Why a Michigan man waited over a month in the hospital for stroke rehab
'Almost immediately they started telling me that the No. 1 most important thing now is to as quickly as possible get me into what they call acute rehab,' said Karadell, 58, of Howell, Michigan. 'They used words like, 'This is crucial. This is essential to your recovery.''
But after 11 days in a hospital bed with no word on when he'd be transferred to the facility, Karadell said he learned his health insurer, Aetna, had denied coverage for what's known as acute post-stroke rehabilitation.
What followed was a weekslong back-and-forth between Aetna and the hospital, University Hospital in Ann Arbor — including phone calls, bureaucratic delays and miscommunication, according to a Michigan Medicine spokesperson, an Aetna spokesperson and hospital case notes reviewed by NBC News.
More than a month after Karadell's stroke, he said he essentially gave up and left the hospital to go to a less-intensive rehab program, a downgrade from what his care team consistently recommended throughout his hospital stay.
'I'm left with what I believe is permanent damage,' Karadell said. 'And I'm left to wonder: Could it have been different if they would have approved what they should have done?'
In a statement, an Aetna spokesperson said the circumstances surrounding Karadell's denied claim are 'complex' and the insurer's ability to process claims and appeals is 'dependent on the timeliness and comprehensiveness of the information we receive from the provider.'
'We understand the frustration whenever there is a health care process that is complicated or does not meet a member's expectations,' the spokesperson said. 'Even though the vast majority of experiences are managed smoothly, our company strives to partner with healthcare providers to make sure each member receives what's expected every time.'
The spokesperson added, 'as we are not in the hospital with this patient, we expect our providers to partner with us and play an active role in conveying important clinical information to us that we would not otherwise have.'
Karadell's experience, however, is far from unique: A nationwide survey of more than 1,300 insured adults found over a third — 36% — had had at least one claim denial, said Miranda Yaver, an assistant professor in the department of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh who conducted the survey. Almost 60% of those patients, she said, went on to have the same claim denied multiple times. Half of the people who were denied ended up postponing their care.
If you are dealing with bills that seem to be out of line or a denial of coverage, care or repairs, whether for health, home or auto, please email us at Costofdenial@nbcuni.com.
What appears to have happened to Karadell can be best described as 'rationing care by inconvenience,' said Yaver, who wasn't involved with Karadell's case.
It's a tactic, she believes, that health insurers use to limit spending. By making the process of getting coverage difficult — either through paperwork, repeated denials or a complex appeal process — they count on doctors and patients giving up.
'It's not that you're never going to get the approval, but it ends up being this endurance contest and administrative burden,' she said. 'And it's really overwhelming, especially because when we're navigating these things, it's not on our best day, it's on our worst.'
'Discharge has been delayed'
Some form of rehab is recommended for all patients after a stroke, according to the American Stroke Association.
The program recommended for Karadell — known as acute post-stroke rehabilitation — is typically for patients who still have significant difficulties, such as trouble walking, feeding themselves or bathing but are medically stable enough to tolerate therapy, said Dr. Nneka Ifejika, chief scientific officer at Ochsner Health System in New Orleans and an ASA national volunteer expert. Ifejika was not involved in Karadell's care.
In a hospital note dated June 8, 2024, two days after he was admitted, Karadell was described as still having significant difficulty getting dressed, bathing, brushing his teeth and using the bathroom on his own. He also required some help eating meals. He had dizziness and intense pain in his neck. His wife, Emily Steiner, also said he had vision and speech problems. The note said he was doing well with the therapy he was getting at the hospital but recommended a more intensive program.
'Progressing well in therapy, will greatly benefit from multidisciplinary rehab at IPR [inpatient post-acute rehabilitation] to facilitate maximal independence in ADLs [activities of daily living] and functional mobility prior to return home,' the note said.
Ifejika said that it's critically important for stroke patients to start rehab as early as possible because delays can lead to worse health outcomes, including long-term disability.
The longer a stroke patient is bedridden, the more their physical ability and mobility decline, she said. Extensive stays in the hospital can also lead to increased risk of falls or getting an infection, she said. (In Karadell's case, his wife said, it also took a mental toll, as he had trouble sleeping due to noise and patients sharing the room.)
Ifejika said she typically starts patients in rehab within two to three days of a stroke. 'They go directly from the hospital to the rehab facility, whether it be a freestanding rehab facility or a hospital-based rehab facility,' she said.
The hospital spokesperson said the hospital's admissions coordination submitted a prior authorization request for Karadell's intensive rehab on June 12.
On June 17, Aetna denied the coverage, saying that clinical documentation hadn't been submitted, the hospital spokesperson said. The spokesperson added that the insurer did not offer an opportunity for a hospital physician to speak to a doctor from the insurance company about the request, a process known as a peer-to-peer review. An Aetna spokesperson said it would have provided a peer-to-peer review if the hospital had requested it.
The hospital submitted an expedited appeal that day, the hospital spokesperson and Steiner said. An Aetna spokesperson said the hospital's appeal was not submitted as 'expedited.'
That same day, a hospital note said that Karadell was 'significantly below baseline of function,' adding: 'Recommend IPR to progress independence in ADLs.' In a second note also dated June 17, a doctor wrote: 'Today, discussed with patient will continue to work on IPR admission. He states he is frustrated with how long it has taken but hoping to begin therapies soon.'
One week later, however, Karadell was still in the hospital. 'Discharge has been delayed by rejected insurance authorization despite our strong medical recommendation for discharge to IPR,' a doctor wrote in a June 24 note.
Two days later, on June 26, a hospital note said: 'He and wife continue to voice their frustration regarding the insurance-related delays.'
In the days that followed, the hospital said Aetna denied the approval for a second time.
Subacute care
On June 30, nearly 30 days after Karadell's stroke, Aetna said it approved the intensive rehab, but the hospital spokesperson said they didn't receive the approval until July 5, a Friday. That Monday, the hospital said it contacted Aetna to confirm the approval but learned it had expired the day before. At that point, Karadell gave up and opted to get less intensive rehab closer to home — an option that his care team had been considering as a backup and had already been authorized. (Aetna said it had canceled the intensive rehab approval because of the hospital's request to send Karadell to a less-intensive program, as the two requests were mutually exclusive.)
Ifejika said that so-called subacute care, which is often provided at an outside facility, such as a nursing home or assisted living facility, is easier to get insurance approval for because it's less expensive.
However, she added, studies show it comes with a higher risk of hospital readmission compared to acute rehab.
'Sending them to a skilled nursing facility is actually doing them a disservice,' she said.
Steiner said the assisted living facility Karadell went to only had a part-time physical therapist, and he was doing less rehab than he had been doing at the hospital.
At one point, he said, he needed help getting up to use the bathroom but couldn't get assistance and ended up falling.
'That was quite frankly awful,' Steiner said. 'None of this I knew at the time, really how significant of a difference it was going to be.'
Karadell left the facility after about two weeks. Though he could have stayed longer, 'I wanted to go home so desperately,' he said.
Karadell was also left with a bill for more than $150,000 marked 'pending' in his hospital file, the result of his extended stay. When NBC News recently asked the hospital about the bill, a spokesperson said it had been going back and forth with Aetna over how much would be covered. Aetna paid around $37,000 and the hospital wrote off the rest.
Prior authorization
Health insurers have pledged to take steps to streamline the often-criticized prior authorization process for approving claims.
In June, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the country's largest health insurers had promised to take steps to reform prior authorization, including quicker approvals and reducing the number of medical services subject to the rule.
Health insurers have made similar commitments in the past, including in 2018 and again in 2023. Many failed to implement such reforms.
Dr. Adam Gaffney, a critical care physician and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, said more fundamental reform, likely from Congress, will be needed to address the health care barriers imposed by insurance companies.
Yaver, of the University of Pittsburgh, said many doctors — and patients — agree that reform is needed.
In more than 100 interviews with doctors, Yaver said many had stated that the prior authorization process had gotten more difficult over the years, not easier.
'On the physician side, this requires a lot of time and staffing,' she said. 'Some of them attribute this to contributing to burnout.'
On the patient side it 'destabilizes their health and economic lives,' she added.
Karadell — who says he still has numbness in his legs, back, face and feet and struggles with simple tasks, like climbing stairs and reaching for the remote — said the experience 'changed my life forever.'
'I always have to watch my step,' he said. 'When I leave the house and I go to the store or to go get something to eat, I have to watch the ground because I'm scared of falling.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GE HealthCare (GEHC) Introduces AI-Powered Digital X-Ray System
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) is one of the 11 Best Under-the-Radar Stocks to Buy Right Now. On July 24, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) announced the commercial launch of a new advanced digital X-ray system called Definium Pace Select ET. This floor-mounted digital X-ray system is designed to offer high-image quality and increased efficiency in highly demanding environments. hin255/ According to the report by GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC), the Definium Pace Select ET automates manual, repetitive tasks and reduces physical strain on technologists. The system leverages AI to make sure patients are positioned accurately while also providing consistent image quality across various clinical conditions. It makes the technologist's work easier and improves the experience for patients. This new system is built on GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GEHC) trusted Definium platform. It offers advanced automation and workflow features on a flexible, floor-mounted system with an elevating table, in-room exam control, and a user-friendly interface to help technologists. GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GEHC) is a global medical technology company that provides digital infrastructure, data analytics, and decision support tools to help in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients. While we acknowledge the potential of GEHC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Best Revenue Growth Stocks to Buy Now and 14 Best Aggressive Growth Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Medscape
3 minutes ago
- Medscape
Long-Term Use of Metformin May Prevent AMD in Diabetes
SOURCE: The study was led by Alexander T. Hong of the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. It was published online Aug. 11, 2025, in Ophthalmology Retina . LIMITATIONS: Due to its retrospective design, the study could not show if taking metformin was actually protecting against AMD. There may have been coding errors and missing information as electronic health records data were used. The cohort analysis only included patients with annual health encounters for 5 years prior to the second eye care visit, potentially excluding those who changed institutions or had gaps in care. DISCLOSURES: The study was partly supported by grants from the National Eye Institute, Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, and All May See Foundation, Inc. One author disclosed receiving consulting fees and having personal financial interests with certain organizations unrelated to this study. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. Lead image: The National Institute of Health


CNN
4 minutes ago
- CNN
Remember ‘The Biggest Loser'? Docuseries ‘Fit for TV' explores the harm the show did in the name of health
Millions of Americans watched for 18 seasons as people pushed their bodies to the limits physically, ate as few calories as possible, and underwent sometimes mortifying challenges to be crowned 'The Biggest Loser.' It was discomfort worth grappling with for a shot at better health and a new life, many of the contestants said. But 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser,'' a Netflix docuseries premiering Friday, suggests that the cultural phenomenon may not have been healthy for the contestants or the country at large. When creating the new show, filmmakers asked themselves whether 'The Biggest Loser' was, in fact, part of an industry promoting health and wellness in the United States, said Skye Borgman, the director of the docuseries. 'Everybody always wants a magic bullet that's real. And the thing about magic bullets — they're never real.' 'Fit for TV: The Reality of 'The Biggest Loser'' investigates how the highly popular show affected the contestants and conversations around health. The docuseries also explores the implications of so many viewers being willing to watch –– and sometimes laugh at –– people attempting to lose weight. 'It was such a huge phenomenon and absolutely reflected and perpetuated some of the really harmful messages around weight and weight loss,' said Dr. Rebecca Pearl, associate professor of clinical and health psychology at the University of Florida. In a show claiming to transform people's health, what did the contestants' regimens look like? Men were advised to cut their calories down to 1,500 to 2,000 per day and women to 1,200 per day, said Dr. Robert Huizenga, physician on 'The Biggest Loser,' in the series. But sometimes, trainers might have recommended as few as 800 calories daily, he added. The amount of exercise was also intense, sometimes spanning eight hours a day, former contestant Danny Cahill said in the docuseries. The series showed clips of contestants dropping to the floor from a treadmill run, many people vomiting in the gym, and instances when caffeine pills were utilized to curb appetite. 'There's not any way that an entertaining show and a health show can 100% exist together. … One of them is always going to take the lead,' Borgman said. 'In the case of 'The Biggest Loser,' I feel like the entertainment value of the show far outran the health aspects of the show.' An extreme diet and exercise regimen is associated with significant health risks, Pearl said. Losing too much weight too quickly or not getting enough calories can lead to gallbladder complications, muscle loss and nutritional deficits, she said. Overexercising can result in heart problems, dehydration and injury –– which also prevents people from maintaining healthy behaviors. Eating a balanced diet and getting movement in your day is generally good for health, but the punishing approach to food and exercise showcased on 'The Biggest Loser' also worked against long-term health-promoting activities, Pearl added. 'One predictor and one recommendation for engaging in physical activity long term is to find an activity you enjoy,' she said. 'The kind of grueling, suffering activity that was shown on that show is not setting someone up to build a healthy, positive relationship with physical activity or with their body.' One theme that may have kept viewers coming back to the show was the hope that someone could make a dramatic, lasting change to their body. But a weight loss transformation that stood the test of time wasn't always necessarily the result even in 'The Biggest Loser,' Borgman said. A 2017 study following 14 contestants in the years after 'The Biggest Loser' wrapped found that many regained much or all the weight they had lost over the course of the show. The return of the weight makes sense, said Dr. Larissa McGarrity, clinical psychologist in physical medicine and rehabilitation at University of Utah Health. The degree of calorie restriction and intensity of exercise were at levels that neither the contestants nor the viewers could implement at home in a realistic way, she said. Also, the amount of weight lost from week to week was extreme. At times, show participants were losing up to double digits at each weekly weigh in. Experts tend to recommend a sustainable weight loss rate of 1 to 2 pounds per week, McGarrity said — adding that the best guidance is to utilize the methods you can keep up long-term. 'The answer instead is probably, 'how do I slowly make changes in my life that help me to get in the right nutrients to help my body feel good? How do I move in a way that will allow my body and mind to feel at its best over time?'' she said. 'Making too many changes at once tends to not go well for most people from a psychological or behavioral standpoint.' Even if viewers at home could implement the stringent protocol followed by 'The Biggest Loser' contestants, research suggests metabolic changes from the dramatic weight loss depicted on the show made it harder to keep the weight off. Six years after contestants were on the show, the 14 studied on average still had a slower metabolisms, even if they had regained about two-thirds of the weight they had lost, according to the study. Their bodies were naturally burning fewer calories throughout the day and increasing hunger cues. 'It essentially means that keeping the weight off long term is nearly impossible without continued extreme measures over many years, because your body will fight against you to maintain that weight or defend that weight at that initially higher level,' McGarrity said. Often interwoven into 'The Biggest Loser' –– from coaches, in depictions of bodies, and in the audience interactions –– was a lot of shame, McGarrity said. The format supported a myth around weight: that the size of a person's body is totally under their control, and having a larger body is a sign of lack of willpower or moral failing, she said. That myth ignores the realities of things like genetics, environment and individual metabolisms, and it paves the way for denigration and callousness, she said. 'Cruelty, verbal abuse, sort of indirect physical abuse, in terms of being forced to really torture your body in unhealthy ways –– there was a sense that if you're in a larger body, you deserve this,' said Oona Hanson, a parent coach who specializes in helping families navigate diet culture and eating disorders. 'It made us participate as viewers in kind of like a pity or even disgust response in terms of the way people's bodies were portrayed, in the way they talked about their bodies,' she added. The docuseries showed just how dehumanizing or degrading those images could be, with cameras shaking as contestants fell to make it look like they caused an earthquake or challenges asking contestants to carry whole loaves of bread in their mouths. 'Without really being completely aware of it, the show succeeded in making fun of fat people,' Borgman said. Some contestants did say that they found empowerment and representation in being part of a competition in which they succeeded in goals and accomplished physical feats, she added. But it isn't hard to find a clip from 'The Biggest Loser' in which contestants are put in disparaging situations, Pearl added. Content that stigmatizes the size of a person's body and emphasizes thinness at all costs impacts not just the contestants, but also the viewers at home, Hanson said. It's hard for those viewers not to internalize those negative stereotypes, affecting how people see their communities and themselves. 'The Biggest Loser' may have been canceled years ago, but 'Fit for TV' shares that the reality show's lasting influence underscores the fact that the United States has not elevated the way people talk about weight and bodies, Borgman added. 'We as a culture feel like we're super evolved. … We don't judge. We take people for who they are,' she said. 'I don't think that's true at all. So, I hope people walk away from this series and look at themselves a little bit more and how we treat people.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.