Taliban Investigating Death Threats against United Nations' Afghan Female Staff, Report Says
In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the U.N. mission to the country said that dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May.
The threats come against a backdrop of severe restrictions placed on women since the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in 2021.
The U.N. report said the threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programs, 'requiring the U.N. to implement interim measures to protect their safety.'
It said that the Taliban told the U.N. mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is underway, the report added.
The Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, said no such threats had been made.
'This is completely incorrect,' Qani said. 'The ministry has an independent department for this, and we have a strategic plan for protection and security so there is no threat to them in any area, nor can anyone threaten them, nor is there any threat to them.'
Qani did not answer questions about an investigation.
The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organizations in December 2022, extending this ban to the U.N. six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Some women have nonetheless stayed on in key sectors, such as health care and urgent humanitarian assistance, where aid agencies say the needs are great.
Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities.
The U.N. report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety.
In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed 'not in compliance' were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said.
In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a hijab — a headscarf — rather than a burqa covering the entire body and face.
Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women.
In Herat, Vice and Virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups.
Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the U.N. said happened in May.
In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage.
It wasn't immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
How a CIA hit on al Qaeda ensnared a U.S. citizen in Afghanistan
As a crowd looked on, uniformed Taliban surrounded the Toyota Landcruiser in which Mahmood Habibi, a naturalized U.S. citizen, sat. Other Taliban smashed open the door of his Kabul apartment, emerging later with his laptop and papers. Blindfolded in the back seat, Habibi and his driver were driven off by gunmen sporting shoulder patches of the Taliban's feared secret police, the General Directorate of Intelligence (GDI), according to several witness statements in U.S. government possession. Afghanistan's Taliban government denies it detained Habibi, 37, who was a former head of Afghanistan's civil aviation. While dividing his time between the United States and Kabul working for a private company, he became a U.S. citizen after the Taliban took power in 2021. The Taliban also says they have no knowledge of his whereabouts, three years after he disappeared. That is contradicted by the witness accounts and other evidence, including data monitored from Habibi's cellphone, described by a U.S. official and a former U.S. official familiar with the matter. The Taliban denials present a conundrum for the FBI, which is leading the U.S. government effort to gain his release; and for the State Department, which describes Habibi's detention a major impediment to exploring increased engagement with Afghanistan, three years after his August 10, 2022 arrest. U.S. President Donald Trump has made freeing Americans held abroad a top priority and already has secured the release of dozens, including from Afghanistan, Russia and Venezuela. The case of Habibi — the only publicly identified American held in the country — has been harder to resolve. Interviews with the U.S. official and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the case reveal that the Taliban likely detained Habibi because the CIA had penetrated the company where he worked. The sources say the U.S. spy agency had accessed one of the company's security cameras, helping it pinpoint the al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in a Kabul guesthouse. Habibi's detention came 10 days after Zawahiri — the last of the top plotters of the September 11, 2001, attack on the United States — was dramatically assassinated by a U.S. drone strike on the guesthouse, ordered by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. At the time, U.S. officials briefed journalists that it was a CIA operation. The U.S. sources said that Habibi was unaware of the CIA plot and was wrongly detained after returning to Kabul from a work trip to Dubai after the assassination, oblivious of the danger he was in. A Taliban official hands out bags of cucumbers to Afghan refugees returning from Iran, at a reception center in the border town of Islam Qala, Afghanistan, on July 10. | Jim Huylebroek / The New York Times The CIA, the Taliban, the White House and Habibi's employer, Virginia-based ARX Communications, did not respond to detailed requests for comment for this story. ARX has previously said neither it, nor its subsidiaries, were involved with the strike on Zawahiri. It could not be independently verified whether Habibi was or wasn't aware of the plot. In a statement, a State Department spokesperson called for Habibi's immediate release. "We know the Taliban abducted Mahmood Habibi nearly three years ago," the spokesperson said. A co-worker detained with Habibi, then later released, saw him in GDI headquarters and heard him in an adjacent room being asked if he worked for the CIA or was involved in the strike on Zawahiri, according to one of the statements in U.S government possession. Then, in June and August of 2023, the U.S. government detected that his mobile phone had been switched on in GDI headquarters, the U.S. official and former official said. The U.S. official familiar with the matter said excerpts of the statements have been presented to the Taliban in response to their repeated denials of Habibi's detention. As Habibi and his family on Sunday mark the third anniversary of his arrest, the Trump administration has stepped up efforts to win his release, including offering a $5 million reward for information. But so far, he appears no closer to freedom, the U.S. sources said. "Our family has new hope that the Trump team will be successful," said Habibi's older brother, Ahmad. Ahmad said his brother would never have gone to Kabul four days after the Zawahiri assassination if the CIA had told ARX to warn him it was too dangerous to return. "Nobody told him anything. Neither the company, neither the CIA nor anybody. So, he just went back,' Ahmad said. The U.S. government officially considers Habibi a hostage, said the U.S. official, because his arrest and location remain unconfirmed by the Taliban. The official and the former official spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the case. In response to a request for comment, the FBI said that along with partners in other U.S. departments involved in hostage recovery, it remains "committed to bringing Habibi home to his family." The Taliban rejected an offer made last year to trade Habibi for alleged Osama bin Laden aide Mohammad Rahim al-Afghani, the last Afghan held in the Guantanamo Bay military prison. "We've tried in terms of both carrots and sticks,' said the official, who requested anonymity to discuss the case. The Taliban "literally throw up a wall," said the official. Camera on cell tower As part of the operation against Zawahiri, the CIA penetrated the Asia Consultancy Group (ACG), a subsidiary of ARX, according to the current and former U.S. officials, who provided details of how the spy agency was able to target the al Qaeda chief. ACG, whose parent is headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, had a contract to erect cellphone towers around Kabul, the sources said. CCTV cameras were fitted to the towers to protect the structures, they said. Mahmood Habibi and his older brother Ahmad Habibi during a visit to Toronto in 2014 | Ahmad Shah Habibi / via REUTERS One of the cameras, the sources said, was pointed at a house U.S. officials have linked to Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Taliban's acting interior minister both at the time and now, in the heart of Kabul's diplomatic quarter, a short distance from the shuttered British and American embassies. The sources said the camera sent back video to the CIA confirming Zawahiri's presence in the residence. That confirmation helped the agency kill the Egyptian Islamist with two drone-fired Hellfire R9X missiles on July 31, 2022, as he emerged onto a balcony, they said. His wife and family survived the strike. Arrest On the day of his arrest, Mahmood Habibi was in his apartment in Kabul's Sherpur neighborhood packing to return to New Jersey, where he had a home, with the help of a sister, who was there with her two children, according to Ahmad. It was about noon when a phone call came from the ACG office saying it had just been raided by the Taliban, Ahmad said. Habibi told his sister that he had to leave without explaining why. He was arrested immediately after getting into his vehicle, Ahmad said. A few minutes later, somebody announcing that they were with GDI knocked on his apartment door, according to Ahmad and a witness statement. His sister declined to open it, telling those outside that she had to conform to the Taliban rule that an adult male relative had to be present. The Taliban broke open the door, entered the apartment and rifled through closets and drawers, demanding Habibi's laptop, according to Ahmad and the witness statement. A crowd had gathered outside after the Taliban arrived in five vehicles, blocked the street and surrounded Habibi's car, before driving him off, according to Ahmad and a separate witness statement. The GDI arrested 30 other ACG employees, according to a letter that ACG sent to Afghanistan's Ministry of Communications. Except for Habibi and one other, all were eventually released. In the letter, dated September 15, 2022, ACG asked that family members be allowed to visit him and three other staff who the GDI still held. Afghan refugee women tailor a carpet at the Khurasan camp on the outskirts of Peshawar on Sunday. | AFP-JIJI The ministry appeared to confirm Habibi was a GDI prisoner in a reply two days later, saying that the intelligence directorate would decide on the petition when its investigation was completed. However, in a July 3, 2025 statement reported by Afghanistan's state news agency, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that in response to requests from Habibi's family, the Taliban had investigated but no evidence has been found to suggest that he was detained by Afghanistan's security forces. Mujahid said the Taliban are a legitimate governing body that does not detain individuals without due process or hide them from public view. Mujahid did not respond to a request for comment. U.S. citizen Born to parents from the southern city of Kandahar, Habibi is one of eight siblings — three brothers and five sisters — who grew up in the Kabul neighborhood of Karte Parwan. His excellent English helped him secure a job with the U.N. civil aviation agency in Kabul in 2008. He worked for the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's U.S. embassy office from 2011 to 2013. Tapped as deputy civil aviation minister, Habibi helped transition Afghanistan's air traffic system from U.S. control to the U.S.-backed Kabul government. Habibi became civil aviation minister in 2017. He held that post until 2019 while earning a civil aviation master's degree from Embry Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, the university confirmed. In 2019, he resigned and then joined ARX to help oversee its Afghan subsidiary's contract to run air traffic control at Kabul's international airport. Habibi lived between the city and the United States, accumulating the last of the 30 months of U.S. residency he needed over a five-year period for U.S. citizenship in 2021, Ahmad said. He was in Kabul with his family during the chaotic departure of the last U.S. troops in August 2021, Ahmad said, as the Taliban consolidated its grip on the capital after 20 years of war. Habibi flew from Dubai to Kabul on August 4, 2022, after stopping in Qatar to check on his family and parents who were housed on a U.S. military base there waiting for final processing of U.S. immigration visas, said Ahmad. A week later Habibi was arrested. His wife, daughter and parents, who waited in Qatar until October for their visas before flying to the United States and settling in California, have not seen or heard from him since. Resolving Habibi's case would be the easiest way for the Taliban, who crave international recognition as Afghanistan's legitimate rulers, to explore improving ties with the U.S., the current U.S. official said. Since Habibi's detention, four other Americans have been arrested and released by the Taliban.
Yomiuri Shimbun
9 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Taliban Investigating Death Threats against United Nations' Afghan Female Staff, Report Says
SLAMABAD (AP) — The Taliban are investigating explicit death threats against dozens of Afghan women working for the United Nations, according to a report published Sunday. In its latest update on the human rights situation in Afghanistan, the U.N. mission to the country said that dozens of female national staff were subjected to explicit death threats in May. The threats come against a backdrop of severe restrictions placed on women since the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan in 2021. The U.N. report said the threats came from unidentified individuals related to their work with the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, or UNAMA, other agencies, funds, and programs, 'requiring the U.N. to implement interim measures to protect their safety.' It said that the Taliban told the U.N. mission that their personnel were not responsible for the threats. An Interior Ministry investigation is underway, the report added. The Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, said no such threats had been made. 'This is completely incorrect,' Qani said. 'The ministry has an independent department for this, and we have a strategic plan for protection and security so there is no threat to them in any area, nor can anyone threaten them, nor is there any threat to them.' Qani did not answer questions about an investigation. The Taliban barred Afghan women from working at domestic and foreign nongovernmental organizations in December 2022, extending this ban to the U.N. six months later, and then threatening to shut down agencies and groups still employing women. Some women have nonetheless stayed on in key sectors, such as health care and urgent humanitarian assistance, where aid agencies say the needs are great. Humanitarian agencies say the Taliban have hampered or interfered with their operations, allegations denied by authorities. The U.N. report is the first official confirmation of death threats against Afghan women working in the sector. The report also highlighted other areas affecting women's personal freedoms and safety. In Herat, inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry began requiring women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head. Dozens of women deemed 'not in compliance' were barred from entering markets or using public transportation. Several women were detained until relatives brought them a chador, the report said. In Uruzgan, women were arrested for wearing a hijab — a headscarf — rather than a burqa covering the entire body and face. Women have also been denied access to public areas, in line with laws banning them from such spaces. In Ghor province, police forced several families to leave a recreational area. They warned the families against visiting outdoor picnic sites with women. In Herat, Vice and Virtue inspectors stopped family groups with women and girls from accessing an open recreational area, only allowing all-male groups. Nobody from the Vice and Virtue Ministry was immediately available to comment on the Ghor, Herat and Uruzgan incidents, which the U.N. said happened in May. In Kandahar, the Public Health Department instructed female health care workers to be accompanied to work by male guardians with an identification card proving that they were related to the woman by blood or marriage. It wasn't immediately clear if the card is specific to Kandahar or will be rolled out across Afghanistan.
The Diplomat
14 hours ago
- The Diplomat
China's ‘Wolf Warrior' Diplomacy Persists in Latin America
China's 'wolf warrior' diplomacy gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic, largely as a result of mounting international criticism toward Xi Jinping's authoritarian governance model and, more specifically, his government's handling of the novel coronavirus, which originated in China. These tensions were compounded by a turbulent period in China-U.S. relations, triggered by the onset of the trade war under Donald Trump's first administration. This hostile climate forced China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs to adopt a reactive stance toward Washington's offensives, one that often deviated from the principles of dialogue and mutual respect. Within this context, Chinese diplomats embraced a combative, nationalistic style aimed at discrediting any narrative that challenged the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or tarnished China's global image. This approach became known as 'wolf warrior diplomacy,' a reference to the 2017 Chinese action film 'Wolf Warrior 2,' whose tagline warned: 'Even if they're thousands of miles away, anyone who offends China will pay.' A Diplomatic Retreat? With the waning of the pandemic, the era of wolf warrior diplomacy seemed to recede. As COVID-19 death tolls declined, the most intense international outcries over repression in Hong Kong, Tibet, and Xinjiang began to fade. Although U.N. experts and democratic states continued to voice concerns about these issues, the international media response lacked the intensity seen in 2020, with the global uproar over the imposition of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, or in 2022, when a U.N. report detailed 'grave human rights violations' against Uyghurs. Signals of a return to conventional diplomacy became apparent even within the Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party, where Xi urged party members to adopt a more civil tone with foreign counterparts: 'We must pay attention to our tone, be open and confident, modest and humble, and strive to present a credible, lovable, and respectable image of China,' he declared in 2021. Similarly, the resumption of high-level dialogue between Beijing and Washington, particularly following Xi's bilateral meeting with then-U.S. President Joe Biden at the 2024 APEC Forum in San Francisco, offered grounds for pivoting away from aggressive posturing and toward diplomatic engagement between strategic rivals. This shift was reflected in the initial Chinese diplomatic responses to provocations by Trump's second administration. The Chinese foreign service appeared unusually composed amid the uncertainty and bombast of the U.S. president. This was evident in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's remarks after the first round of tariffs imposed by the U.S. in March 2025. 'Major powers should fulfill their international obligations… and not seek to bully or take advantage of the weak,' he said. To be sure, certain Chinese diplomats found themselves forced to respond in kind to Trump's attacks. The Chinese embassy in Washington, for instance, stated, 'If what the United States wants is war – be it a tariff war, a trade war, or any other kind of war – we are ready to fight until the end.' Still, such declarations have not signaled a full return to the pandemic-era wolf warrior approach as an official mode of political communication, but rather a reactive strategy in response to certain decisions that undermine China's interests in strategic sectors and regions. Indeed, most Chinese embassies around the world have focused on highlighting the harmful effects of the trade war on global commerce, articulating China's perspective via social media, Chinese state media, and local newspapers. In early 2025, Wang Yi published an op-ed in the Mexican daily La Jornada, asserting: 'We must jointly reject unilateralism and defend the multilateral trading system centered on the World Trade Organization. Together, we must advocate for an equal, orderly multipolar world and a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization.' As such, leading analysts like Duan Xiaolin and Tyler Jost have recently stated that the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs is no longer interested in promoting wolf warrior diplomacy. Some take this argument further, suggesting that the torch of (anti-)diplomatic bluster has passed not to China, but to senior figures in the Make America Great Again movement: examples include the Oval Office humiliation of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, jabs at the European Union during the Munich Security Conference, or Trump's threats about annexing Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal. From Central America to Colombia Nevertheless, in Latin America – particularly in Central America – the wolf warrior spirit remains active and visible. This may be driven by geopolitical pressures, as the U.S. seeks to preserve its hegemony in the region amid China's growing assertiveness and its campaign to win diplomatic recognition from countries like Guatemala, Belize, and Paraguay, which still maintain ties with Taipei. Among the most outspoken wolf warriors in the region is Xu Tiefei, the political counselor at the Chinese embassy in Costa Rica, known for his anti-U.S. rhetoric. In 2020, responding to conspiracy theories about COVID-19's artificial origin, Xu tweeted: 'As far as I know, the most infamous flu virus in recent history is H1N1, which originated in the U.S. in 2009. It killed nearly 20,000 people in that same year and later spread to over 200 countries and regions.' Following U.S. announcements of cooperation with Rodrigo Chaves' government to counter alleged Chinese cybercriminal activity in Costa Rica, Xu tweeted a statement from the embassy with his own mocking comment: 'Guided by the North, it will lose its direction.' In Panama, the Chinese embassy has also continued its offensive tone since the days of Wei Qiang, the first Chinese ambassador to the country. In a recent statement condemning U.S. pressure over the Panama Canal, the embassy remarked: 'It is well known who is orchestrating the global wave of wiretapping and surveillance, and who is the biggest source of cyberattacks' – a not-so-subtle reference to the U.S. The statement added, 'The United States is the country that has inflicted the greatest harm on Panama throughout its history.' In Colombia, Ambassador Zhu Jingyang has likewise adopted a confrontational and undiplomatic tone. His recent social media skirmishes have drawn attention. In response to a Deutsche Welle report on DeepSeek's self-censorship regarding sensitive topics for Beijing – such as the Tiananmen massacre – Zhu snapped: 'We know they're stupid, but not that stupid. Hilarious!' Elsewhere, Zhu accused the local outlet Entorno of spreading 'fake news' – without evidence – after it published a story about the so-called Chinese debt trap in the Global South. These episodes suggest that wolf warrior diplomacy has not entirely vanished, at least not in Latin America. Despite Xi Jinping's attempts to project a more moderate image in recent years, Trump's return to the White House has reactivated confrontational rhetoric on certain fronts. It's no coincidence that Chinese ambassadors in countries like Costa Rica, Panama, and Colombia – where the U.S. has stepped up the pressure on cybersecurity, infrastructure, and trade, respectively – have taken on a combative stance. As long as Latin America remains a strategic battleground in the China-U.S. rivalry, the combative streak in China's diplomacy will linger. This article is part of a research project by the center Expediente Abierto on Chinese digital propaganda in Latin America. The initial findings of the study are available here.
