High Court's urgent order to Meta: Shut down child pornography accounts
Image: Supplied
While the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, on Monday evening ordered Meta to shut down several anonymous Instagram accounts and WhatsApp channels which are distributing explicit child pornography depicting South African school children, this had not yet been done by Tuesday afternoon.
Judge Mudunwazi Makamu also ruled that Meta had to, before noon Tuesday, furnish The Digital Law Company (DLC) with all information in its possession pertaining to the creator(s) of the WhatsApp channels and Instagram profiles listed in the urgent application.
Rorke Wilson of the DLC on Tuesday said as the matter was heard on Monday evening, the deadline for Meta to shut down the accounts and channels was set to be midnight on Monday.
'However, Meta has not complied with any of the demands and all the deadlines have passed,' Wilson said, adding that they are now contemplating next steps.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The DLC turned to court on an extremely urgent basis, which was not opposed, when it became aware of the explicit content involving children on Instagram and WhatsApp.
Emma Sadleir Berkowitz, social media law expert and the founder of DLC, said in an affidavit that DLC was made aware of some social media accounts depicting shocking material relating to children on Friday.
Wilson, meanwhile, had already been dealing with complaints from victims depicted on three other platforms the day before, which related to pupils of schools in Pretoria and Centurion.
Upon investigation, the shocking nature of these posts became clear, as they involve the mass distribution of unlawful material involving children to large unidentified audiences who are members of so-called WhatsApp 'community channels', as well as Instagram profiles, Sadleir said.
'The content consists of explicit pornographic images and videos depicting children. The images and videos are often accompanied by other information relating to the individual child depicted, including their name, grade, school, as well as lewd or otherwise offensive descriptions relating to the individual's purported behaviour,' she stated in her affidavit.
The material is sourced from the community by sharing links to an anonymous uploading service.
Sadleir said that the creator and operator of the Instagram profiles and WhatsApp channels appears to be the same person, using many aliases.
From time to time, it appears that Meta administrators will delete or block some of the pages and channels. However, not long after, the same page or channel becomes active again, or another channel crops up replicating the previous one, she explained.
These disturbing postings include graphic child pornography and allegations of children being HIV positive – all while identifying children and schools.
DLC, however, rushed to court late on Monday when a live WhatsApp channel with more than 11 000 followers threatened to publish pornographic material as well as the private information of children at 8pm on Monday.
Sadleir said a letter of demand was sent to Meta and its officials, requiring that they delete the channels and profiles, and provide DLC with information that will assist in identifying the perpetrator.
'Receipt has been acknowledged, but no meaningful action has been taken,' she said.
'At this stage, it is impossible to identify exactly which children will be affected by the anticipated upload at 8pm, but given the tenor of the message shared by the anonymous user – the harmful effects will be widespread and irreparable,' she told the court.
She also told the court that DLC has received reports that girls are being placed on suicide watch after being featured on the channels.
'If we are furnished with the information of the user behind these Instagram and WhatsApp accounts, it will enable us to take appropriate legal steps, such as obtaining a protection order or interdict against this individual,' Sadleir said.
Cape Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
35 minutes ago
- IOL News
Mango airline's business rescue plan faces setback as court ruling is challenged
Mango's business rescue practitioner is challenging the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, ruling declaring the plan to save the state-owned low-cost airline unimplementable. Image: File The business rescue practitioner (BRP) of grounded low-cost airline Mango is challenging the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, judgment declaring the plan to save the state-owned company unimplementable. BRP Sipho Sono has filed an application for leave to appeal Judge Denise Fisher's ruling handed down last month. Judge Fisher found that the plan, stripped of its complexity, amounts to nothing more than the confiscation of creditors' claims to be transferred by Sono to an investor who pays no value for them or the shares. She ordered: 'The compulsory cession contained in clause 6.2.6 of the business rescue plan is declared to be invalid and of no force and effect. It is declared that the business rescue plan cannot be implemented'. Judge Fisher said Sono's opposition to Aviation Co-ordination Services' (ACS's) application was unmeritorious. ACS, which provided security-related services such as baggage and cargo screening services, baggage reconciliation and check-in services, hauled Mango and Sono to court over the plan to save the subsidiary of South African Airways. The company is one of the creditors owed about R2.91 billion by Mango before it was placed under business rescue in July 2021 and is owed over R23.3 million. ACS complained that its estimated settlement would translate roughly to R44,300 per R1m, a return which it described as negligible, if not nominal. Sono has indicated that there are sufficient funds to pay a dividend of more than the 4.43 cents to each rand owed, as estimated in the business rescue plan. In the challenge to Judge Fisher's judgment, Sono stated that the court's findings that a business rescue plan cannot provide for an involuntary cession against non-acceding creditors was made as a principle that is far-reaching and has implications that extend beyond the present dispute and constitute a compelling reason why leave to appeal should be granted. 'The decision involves a question of law which is important, as the decision is of general application, affecting all business rescue plans that entail an involuntary cession, including against non-acceding creditors, which is a common feature of business rescue plans,' he explained. Mango and Sono want to be granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal and believe there are reasonable prospects of success. Sono defended the appeal, asserting his right to pursue litigation if he reasonably believes that a favourable outcome for Mango will benefit all affected parties. 'The BRP will continue to act and take such steps as he reasonably believes are in the best interests of all affected persons, notwithstanding the various threats made by ACS and its legal representatives, which are regrettable, inflammatory, and achieve no legitimate purpose,' he added. According to Sono, ACS's intentions remain unclear but on the face of it, it would seem that the company prefers a situation where the potential investor withdraws and Mango is wound up. 'It is not clear why such an outcome would be favourable to ACS, who during the height of Mango's operations generated approximately R70m per annum in revenue,' he added. [email protected]
Daily Maverick
36 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist
The solar panel company had wanted to stop three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist from reporting that it was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. Solar panel manufacturer ARTsolar has thrown in the towel in its controversial battle against three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist. The company had successfully gagged them by court order from making or reporting on 'defamatory' allegations that ARTsolar was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. The interim gagging order was granted in March by Durban High Court acting Judge Perlene Bramdhew against businessman Brett Latimer, two former employees of ARTsolar and journalist Bongani Hans. The date to determine whether the order should be confirmed or discharged was set for 29 July. But this week, ARTsolar withdrew the application and tendered to pay the costs of Latimer, Hans and former employees Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj. It also tendered to pay the costs of the Industrial Development Corporation, which entered the legal fray because it had provided R90-million funding to ARTsolar to set up its 'proudly South African' factory in New Germany. The IDC wanted to interview Latimer about his claims. The initial court order specifically barred Latimer from communicating with the IDC. The IDC launched its own urgent court application, successfully arguing that it should have been joined in the proceedings, and that the order was stifling an investigation into the matter on the instruction of Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau. The order was amended to exclude reference to the IDC. The shift in ARTsolar's stance came after it appointed new attorneys last month. Mohamed Mota, partner at Cox Yeats, confirmed the withdrawal. He said his client had no comment 'at this stage'. Media freedom Because the case had implications for freedom of expression, the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism had applied to be admitted as an amicus curiae. Managing partner Sam Sole said the withdrawal was a 'bittersweet victory'. 'The facts of the case make it clear the order should never have been granted and amaBhungane was looking forward to urging the court to give decisive direction to other presiding officers about the very narrow and limited circumstances which could justify such pre-publication censorship,' he said. 'We had also intended to remind the court that an effective press is a 'public sentinel' and is a conduit for the public's right to receive and impart information, meaning curbs on the media effectively limit the rights of the general public. 'This places a duty on the courts to be exceptionally vigilant in ensuring adherence to the legal safeguards of press freedom, especially where the public have no voice in the proceedings – as in this case, where the media house did not initially come to court.' Sole said there were various reasons that a journalist may fail to effectively oppose such an application, especially an extremely urgent one, such as a lack of timely access to adequate (or any) legal representation. 'We hope the publicity engendered by this case will discourage other parties from running to court and will also encourage presiding officers to exercise due care and caution when faced with similar cases,' Sole said. ARTsolar's urgent application was sparked by Hans sending questions, based on Latimer's allegations, to the company. Latimer, a former client of ARTsolar, alleged that he had been duped into believing that the panels were locally manufactured when they were in fact imported from China. He was backed up by Singh and Hansraj, who previously worked for the company. On the back of the gagging order, Latimer obtained a subpoena against Turners Shipping and, in a supplementary affidavit, he said the shipping documents (bills of lading) showed that the company imported 99% of its panels. Latimer's attorney MS Omar said: 'The interim gagging order was a drastic and draconian violation of my client's fundamental rights of freedom of expression as enshrined in section 16 of the Constitution. The overbroad interim order plainly prohibits permissible statements, based on truth and public interest, and failed to take account of the high threshold for a defamation interdict.' The application will be formally withdrawn in court on 29 July. DM
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Why South African commissions fail to deliver justice and perpetuate violence
THE Marikana Massacre is one of many examples of how commissions of inquiry fail to deliver justice for victims and their families, just like the Marikana Commission did. Those responsible continue with their lives, argues the writer. LONDIWE GUMEDE FORMER Economic Freedom Front (EFF) politician Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi argues that a president cannot find anyone guilty. He is, instead, advocating for a "proper" judicial commission of inquiry, led by a judge, with strict timelines. He deems this "proper" for a democracy. However, the subsequent analysis of South African commissions reveals how they often fall short of this ideal, instead perpetuating systemic violence and delaying justice. The Commissions Act, 1947 (Act No. 8 of 1947), used for enquiries like the Zondo Commission on State of Capture, originated under British colonial rule. This embedded a legalistic facade for systemic violence. It enabled apartheid-era enquiries, such as the Hefer Commission (2003) and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which probed allegations of apartheid espionage against the then-National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli and the then-Justice Minister Penuel Maduna, and apartheid-era crime, respectively, to probe without any accountability. There was also the Donen Commission, which probed the UN's 'oil for food' program, which exonerates individuals linked to the scandal, like Tokyo Sexwale and former Director General Sandile Nogxina. Like colonial inquests pathologising indigenous resistance, modern commissions prioritise bureaucratic order over human dignity. Actress Tebogo Thobejane's condemnation, 'No mention of the lack of protection… left to fight alone,' echoes this centuries-old erasure. After a brush with death, she now attends a trial process that offers legal theatrics, not safety. Thobejane, a survivor of a hit allegedly engineered by her ex-boyfriend Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala and his wife, feels betrayed by the lack of protection against the suspected mastermind of the underworld. Commissions ritually harvest victim trauma while withholding redress. Matlala will likely be the subject of a commission of inquiry headed by acting deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga after his name was mentioned by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi two weeks ago. The Marikana Commission, which was established after the August 2012 massacre of Lonmin mine workers, gathered 641 days of testimony from widows of massacred miners and colleagues of the departed miners yet delivered no prosecutions or timely reparations. Similarly, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) heard 21,000 victim testimonies but granted amnesty to 1,500 perpetrators, providing only negligible justice. This dynamic inherits colonial evidence-gathering: Black pain becomes archival fodder, catalogued and then discarded. As Thobejane noted, President Cyril Ramaphosa's speeches often overlook victims, reducing their experiences to procedural footnotes. Commission structures inherently protect power networks. The Mokgoro Commission (2018) and Ginwala Inquiry (2007) scrutinised prosecutors threatening political elites under the NPA Act. Enquiries into police violence, such as those in Khayelitsha (2012), operated with weaker mandates. This bifurcation mirrors colonial "divide and rule" tactics, ensuring that accountability evaporates. The Zondo Commission's R1 billion inquiry, for instance, yielded minimal prosecutions despite documenting over R1.5 trillion in state capture. Victims like Thobejane receive a whiff of justice, marked by endless postponements while perpetrators retain influence. Ramaphosa's latest commission of inquiry's mandate is investigation, not prosecution. Judicial appointments cloak commissions in false objectivity. Retired judges like Farlam (Marikana) and Seriti (Arms Deal) lent legitimacy to enquiries that ultimately shielded the interests of the state and corporations. The president's latest 'independent commission' further demonstrates how these bodies often obscure underlying political complexities and power struggles. This legal theatre pathologises victims: Marikana miners were framed as 'illegal strikers,' while Thobejane's assault became a tabloid spectacle. When commissions centre perpetrators' due process over victims' safety, they enact "terror through bureaucracy." The TRC's unresolved legacy continues to haunt recent and past commissions. Thirty years later, only 137 of its recommended prosecutions have been investigated, while apartheid-era cases like the Cradock Four murders remain in legal limbo. Nomonde Calata's tears at a 2025 inquest echo her 1996 TRC testimony, testifying to the commission's broken promises. Thobejane's demand for 'accountability and support' confronts this cycle; her ex-boyfriend faces new charges while his police and political connections remain intact. Reparations remain theoretical: TRC victims received a single payment of R30 000 each, while Marikana families await R1 billion in compensation. This reflects colonialism's core calculus: human suffering indexed against fiscal "pragmatism."Breaking this machinery requires centring victims as architects, not evidence. Unlike President Ramaphosa's commissions, a transformative approach would enforce existing recommendations: implementing the Khayelitsha Commission's 2012 police reforms, funding TRC-mandated educational reparations, and prosecuting the network of Thobejane's ex-boyfriend beyond his hitmen. Thobejane's courage, demanding protection while testifying, sets a model for this agency. Yet, without dismantling the Commissions Act and colonial-era legalisms, enquiries remain stone fortresses where violence is ritualised, not remedied. South Africa remains fractured by inequality, a landscape where commissions consecrate state power while the vulnerable fight alone in the ruins. (Gumede is a freelance journalist with interests in politics, economics, sports, travel, and community news. Her views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or IOL)
