
Why Modi govt's flagship internship scheme is off to a stuttering start with low turnout, high attrition
Armed with an internship offer letter from DSP, he thought he would be better equipped to navigate the challenging job market.
New Delhi: When Aman Mashi Soy, a commerce graduate, joined SAIL's Durgapur Steel Plant (DSP) in December 2024 under the Modi government's flagship Prime Minister Internship Scheme (PMIS) launched in October 2024, he saw it as an opportunity for a better future.
'I was not finding value in the work that was given to me… So once a better opportunity came, I quit,' Soy told ThePrint over the phone from West Bengal.
He said the work assigned to him was mostly related to data entry, filling papers and maintaining files. 'This is not the work I was looking for when I applied for the internship,' he said.
The steel plant in Durgapur, West Bengal, saw 40 candidates joining in December 2024 under the PMIS. Of this, eight have already left.
Another candidate, who did not want to be named as he is still interning with DSP, told ThePrint he isn't hopeful the type of work he is doing will help him find a job in the future.
'The work that I am doing is not adding to my technical skillset. I am not sure what to do', he said.
ThePrint spoke to over half a dozen candidates who joined the Modi government's flagship internship scheme announced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Budget 2024-25.
Jyotish Hazarika, a diploma holder in electrical engineering, took an internship at ONGC in December 2024 and left after three months. Based in Assam, he told ThePrint that he found an apprenticeship with better work and salary.
While some like Soy and Jyotish left, others, in the absence of better opportunities, are continuing.
The PMIS aims to provide internships to 1 crore youth for the next five years. The aim is to equip the country's young population living in tier 2 and tier 3 cities with the necessary skills enabling them to prepare for future employment.
The scheme entails giving a one-year on-the-job training to aspirants with a monthly stipend of Rs 5,000 to be shared by companies (Rs 500 via CSR fund) and the government (Rs 4,500). Apart from a stipend, the government will pay a one-time grant of Rs. 6,000 to candidates.
Despite high initial interest, the scheme has been plagued by early hurdles since its first round was launched in October 2024, including low acceptance of offers, high attrition and complaints of low-quality work for some candidates.
A parliamentary panel flagged multiple structural issues, including a mismatch of roles, location constraints and long internship tenure.
As the second round rolls out with new features, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs is aiming to plug gaps.
The first round, which was more of a pilot phase, ended in December 2024.
Only 8,725 candidates physically joined out of the 1.27 lakh internship opportunities offered by 280 public and private companies, according to a parliamentary committee on finance report on Demand for Grants (2025-26) of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) tabled on 19 March 2025.
The report acknowledged that factors such as a mismatch of roles, a higher age limit for Industrial Training Institute (ITI) and polytechnic graduates, location constraints such as relocation or long-distance travel, and the scheme's 12-month tenure contributed to the low acceptance rate. '
A January 2025 survey by education consulting firm TeamLease EdTech, 'The Role of CSR in Transforming Education into Employability', which covered 932 companies, found that nearly 73 percent of firms considered one to six months an optimal duration for an internship.
Meanwhile, the funds allocated for the first round of the PMIS remained largely underutilised — of the Rs 2,000 crore initially earmarked for FY25, which was later revised to Rs 380 crore, only Rs 21.1 crore had been spent till February 2025.
Also Read: India's real jobs problem is not unemployment. It's the lack of quality employment
Low acceptance, high attrition
The low acceptance among candidates, along with high attrition, has become a cause for concern among authorities, who are working behind the scenes to fix the gaps in the second round.
During the first PMIS round, partner companies offered 1.27 lakh internship slots, attracting 6.21 lakh applications from 1.8 lakh candidates.
Of these, the companies extended 82,000 offers, but only 28,000 were accepted, according to the report by the Standing Committee on Finance report. Ultimately, only 8,725 candidates joined—only 7 percent of the total internships on offer.
A senior MCA official told ThePrint that many candidates were unfamiliar with the concept of internships, which became apparent during feedback sessions held after the first round.
'For many, this was their first time building a CV or working in a professional setup,' said the official, who did not want to be named.
Apart from low acceptance of offers, companies also saw high attrition. The reasons varied from low quality work to no assurance of future employment in PSUs and the need for a better salary for higher studies.
Some companies ThePrint spoke to said that while the quality of work being offered is subjective, there are cases of poor-quality work.
However, many are offering meaningful work.
Aditi Kashyap, an intern at the ONGC processing centre at Jorhat, Assam, expressed satisfaction with the work. A physics honours graduate, she is currently studying seismic data from the sea at ONGC using industrial software.
'I am satisfied with the work. Learning industrial software from a big company like ONGC will add to my skillset and resume for future employment opportunities,' she told ThePrint.
However, despite offering qualitative work, even ONGC has seen attrition among interns.
Of the 539 candidates who physically joined ONGC in December last year, 443 remain. A total of 96 candidates have left without completing the 12-month tenure, citing varied reasons.
ONGC had offered 6,020 internship opportunities in the first round, the highest for any PSU.
'Attrition could be due to multiple reasons. Many candidates leave to pursue higher studies, a better salary or full-time employment. Being a public company, we cannot commit permanent jobs to PMIS candidates after completion of a 12-month internship,' Anil Kumar Bahuguna, Chief of Skill & Development at ONGC, told ThePrint.
Bahuguna said nearly 80 percent of round one interns at ONGC were deployed in the field – including rigs, processing centres, basin offices and stations – to ensure better training and knowledge.
'We plan to deploy 100 percent of round two candidates to the field,' he added.
The TeamLease EdTech survey also highlighted that 81 percent of the companies are backing the PMIS, while 70 percent of companies are keen on offering full-time jobs to up to 10 percent of candidates. Most of these are private companies.
'A large number of the surveyed companies were private entities (only a few of them being public listed entities), spread across small cap, medium cap and large cap entities, who expressed their intent to hire 10 percent of interns into their organisation', Shantanu Rooj, CEO of TeamLease Edtech, told ThePrint.
'It is heartening to notice that these companies would like to give back 90 percent of the trained resources to the industry, which can help boost the talent supply channels for the industry at large,' he added.
ThePrint reached out to representatives of private companies but did not receive any response. This report will be updated if and when they respond.
Round two to have new features
Learning its lesson from round one, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has made several changes in round two to make the scheme more viable and transparent.
Registration for the second round started on 9 January this year and closed on 22 April.
The deadline was extended multiple times without citing any official reasons. However, according to MCA officials, the extension was aimed at giving candidates more time to apply, as outreach programmes were still being organised.
So far, more than 1.18 lakh internship positions have been listed under the second PMIS round across more than 700 districts by 310 companies, according to ministry sources.
In the second round, candidates can see more details about internship positions on the PMIS portal, such as company name, additional benefits and exact work location through geo-tagging. This will help candidates make an informed choice.
'Key upgrades include greater transparency as candidates can now view company names, any additional benefits offered, and the exact internship location using GIS technology. They can now also look for internships near their homes by entering a preferred distance from their place of residence,' the senior MCA official overseeing the scheme's implementation.
These additional features were absent when the scheme was launched.
Now candidates can choose from three internships instead of five as earlier. According to the MCA official, the change was aimed at reducing confusion and curbing the high volume of applications that often led to rejections due to mismatches between candidates' backgrounds and the roles on offer in the first round.
More than 100 physical outreach events were organised during the second round across districts in collaboration with state governments, urban local bodies, education and skilling institutes (based on the qualification required for internships in the location) and other district-level ecosystems.
The MCA organised targeted campaigns by the MCA to build awareness about the PMIS through open houses, which are live sessions with candidates, and information, education and communication (IEC) events.
'In this round, we also relied more on youth-centric digital platforms like YouTube and Instagram to generate awareness and engagement in a targeted manner. In addition, we also organised a series of open-house sessions to guide interested candidates by helping them understand the benefits of the scheme and answering their queries live,' said the senior MCA official.
Lack of additional benefits and delayed stipend
Under the scheme, candidates received a one-time grant of Rs 6,000 and a monthly stipend of Rs 5,000, which would be shared by the company and the government.
However, for many candidates, meeting expenses over and above the stipend amount is not feasible, at least for outstation candidates.
While some companies are offering additional benefits to candidates, many are holding back.
But a senior MCA official said the PMIS is a voluntary scheme for both candidates and companies. There are no guidelines about additional benefits from the government.
'Companies are given full flexibility to offer higher financial assistance and additional benefits. Over 180 companies have already done so, offering additional benefits such as additional financial assistance, accommodation, travel and/or food allowance,' said the MCA official.
ONGC, for instance, offers other benefits, including Rs 5,000 for food each month, a monthly rent of Rs 5,000 for outstation candidates and free transport.
'I would urge more companies to offer additional benefits to the interns under this scheme as it would motivate candidates and ensure higher participation. At ONGC, we are offering rent allowance to outstation candidates and food allowance for all,' said ONGC's Bahuguna.
Similarly, Manappuram Finance is offering an additional stipend to its PMIS candidates. The company will provide Rs 500 per month for the first three months, Rs 2,500 for the next three, Rs 5,000 for months six to nine, and Rs 7,500 for the final quarter.
Another common issue faced by candidates is that the stipend of Rs 4,500, which is borne by the government, is usually delayed.
Candidates have raised concerns on the PMIS portal about payment delays.
Candidates can file internship-related complaints through the grievance section of the PMIS portal by logging into their accounts.
MCA officials and company representatives told ThePrint that the payment process is time-consuming. The company needs to mark candidates eligible for payment every month, based on attendance and other factors, and make their share of payment. Then the MCA releases its share based on the Aadhaar-seeded account of the candidates through Direct Benefits Transfer.
Though ministry officials acknowledged instances of delay, but highlighted that some of it is because many candidates either did not have Aadhaar-seeded bank accounts or were checking other bank accounts while the amount had been credited to their Aadhaar-seeded account.
Efforts are underway to improve the payment process.
'We have recently integrated the PMIS portal with the Public Finance Management System to ensure a more streamlined process. We have also established a robust grievance redressal mechanism on the portal and set up a multi-lingual helpline centre (both inbound and outbound calling) to provide timely information,' said the MCA official.
Professor K.R. Shyam Sunder, who teaches at the Gurugram-based Management Development Institute, told ThePrint that the PMIS scheme must offer at least the applicable minimum wage rate for a state. He also called for the scheme to include candidates across income levels.
'Skills are essential for candidates across income brackets,' he said.
He further added that internship tenure must not be more than six months. Also, if the scheme becomes part of the curriculum at institutes, then candidates would be motivated to join the scheme to get academic credits.
However, government officials and industry players are optimistic about the scheme's success, saying it's still early days. For FY26, the government has set an ambitious target of providing internships to 15 lakh candidates (1.25 lakh per month) with an allocated budget of more than Rs 10,000 crore.
Udit Bubna is an intern who graduated from ThePrint School of Journalism.
(Edited by Sugita Katyal)
Also Read: 20L formal jobs created in July, biggest monthly addition to EPFO. 3 lakh women entered job market
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Jaishankar lands in Moscow, to meet Lavrov, First Dy PM Manturov
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS Minister S Jaishankar is set to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and First Deputy PM Denis Manturov in Moscow, as he landed in Moscow on Tuesday. The visit comes days after Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and briefed him about his meeting with US President Donald Trump in Alaska on the Russia-Ukraine war. The phone call between Modi and Putin – their second conversation in 10 days – was significant in the backdrop of the tension in ties with the US after Trump doubled the tariff on India over its purchase of Russian oil. On August 8, Modi and Putin held a phone conversation during which they discussed 'the latest developments on Ukraine' and reaffirmed their 'commitment to further deepen the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership'. The Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement, 'At the invitation of First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov, the External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar, will undertake an official visit to Russia on 19-21 August 2025 to co-chair the 26th Session of the India-Russia Inter-Governmental Commission on Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological and Cultural Cooperation (IRIGC-TEC) scheduled for 20 August 2025.' He will also address the India-Russia Business Forum meeting in Moscow. During the visit, the External Affairs Minister will meet Lavrov and 'review the bilateral agenda and share perspective on regional and global issues'. It said that the visit aims to further 'strengthen the longstanding and time-tested India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership'. The timing of the visit is important at a time when the India-Russia ties have been the focus of the Trump administration. The US administration, led by US President Donald Trump, has imposed 25 per cent tariffs as penalty on India for buying Russian oil. Earlier this month, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval also travelled to Moscow and met Putin. Senior American officials, including Peter Navarro, who is White House advisor on trade, and Cabinet ministers, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have attacked India for buying Russian oil. While India is hoping for a reprieve from the Trump administration after the Alaska summit, its outreach to Moscow needs to be seen in the context of its multi-alignment policy and its legacy defence partnership. New Delhi views Moscow as a robust and reliable partner, in the face of uncertainties faced from the US and assertiveness from China. And that has been the foundation of Delhi's partnership with Russia over the decades. The two sides have maintained regular contact, and now Prime Minister Modi is likely to meet President Putin on the sidelines of the SCO leaders' summit in Tianjin in China from August 31 to September 1. Sources said there are also discussions for a visit by Russian President Putin to India later this year.

The Wire
28 minutes ago
- The Wire
What is China's ‘Early Harvest' Proposal for Border Talks That Modi Govt Has Now Conceded?
This decision represents a fundamental departure from India's long-standing position that the border dispute must be resolved as a comprehensive package deal, as established in the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles. New Delhi: The Modi government's decision to agree to establish an expert group for exploring China's 'early harvest' proposal in the recent India-China Special Representatives talks represents a reversal of India's longstanding position that betrays decades of careful diplomacy and strategic thinking. This concession – to explore fast-tracking a settlement of the India-China boundary in the Sikkim region – comes at a time when China has been systematically using the border dispute as leverage while offering cosmetic solutions that primarily benefit Beijing's strategic objectives. What are the origins and evolution of China's 'Early Harvest' proposal? Even though the 'early harvest' in Sikkim idea had been broached by Beijing with Indian officials earlier, it first surfaced publicly in 2017 when Chinese Ambassador Luo Zhaohui cryptically mentioned it during a think tank event at New Delhi. This was a couple of months before the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Indian soldiers had crossed from Sikkim into Bhutan to stop the Chinese from constructing a road to the sensitive Jhampheri ridge. 'Early harvest' involves exclusively settling the boundary in Sikkim –a proposal which the then foreign minister Sushma Swaraj had described as the Chinese equivalent of saying a 'low-hanging fruit'. This would separate the Sikkim boundary from the three other sectors on the disputed Sino-India border: western, middle and eastern. Chinese military analyst senior colonel Zhao Xiaozhou later clarified in 2017 that the proposal essentially sought to replace the 1890 Great Britain-China convention with a new agreement signed directly between China and India. 'For China, early harvest means, we want to have a new agreement with India, because the 1890 convention was signed between Great Britain and China,' he explained, adding that China wanted to 'start from the easiest, that is what we call early harvest' in the Sikkim sector. China formally submitted these proposals to external affairs minister S. Jaishankar during his meeting with Wang Yi in Beijing in August 2019. After the 22nd dialogue of the Special Representatives on the boundary issue between Ajit Doval and Wang Yi in New Delhi in December 2019, the Chinese statement on the talks said the two sides should 'promote early harvest consultations'. There was no mention of such proposals in the statement from the Indian side. New Delhi instead linked the proposal to the simultaneous demarcation of the middle sector in Uttarakhand, in line with the 2005 agreement. What has been India's historical resistance to the proposal? What are its strategic concerns? For years, India consistently rejected China's 'early harvest' approach, recognizing it as a strategic trap. In 2019, former foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal articulated the core problem: 'China's early harvest proposal violates the 2005 agreement on the guidelines and parameters for resolving the boundary issue as it clearly says that it has to be a package deal. This is the usual Chinese way of walking out of agreements. This early harvest proposal relates to the Sikkim border which is the only one which is settled. So where is the early harvest for India in this? On the contrary, China will seek to settle the tri-junction in its favour through this proposal which is unacceptable. Is China ready to accept tri-junction as per the Indian position?' Indian officials recognised that the Sikkim proposal was 'not so simple, as any Indian agreement on demarcation will be used by Beijing to settle the boundary with Bhutan with an eye towards the Doklam plateau'. A former Indian Army chief warned that "if India settles Sikkim, where it dominates both Chumbi Valley and Finger Area up in the north, then China will expand its Chumbi Valley area and increase pressure on the Siliguri corridor in West Bengal". The strategic concern was that settling the Sikkim border would directly impact the India-China-Bhutan trijunction at Batang La, potentially allowing China to extend its reach to the Jhampheri ridge, from where "the entire Siliguri corridor becomes extremely vulnerable to the PLA. The lights of Gangtok are visible from Jhampheri ridge," as one China expert noted. Why has the Modi government conceded now? Despite years of principled resistance, the August 19, 2025 MEA statement reveals a dramatic policy reversal. The Modi government has now agreed to 'Setting up an Expert Group, under the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC), to explore Early Harvest in boundary delimitation in the India-China border areas'. In the statement issued after Wang Yi's meeting with Modi, the Chinese side said that 'on the boundary issue, new consensus was reached on… initiating boundary demarcation negotiations in areas where conditions are met'. This U-turn by the Modi government appears driven by multiple pressure points. Trump's tariff war against India, imposing 50% tariffs on Indian goods and threatening further penalties over Russian oil purchases, has made India more vulnerable to China. The Modi government appears keen to seek friendly ties with China, at Beijing's own terms, despite the obvious strategic risks. Indian officials claim that China has reportedly promised to address India's concerns regarding rare earths, fertilisers and tunnel boring machines. None of these have figured in any of the official statements but these economic carrots, essentially reversing the coercive actions taken by Beijing, have led to a major strategic concession by the Modi government. What are the strategic risks of this concession? This decision represents a fundamental departure from India's long-standing position that the border dispute must be resolved as a comprehensive package deal, as established in the 2005 Political Parameters and Guiding Principles. By agreeing to explore 'early harvest' options, the Modi government has legitimised China's piecemeal approach that violates this foundational principle. The move is particularly dangerous given China's expanding claims against Bhutan, including new territorial demands in the eastern part of the Himalayan kingdom that emerged around 2020. Any resolution of the Sikkim sector boundary without addressing these broader strategic concerns will only embolden China's aggressive posture toward India's Himalayan neighbours, security experts feel. Moreover, the agreement comes at a time when China has been systematically strengthening its border infrastructure and military capabilities. The PLA has established itself firmly in the Doklam plateau and explored alternative routes to reach the Jhampheri ridge. The PLA's enhanced capabilities, and increasing superiority over India, make any territorial concessions even more strategically problematic. To conclude, the Modi government's decision to explore China's 'early harvest' proposal represents a dangerous precedent that abandons decades of careful strategic thinking for short-term economic and political relief. By legitimising China's divide-and-conquer approach to the border dispute, the Modi government has weakened India's negotiating position and potentially compromised the strategic interests. There is no 'early harvest' for India in this arrangement, only a reversal of its longstanding policy disguised as diplomatic progress. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Final nod for ₹62,000 crore deal to procure 97 more Tejas Mk1A jets
The government on Tuesday cleared the Rs 62,000 crore order to procure 97 additional indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A fighter jets from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) for the Indian Air Force (IAF), a defence source confirmed. The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has given its final approval — marking the last step before the formal signing of the deal. The jets will be built by Bengaluru-headquartered HAL, a Maharatna public sector undertaking under the Ministry of Defence. This will mark the second order for the Mk1A fighter jets, with an earlier contract already placed with HAL for 83 aircraft at a cost of Rs 36,400 crore. HAL missed the original February 2024 deadline to start deliveries of the LCA Mk1A, primarily due to delays in the arrival of F404-IN20 engines from the American engine maker GE Aerospace. These jets are intended to replace the last of the IAF's Russian-origin MiG-21s, which are scheduled to retire in September. Amid the IAF's mounting challenges, HAL has assured that 12 Mk1A aircraft will be delivered by the end of 2025-26. The company has already built six, which are currently flying with reserve engines — a temporary measure. The second GE engine for the Mk1A was delivered to HAL in mid-July. The Tejas, an indigenous single-engine, fourth-generation multirole light fighter aircraft, has been developed by the Aeronautical Development Agency. It originates from the LCA programme launched in the 1980s to replace the IAF's ageing MiG-21 fleet — a goal now pursued through the operational Tejas MkI and the planned induction of the more advanced Mk1A variant.