Premature release of prisoners: Delhi HC suggests reconstitution of Sentence Review Board, fine-tuning 2004 policy
Hearing a murder convict's plea for premature release, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday referenced the reformatory policy of remission in Kautilya's Arthashastra and suggested that 'the competent authority' deliberate upon the composition of the Sentence Review Board (SRB) and reconstitute the same. It also suggested fine-tuning Delhi's 2004 sentence review policy.
Justice Girish Kathpalia was dealing with a plea by a convict, who was serving life imprisonment for murder committed in 2001. He was seeking premature release after spending more than 21 years in prison with remission.
The convict's case for premature release had been rejected by the SRB five times between 2020 and 2023, compelling him to then seek a direction from the Delhi High Court. On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court directed the SRB to consider his case afresh. It further directed the SRB, that in case it does not find it to be a fit case to grant premature release to the convict, 'the decision of SRB shall be worded in a manner that one can decipher as to what worked in the mind of SRB'.
Holding that the SRB's decision of denial of premature release to the convict 'suffers from vices of non-application of mind and completely mechanical approach to such a sensitive issue', Justice Kathpalia noted, 'The composition of the SRB would make this court assume that each matter is discussed threadbare in such meetings. But unfortunately, the manner in which minutes of these meetings were worded, the allegation of non-application of mind cannot be brushed aside.'
'Every instrumentality of the State, be it judicial or administrative, while deciding an issue must author the decision in such manner that deciphers what worked in the mind of the authority concerned. The court must have material before it to examine as to whether there was proper application of mind or not. In the present case, there is nothing on record to suggest proper application of mind by the SRB,' he added.
Placing faith in the convict's reformation, the court observed, 'I have no doubt that the petitioner stands substantially reformed and can become a useful member of the society. Keeping the petitioner in jail for further period would not yield any fruitful result towards his reformation or to the society at large.'
Making a case for applying the reformatory tool of premature release or remission, the court recorded, 'Not that due to passage of time, the inherent perversity of the crime per se diminishes in any manner. But for the purposes of reformative sentencing, such long incarceration, as already suffered by the petitioner, the perversity must be visualised as faded. The wound suffered by the kith and kin of the deceased, which was fresh in the year 2001, would have by now reduced to scab.'
'Time heals all wounds. This is the only way to fathom in order to ensure purposive application of the reformatory tool of premature release, otherwise no convict would be ever granted an opportunity to reform himself. For, life imprisonment, by its very nature is awarded in gruesome offences where the appropriate punishment is a bit short of awarding capital sentence. A punishment, to be scientific has to have an end somewhere during lifetime of the convict,' Justice Kathpalia said.
While the state had opposed the convict's plea, referring to his misconduct in 2015 when he had jumped parole and his re-arrest in two more criminal cases, the court did not concur with the state's view.
'…citing this misconduct, the SRB has repeatedly denied premature release to the petitioner. Some point of time has to be there, when aftereffects of such misconduct must taper down. It has been more than a decade since the petitioner jumped parole and got involved in those two cases. After the year 2015, there is not even a whiff of any allegation of any jail misconduct on the part of the petitioner. Rather, as observed hereafter, subsequently the petitioner was awarded a number of commendations by the jail authorities. Most significantly, as discussed above, the petitioner stands acquitted in those two cases,' the court reasoned.
The convict was issued six commendation certificates while in jail, which included appreciation for his work and performance on Republic Days, and his work in assisting jail administration in fighting COVID-19.
Taking the commendation certificates into account, the court noted, '…the petitioner had done an extraordinary job in the jail in fight against Corona, due to which the jail administration succeeded in keeping Corona free the jail no.2, even while admitting and quarantining more than 8,200 newly admitted prisoners. These certificates, coupled with the fact that across a period of time, the petitioner was released on parole and furlough more than once show a substantial reformative growth of the petitioner, which is a vital indicator of reduced propensity to commit crime again.'
'As regards possibility of the petitioner committing crime again, merely because he has not physically attained old age, it cannot be said that there are higher chances of his committing crime again. Bodily strength has no
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
370 Tamil families displaced after Jangpura demolition, MK Stalin writes to Delhi CM Rekha Gupta
CHENNAI: Tamil Nadu chief minister M K Stalin has written to Delhi chief minister Rekha Gupta highlighting a 'humanitarian crisis' following the demolition of the Madrasi Camp in Jangpura on June 1, which displaced 370 Tamil-origin families who have lived and worked in the capital for decades. In his letter, Stalin pointed out that although 189 families were found eligible for EWS flats in Narela as per Delhi High Court orders, the flats remain uninhabitable due to incomplete infrastructure — including water supply, sanitation, internal roads, drainage, and street lighting. With no dedicated transport to workplaces nearly 20km away and no arrangements for over 150 Tamil-medium school children, the displaced families continue to suffer, he said. The remaining 181 families have not been given any alternative housing and remain homeless, the letter noted. Stalin urged the Delhi government to complete infrastructure in the Narela housing pockets, relax eligibility norms under the Slum & JJ Rehabilitation Policy for the other displaced families, set up temporary Tamil-medium schooling, and offer vocational and livelihood support — particularly for women — to ensure dignified rehabilitation. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
News18
7 hours ago
- News18
Delhi HC Asks Govt to Reconsider Life Convict's Release, Cites Kautilya & Ashoka
Last Updated: A man serving life imprisonment for murder had approached the Delhi High Court seeking premature release under the Delhi Government's 2004 remission policy. Rooting remission in ancient Indian jurisprudence, the Delhi High Court cited Kautilya's Arthashastra and Ashoka's edicts while directing the government to reconsider the premature release of a life convict who had once jumped parole. Observing that reformative justice must guide such decisions, a bench led by Justice Girish Kathpalia, in a 22-page judgment, remarked, 'There existed a conscious and consistent thought amongst ancient thinkers, aimed at reformation of criminals in order to achieve the larger goal of peace in society by minimisation of crime and criminogenic tendencies. Later, thinkers across the globe nurtured the idea that reformatory policies are more productive than a deterrent and retributory approach to crime and criminal." These observations came in a case where a man, booked under IPC Section 302 for murder and serving life imprisonment, had filed a plea before the high court seeking premature release under the Delhi Government's 2004 remission policy. It was the petitioner's case that he had already served over 18 years without remission and more than 21 years with remission. He added that he had applied for premature release; however, his request had been rejected five times by the Sentence Review Board (SRB). The said rejections were primarily based on the gravity and perversity of the offence, along with his 2010 parole jump. Further, the authorities had also pointed to his re-arrest in 2015 in two separate cases, although he was subsequently acquitted in both. The Board had further alleged a non-reformative attitude based on his past conduct, and the police had also consistently raised objections. Before the High Court, the petitioner, represented by Senior Advocate Arundhati Katju, argued that all of the SRB's orders were mere copy-paste versions and that the Board had ignored recent developments. While acknowledging that the petitioner had jumped parole, Katju contended that the incident occurred 15 years ago and should not, by any means, bar him from liberty or remission. Presenting commendation certificates from jail and other authorities, the senior counsel highlighted his consistent good behaviour and emphasised that the SRB had failed to re-evaluate the case. On the other hand, the State, represented by Sanjeev Bhandari, Additional Standing Counsel, emphasised the seriousness of the crime and noted that commendation certificates alone were not enough. Arguing that the SRB is a technical committee, the ASC contended that the high court's scope under Article 226 is limited when it comes to reviewing its discretionary decisions. Taking note of the submissions, the court, at the outset, noted that the SRB's repeated rejections showed no real application of mind and were 'virtually copy-paste" from earlier meetings. 'The SRB deals with human beings, that too those who have been deprived of liberty across a long span of time on account of their aggression which led to criminality. The approach of the SRB ought to be reformation-oriented and not a routine disposal/statistics-dominated exercise. The composition of SRB needs to be re-examined by the authorities concerned so as to make the exercise of sentence review meaningful and commensurate to the laudable philosophy of reformation of criminal…," the court added. Addressing the parole violation, the court noted that the incident had occurred way back in 2015 and that more than a decade had passed since. It emphasised that there had not been even a whiff of any allegation of jail misconduct on the part of the petitioner. Highlighting six commendation certificates issued by the jail and other authorities, the court remarked that these certificates reflected genuine reformative growth by the petitioner and should have been meaningfully considered. 'Commendation certificates are not just formalities; they are guiding tools for the SRB to assess real reform," the court added. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's case for premature release.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
HC upholds 12-yr jail term for man convicted of raping elderly woman
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has upheld the 12-year jail sentence of a man convicted of raping a 60-year-old woman, finding her testimony "cogent, consistent, and free from material embellishments." Justice Sanjeev Narula, in a recent order, observed that the survivor's account remained "unshaken under the rigour of cross-examination" and suffered from no material infirmity that would warrant rejection. "Her testimony inspires confidence and stands as a credible and trustworthy narrative of the incident," the court said. Rejecting the convict's plea for a reduced sentence, the HC noted that the crime was committed under grave circumstances—against a vulnerable survivor, and while the accused—24-year-old man at the time of crime—was in an inebriated state. "The sentence awarded by the trial court is neither excessive nor disproportionate. Rather, it is commensurate with the seriousness of the crime and the circumstances under which it was perpetrated," the court ruled. According to the prosecution, the incident took place in June 2017 when the accused forcibly entered the survivor's shanty during the early hours, gagged her, and committed the assault. Although the accused denied the charges and claimed inconsistencies in the survivor's version, the court held that her testimony alone was sufficient to sustain the conviction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Referring to established jurisprudence, the court reiterated that in cases of sexual assault, a survivor's sole testimony can be the basis for conviction if found to be credible and of "sterling quality". In this case, the court said, the woman's version not only withstood judicial scrutiny but was also corroborated by medical evidence, expert testimony, and statements by the investigating officer. The consistent jurisprudence of the Supreme Court has underscored that in prosecutions relating to sexual offences, the solitary statement of the survivor, if it inspires the confidence of the court, requires no further corroboration, it added. Crucially, DNA analysis conducted in the case confirmed the allegations and directly linked the accused to the crime, further strengthening the prosecution's narrative. "The evidence presented was reliable, admissible, and consistent with the survivor's version," the court said, finding no ground to interfere with the trial court's "well-reasoned findings." Addressing the argument that no independent witnesses were produced, the court clarified, "The law does not mandate public witnesses in every case, particularly when the act occurs in an enclosed area and at a time when most people would be asleep." Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
