skeptical when teachers in Calgary announced a cellphone ban during the first assembly of the school year. 'I was like, 'No one's going to follow this,'' the Grade 11 student recalled of the change in September. 'It's just the nature of teenagers. We don't like rules.' Teachers didn't want to see phones on desks or in pockets, Akram added. 'They wanted it in the backpack, in the locker, in the car.' She said the ban has been good for some students, who just need a reminder to focus in class, particularly when teachers are speaking. But some have struggled. One teacher took a phone away from a boy who was really attached to his device, she said. 'He started acting crazy. He went around asking everyone, 'Can I use your phone? Can I use your phone? I need to go on Instagram.' 'I saw phones are kind of becoming an addiction.' As the school year wraps up this month, education ministries across Canada say there have been overall positive results from banning cellphones. They say it has taught students not to develop unhealthy attachments to their phones and to focus on lessons in the classroom. Last fall, most provinces introduced policies to limit cellphone use in schools, similar to jurisdictions in other countries. Before the ban in Manitoba, Education Minister Tracy Schmidt said a school librarian complained to her that students were too quiet sitting around the stacks of books. 'The students would come in groups, sit down at a table together, pull out their cellphones and they would all sit there. You could hear a pin drop,' said Schmidt. The cellphone ban has returned the chatter and socialization among students, she said. 'They still come with their groups of friends, but now they're sitting, they're talking, they're laughing. They might pick up a board game. (The librarian) was really, really grateful to the province for taking this step.' Ontario's education ministry said parents and teachers find the ban has created a better learning environment. 'As we close out the first full year of implementation, we will continue gathering input to understand how the policy has worked in practice, where it has been effective, and where further support may be needed,' said spokesperson Emma Testani. In Nova Scotia, school staff were surprised by how smoothly it was to implement the new directive, said education spokesperson Alex Burke. 'While not all students like leaving their devices out of the classroom, there is a general acceptance of the benefit of limiting cellphone use and appreciation of the opportunity to ignore their phones,' said Burke. The Edmonton Public School Board, Alberta's largest school division, said it didn't notice any significant issues. 'Schools had the flexibility to determine how best to implement the ban, whether it meant introducing new practices or adjusting current ones,' said spokesperson Kim Smith. A year of the ban doesn't mean students aren't still using phones in class, admitted Akram. Some have just become more sneaky. One fellow student used a textbook to hide his phone while teachers were talking, she said. 'He just watches YouTube Shorts the whole class.' Akram said she also occasionally uses her phone during work time in class — her AirPods in her ears, under her hijab — so she can listen to music. When teachers do confiscate phones, they're typically returned at the end of class or the school day, she added. Akram said she can see why the ban might be necessary for generation Z and students with unhealthy attachments to their phones. 'We were born when people were inventing iPads and iPhones ... so we grew up with screens.' She said she thinks teachers will be stricter with the ban next year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.


USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break.
Former Biden press secretary is ready to tell Americans the truth? Give me a break. | Opinion The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Show Caption Hide Caption Karine Jean-Pierre talks exit from Democratic party in new book Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre talks about leaving the Democratic party in her upcoming book slated for release in October. The Democratic Party continues to self-destruct, and I am here for it. Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has teased a tell-all memoir about former President Joe Biden and the administration she served for nearly three years. 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines' is stoking claims that Jean-Pierre is a grifter, profiting off her time in the administration by trashing the former president and the political party that gave her prominence. Knives are out among Democrats for one of their own who has now betrayed them. Like other books that have recently exposed details about Biden's poor health, Jean-Pierre's book raises questions about the White House cover-up that attempted to hide the president's mental and physical decline from voters. It also calls into question Jean-Pierre's honesty: Why did she wait until now, when she can profit from it, to tell the truth about the former commander in chief? Former White House colleagues turn on former Biden press secretary Democrats are now a minority party in America. The GOP controls the White House, the Senate and the U.S. House along with a majority of governor's offices and state legislatures. The Democratic Party has lost Americans' trust because of its leaders' penchant for gaslighting, not just about Biden's health but also on issues like immigration, border security and the economy. Jean-Pierre, who now claims to be an independent, certainly isn't helping her former colleagues rebuild that lost trust. Details from the book are still sketchy, but Jean-Pierre should provide readers with an inside look at what happened after Biden's disastrous debate with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump a year ago this month. Jean-Pierre's coworkers have already reacted to the book with contempt. "Former colleagues expressed confusion at how Jean-Pierre seemingly intends to paint Biden as a victim while pinning her own decision to leave the party on his 'broken' White House," Politico reported, citing multiple former Biden administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. Opinion: Biden's cancer diagnosis raises the question: Was he ever in good enough health? Caitlin Legacki, a Democratic strategist who worked on the Commerce Department's communications team during Biden's presidency, took umbrage with Jean-Pierre's assertion that the Democratic Party betrayed Biden. 'Kamala Harris and the entire Biden/Harris campaign did hero's work to avoid losing 400 electoral votes and giving Republicans a supermajority in Congress, which is what would have happened if he stayed on the ticket,' Legacki told Politico. 'It's more productive to focus on that, and thank Biden for doing the responsible thing by stepping aside, than it is to pretend this was an unwarranted act of betrayal.' But party insiders continuing to squabble over whether a now former president was or was not betrayed by fellow Democrats entirely misses the larger point. Opinion: Guess who Americans want to run the economy? Hint − it's not Democrats. Far too many Democrats, Jean-Pierre included, worked hard to deceive Americans. Their willful lack of self-awareness about their gaslighting and dishonesty is why the party has shown no signs of recovering from the last disastrous election cycle. Karine Jean-Pierre's book about Biden isn't the first Jean-Pierre's book will be far from the first to address the deception at the heart of the Biden White House. On May 20, journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson released "Original Sin," which describes in detail Biden's cognitive decline and the mind-boggling efforts with which his inner circle and the Democratic Party tried to hide the truth from Americans. Opinion: Texas woman's death would have been prevented if Biden had secured the border Conservatives had long been suspicious about Biden's health, but journalists with White House access failed to ask tough questions then. Now that it's too late to make a real difference, those who were silent when it mattered most are more than ready to profit from belated exposés about the former president's failing health. The knives are now out inside the Democratic Party. And the party is bleeding, not only Americans' support and trust but also its last remaining drops of honesty and truth. Nicole Russell is an opinion columnist with USA TODAY. She lives in Texas with her four kids. Sign up for her newsletter, The Right Track, and get it delivered to your inbox.

Business Insider
25 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The rise of layoff culture
Shaffan Mustafa was laid off for the first time in 2020. Four years later, in January 2024, the software engineer in Ohio was laid off again. Then, in September, he was let go from a contract job. "I wish I could say I didn't have experience with layoffs, but unfortunately, I have a bit too much," he tells me. The first time, he found it depressing. It took him 10 months of scouring job boards and hundreds of unanswered applications before he landed his next role at a local consulting company. The second time, says the 29-year-old, "I was still sad about it, but at that point it wasn't as unexpected." His third layoff in five years has been different. In the middle of yet another job search a few months ago, he came across a Substack called Laid Off. "I probably typed something like 'being laid off sucks' and found it that way," he says. After reading several people's layoff stories on the Substack, he felt less alone. He became a paid subscriber and joined the dedicated Discord group where members went into more detail about their layoffs, shared job updates, and ranted about the state of the economy. Mustafa checks the group daily, sometimes every few hours. The Substack is the brainchild of Melanie Ehrenkranz. After being laid off herself from her role as a newsletter editor at a financial technology startup in 2023, she wanted a way to process the experience. "I felt like there wasn't really a lot of spotlight on the individual experience of a layoff outside of a LinkedIn post or a tweet or a group chat with a couple of your friends," she says. Ehrenkranz, 35, found a job nine months after being laid off, but she decided to launch the newsletter anyway. In August 2024, she shared her first post, an interview with a social media producer laid off from Condé Nast, asking her questions such as, "Where were you when you found out?" and "What was your greatest financial concern with the sudden loss of income?" and "Has being laid off changed how you view your relationship to work?" She has since been inundated with people willing to share their stories. Within two months, Laid Off grew to 5,000 subscribers. Recently, it surpassed 10,000. The number of Americans facing long-term unemployment has crept up from 1.05 million in February 2023 to over 1.67 million as of last month. Since 2022, more than half a million tech workers have been laid off — one analysis found there had been about 90,000 tech layoffs in the first five months of 2025. Amid the job losses, a new culture around layoffs has sprung up. Workers are livestreaming their layoffs to audiences of millions on TikTok. The post-layoff note on LinkedIn has become so ubiquitous that it's now a social media cliché. Many of the newly laid-off have no qualms declaring themselves #OpenToWork. There's even layoff merch now. To welcome the legions of freshly unemployed, a network of layoff support groups has emerged. On Reddit, r/Layoffs is in the top 2% of subreddits by size, with more than 120,000 members. On LinkedIn, there are more than 100 groups for those affected by layoffs, including company-specific groups for Meta, X, and Amazon. Across social platforms, layoff influencers are attracting thousands of followers by sharing advice and commiserating with those in the same boat. While workers can't change the fact of being laid off, they are no longer taking it lying down. In the 1990s, layoffs had become more or less standard business practice, but there was still a major taboo around them. "We've all heard those stories about a dad who was laid off," says Denise Rousseau, a professor of organizational behavior and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University. "Every day, instead of going to work, he goes to the mall and spends eight hours there before coming home. He's embarrassed to not be working." The pandemic changed layoff culture. People stuck at home on their laptops all day began broadcasting their unemployed status. Then the pandemic changed layoff culture. More than a fifth of the American workforce was laid off during the first few months of COVID-19, a decline in employment not seen since the end of World War II. Layoffs stopped being seen as an individual failing but as an unfortunate byproduct of economic instability. People stuck at home on their laptops all day began broadcasting their unemployed status. LinkedIn introduced its green #OpenToWork banner in June 2020. The post-layoff note, with its cheery tone and calls to "reach out if you're hiring," quickly became standard practice. As more layoffs have hit in the past year, the stigma has vanished even more. "It used to be if you got laid off, it's because you're a screwup — you're just a bad employee," Mustafa says. "Now it's just par for the course." For some, being laid off became not just a LinkedIn update but lucrative content. Giovanna Ventola, a commercial real estate worker, first went viral for sharing advice to other job seekers after being laid off three times in three years, Bloomberg reported. She has gained nearly 30,000 followers sharing her perspective on coping with unemployment and has launched a professional networking platform, Rhize. Others have documented their days-in-the-life navigating being newly unemployed. In her newsletter, Ehrenkranz has spotlighted stories from everyone from a design intern for the National Park Service to a creative director at Google. "I definitely think it's opening up people's eyes to the fact that a layoff is not this thing that happens to a certain type of person in a certain industry," Ehrenkranz says. "It's something that can happen to anyone." The new visibility of layoffs doesn't make it any easier when a call with HR gets added to your calendar. Research published in the International Journal of Mental Health found that losing a job increased the risk of depression, risky substance use, and suicide. For Mustafa, being laid off meant involuntarily grinding his teeth at night and having debilitating stress headaches. Christine Reichenbach was laid off from her chief of staff role at the cloud computing company VMware in January 2024 while she was 34 weeks pregnant. It quickly sent her into a downward spiral. She ended up on postpartum anxiety medication and, despite having ample savings, put her baby in day care at seven weeks to frantically hunt for a new job. "It was very illogical," she says. "It's just what it did to my brain." At the time, Reichenbach was introduced to a Discord group called The Labor Club, a referral-only application-based group of 500 women who have experienced being laid off while pregnant or postpartum. "It's a specific niche that was just awful to experience," Reichenbach says. Her husband, though supportive, couldn't relate to what she was going through. "He has no idea what it's like to be laid off pregnant." Instead, she had a pool of women to turn to for both practical resources and, importantly, emotional support. After some soul-searching, Reichenbach decided to leave Big Tech altogether and founded her own company, The Phoenix Formula, at the start of this year with the goal of empowering other job seekers. She is also building her own support group, Beyond the Layoffs, on LinkedIn and Slack. "People need a space for this to actually be constructive," she says. If members need a space to yell in all caps, there's a channel for that. "I hope it's a place people can vent on a bad day and it's not on social media for hiring managers to see," she says. As the stigma around layoffs disappears, the boundaries of professionalism on social media have become increasingly blurred. Ask any recruiter, and they'll say bad-mouthing a previous employer on social media is tantamount to career cyanide. "It gives me alarm bells," says Brad Thomas, a business manager at Orange Quarter, a tech recruitment company in New York. "It's the same as when a candidate interviews somewhere — talking bad in an unprofessional manner about a previous employer is just not a good look." His advice when it comes to posting on social media is to keep it professional. In the new culture of layoffs, however, there is an important caveat. "The size of the company makes a difference," Thomas explains. "If someone has a pop at Meta or Google, it's less personal and less damaging to the brand versus a startup of 30 people." As the stigma around layoffs disappears, the boundaries of professionalism on social media have become increasingly blurred. Earlier this year, when Meta let go of some 4,000 workers, branding them as " low performers" on the way out, the departing employees refused to leave quietly, pushing back on the label on LinkedIn. As Business Insider's Aki Ito wrote, "This is something we haven't seen before in the professional world: Employees sticking up for themselves in public, and calling out their former employer for misrepresenting their work." Both the social media posts and the private communities offer a kind of testimony that shifts blame from the employee back onto the employer. Ehrenkranz has had many people tell her that being interviewed for Laid Off or filling out her surveys is a cathartic experience. "A layoff these days is a 10-minute Zoom call, shut your computer, and then you're thrown into this new chapter," she says. Having a dedicated space to talk about being laid off with those who get it is a relief for Mustafa. "I don't really feel like I'm being pushy or shoving my layoff experiences down someone's throat," he says. While there is power in numbers, for some, those numbers can be overwhelming. A friend of Mustafa's left the Discord group shortly after joining. "She was getting emotionally burned out from hearing about layoffs," he explains. "She's fortunately a freelance writer, so she's making some money. She can just tune out that stuff if she wants to. For me, I'm still desperately tuned in." Ehrenkranz focuses on making sure the Laid Off community is a toxic-positivity-free zone. "I would say the vibe is just real," she says. "There's no 'Everything happens for a reason' or 'You'll get the next one.' People don't want to hear that." Rather than just a place to wallow, many of these support groups are designed as both a safety net and a springboard for when members are ready to begin the hunt for their next role. Fana Yohannes, a social media consultant and former Meta employee, founded the group Here2Help to give job seekers a leg up. In the wake of the 2020 layoffs, she posted on Instagram that she was open to reviewing and providing feedback on five people's résumés. "One person replied and was like, actually, I'd be down to help too," she says. From there, Yohannes says, Here2Help grew to 200 mentors who helped about 2,000 people find new opportunities during COVID. "We've come to an era where layoffs are part of the job," Yohannes says. "We have to kind of be strategic." After four months of sending out applications, Mustafa has a second interview lined up for another tech role. Even if he gets the job, he plans on staying in the Laid Off community for a while — just in case. "I can't trust these people anymore," he says about employers.