Colbert Says RFK Jr. Is Not Even Qualified to Work at Jamba Juice
Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night's highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now.
Pet Feed
President Trump's nominee for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., appeared before the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday, where he was questioned about his views on vaccines, abortion and baby onesies sold by an anti-vaccination nonprofit organization he founded in 2016.
Stephen Colbert said, 'If you're alarmed about RFK Jr. becoming our health secretary, there's a good chance you may be a member of his family,' referring to Caroline Kennedy's letter and video urging the Senate to reject her cousin's nomination on the grounds that he's unqualified, and a 'predator.' She also said that he used to enjoy putting baby chickens and mice in a blender to feed his pet hawks.
That behavior is disgusting and cruel, and it completely disqualifies him from working for H.H.S. and for Jamba Juice. Plus, why did he have to blend up food for his hawks? They swallow their prey whole. It's not like they are up their flying around with a Nutribullet. — STEPHEN COLBERT
''He put baby chickens and mice in a blender to feed to his hawks.' And guess what? Not one of the 27 senators on the finance committee asked him about it today. Not one! We've reached the point where these cabinet picks are so nutty, the idea that one of them was making Stuart Little smoothies doesn't even come up.' — JIMMY KIMMEL
'He was putting baby chickens and mice in a blender? And ladies, you thought it was bad when a guy brought you back to his dorm room and busted out a guitar.' — MICHAEL KOSTA
'Now, I'm not sure her statement will have much sway because, first of all, blending food — that's just how you feed a hawk. If you've ever looked at their nests, you'll see they always have a little NutriBullet right in there.' — MICHAEL KOSTA
'Basically, if there's an animal corpse anywhere in America, RFK Jr. is probably involved.' — MICHAEL KOSTA
'Well, that explains why he lost the job at Jamba Juice.' — JIMMY KIMMEL
The Punchiest Punchlines (Unqualified Kennedy Edition)
'Another weird day in Washington today where a man who does not believe in medical science may soon be in charge of medical science.' — JIMMY KIMMEL
'Health and Human Services Secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testified today before the Senate Finance Committee. In related news, the Senate Finance Committee now has rubella.' — SETH MEYERS
'Yep, RFK Jr. was tested, and he came back positive for everything.' — JIMMY FALLON
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Unfixable FEMA puts the ‘disaster' into ‘disaster recovery'
We thought reform was possible. We were wrong. We were brought to Puerto Rico to fix FEMA's broken disaster recovery processes after Hurricane Maria struck in 2017. Our team of seven Lean Six Sigma experts — decorated military officers and retired executives — had more than 150 years of combined experience in process improvement across 60 organizations in more than 20 countries, including war zones. FEMA was the only organization our team unanimously deemed unfixable — not because the mission was complex, but because of its toxic mix of incompetence, lack of accountability, and calcified dysfunction. FEMA's three-part mission was extremely simple: assess damage, calculate costs, release funds. Yet two years after Hurricane Maria, only 5 percent to 8 percent of cost estimates had been completed. Recovery had stalled. And instead of admitting failure, FEMA inflated $1.5 billion in project estimates to mislead Congress. At FEMA's Joint Recovery Office near San Juan — with 2,000 to 3,000 staff — the public Wi-Fi password had to be changed because so many employees were streaming Netflix. Damage assessments were routinely fabricated. 'It's easier,' one staffer told us. When we reported it, investigators asked, 'Did anyone take the money?' We said no. They lost interest. It got worse. FEMA approved leasing $46 million in pumps that could have been bought for $4 million. A whistleblower who reported this later died under suspicious circumstances — his body was cremated without an autopsy, despite requests for a forensic review. FEMA's response? Nothing. At the core was FEMA's unique DEI mandate: 80 percent of positions had to be filled locally, regardless of qualifications. Only 25 percent of residents were fluent in English, and fewer than one-third held college degrees. This created a woeful mismatch between mission needs and personnel. The federal coordinating officer had told us, 'I wish I had retired execs who just want to do the right thing.' We recruited just such a team, but we were then sidelined during our time in Puerto Rico from July 2018 to June 2019, largely due to discrimination. Merit was irrelevant. FEMA handed its critical improvement program to a young woman who epitomized quota-driven hiring. Enrolled in law school, she unabashedly prioritized classes over work, failed our Lean Six Sigma training, tried to steal test material, and colluded with the prime contractor to dilute requirements. We reported her, but she was protected. We faced relentless discrimination for being 'the straight old white guys.' Some managers mocked us in Spanish. FEMA's Equal Employment Opportunity office 'lost' our complaints five times. The lead counselor was fired the day before the investigation was set to begin. Discrimination was later confirmed by FEMA's Office of Professional Responsibility, but the findings were suppressed for six years. When we filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the report, FEMA redacted it entirely — including the page numbers. We brought our findings to Congress and the Inspector General but were ignored. Freedom of Information requests were stonewalled. FEMA's Freedom of Information office withheld records — even from Congress. That's not incompetence — it's obstruction. After exhausting every avenue — facing retaliation, smear campaigns, and sabotage — we filed lawsuits. Seven are now active, three of them naming FEMA. They were filed just before the statutes of limitations expired, only because FEMA's Whistleblower Protection Unit, Equal Employment Opportunity office, and Freedom of Information teams delayed resolution for years. Legal costs now exceed $700,000 — and we haven't even set foot in court yet. The strategy is attrition: Bury the truth in paperwork and delay. It is now 2025, and Puerto Rico's recovery remains incomplete. Its power grid is fragile. Two near-total blackouts in six months confirmed what we already knew: FEMA failed — and still is failing. In a real national emergency, FEMA will not be the answer. U.S. Northern Command, the National Guard, the Defense Logistics Agency, and hardened continuity-of-government military sites like Cheyenne Mountain and Raven Rock are the real backstops — not FEMA bureaucrats. Even in routine disasters, FEMA doesn't do the heavy lifting during the response. That falls to the Army Corps of Engineers, local EMS, and the Red Cross. In recovery, FEMA behaves like a bloated, poorly run insurance company — slow to pay, hostile to oversight, and incapable of learning. We have kept fighting because this isn't about FEMA's image. It is about lives. Americans are being failed by a $33 billion bureaucracy that delivers PowerPoints instead of progress. FEMA doesn't go to where the work happens, embrace problems, or fix them. Rather, it hides failures, punishes dissent, and rewards mediocrity. In FEMA's culture, the nail that sticks up doesn't just get hammered back down — it gets audited, reassigned, or made to disappear. It embodies the very things the Lean Six Sigma management approach was intended to eliminate — overburden, waste, and unevenness. If FEMA were a company, it would be bankrupt. If a military unit, it would be relieved of command. Instead, it limps along—propped up by Cold War nostalgia and D.C. inertia. President Trump has spoken of dismantling it. He cannot do it soon enough. He should devolve emergency operations to the states via block grants. Let the military handle large-scale logistics. Bring back transparency, urgency, and accountability. It can't happen overnight, of course, but it must begin. States must be gradually and strategically weaned — both operationally and financially — from FEMA's central role in disaster recovery. This phased approach should prioritize high-aid, high-frequency states, based on disaster frequency and severity. States facing similar risks should form regional pacts to share resources and coordinate surge response. This starts with honest assessments of each state's disaster history, capacity, and capability gaps. It includes inventories of personnel, materiel, and clearly defined responsibilities. States should formalize mutual-aid agreements to offset localized shortfalls. And FEMA reservists should be retained in a modified form to provide flexible, rapid-deployment surge staffing when disasters exceed state capacity. We used to joke that if you sent FEMA managers out to get you a Big Mac and a Coke, they'd come back with a kitten, a pincushion, a harmonica — and not a single receipt. When the next real emergency hits, FEMA won't save anyone. Americans deserve better than the bureaucratic cosplay we witnessed when we tried in vain to fix. It is not ending FEMA, but continuing to fund FEMA that is radical. Barry Angeline, a retired business executive, led the FEMA Lean Six Sigma effort in Puerto Rico. Col. Dan McCabe (U.S. Army, Ret.), two-time Bronze Star recipient, served as a senior consultant for FEMA Lean Six Sigma in Puerto Rico. Both are federal whistleblowers. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republicans look for reset on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is looking for a reset and to build momentum on President Trump's big, beautiful bill after it struggled through a tough week on Capitol Hill. Trump's July 4 deadline for signing the bill is slipping away as GOP senators battle each other over spending cuts and other issues in the House-passed bill. But Thune wants to get the legislation back on track by convening small working groups to hash out key components of the bill, according to Republicans familiar with his plan. Thune is hoping to build enough momentum in the Senate's various committees that the components of the bill come together in a grand compromise by the end of the month. But rank-and-file senators who have some of the strongest objections to the legislation have yet to see key pieces of text. And Elon Musk's scathing criticism of the bill as a 'mountain of disgusting pork' is creating political headwinds for the legislation. A GOP senator familiar with Thune's strategy says he will break out portions of the bill to Senate Republican working groups in an effort to make progress on the sections that face the strongest objections — such as nearly $800 billion in spending reductions for Medicaid and $267 billion in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). 'Thune's going to do the same thing he did for other things where folks have deeper issues. He'll put small groups together. No one is going to be able to say they weren't listened to,' the GOP senator said. Thune's plan to involve a broader swath of his caucus in negotiations on a must-pass bill is a departure from former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who tended to keep the details of major deals close to the vest until shortly before he unveiled them, the senator said. Senate Republicans control 53 seats and can afford only three defections and still pass the bill. No Democrat is expected to support it, and it is not subject to a filibuster. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told GOP colleagues at a meeting last week the bill already faces two likely Republican 'no' votes. Thune told The Hill that he wants to inject fresh momentum into the bill next week and move at 'full speed' toward Trump's July 4 deadline, even though he told GOP colleagues privately earlier this year that getting the legislation to Trump's desk by the August recess is a more realistic target. 'We're continuing to have meetings with groups and committees,' he said. 'Full speed ahead, a lot of conversations, getting everybody comfortable.' The biggest obstacle the bill faces is that many Republican senators are demanding more deficit reduction but a group of lawmakers, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), are objecting to the biggest deficit-reduction in the bill currently: Hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid spending cuts. This has Republican senators looking for new strategies to further reduce the deficit without cutting more deeply into Medicaid or SNAP. The latest proposal that has interest from several members of the Senate Finance Committee, including Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), is a proposal to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in the Medicare Advantage program. Cassidy has a bipartisan proposal cosponsored by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) to crack down on 'upcoding,' a practice whereby insurance companies bill Medicare for additional diagnoses that may not be medically necessary or urgent. The proposal could raise as much as $275 billion over 10 years. Marshall said he's getting 'a huge number of complaints about Medicare Advantage from our seniors,' a big increase in dissatisfaction compared to just four years ago. 'Now many, many seniors call and say they feel like they've been taken [advantage of.] They can't see the doctor they want to, no one told them that. They can't go to the hospital [around] town. There's been a lot of fly-by-night Medicare Advantage programs coming in to take care of people. I think it's a huge problem,' Marshall said. Medicare Advantage plans have a financial incentive to make beneficiaries appear sicker than they might be because they are paid based on the health of an individual patient. Some Republicans, however, are pushing back hard on the idea of turning to Medicare for spending cuts, even if they are intended to address what proponents call 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'I hear talk about Medicare, which I think is insane,' Hawley said. 'I don't like the idea of that at all.' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), meanwhile, is floating a proposal for the Federal Reserve to stop paying interest on bank reserves, a practice that Congress implemented during the 2008 financial crisis to stabilize the banking sector. 'For most of the history of the Federal Reserve, they did not pay interest on reserves held by banks. And then in 2008 Congress changed the law and they spend roughly spend roughly $100 billion a year. And so eliminating that would save a trillion dollars over 10 years,' he said. Cruz said the idea is 'certainly under discussion' as part of the search for new proposals to improve the big, beautiful bill's budget score. Senate Republican leaders say the House-passed bill would reduce spending by $1.6 trillion over the next decade but a group of Republican senators want to get that number closer to $2 trillion. Thune has met in small groups with GOP colleagues to discuss their concerns with Medicaid reforms and lawmakers say they're happy with the level of engagement so far. Moran, who warned on the floor earlier this year, that he could not support Medicaid changes that imperil the fiscal health of rural hospitals, said he doesn't think the bill will need to be marked up as long as he continues to have solid input with the negotiators. 'I don't expect the bill to be the House bill. And we'll work to put our priorities in front of the Finance and Budget Committees to see what kind of success' we can have in making changes, Moran said. 'There's lots of places I have issues.' He said he has concerns about reforms to health care provider taxes, which states have used to draw more federal Medicaid funding. Republicans are uncomfortable with the latest Congressional Budget Office estimate that changes to Medicaid and subsidies under the Affordable Care Act could cause an estimated 10.9 million Americans to lose health care coverage. Collins, Murkowski and Moran have also raised concerns about cuts to SNAP and the effort to shift more of the administrative costs of the programs onto states. Murkowski, Moran, Sen. Thom Tillis, Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( meanwhile, are raising objections to the quick phaseout of renewable energy tax breaks in the House bill. Capito is concerned about House language that would phase out federal tax support for the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub in West Virginia if construction doesn't get underway by the end of this year. 'You have to be under construction by 2025, the end of this year. Our hydrogen hub cannot be under construction by that time. So it's problematic for us. It'll be a lot of jobs and a lot of energy-for-the-future types of opportunities for our state. I'm trying to work with other folks who have difficulties with this,' Capito said. Republican senators say the House-passed bill can't get a majority vote in the Senate without significant changes and predict it will take a lot of negotiating before it comes to the floor. 'It's a work in progress,' said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), an adviser to the Senate GOP leadership team. 'We don't have as thin a margin as the House, but we got to get to 51.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate Republicans Plan to Release Major Revisions to Trump's Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) -- Senate Republicans intend to propose revised tax and health-care provisions to President Donald Trump's $3 trillion signature economic package this week, shrugging off condemnations of the legislation by Elon Musk as they rush to enact it before July 4. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Senator Calls for Closing Troubled ICE Detention Facility in New Mexico The Senate Finance Committee's plan to extract savings from the Medicaid and — perhaps — Medicare health insurance programs could depart in key respects from the version of the giant bill that narrowly passed the US House in May. The release of the panel's draft will likely touch off a new round of wrangling between fiscal conservatives and moderates. As the debate unfolds, businesses in the energy, health care, manufacturing and financial services industries will be watching closely. SALT Dilemma A crucial decision for Majority Leader John Thune, Committee Chairman Mike Crapo and other panel members will be how to handle the $40,000 limit on state and local tax deductions that was crucial to passage of the bill in the House. Senate Republicans want to scale back the $350 billion cost of increasing the cap from $10,000 to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000. House Speaker Mike Johnson and a group of Republican members from high-tax states have warned that any diminishing of the SALT cap would doom the measure when it comes back to the House for a final vote. At the same time, so-called pass-through businesses in the service sector are pushing to remove a provision in the House bill that limits their ability to claim SALT deductions. The Senate Finance Committee is widely expected to propose extending three business tax breaks that expire after 2029 in the House version to order to make them permanent. They are the research and development deduction, the ability to use depreciation and amortization as the basis for interest expensing and 100% bonus depreciation of certain property, including most machinery and factories. Manufacturers and banks are particularly eager to see all of them extended. To pay for the items, which most economists rank as the most pro-growth in the overall tax bill, senators may restrict temporary breaks on tips and overtime, which Trump campaigned on during last year's election in appeals to restaurant and hospitality workers. The White House wants to keep those provisions as is. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump 'supports changing' the SALT deduction and it's up to lawmakers to reach a consensus. 'It's a horse trading issue with the Senate and the House,' Hassett said Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation. 'The one thing we need and the president wants is a bill that passes, and passes on the Fourth of July.' Earlier: Trump Tax Bill Set to Damp Solar Power Buildout, Hammer Wind The committee will also face tough decisions on green energy tax credits. Scaling those back generates nearly $600 billion in savings in the House bill. On Friday, rival House factions released dueling statements. The conservative House Freedom Caucus warned that any move to restore some of the credits would prompt its members to vote against the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: If the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' the group said. In contrast, a group of 13 Republican moderates, led by Pennsylvania's Brian Fitzpatrick and Virginia's Jen Kiggans, urged senators to make changes that would benefit renewable energy projects, many in Republican districts, that came about through President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. 'We remain deeply concerned by several provisions, including those which would abruptly terminate several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction,' the lawmakers said in a letter to the Senate. Banks are especially interested to ensure that tax credits on their balance sheets as part of renewable energy financing aren't rendered worthless by the bill. Health-Care Perils Medicaid and Medicare cuts present the most daunting challenge in the committee's draft. While Republicans are generally in favor of new work requirements for able-bodied adults to be insured by Medicaid, some moderates like Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have expressed concern over giving states just a year and a half to implement the requirement. House provisions instituting new co-pays for Medicaid recipients and limits on the ability of states to tax Medicaid providers in order to increase federal reimbursement payments are more disputed. Senators Josh Hawley of Missouri and Jim Justice of West Virginia have said they oppose these changes. To find savings to make up for removing these provisions, Republicans said last week that they are examining whether to put new restrictions on billing practices in Medicare Advantage. Large health insurers that provide those plans would be most affected by such changes. Yet overall, GOP leaders say the tax bill remains on schedule and they expect much of the House bill to remain intact. The Senate's rules-keeper is in the process of deciding whether some provisions are not primarily fiscal in nature. Provisions that restrict state regulations on artificial intelligence, ending some gun regulations and putting new limits on federal courts are seen as most vulnerable to being stripped under Senate budget rules. Lawmakers are largely taking their cues from Trump and sticking by the $3 trillion bill at the center of the White House's economic agenda. Musk, the biggest political donor of the 2024 campaign, has threatened to help defeat anyone who votes for the legislation, but lawmakers seem to agree that staying in the president's good graces is the safer path to political survival. 'We are already pretty far down the trail,' Thune told reporters on Thursday afternoon as his colleagues left for the weekend. The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? America Cast Itself as the World's Moral Leader. Not Anymore ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
