logo
Bullet train project to be completed by Dec 2029, govt tells LS

Bullet train project to be completed by Dec 2029, govt tells LS

Time of India5 days ago
New Delhi: The Centre on Wednesday said the entire Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train project is likely to be completed by Dec 2029, with the section falling in Gujarat to be completed by Dec 2027.
This comes months after Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis announced that he expected the entire bullet train corridor to be operational by 2028. Interestingly, while the Centre has maintained that the timeline for the country's first high-speed train project has been pushed back due to delay in land acquisition and forest clearance for the Maharashtra section, there is delay in work on the Gujarat portion as well.
In a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha, the railway ministry submitted that the Vapi-Sabarmati section in Gujarat is "planned to be completed by Dec, 2027" and the entire Maharashtra to Sabarmati section "is expected to be completed by Dec, 2029". The foundation stone for the project was laid in Sep 2017.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
It added that since the project is very complex and technology-intensive, "Exact timelines for the completion of the project can be reasonably ascertained after the completion of all associated works of civil structures, track, electrical, signaling and telecommunication and supply of trainsets".
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Time is running out! Green Card Registration
americ24
Undo
The 508-km corridor with 12 stations is being executed with technical and financial assistance from the Japanese govt. Though the project cost has increased significantly due to the delay, the ministry told the lower House that the total estimated cost is around Rs 1.1 lakh crore. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) is funding 81% of the project cost and the balance 19% is being funded through equity contribution from railways (50%) and the two states of Maharashtra and Gujarat (50%).
Till June end, around Rs 78,839 crore had been spent on the project. The National High Speed Rail Corporation Ltd (NHRSCL) is yet to bid out two of the 28 tender packages.
The ministry said that 392 km of pier construction, 329 km of girder casting and 308 km of girder launching have been completed so far. Work on the undersea tunnel (21 km) has also started.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'
Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'

New Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'

"A reference under Article 143 cannot be used to overrule findings of law and fact in earlier judgments," the Kerala government stated. It further pointed out that the Union government has not filed any review or curative petition against the April 8 ruling, making it binding under Article 141. "The President and the council of ministers must act in aid of the Supreme Court under Article 144," the plea added. The state also accused the reference of misinterpreting Article 200 by falsely claiming that no timeline exists for governors to act on Bills. "The foundational issues in queries 1 to 11 have already been settled in the Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and Telangana cases," Kerala argued, urging the court to reject the reference as "misleading." The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has agreed to examine the Presidential reference and has sought responses from the Centre and all states by July 29. A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, will hear the matter on August 29, with the assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani. The court will determine whether judicially enforceable timelines can be imposed on Governors and the President regarding pending Bills. The controversy stems from the April 8 ruling by a two-judge bench, which held that Governors must act within three months if withholding assent to a bill and within one month if a bill is re-enacted. The court had invoked Article 142 to declare Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's inaction as "illegal" and deemed 10 pending Bills as approved. President Murmu's reference challenges this verdict, raising questions on whether Governors are bound by ministerial advice and if their discretion under Article 200 is subject to judicial review. With Kerala now accusing the reference of being a "backdoor attempt" to undo settled law, the Supreme Court's upcoming decision could have far-reaching implications on Centre-state relations and the powers of constitutional authorities. Out of 14 crucial questions, the majority and important were as follows: 1) What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 2) Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 3) Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 4) Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to the judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 5) In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor?

New York to Tokyo: Japan proposes capital for UN office relocation
New York to Tokyo: Japan proposes capital for UN office relocation

Business Standard

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

New York to Tokyo: Japan proposes capital for UN office relocation

Tokyo Governor Yuriko Koike has proposed relocating certain functions of the United Nations (UN) to Japan's capital, citing safety, security, and the cost advantages of operating in Tokyo due to the weak yen, according to several Japanese media outlets. Koike met with UN Secretary-General António Guterres at the organisation's headquarters in New York on July 24, where she expressed Tokyo's readiness to support a broader UN presence. The meeting was part of Koike's official visit to the United States. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, she said, 'Life in Tokyo is advantageous in terms of safety and security, and thanks to the weak yen.' Japan currently hosts several UN bodies, such as the United Nations University and an office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. Trump admin policies driving cost-cutting and relocation Koike's comments come at a time when the UN is undertaking cost-cutting measures under pressure from the administration of US President Donald Trump. Rising expenses in New York have prompted the relocation of parts of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) to Nairobi, Kenya, where operational costs are lower. Donald Trump withdraws US from major UN programmes Meanwhile, the United States, under President Trump, has been withdrawing its involvement from several UN programmes. In January, shortly after taking office for his second term, Trump announced the US' withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO). On February 4, Trump signed an executive order pulling the US out of the UN Human Rights Council and cutting funding to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), citing anti-Israel bias and institutional failure. Last week, he announced the US' formal withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco), effective end-2026. The latest withdrawal was criticised by Unesco Director-General Audrey Azoulay, who stated it contradicts the principles of multilateralism and may impact the agency's partnerships in the US. Several United Nations offices, including UN headquarters, and affiliated agencies operate in the United States, primarily centred in New York City, but also Washington, DC, and other locations. Koike cites weak yen and Tokyo's readiness for UN office relocation Although Koike did not present a specific proposal during the meeting, she had previously suggested transferring functions of UN agencies, including the UN Security Council, the World Health Organisation (WHO), and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), during a session at the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly in June. Guterres responded that the UN has received similar cooperation offers from other parts of the world. Japan has recently made other moves to enhance its global engagement, including a proposal to host an Asian branch of the International Criminal Court in 2023. Koike's push for Tokyo comes as the UN marks its 80th anniversary this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store