
What is the New Income Tax Bill 2025? Income Tax Act 1961 to be replaced; top points taxpayers should know
The New Income Tax Bill has been passed by the Lok Sabha, marking a significant reform to modernise the longstanding
income tax
legislation for both individuals and corporations. The New Income Tax Bill 2025 aims to simplify tax procedures and reduce compliance requirements for taxpayers.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the updated version of the I-T bill to Parliament, which included changes suggested by the Parliamentary Select Committee. She had previously withdrawn the initial bill, introduced on February 13, on August 8.
The Parliamentary Select Committee, under the leadership of BJP member Baijayant Panda, reviewed the I-T Bill 2025 and finalised their report on the proposed legislation in the previous month.
"Almost all of the recommendations of the Select Committee have been accepted by the government. In addition, suggestions have been received from stakeholders about changes that would convey the proposed legal meaning more accurately," said the Objects and Reasons section of the Income Tax (No.2) Bill.
The parliamentary committee proposed 285 suggestions to streamline and update the taxation framework.
New
Income Tax Bill 2025
: Top points to know
The proposed legislation reduces text volume and sections by approximately 50%, presenting provisions in a more straightforward and comprehensible manner.
It simplifies the taxation timeline by eliminating the complex distinction between assessment year and previous year, introducing a unified "tax year" concept.
The revised I-T bill introduces provisions for taxpayers to claim refunds even when returns are submitted after deadlines, which should provide significant relief to individuals filing their taxes.
The New Income Tax Bill 2025 retains existing provisions for carrying forward losses, provides tax relief on anonymous donations to religious trusts, and adjusts MSME (micro, small and medium enterprises) classifications to align with the MSME Act, incorporating the panel's suggested modifications.
The duration for submitting TDS correction statements has been shortened to two years from the previous six years under the Income-tax Act, 1961. According to I-T department officials, this reduction should substantially decrease complaints from deductees.
The New Income Tax Bill has additionally provided explicit clarification regarding deductions applicable to commuted pension and gratuity payments received by family members.
Tax experts indicated that the reforms would simplify compliance procedures for individuals, organisations, MSMEs whilst fostering a reliable, foreseeable and lucid taxation framework, essential for maintaining domestic spending, drawing overseas investments and backing economic expansion.
Gouri Puri, partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Co noted that the initial proposal created uncertainty, particularly concerning residential property taxation, pension deductions and reimbursement procedures for late submissions. "The revised bill addresses these gaps to simplify interpretation, reduce disputes and promote fairness," said Puri.
The updated I-T Bill seeks to remove unnecessary and duplicate clauses for improved navigation, systematically reorganising sections for easier reference.
It employs straightforward terminology to enhance accessibility and has eliminated outdated provisions to achieve better clarity.
The requirement for compulsory investment and deposit of deemed accumulated income, previously set at 15% of regular income in designated modes, has been eliminated.
Additionally, clause 187 has been expanded by incorporating the term "profession" following "business", allowing professionals whose total receipts surpass Rs 50 crore annually to access prescribed electronic payment methods.
"The withdrawal of the earlier I-T bill and the introduction of a revised version demonstrates the government's responsiveness to stakeholder feedback and the Select Parliamentary committee's recommendations," said Gouri Puri said.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, current
gold rate
and
silver price
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
L&T Energy, Japan's ITOCHU to develop green ammonia project in Gujarat
Homegrown L&T Energy GreenTech Ltd and Japan-based ITOCHU Corporation have joined hands to develop a green ammonia project of 300 kilo tonne per annum (KTPA) capacity in Gujarat, to target opportunities in the maritime sector. The project will come up over a land parcel acquired by parent Larsen & Toubro (L&T) at Kandla in Gujarat last year, L&T Energy GreenTech Ltd (LTEG) said in a statement on Wednesday. As per the statement, LTEG has entered into a Joint Development Agreement with ITOCHU Corporation of Japan to develop and commercialise a 300 KTPA green ammonia project at Kandla in Gujarat. "The latest collaboration supports LTEG's strategic vision to establish a presence across the green energy value chain and complements ITOCHU's initiatives to introduce low-carbon ammonia as a zero-emission marine fuel," LTEG said. Under the agreement, LTEG and ITOCHU will collaborate on the development of the green ammonia facility, with ITOCHU planning to offtake the product for bunkering applications in Singapore, it said. "The partnership with ITOCHU reflects L&T's larger vision of enabling a cleaner, greener future through sustainable business focus," Subramanian Sarma, Deputy Managing Director & President, L&T, said. A wholly-owned subsidiary of the USD 30 billion Larsen & Toubro (L&T), L&T Energy GreenTech Ltd (LTEG) is committed to delivering sustainable energy solutions across the green hydrogen value chain. The company offers integrated solutions through advanced technology, strategic partnerships, and dedicated R&D.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
10 minutes ago
- First Post
‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?
The Supreme Court's order to remove stray dogs from the streets of Delhi and NCR has sparked major outrage in the country. BJP leader and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has called the directive 'impractical' and claimed that when Paris got rid of its strays in the 1880s, it had to face a rodent problem. Here's what happened A local resident walks her dogs past War propoganda posters in the Montmarte district in Paris on March 25, 2020. File Photo/Reuters The Supreme Court's recent ruling on the immediate removal of stray dogs from Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) has sparked a huge debate in the country. It has pitted public safety advocates against dog lovers who see the order as 'cruel'. The directive has garnered reactions from various quarters, including politicians. While some have hailed the top court's directive, others found it 'inhumane'. Former Union minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has described the order as 'impractical', 'financially unviable' and 'potentially harmful' to the region's ecological balance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD She also brought up the example of Paris, which she said faced a rat problem after getting rid of the canines from its streets in the 1880s. Let's take a closer look. Supreme Court's stray dogs order The Supreme Court on Monday (August 11) ordered the Delhi government, civic bodies and authorities of Noida, Gurgaon, and Ghaziabad to start picking up stray dogs and relocate them to shelters. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said that dog shelters have to be set up to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, which should be sterilised and immunised. The apex court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back onto the streets. It also warned that any person or organisation that obstructs the move will face strict action. The bench also refused to consider petitions from dog lovers or any other party on the issue. The order came amid a rise in dog bites and cases of rabies. However, it has divided the country, with many animal lovers criticising the ruling. Both Gandhi families have spoken against the Supreme Court's directive to remove the stray dogs. 'The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted, and strip us of compassion,' Congress MP Rahul Gandhi wrote in a post on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He added, 'We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand.' The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 12, 2025 Animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi warned that removing stray dogs from the streets will create new problems. 'Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad, because there's food here in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground… I've seen this happen at my own house,' she reportedly said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Referring to 1880s Paris, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader stated, 'When they removed dogs and cats, the city was overrun with rats.' She said dogs were 'rodent control animals'. What happened in the 1800s Paris? In the 1800s, stray dogs were frowned upon in Paris, seen as transmitters of rabies, fleas, and dirt. Paris had a large number of strays at the time, with the administration considering them a threat to cleanliness, health, and safety. According to a research paper titled Stray Dogs and the Making of Modern Paris, shared by The University of Liverpool Repository, in 1883, pharmacist Emile Capron backed the removal of stray dogs from the streets of Paris, claiming that 'the infinite number of these awful mutts' spread rabies. She also blamed them for scaring horses and pedestrians, which resulted in traffic accidents. 'As Capron's remarks suggest, many commentators treated strays as dangerously mobile nuisances that hindered the movement, and threatened the health, of the city's productive human and nonhuman inhabitants. Strays contributed to the sense that Paris was a pathological city plagued by crime, filth, and insecurity, and elite commentators treated them as members of the city's criminal, dirty and uprooted 'dangerous classes,'" Chris Pearson wrote in the paper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To ensure 'public safety', many stray dogs were allegedly culled. As Paris moved towards becoming modern, 'Parisian public hygienists and authorities turned strays into a problem that they would solve to make the city safe, clean and modern,' Pearson wrote. As per some accounts, the killing of strays led to a surge in the population of rats in the French city. ALSO READ: With nearly 10 lakh stray dogs, how will Delhi implement the Supreme Court order? When Parisians ate dogs, cats, rats During the Siege of Paris (the Franco-Prussian War between 1870-1871), the allied German forces surrounded Paris and cut off most of the food shipments to the French capital. Amid food shortages, Parisians resorted to eating rats, cats, dogs, and even horses. On November 12, 1870, a stall on the Rue Rochechouart street sold several animals. 'On the right side of the stall was several large dogs, neatly dressed … next to these are several large cats, also very neatly dressed … On the left of the stall there is a dozen or more of rats stretched upon a tray, and a young woman, half veiled, is timidly approaching them with a little girl at her side. She wishes to inquire the price of the rats, and, if she has money enough, to purchase one,' Robert Lowry Sibbet, an American doctor who was trapped in Paris during the siege, wrote in the book The Siege of Paris by an American Eye-Witness, published in 1892. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies


India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so
Voter's list row: Congress' Sonia Gandhi's name added to voter list before she was citizen? BJP alleges so The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday launched a counterattack on Congress and claimed Sonia Gandhi had been illegally added to the voter list 45 years ago, before she was an Indian citizen. The Congress has accused the BJP of 'colluding' with the Election Commission to commit voter fraud. Ex-Union Minister Anurag Thakur claimed ex-Congress boss – born Sonia Maino in Italy in 1946 – was added on the list from 1980 to 1982, a year before she was an Indian citizen. In a long Twitter post, BJP leader Amit Malviya claimed that Sonia Gandhi's name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship. The post read: Sonia Gandhi's tryst with India's voters' list is riddled with glaring violations of electoral law. This perhaps explains Rahul Gandhi's fondness for regularising ineligible and illegal voters, and his opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Her name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship. At the time, the Gandhi family lived at 1, Safdarjung Road, the official residence of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Until then, the voters registered at that address were Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, and Maneka Gandhi. In 1980, the electoral rolls of the New Delhi parliamentary constituency were revised with January 1, 1980, as the qualifying date. During this revision, Sonia Gandhi's name was added, appearing at serial number 388 in polling station 145. This entry was a clear violation of the law, which requires a person to be an Indian citizen to be registered as a voter. Following an outcry in 1982, her name was deleted from the list — only to reappear in 1983. But even her reinstatement raised serious questions. In the fresh revision of the electoral rolls that year, Sonia Gandhi was listed at serial number 236 in polling station 140. The qualifying date for registration was January 1, 1983 — yet she was granted Indian citizenship only on April 30, 1983. In other words, Sonia Gandhi's name entered the electoral rolls twice without meeting the basic citizenship requirement — first as an Italian citizen in 1980, and then again in 1983, months before she legally became a citizen of India. We are not even asking why it took her 15 years after marrying Rajiv Gandhi to accept Indian citizenship. If this isn't blatant electoral malpractice, what is? What the Opposition is alleging? Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, also made explosive claims of a 'huge criminal fraud' in polls through collusion between the BJP and the Election Commission. Alleging that a 'vote chori model' was being used in many constituencies across the country, Gandhi said that the judiciary needs to get involved in this because 'the democracy that we love so much, does not exist anymore'.