
BRICS nations 'condemn and reject' Europe's carbon-based import duties
CBAM is an import duty imposed by the European Union (EU) on goods produced by processes that lead to more carbon emissions than domestic European manufacturers are allowed to emit. The ostensible reason is to check 'carbon leakage', but this has the effect of making items like steel or cement, from a country like India for example, more expensive, and thus less competitive, in the European markets.
Developing countries including India and China have been strongly critical of CBAM, calling it a unilateral and unfair trade barrier. They maintain this violates international agreements on both trade and climate, and have raised this issue at multiple international forums, including the annual climate conferences. But EU has been unrelenting. The statement by the BRICS nations, a group of nine large developing economies whose annual two-day summit concluded in Brazil on Monday, is another reiteration of the stand of the developing countries, though in a much stronger language.
'We condemn and reject unilateral, punitive and discriminatory, protectionist measures that are not in line with international law, under the pretext of environmental concerns, such has unilateral and discriminatory carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAMs), due diligence requirements with detrimental impacts on global efforts to halt and reverse deforestation, taxes and other measures …', the BRICS nations said in a statement on climate finance that is a new addition to the outcomes from this annual meeting.
The Leaders' Framework Declaration on Climate Finance is the result of the discussions held by a new contact group of ministers on climate change and sustainable development that was formed last year under Russia's chairmanship of BRICS.
The declaration said CBAMs, and other measures like restrictions on trade of forest goods, violated the provisions of the 1994 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and agreements reached at other climate meetings. For example, Article 3(5) of UNFCCC calls upon countries to 'promote a supportive and open international economic system' that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development in all countries, particularly those in the developing world. Importantly, it also says that 'measures taken to combat climate change, including unilateral ones, should not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade'.
The BRICS countries, in their latest statement said they want a full implementation of this provision in UNFCCC.
'We also oppose unilateral protectionist measures which deliberately disrupt the global supply and production chains and distort competition,' it said.
'We express concern that such measures, as well as unilateral economic and financial sanctions, may undermine BRICS countries' capacities to invest in their own just transitions and development priorities and risk diverting away critical resources at a time when developing countries face a financial gap to pursue climate action and sustainable development. We emphasise the importance of non-discriminatory access to trade and to climate finance for all countries and the need to address existing barriers,' it said.
The BRICS nations also asked the rich and developed world to fully deliver on their commitments under the UNFCCC and the 2015 Agreement, particularly those related to providing financial resources to the developing countries to take climate action. Developed countries are obligated to raise at least US$ 100 billion a year in climate finance meant for developing countries. They have promised to raise this to at least US$ 300 billion a year from 2035. But developing countries say this is too less and too late, considering that they already need at least US$ 1.3 trillion a year.
'We emphasize that although developing countries have contributed to a lesser extent to climate change, populations in these countries are the most vulnerable to its adverse impacts and the lesser equipped, including in terms of relevant infrastructure, to withstand its effects. Therefore, we highlight the need to increase the share of financing for adaptation, particularly public finance…,' the BRICS statement said.
The BRICS nations called on the developed world to urgently increase their financial contribution to adaptation projects, at least doubling the amount in 2019 by 2025, as has been agreed in climate conferences.
'We emphasise that adaptation finance must be primarily concessional, grant-based and accessible to local communities and should not substantially increase debt burdens on developing economies, while ensuring predictability, adequacy and direct access modalities that facilitate implementation of context-appropriate solutions aligned with national adaptation plans and priorities,' their statement said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Ukraine's Alaska agenda: Kiev wants a lasting ceasefire, NATO-backed security, reparations, and sustained sanctions on Russia
Synopsis As Trump and Putin prepare to meet in Alaska, Ukraine seeks assurances that its interests won't be sacrificed. Kyiv insists on a durable ceasefire, Russian reparations for war damages estimated up to $1 trillion, and binding security guarantees via NATO and the EU. Ukraine also demands the return of abducted children and prisoners of war, alongside maintaining sanctions on Russia. AP Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attends a joint press statement with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz following talks with European and US leaders in Berlin, Germany, Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi) As US President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, Ukraine hopes for an agreement that will meet its demands of stopping the war and preventing future aggression. But since Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will not attend this meeting, Kyiv fears being left out of negotiations that could decide its and its European allies also fear that Friday's Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could yield a settlement that sacrifices Kyiv's interests for the appearance of peace. President Zelensky will hold a pre-summit call with Trump alongside European leaders on Wednesday, August 13, to lay out non-negotiable red lines, including a durable ceasefire, full participation in talks, and compensation for war damage estimated at up to $1 has warned that any decisions made without Ukraine 'are at the same time decisions against peace,' as quoted by Politico. Ukrainian officials say Putin's ultimate goal is not just holding territory but ending Ukraine's independence. These are Kyiv's longstanding demands, which they are eagerly hoping to meet. Kyiv insists on a durable ceasefire before discussing any territorial issues, rejecting US suggestions of 'land swaps' involving the says ceding the region would invite future offensives and undermine Ukraine's Mark Rutte has floated a possible compromise in which some areas remain under Russian control but are legally recognized as Ukrainian.'When it comes to this whole issue of territory, when it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal that Russia is controlling de facto, factually some of the territory of Ukraine, it has to be effectual recognition, and not a political de jure recognition,' he told insists that Moscow must bear the financial burden for the destruction it has inflicted (by starting a war), a toll estimated between $500 billion and $1 trillion in damages to infrastructure, homes, and Chancellor Friedrich Merz, speaking at the Ukraine Recovery Conference last month, underlined this demand:'Russia must pay for the approximately €500 billion in damages caused. Until this happens, Moscow must not be granted access to its frozen assets.'Ukraine points to the fact that close European allies hold significant Russian state assets, with almost €200 billion frozen in Belgium alone, as a major source of leverage. Kyiv believes these funds must remain inaccessible to Moscow until full reparations are Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made clear that only full membership in NATO and the European Union can guarantee Ukraine's long-term security:A Politico article quotes Zewleanskey, 'Will we be in NATO? In the EU? I haven't heard anything — simply not a single proposal that would guarantee that a new war won't start tomorrow. We need security guarantees that will preserve, first of all, our state, a sovereign state, our independence.'However, Ukraine faces pushback: US President Donald Trump has ruled out NATO membership, a stance quietly backed by some European capitals, and Moscow demands a permanent NATO veto for Ukraine. Zelenskyy also criticizes EU member states that are hesitant to admit a large, poor country with a vast agricultural now, European partners, not the US, are Ukraine's primary source of military assistance. Since the war began, Europe has provided at least €73.9 billion in military aid, compared to €64 billion from the US, according to the Kiel demands the immediate return of nearly 20,000 children, who it says were abducted by Russia. Only 1,453 have been returned so far, often through mediation by Qatar and other claims these transfers are evacuations to safety, but refuses to return the children to their families, instead placing them in adoption systems and subjecting them to Russian propaganda. In 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin over the unlawful deportation of children from occupied Ukraine to prisoners of war, there has been more progress: more than 2,000 POWs have been exchanged under Trump's mediation, but thousands remain in Russian custody without access for international human rights backed by European allies, demands that existing primary and secondary sanctions remain in place and even be strengthened. They argue that easing sanctions or resuming trade with Russia would allow Moscow to rebuild its war Timothy Ash estimates the war has already cost Russia about $2 trillion, nearly equivalent to its annual risks for Ukraine are clear. As he told Politico, 'Ukraine could survive the war, but not survive the peace,' if a bad deal undermines its security and sovereignty.

Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
1, 2, 3…BOOM! Hamas BLITZES IDF Ahead Of ‘Gaza Conquest'; Unleashes Deadly Mortar Fire
BIG! Putin To Meet Zelensky? Trump Vows 3-Way Meeting Without Asking After Warning On 'Russia Bluff' U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that he will arrange a rare three-way meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. The announcement follows a private virtual call between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders, during which Zelensky reportedly said Putin is 'bluffing." The proposed meeting could mark a dramatic turning point in the ongoing conflict, with Trump positioning himself as a direct mediator between Moscow and Kyiv. This high-stakes diplomatic gamble comes at a critical moment, with the world watching to see if the confrontation will de-escalate—or explode. Watch. 83 views | 1 hour ago

Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
After Muslim World, Netanyahu Gets Snubbed By Tiny Nation On Bid To KICK OUT Palestinians From Gaza
BIG! Putin To Meet Zelensky? Trump Vows 3-Way Meeting Without Asking After Warning On 'Russia Bluff' U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that he will arrange a rare three-way meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. The announcement follows a private virtual call between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders, during which Zelensky reportedly said Putin is 'bluffing." The proposed meeting could mark a dramatic turning point in the ongoing conflict, with Trump positioning himself as a direct mediator between Moscow and Kyiv. This high-stakes diplomatic gamble comes at a critical moment, with the world watching to see if the confrontation will de-escalate—or explode. Watch. 83 views | 55 minutes ago