logo
Pak-Afghan ties — thaw and thistle

Pak-Afghan ties — thaw and thistle

Express Tribune23-04-2025

The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@hotmail.com and tweets @20_Inam
Listen to article
Pakistan did reach out to Kabul in an ostensible reset of its fracturing ties with its erstwhile proteges, the Afghan Taliban. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar visited Afghanistan on Saturday April 19, 2025, in a first high-level exchange with the Emirate since assuming office.
He met Acting Afghan PM Mullah Muhammad Hassan Akhund, Deputy PM Mullah Abdul Salam Hanafi, FM Amir Khan Muttaqi, etc. The focus of the delegation level talks was continuation of diplomacy to iron out differences, trade and economic relations, regional economic integration, repatriation of the Afghan Refugees (ARs), cross-border security and TTP-engendered terrorism etc.
First, diplomacy and trade. Wows were exchanged to enhance bilateral ties, P2P and B2B contacts, and ensure continued engagement at all levels. Wide-ranging discussions covered CASA-1000 MW electricity project, TAPI and TAP, and trans-regional connectivity projects like Central Asia-Pakistan railway connectivity via Kohat and Parachinar, besides trade facilitation and tariff reduction.
Dar successfully pursued diplomacy, especially economic diplomacy, greatly melting the ice. In offering concessions, Pakistan agreed to eliminate tariffs on Afghan transit goods for around 16 additional categories. It removed 10% taxes on 867 types of products and transit goods.
The 2% Container Cross Stuffing (CSS) tax imposed by KP Government on Afghan containers is slashed to 1%. 'Bank guarantees' from Afghan traders are to be replaced with 'insurance guarantees' to ease financial burden and enhance trade.
Demurrage on Afghan goods at the Karachi port is to be limited; concessions would be given to Afghans on loading and handling, besides container exchange privileges; and they would be exempted from extra duties, to incentivise bilateral trade. Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA) would be finalised and implemented effective June 30. And the two committees formed earlier for political and trade discussions shall meet periodically.
Second, the ARs. Pakistan stuck to its position of repatriating illegal migrants, including ARs, with respect and dignity, without resorting to forced deportations, as per its phased timeline, despite Kabul's requests to hold or slow down the process. Dar reaffirmed protecting the property and capital of ARs in Pakistan, pledging to prevent any 'arbitrary action'.
Third TTP. Both sides agreed to tackle this thorny issue through an ambiguously stated 'mutual understanding and joint mechanisms'. However, potential optimism about resolution in the short-term remains misplaced, as none of the Khostwal Haqqanis, the host and benefactors of the TTP, attended the parleys.
TTP and the rising terror incidents along the Pak-Afghan border, and in the settled districts, were discussed in detail, especially the involvement of Afghan nationals in such acts. Pakistan also raised the issue of cross-border movement of terrorists and smuggling. On Afghanistan's observation about miscreants entering Afghanistan disguised as ARs, Pakistan reassured Kabul of never allowing its soil to be used against Afghanistan.
At the conclusion of the visit, a joint press conference by Dar and Muttaqi was held. Pakistan and Afghanistan already have a Joint Coordination Committee (JCC), reporting monthly on the TTP violence and other security related issues.
Pak-Afghan bilateralism is defined by constants like common religion, history, geography linguistics, ethnicity and culture etc all positive; and variables like TTP, Durand Line, Border Fence and ARs sadly all negative. During the cited talks, there has been no tangible commitment by the Afghan side on the most disruptive variable of TTP.
It had been argued in this space that TTP remains a divisive issue within the IEA; and that TTP is a force-in-being for its Khostwal hosts, the Haqqanis; and at the same time, TTP is an intractable dilemma for Haqqani, given their pro-Pakistan imperatives. And that without Haqqani intercession, peace would remain elusive in KP and Balochistan.
Details were covered in my piece 'Greater Qandahar, Loya Paktia and the US' published in these columns on April 3, 2025. It goes without saying that minus lasting resolution of the TTP conundrum, all other cooperation between both countries would always stand on shaky grounds.
Although due to persistent efforts by Pakistan, IEA in particular Qandahar now admits that TTP is a problem, yet it remains unable, and/or unwilling or both to go for a resolution in the absence of TTP hosts, the Haqqanis. IEA discreetly seeks time from Pakistan to address Pakistan's concerns, whereas Islamabad, while showing flexibility, expects the IEA to take 'some' steps in order to prevent the TTP attacks against Pakistan.
Realising the IEA dilemma, Pakistan has asked IEA to take measures, short of resorting to use of force against TTP. Some 'critical' intelligence cooperation is discerned as briefings in the JCC suggest.
While continuing to conduct 'religious diplomacy' with Qandahar and applying calibrated force cis or trans-frontier when needed, Pakistan is suggested to help its one-time Haqqani assets to either cough out or gobble up the TTP bone, stuck in their neck. Serious-minded Afghanologists realise this Afghan/Haqqani dilemma. For Haqqanis and the IEA, restraining TTP attack remains the most essential confidence building measure.
It is a sad reality that lack of progress on the TTP issue by Kabul and IEA's continued recalcitrance make ordinary Afghans, living peacefully for decades in Pakistan, pay the price. With no TTP hosting by the Emirate, the empathy and support for ARs within Pakistani state and society would have remained intact, bringing in the neighbourly integration between the two countries on more solid grounds. Pakistani state and society feel ARs' pain and have responded to their plight in unprecedented ways.
In the changed and charged realities of real politick, the notions of treating Afghanistan as a sovereign state, and the bogey that Afghans never yield to force are, at best, historic romanticisms, without any geostrategic footing.
The full potential and benefits from the 'reset' of Pak-Afghan bilateralism as optimistically expected now, would be evident by June this year, when the APTTA and the concessions offered during recent visit are put to implementation. And if and when, the TTP meanwhile could be restrained by its Afghan hosts from recommencing its terrorist violence against Pakistan.
PM Akhund assured Deputy PM Dar about not allowing the use of Afghan soil against neighbours, including Pakistan. It would be interesting to see the Afghan side walking the talk. We are keeping the fingers crossed!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top US general praises 'phenomenal partner' Pakistan
Top US general praises 'phenomenal partner' Pakistan

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Top US general praises 'phenomenal partner' Pakistan

Lieutenant General Michael Kurilla testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee on his nomination to become Commander of Central Command during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, US, February 8, 2022. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE Listen to article In a stunning rebuke to the Indian attempts seeking Pakistan's international isolation, a top US general on Tuesday publicly praised Pakistan as a "phenomenal partner" in the global fight against terrorism and insisted Washington must not ignore Pakistan while pursuing strategic ties with India. The testimony of General Michael Kurilla, Commander Central Command (CENTCOM), was seen as a major diplomatic win for Pakistan at a time when India was trying to build a narrative that Islamabad was sponsoring terrorism. The testimony stands in sharp contrast to persistent efforts, particularly from Indian lobbying groups, to paint Pakistan as an unreliable partner in the fight against terrorism. Gen Kurilla's candid remarks not only validate Pakistan's ongoing sacrifices but may also recalibrate the tone of future US policy in South Asia. Gen Kurilla's statement before the House Arms Services Committee led to a meltdown in India where the media and commentators questioned the US loyalty. The CENTCOM chief terming ISIS-Khorasan the most active terrorist groups, said the Afghan Taliban went after them and pushed "a lot of them into the trial areas on the Afghan-Pakistan border". "Through a phenomenal partnership with Pakistan—they (Pakistan) have gone after ISIS Khorasan, killing dozens of them," he told lawmakers. "Through our relationship we have with them, and providing intelligence, they have captured at least five ISIS Khorasan high-value individuals. They extradited back Jafar, who is one of the key individuals behind the Abbey Gate bombing," he added. "And the first person [ ] the [Pakistani] chief of the army staff Munir [called] me and said, "I've caught him, ready to extradite him back to United States, please tell the Secretary of Defense and the President." "So, we are seeing Pakistan, with limited intelligence that we provide, and go after them using their means to do that, and we're seeing an effect on ISIS Khorasan," General Kurila said. "And I would also tell you that since 2024—the beginning—Pakistan has had over 1,000 terrorist attacks in the western area, killing about 700 security and [2,500] civilians. They have an active counterterrorism fight right now, and they have been a phenomenal partner in the counterterrorism world." Gen Kurilla highlighted the staggering toll terrorism continues to take on Pakistan itself, citing over 1,000 terrorist attacks in 2024 alone—killing approximately 700 security personnel and 2,500 civilians. "They have an active counterterrorism fight right now," he stated. "And they've been a phenomenal partner in the counterterrorism world." The CENTCOM chief emphasized that Pakistan's efforts over the last several months have severely degraded ISIS-K's capabilities. According to intelligence gained through interrogations and exploitation of captured militants, the terrorist group is currently at a "low point", though it still poses a transnational threat. "These are the same individuals that carried out the Crocus City Hall attack in Moscow and the bombing in Kerman, Iran," Kurilla said. "There are even ties to plots against the U.S. homeland, which I can discuss in a classified setting." In a significant diplomatic note, Gen Kurilla rejected the idea that US relations in South Asia must be zero-sum between India and Pakistan. "It's not a binary switch," he asserted. "We can't have one with Pakistan if we have a relationship with India. We should look at the merits of the relationship for the positives that it has." Paul Kapur Paul Kapur, US President Donald Trump's nominee for Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday that he would prioritise security cooperation with Pakistan where it aligns with US interests. He also expressed intent to explore opportunities for enhancing bilateral collaboration in trade and investment, He previously served on the State Department's Policy Planning Staff during Trump's first term, where he played a role in shaping US strategy in South Asia. Kapur, an academic of Indian origin, acknowledged the region's volatility, referring to the recent escalation between India and Pakistan. He said the crisis was narrowly averted due to "intense engagement" by US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. "If confirmed, I will pursue security cooperation with Pakistan where it is in America's interest," says Paul Kapur who is set to become Trump's top diplomat on South Asia. On Pakistan, he said that if confirmed, he would "pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to US interests while seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment." He noted that "South Asia recently avoided a costly conflict with Vice President Vance and Secretary Rubio intensely engaged on the issue." He added, "If confirmed, I will continue to promote long-standing US security interests with India and Pakistan through the pursuit of peace and stability and the fight against terrorism."

Taliban hang up Kalashnikovs to pen memoirs of Afghan war
Taliban hang up Kalashnikovs to pen memoirs of Afghan war

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Taliban hang up Kalashnikovs to pen memoirs of Afghan war

Author Khalid Zadran, a member of the Haqqani network, long viewed as one of the most dangerous militant factions in Afghanistan, is the Kabul's police force spokesman. Photo AFP Since trading the battlefield for Afghanistan's halls of power, some Taliban members have also swapped their weapons for pens to tell their version of the 20-year conflict with Western forces, who they accuse of distorting "reality". A flood of books has been written, mostly from a Western perspective, about the war between the US-led forces that invaded Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11 attacks until the Taliban's return to power in 2021. But in the years since, a proliferation of writings by Taliban figures — praising their exploits and the achievements of the "Islamic Emirate" — is now the reigning narrative in Afghanistan. "No matter what foreigners have written... they have largely ignored the reality of what happened to us and why we were forced to fight," author Khalid Zadran told AFP. A member of the Haqqani network — long viewed as one of the most dangerous militant factions in Afghanistan — he now serves as the spokesman for the capital's police force. In his 600-page tome in Pashto published in April, he recounts US incursions in his home province of Khost, his childhood steeped in stories of soldiers' "atrocities", and his desire to join the Taliban in the name of his country's "freedom". "I witnessed horrific stories every day — mangled bodies on the roadside," he writes in "15 Minutes", a title inspired by a US drone strike he narrowly escaped. Muhajer Farahi, now a deputy information and culture minister, penned his "Memories of Jihad: 20 Years in Occupation" to "state the facts", he said. "America, contrary to its claims, has committed cruel and barbaric acts, destroyed our country with bombs, destroyed infrastructure, and has sown discord and cynicism between nations and tribes," he told AFP from his office in central Kabul. Little attention is paid in either book to the thousands of civilians killed in Taliban attacks — many of them suicide bombings that entrenched fear across the country for nearly two decades. Farahi insists the Taliban "were cautious in saving civilians and innocent" lives, while criticising fellow Afghans who collaborated with the pro-Western police as a "stain" on the country.

Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—II
Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—II

Business Recorder

time4 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—II

Agriculture, livelihoods, and forests: climate impacts and systemic constraints Agriculture remains the backbone of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's rural economy—contributing 30% of provincial GDP and employing 32% of the labour force. KP hosts 45% of Pakistan's forest cover and contributes over 50% to the country's carbon sink—yet receives little recognition or fiscal compensation for its stewardship role. Forest conservation, reforestation, and sustainable land-use initiatives remain underfunded and excluded from federal climate finance frameworks. Beyond the divide: rethinking federal-provincial collaboration for economic transformation—I Despite constitutional devolution, KP lacks the fiscal autonomy and institutional access to key instruments such as green climate funds, carbon markets, and agricultural risk insurance schemes. Without flexible financing, targeted climate adaptation resources, and greater programmatic authority, the province remains constrained in addressing both the short-term needs of farmers and the long-term challenge of climate change. Misaligned policies and data disconnect One of the gravest flaws in Pakistan's fiscal governance is the siloed preparation of budgets. Federal and provincial budgets are formulated in isolation, without integrated data or joint economic planning. Decisions like changes in property taxation, sales tax, etc., are taken unilaterally by the federal government, with little regard for provincial fiscal autonomy or local economic realities. The Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS), central to data generation, remains under federal control—leaving provinces dependent on potentially outdated or misaligned datasets for planning and investment. Rethinking the NFC: misaligned incentives and a disconnected federation The current National Finance Commission (NFC) Award—structured predominantly around population size — has become increasingly disconnected from Pakistan's development needs and federal realities. Provinces like Punjab and Sindh, by virtue of their demographic weight, receive nearly 80% of the divisible pool. In contrast, regions such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, and Azad Jammu & Kashmir — despite facing deeper development deficits, climate vulnerability, and regional instability — remain chronically underfunded. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa exemplifies this imbalance. The province that hosts over 1.5 million Afghan refugees has absorbed the Ex-FATA region without corresponding fiscal adjustment, and accounts for 45% of Pakistan's forest cover. Its vital contributions to national security, environmental preservation, and humanitarian burden-sharing go largely unrecognized in the current NFC formula. By rewarding population growth over economic performance, resilience, or service delivery, the NFC structure not only neglects disadvantaged regions but also distorts provincial incentives. International models—such as Vietnam's capped population shares and performance-linked transfers—offer more equitable frameworks, aligning resource allocation with outcomes rather than demographics alone. Efforts to reform the fiscal compact have been insufficient. KP's National Dialogue on the NFC in February 2025 signaled an intent to revisit the distribution model, but the absence of key federal and provincial actors reflected a broader lack of political will. The debate over vertical and horizontal allocations remains hostage to entrenched interests, especially in larger provinces that dominate federal politics. Federal fiscal policies further compound the imbalance. IMF-mandated surplus targets require provinces to underwrite federal deficits, while unfunded mandates—such as the devolution of higher education, social protection, and climate adaptation—shift responsibilities to provinces without the resources or autonomy to meet them. These gaps between constitutional obligations and fiscal reality are growing wider. If Pakistan is to function as a true federation, the NFC must evolve. A reformed framework should account for provincial contributions to national stability, equity, and long-term development—not just population figures. Until then, regions like KP will continue to carry disproportionate burdens, with limited fiscal space to realize their full potential. Toward a functional federation: empowering provinces, energizing Pakistan Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's experience offers a window into a broader national truth: Pakistan's progress is only as strong as the sum of its provinces. Yet today, provinces are expected to deliver on national priorities without the authority, autonomy, or tools to do so. Fiscal transfers alone are not enough. What Pakistan needs is a new federal compact—one that shifts from control to coordination, from entitlement to performance. The National Finance Commission (NFC) Award must evolve to reward results, resilience, and resource stewardship—not just population size. Provinces should have the power to issue bonds, tap into international climate and diaspora finance, and generate their own revenues. Control over key sectors—energy, minerals, tourism, trade logistics—must be operationally devolved, backed by institutional coordination rather than political gatekeeping. Federal planning must reflect provincial realities, not override them. KP has shown initiative—reforming regulations, attracting investors, and pushing innovation—but its efforts remain stifled by a system that doesn't keep pace. To unlock Pakistan's full potential, we must empower its provinces—not just with mandates, but with the means to lead. Conclusion: expand the pie, don't just fight over slices — unlocking Pakistan's true potential Pakistan's future won't be won by provinces fighting over shrinking slices of a fixed pie or by a federal system that clings to outdated formulas. Instead, real progress will come from expanding the pie—by empowering provinces to unlock their unique strengths, invest boldly, and drive growth that benefits all. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's story is a powerful reminder: it's not a tale of dependency or deficit, but of immense potential held back by an inflexible system. Despite bearing heavy burdens—from hosting millions of refugees to safeguarding nearly half of Pakistan's forests—KP remains shackled by fiscal constraints and limited autonomy. Imagine the possibilities if these provinces were trusted to lead their own growth with the tools and resources they deserve. The National Finance Commission must transform—from a zero-sum contest focused on population numbers to a dynamic framework that rewards innovation, resilience, and results. Provinces should be architects of their own destinies, empowered to build infrastructure, attract investment, and pioneer solutions aligned with national goals. This is not just a fiscal debate—it's a call for a new social contract: a federation that shares opportunities, not just resources; a Pakistan where every province sees itself not as a burden, but as a vital partner in shaping a prosperous, sustainable future. The true test of federalism lies in creating an ecosystem where provinces grow not in spite of the system, but because of it. Reform the structure, and provinces like KP won't just survive—they will thrive and lead Pakistan toward green growth, enhanced regional trade, and lasting unity. The road ahead demands courage and vision. But if Pakistan can embrace a federation that trusts its provinces, values their contributions, and grows the pie together, the promise of inclusive, resilient development will finally be within reach. (Concluded) (The writer is an expert in public policy and finance, focusing on fiscal federalism, economic development, and governance reforms) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store