logo
US-Indonesia trade compromise will test Prabowo's mettle

US-Indonesia trade compromise will test Prabowo's mettle

AllAfrica16-07-2025
JAKARTA – On July 15, Indonesia and the United States reached a compromise: the threatened 32% tariff on Indonesian exports will now be capped at 19% in exchange for Indonesia's commitment to purchase US energy, agricultural goods, and 50 Boeing aircraft.
The deal also reportedly includes reciprocal tariff relief for American exports to Indonesia. The announcement, however, came unilaterally via a post on President Trump's Truth Social platform. While Jakarta's stock market reacted positively, no official statement has been issued from President Prabowo Subianto's office at the time of writing.
Key aspects of the agreement—particularly its implementation timeline and enforcement mechanisms—remain uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the energy, agriculture and Boeing components of the deal had been proactively offered by Indonesia in prior negotiations, as reported by CNBC Indonesia and The Jakarta Post, further underscoring Jakarta's strategic signaling even before Trump announced it on social media.
This asymmetrical rollout underscores the transactional nature of Trump-era trade tactics and places Indonesia in a diplomatically delicate position – forced to respond without the benefit of reciprocal clarity.
The 19% tariff rate, though less severe than Trump's original 32% threat, offers limited relief. It reflects a partial de-escalation in a high-pressure game where leverage and optics trump deliberative fairness.
Indonesia's inclusion—alongside China, Japan, Brazil, the EU and dozens of other countries—had little to do with specific trade violations. Rather, it reflects Washington's myopic vision of its global economic relationships: maximizing short-term partisan gain at the expense of systemic stability.
This episode is more than bilateral maneuvering; it constitutes a strategic test for Indonesia. The real question is whether the Prabowo government can craft a resilient, adaptive response under asymmetric pressure, one that reinforces—not compromises—Indonesia's long-term strategic and economic sovereignty.
Some observers have argued the deal is a clear-cut diplomatic failure. A recent Australian Outlook article by CELIOS, published before the July 15 announcement, called for a cabinet reshuffle, pointing to disjointed communication and technocratic underperformance.
But while the critique identifies real symptoms—such as confusion over negotiating mandates and a long-vacant ambassadorial post—it mistakes short-term optics for attempts to forge a long-term strategic structure.
Indeed, President Prabowo moved early on this front. Since taking office last October, he has pursued a multi-vector foreign policy aimed at expanding Indonesia's geopolitical and economic options.
He has met with counterparts from China, Europe, Japan, Russia, India, Australia, Brazil and the Middle East. Indonesia joined its first BRICS summit, revived trade talks with the EU, initiated outreach to Latin America, and reinforced bilateral ties with key Muslim brother Saudi Arabia.
Symbolically, Prabowo's recent appearances alongside leaders like French President Emmanuel Macron at Bastille Day and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara—where 11 billion euros worth of deals and 13 cooperation agreements, respectively, were signed—illustrate Indonesia's active hedging against global economic fragmentation and potential strategic shifts.
These bilateral engagements also included defense cooperation, reflecting Indonesia's intent to link economic strategy with broader security considerations.
But diplomacy alone cannot buffer the economy. Prabowo has also directed key domestic institutions to coordinate policy delivery. His administration has activated task forces focused on US trade response, deregulation, and labor market adjustment. Bank Indonesia, recognizing the urgency while maintaining its independence, has adjusted its monetary stance to preserve rupiah stability amid market volatility.
Meanwhile, the Danantara fund—Indonesia's new sovereign wealth and development vehicle—has been structured to enhance national capacity to finance green energy, critical infrastructure and food system resilience.
Critiques like CELIOS' overstate the effectiveness of short-term governance fixes, like cabinet reshuffles, and understate the structural reality of negotiating with a major power that shifts its trade doctrine by tweet. A personnel shake-up will not change the terms of asymmetry.
What Indonesia requires is institutional stamina and adaptive coordination. Indeed, Prabowo's recent nomination of Indroyono Soesilo as ambassador to Washington reflects a course correction grounded in practical diplomacy, not theatrical reset.
As an ABC analysis noted, the Trump tariff doctrine has ripple effects that are felt most acutely in emerging markets. While the immediate cost will fall on US consumers in many sectors, the structural burden of supply chain adjustment, risk repricing and investor perception falls heavily on countries like Indonesia.
Jakarta's ability to weather these headwinds will depend less on any single deal, and more on whether its broader strategy builds economic depth. In that light, the July 15 announcement—while a tactical step forward in terms of avoiding a harsher tariff—is no guarantee of future reprieve. It reflects a pause, not a pivot. It buys Indonesia time, but not immunity.
The weeks ahead must now focus on consolidation: fast-tracking alternative trade routes, deepening ties with ASEAN and the Global South, and insulating Indonesia's critical industries from further external shocks. At the same time, the government must show clarity in its communication, especially toward investors and producers navigating this new landscape.
Toward its domestic constituents, the government will also need to manage rising expectations and potential discontent, particularly among export-oriented industries, small producers, workers and consumers who may feel squeezed by the reverberation from this global trade disruption.
Prabowo will have to maintain a careful balance—communicating that while this deal secures temporary relief, it does not resolve the structural challenges ahead. Managing perceptions, sustaining investor confidence and ensuring that trade-offs do not disproportionately burden lower-income Indonesians will be critical to his government's future political stability.
For all its constraints, Indonesia retains agency. It boasts a large domestic market, growing regional influence and leadership that is attempting to navigate an increasingly fluid global order. The strategic direction appears promising, but whether it will yield a net positive outcome remains to be seen. At least, for the time being, Indonesia can avert Sauron's gaze.
Adi Abidin is a public policy specialist at the Kiroyan Partners and a research fellow at Populi Center, both of which are Jakarta-based offices. The views expressed here are his own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump plays golf as protesters rally
Trump plays golf as protesters rally

RTHK

time5 hours ago

  • RTHK

Trump plays golf as protesters rally

Trump plays golf as protesters rally President Trump on the golf course his first full day of a visit to Scotland. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump played golf under tight security on the first full day of a visit to Scotland Saturday, as hundreds of protesters took to the streets in major cities. Trump played at his Turnberry resort with son Eric and US ambassador to the UK Warren Stephens, waving to photographers following his arrival in his mother's birth country on Friday evening. His presence has turned the picturesque and normally quiet area of southwest Scotland into a virtual fortress, with roads closed and police checkpoints in place. Police officers - some on quad bikes and others on foot with sniffer dogs - patrolled the famous course and the sandy beaches and grass dunes that flank it. Secret Service snipers were positioned at vantage points while some other golfers on the course were patted down by security personnel. The 79-year-old touched down Friday at nearby Prestwick Airport as hundreds of onlookers came out to see Air Force One and catch a glimpse of its famous passenger. The president has professed a love of Scotland, but his controversial politics and business investments in the country have made for an uneasy relationship. Speaking to reporters on the tarmac, Trump immediately waded into the debate surrounding high levels of irregular migration, and lashed out at renewable energy efforts. Trump's five-day visit, which is set to mix leisure with business and diplomacy, has divided the local community. Several hundred protesters demonstrated outside the US consulate in the capital Edinburgh and in the city of Aberdeen, near where Trump owns another golf resort. The protests were organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. Participants held placards with slogans like "Scotland hates Trump" and waved Palestinian flags. (AFP)

Trump plays golf as protesters rally
Trump plays golf as protesters rally

RTHK

time5 hours ago

  • RTHK

Trump plays golf as protesters rally

Trump plays golf as protesters rally President Trump on the golf course his first full day of a visit to Scotland. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump played golf under tight security on the first full day of a visit to Scotland Saturday, as hundreds of protesters took to the streets in major cities. Trump played at his Turnberry resort with son Eric and US ambassador to the UK Warren Stephens, waving to photographers following his arrival in his mother's birth country on Friday evening. His presence has turned the picturesque and normally quiet area of southwest Scotland into a virtual fortress, with roads closed and police checkpoints in place. Police officers - some on quad bikes and others on foot with sniffer dogs - patrolled the famous course and the sandy beaches and grass dunes that flank it. Secret Service snipers were positioned at vantage points while some other golfers on the course were patted down by security personnel. The 79-year-old touched down Friday at nearby Prestwick Airport as hundreds of onlookers came out to see Air Force One and catch a glimpse of its famous passenger. The president has professed a love of Scotland, but his controversial politics and business investments in the country have made for an uneasy relationship. Speaking to reporters on the tarmac, Trump immediately waded into the debate surrounding high levels of irregular migration, and lashed out at renewable energy efforts. Trump's five-day visit, which is set to mix leisure with business and diplomacy, has divided the local community. Several hundred protesters demonstrated outside the US consulate in the capital Edinburgh and in the city of Aberdeen, near where Trump owns another golf resort. The protests were organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. Participants held placards with slogans like "Scotland hates Trump" and waved Palestinian flags. (AFP)

Sanchez's Huawei stance puts Spain in Trump's line of fire
Sanchez's Huawei stance puts Spain in Trump's line of fire

AllAfrica

time14 hours ago

  • AllAfrica

Sanchez's Huawei stance puts Spain in Trump's line of fire

The United States could soon impose severe consequences on Spain's Sanchez administration for advancing the claim that the use of Huawei technology in its storage system for Spanish judicial wiretaps does not pose a national security threat. The Trump administration and the US Congress have made it clear that they believe that it is in the US national interest to aggressively counter the use of Chinese hardware and software in and around the national security-sensitive infrastructure of the United States and its allies. That includes NATO and major non-NATO allies. The Trump administration, therefore, cannot give the Sanchez government a pass on its controversial decision to downplay the national security threats posed by Huawei technology in the Spanish defense, security and intelligence sector. That would not only give rise to inconsistency between policy and practice, but also lead to confusion and uncertainty. It would create the impression that the Trump administration is willing to accept strategic misalignment with US national security and foreign policy interests by US allies and partners. It is not. The Trump administration, therefore, needs to quickly decide how best to respond to the Sanchez administration. In Washington, one proposal that has been discussed is to impose targeted sanctions that restrict travel and freeze the assets of Spanish individuals and entities that are involved in corruption, organized crime, human rights violations and anticompetitive practices. They might include Spanish organizations far outside the defense industrial base. Examples include La Liga, the Galician Mafia and the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party. Another option that has been discussed is to rein in bilateral defense, security and intelligence cooperation. That could include imposing restrictions on defense trade, relocating US military forces from Spanish military bases, suspending Spain from US intelligence sharing platforms, and/or ordering a full review of the bilateral relationship between Spain and the United States – similar to what is being discussed for South Africa. All of those options would impose heavy consequences for Spanish national security and foreign policy interests. Whatever policy pathway the Trump administration ultimately pursues, there is likely to be support within the US Congress for imposing harsh consequences on the Government of Spain. The Republican Party remains relatively united in demanding strong alignment on Chinese affairs from US allies and partners. That does not exist in the case of Spain right now, and many Republican elites are unwilling to continue to settle for the status quo. This is not the Biden era. To be clear, this is a predicament of Sanchez's own making. Since inauguration, Sanchez has been playing a high-stakes game of political poker with the Trump administration. Unfortunately, he has been using the bilateral strategic partnership as collateral in this game. At some point, both sides are going to have to show their hands. That could be disastrous for the future of US-Spain relations. Before that happens, the Sanchez administration would be wise to solicit non-partisan advice from the Spanish Ministry of Defense and National Intelligence Center. If domestic politics were taken off the table, one would have to imagine that those institutions would advise Sanchez against siding with the People's Republic of China over the United States on the matter. Michael Walsh is a non-resident senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store