&w=3840&q=100)
Delhi govt cuts MLALAD fund to ₹5 crore from ₹15 crore per constituency
Previously, the fund stood at ₹15 crore after it was hiked by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)-led Delhi government in October 2024, news agency PTI reported. The earlier administration had increased the allocation by 50 per cent—from ₹10 crore to ₹15 crore.
Citing a recent order issued by the Urban Development Department, the PTI report said the new allocation has been fixed at ₹5 crore per Assembly constituency per year. The cabinet decision was made on 2 May.
'In pursuance of Cabinet Decision No. 3187 dated 02.05.2025, the allocation of funds under the MLALAD Scheme has been kept at ₹5 crore per Assembly constituency per year from the financial year 2025–26 onwards,' the order stated.
Citing the Council of Ministers, the order further added that this would be an untied fund and could be used for the repair and maintenance of public assets without a ceiling. It may also be utilised for capital projects approved under the scheme.
A BJP MLA confirmed that ₹350 crore has been allocated under the MLALAD Scheme and has been distributed equally among the 70 MLAs in Delhi.
What is the MLALAD fund?
The MLALAD fund is issued annually by the state government, enabling Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) to suggest development projects for their constituencies. Commonly funded works include road repairs, construction of community spaces and parks, and other local infrastructure.
The scheme is modelled after the central government's MPLAD (Member of Parliament Local Area Development) scheme. While the funds are not disbursed directly to MLAs or MPs, elected representatives can recommend specific projects to be undertaken under defined guidelines.
According to a report in The Indian Express, the funds can only be used for 'durable infrastructure work,' such as roads and community halls. During the Covid-19 pandemic, however, they were also used to procure personal protective equipment, including masks and testing kits. (with PTI inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mumbai kabutarkhana in Dadar covered again by BMC; security tightened to stop pigeon feeding
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Days after protesters removed a tarpaulin cover from a pigeon feeding spot in Mumbai's Dadar, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has reinstalled plastic sheets over the site. Officials said the move aims to prevent public feeding of pigeons and avoid any law and order issues. Security in the area has been increased, a PTI report August 6, a large group of agitators pulled down the cover placed by the BMC at the Dadar kabutarkhana to discourage pigeon feeding. The protest led to a clash with police. Maharashtra minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha later said members of the Jain community had no role in the incident and clarified that there was no religious angle to the to officials, the BMC on Sunday repaired damaged bamboo cladding at the site before covering the pigeon feeding area, located on the west side of Dadar station, with silver-coloured plastic sheets. The civic body has also deployed marshals at the BMC has banned public feeding of pigeons citing health risks, leading to legal challenges in the Bombay High Court. On August 7, the court stated it had not ordered the closure of kabutarkhanas but had refrained from staying the civic body's closure order. The court said a committee of experts could study whether old kabutarkhanas should continue but stressed that 'human life is of paramount importance'. It added, 'If something affects the larger health of senior citizens and kids, then it should be looked into. There has to be a balance.'Last month, the court declined interim relief to petitioners challenging the ban but asked authorities not to demolish heritage Saturday, police registered a case against a man for feeding pigeons from a grain-filled tray placed on his car roof in Dadar. His vehicle was seized.
The Wire
5 minutes ago
- The Wire
KSU Leader Lodges Complaint to Trace 'Missing' Suresh Gopi, Congress Alleges Voter List 'Manipulation'
The Congress alleged that Gopi managed to win the Thrissur Lok Sabha constituency by manipulating voter list. New Delhi: The Thrissur district president of the Congress-affiliated Kerala Students' Union (KSU) has lodged a 'man missing' complaint and seeking a probe into the 'disappearance' of Union minister and Thrissur MP Suresh Gopi. In his complaint, KSU leader Gokul Guruvayur has alleged that Gopi went missing after the arrest of two Malayali nuns in Chhattisgarh, reported New Indian Express. Guruvayur has asked the police to 'probe the whereabouts of the MP and to find those behind his disappearance'. According to his social media handles, Gopi is presently in Manipur for official duty as part of his role as the Union minister of state for tourism and petroleum and natural gas, said the New Indian Express report. 'Everyone knows that when an MP becomes a Union minister, he will have additional responsibilities,' said Kerala Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Rajeev Chandrasekhar, brushing away complaints that Suresh Gopi has been missing from his constituency. Congress alleges Gopi won Thrissur Lok Sabha seat by 'manipulating voter list' Meanwhile, the Congress alleged that Gopi managed to win the Thrissur Lok Sabha constituency by manipulating voter list. 'BJP won its first Lok Sabha seat from Kerala surprising everyone across political spectrum. When you take a deeper look at the data, it becomes obvious how BJP candidate @TheSureshGopi managed to win the seat by manipulating voters list,' Kerala Congress posted from its official handle on X. VOTE CHORI IN THRISSUR, KERALA | BJP won its first Lok Sabha seat from Kerala surprising everyone across political spectrum. When you take a deeper look at the data, it becomes obvious how BJP candidate @TheSureshGopi managed to win the seat by manipulating voters list. Take a… — Congress Kerala (@INCKerala) August 10, 2025 'Take a look at the total electors data for each Parliament constituency in Kerala from 2014 General Elections. When you look carefully, you'll find something unusual about Thrissur. Thrissur had seen an addition of 62,318 votes in 2019, while the same constituency saw an addition of 1,46,656 (2.35x) votes making it the largest constituency in Kerala with 14.83 lakh votes out of nowhere,' it added. The post added that it was reported during the elections that large scale voter registrations were done by BJP a few months before the elections. 'Suresh Gopi's family lives in Sasthamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram. 11 votes were added under the name 'Bharath Heritage' at the Nettissery residence where Suresh Gopi was residing in Thrissur, for adding all his family members to the Thrissur voters list, while they were residing in Thiruvananthapuram. There are many more such additions which resulted in the manipulated voters list, where non-residents of Thrissur were added at scale,' said the Congress. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Print
35 minutes ago
- The Print
Seven reasons why Rahul Gandhi's voter fraud claim must be taken with a pinch of salt
While it is fair for Gandhi to point out what may be problematic with one Lok Sabha result, where the BJP won with a margin of 32,707 votes, it is quite unreasonable to allege that the BJP and the ECI were in cahoots. The BJP candidate, PC Mohan, won the seat with a 2.5 per cent margin in a constituency where over 13 lakh votes were cast in the Lok Sabha elections. While the Election Commission of India (ECI) has demanded a signed oath saying all the details provided by him were true, it would do well to actually check out the claims, regardless of the Gandhi scion's arrogant claim that his statement in public constitutes an oath. At the very least, this would show that ECI is not afraid of scrutiny and correcting mistakes—which are sure to exist. Or else, why initiate a SIR in Bihar? An SIR is the only realistic way of validating genuine voters and chucking out the rest. If there can be over one lakh alleged 'fake' voters in just one assembly constituency, potentially deleting 65 lakh voters from the Bihar list hardly sounds unreasonable. Rahul Gandhi's 'atom bomb' provides us with the best justification for a nationwide Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls—a process that the Congress and most opposition parties have opposed in Bihar. Speaking in Bengaluru on Thursday, 7 August, he provided what he claimed was evidence proving the existence of over one lakh fake voters in Mahadevapura in Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency. Re-examining fake voters claim Gandhi's broader claim, that the Bengaluru Central result was tantamount to vote-stealing, must be taken with a pinch of salt. He picked the one constituency with a significant number of Muslim voters, and polarisation and counter-polarisation are normal here. He must re-examine his premises for several reasons. First, it is facile to assume that all the 1,00,250 'fake voters' had gone to the BJP. No one can prove that. The caveat is that not all may be fakes, and not all votes may have been cast either. Second, according to Gandhi's analysis, 11,965 'fake voters' were duplicates with names in other states, 40,009 had invalid addresses, 10,452 were bulk voters registered at a single address, 33,692 first-time voters had misused form 6 (used to register first-time voters or make corrections), and 4,132 voter cards did not have valid photos. In Bihar, out of the proposed deletions, 22 lakh were reported deceased, 35 lakh were migrants who may have shifted permanently out of Bihar, and another 7 lakh had their names in multiple state voter lists (ie, the equivalent of Rahul Gandhi's 'duplicate' voters). The Bihar list of likely exclusions hardly sounds unreasonable, but Gandhi won't acknowledge that. Third, the claim that the BJP won the Bengaluru Central seat only because of huge gains in the Mahadevapura (one of eight assembly segments in the Lok Sabha seat, where the BJP won four and the Congress the other four) is questionable. Mahadevapura, despite having many minority voters, has large numbers of migrants and middle-class voters from other states working in the IT services sector. The voter list must indeed be investigated, but it is worth pointing out two realities: these voters usually tend to vote BJP, and Mahadevapura is a BJP stronghold. And if a sharp swing toward one party in one constituency is evidence of possible fraud, then what does one make of the Dhule Lok Sabha result in Maharashtra? In 2024, the BJP led significantly in five assembly constituencies there, but lost badly in the Muslim-dominated Malegaon Central, where the Congress' lead of a massive 1.9 lakh votes was enough to give it a marginal victory despite losing five other assembly segments. Polarisation can lead to such skews. Fourth, while the Congress is at liberty to make its point using the best means at its disposal, any neutral observer cannot ignore this: it chose the one constituency with a large Muslim voter base (around 3.5 lakh), and fielded a Muslim candidate (Rizwan Arshad) to harvest a bulk of minority vote. In the last three elections, the Congress candidate here has always been Muslim, and each time a counter-consolidation helped PC Mohan win, though with declining margins between 2014, 2019, and 2024. Counter-consolidation in Mahadevapura can easily explain Mohan's victory, even assuming there were many fake votes. Given a significant number of illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, the possibility that some of them were also 'fake' voters in the constituency is difficult to dismiss. Fifth, as I have noted in an earlier article, voter lists—both additions and deletions—are supervised by temporary staff on loan from state governments. Therefore, there's a good chance that lists can be partially manipulated. Party workers (not just BJP, but also Congress) also tend to work closely with the ECI to get their bloc of voters registered. This may skew the lists in one direction or the other. In 2018, a Congress MLA was linked to the discovery of 9,896 voter ID cards in an apartment in Bengaluru's Jalahalli. Both BJP and Congress traded accusations against each other for being responsible for this. Sixth, voter lists can never be totally accurate, given the large number of people moving to the richer southern states for jobs and livelihoods (not to speak of the porous border states of Bihar and West Bengal). Many migrant voters may have trouble showing address proof, which may explain why some addresses may have multiple (even 80) voters registered there. These days, Aadhaar is required in many situations, and for migrants, it makes sense to use a fixed, available address to have their Aadhaar cards delivered. Additionally, when people move from city to city, they may change their voter IDs, but the old IDs may not be deleted. Hence, the possibility of multiple voter IDs remaining on the ECI's books. Seventh, the state and national voter rolls are often left unreconciled, which makes regular deletions or additions difficult to ensure. Also read: Opposition MPs to march from Parliament to ECI office despite no police nod Not malice but incompetence We can conclude the following from Rahul Gandhi's 'atom bomb'. One, there is a problem with voter lists, and fake voters can get onto those lists, but there is no reason to assume that it happened only in favour of one party in one constituency and one state. We should not attribute to malice or malign intent what can easily be explained by the Election Commission's lack of resources and local-level failures or even incompetence. Two, the Election Commission cannot endlessly field accusations about aiding election fraud, whether it is about EVMs or fake voters, without damaging its own credibility. Maybe, just maybe, there can be some kind of parliamentary scrutiny of its actions, scrutiny that does not impinge on its independence. A bipartisan law that ensures the Commission's independence and helps it carry out its duties impartially is the need of the hour. Three, the Election Commission probably needs a larger permanent staff to ensure that it is not solely dependent on state-level part-time officials who may have political leanings. Recently, when the Election Commission ordered the West Bengal Chief Secretary to suspend four electoral registration officers and file FIRs against them for enabling bogus voters to get onto the list, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee fulminated against the order and said she won't allow it. She also reminded block-level officers doing the Commission's work that they are state employees, and not the Election Commission's, which amounts to intimidation of staff working temporarily for the Commission. The Election Commission cannot be expected to produce a foolproof list if state governments have the power to threaten officials working for the Commission. What is good about Rahul Gandhi's 'atom bomb' is that it has alerted us to the possibility of fake voters and how they may tilt close contests. However, nothing can be achieved by pretending that this is solely the work of the BJP or the Election Commission. All parties are complicit in this fraud, and should fix things while they can still be fixed. The Election Commission and the Modi government would do well to take heed and act instead of merely scoring political points against the Gandhi scion. R Jagannathan is the former editorial director, Swarajya magazine. He tweets @TheJaggi. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
