
MNS reaches out to Prakash Mahajan after his public outburst on not being invited to party conclave in Nashik
The MNS has organised a three-day state conclave at Igatpuri in Nashik district. The conclave assumes significance in the wake of the reunion of estranged brothers Uddhav Thackeray, president of Shiv Sena (UBT), and MNS chief Raj Thackeray.
While Raj Thackeray was determined to give a bold message in the conclave and ascertain the majority view within the organisation over truce and political alliance between Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS, senior leader Prakash Mahajan expressed his displeasure with the organisation in public on Tuesday.
Prakash Mahajan, who is the brother of slain BJP leader and former Union Minister Pramod Mahajan, hails from Beed district in Marathwada region. Unlike his high-profile brother, Prakash Mahajan maintains a low profile but is known for his blunt nature.
He has been associated with the MNS, which was founded by Raj Thackeray in March 2006 after leaving undivided Shiv Sena which was then led by late Bal Thackeray.
However, the party's decision to skip his name from the conclave disappointed him. 'Is a spokesperson's post so insignificant? What face do I have in public if my party and leadership don't value my work,' he said.
'There is Diwali in party and darkness in my home. I cannot face my own people. However, irrespective of the treatment that has been meted out to me, my loyalty remains with the party and Raj Thackeray,' said Mahajan.
Taking cognizance of Mahajan's unrest, MNS leader Bala Nandgaonkar reached out to him and assured to address his concerns.
This is not the first time Prakash Mahajan is complaining about MNS. In the past, he faced the threat of expulsion from the party for 'anti-party' activities—a charge he had strongly refuted as baseless.
In July 2009, Mahajan joined Shiv Sena led by Uddhav Thackeray alleging that MNS had declined to a group where only a handful people hold sway and that the party lacked vision for Maharashtra. However, his stint in the Shiv Sena was shortlived and he returned to the MNS within a couple of years.
Prakash Mahajan has often created a flutter with his public outbursts. In June 2025, he wrote letter to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis alleging that followers of Union Minister Narayan Rane were threatening him with abusive calls and sought protection.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Suspended for media byte, IIT-B pupil to be reinstated
Mumbai: IIT-Bombay must reinstate a Ph D student who had been suspended in April this year for 'giving unauthorised interviews to the media'. Bombay high court has said this in an order passed on July 15. The court said that the suspension will cease to have effect from July 25 and the period of suspension undergone will not have any bearing on the record of the petitioner. An official from the institute said they would follow the court's order. The student, Akshay Sawant, from department of humanities and social sciences, was suspended for eight months based on a report of the institute's fact-finding committee and disciplinary action committee. He moved court seeking quashing of the suspension order, stating that the charges levelled were unfounded and misplaced and the action taken against him was based on 'false, unreasonable and arbitrary charges'. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai In an article published in a newspaper in February, Sawant was quoted as saying, 'Every festival is celebrated on our campus. There are several Hindu festivals and most of them including Holi, Diwali, Ganesh Chaturthi, are celebrated with much fervour. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The allegations are baseless and merely an attempt to target the department's liberal environment'. The statement was made in the context of the allegations of favouritism against the institute by third parties. The student got a call regarding 'unauthorised interviews given to the media'. The student said in the petition that he did not give consent for the quote to the mediaperson, which he had also submitted before the fact-finding committee. The student received an order on Apr 28, suspending him till Dec 31, 2025, with immediate effect. Even after writing to the institute appealing against the order, there was no response, forcing the student to move court. Disposing of the petition, the court mentioned that the order was passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case so that the academic career of the petitioner should not be jeopardised. The order said he had made the statements in the article in an individual capacity. Ambedkar Periyar Phule Study Circle, a student collective, on Friday said in a statement they were celebrating "victory for students' rights and a pushback against casteist and authoritarian tendencies of the IIT- Bombay administration…"


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Not against Hindi, but against forced imposition: Raj Thackeray
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray on Friday warned the Maharashtra government against imposing Hindi in primary schools (from classes 1 to 5) and threatened to shut down schools if the policy was enforced. He said he was not against any language but would not tolerate compulsion, calling the move an attack on Marathi identity. Referring to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis's latest statement that Hindi would be taught in State schools at any cost, Mr. Thackeray emphasised that everyone living in Maharashtra must learn Marathi. He urged citizens to remain vigilant against what he called an attempt to impose Hindi under the guise of educational reform. Editorial | Language of unity: On Maharashtra and the issue of Hindi 'When they tried to enforce it earlier, we shut down shops. If you [CM] try again to impose Hindi on our schools, we won't just shut shops — we'll shut down schools. I will not make any compromises over Marathi and the people of Maharashtra. Those who live in Maharashtra, to them I would like to say, 'learn Marathi as soon as possible, wherever you go, speak Marathi'.' The comments came in the wake of the BJP-led State government's controversial policy decision — since rolled back — that would have made Hindi mandatory in primary schools. The move drew sharp resistance from regional parties, including the MNS and the Shiv Sena (UBT). Though the government has since revoked the two government resolutions, Mr. Fadnavis recently asserted that the three-language formula would still be implemented, with a committee now tasked with deciding the grade level at which Hindi would be introduced. 'Loses identity' Addressing a rally in Mira Bhayandar, Mr. Thackeray said: 'I can speak better Hindi than most politicians in Maharashtra. My father was fluent in it. I am not against any language, but I am against its forced imposition. There is no harm in learning a regional language. There are so many languages in this country, such as Maithili, etc. By imposing Hindi, the regional languages dies eventually and loses its identity, which is the case already in many Hindi speaking States.' The MNS chief accused the BJP of using Hindutva as a cover to promote Hindi dominance, stating, 'This is not nationalism; it is linguistic domination under the garb of religion.' Calling it 'unfortunate' that the Chief Minister of Maharashtra was advocating for compulsory Hindi, Mr. Thackeray questioned the intent behind the move. 'This is not just about language. They are testing the waters. Their long-term goal is to sever Mumbai from Maharashtra and merge it with Gujarat,' he alleged. The MNS chief emphasised the cultural depth of Marathi, claiming it has a 2,500 to 3,000-year-old legacy, compared to Hindi, which he called 'just 200 years old.' He said the government's actions were an affront to Marathi identity and pride. He also referred to historical figures such as Morarji Desai and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, alleging that they held anti-Marathi views after Independence, and urged Maharashtrians to assert themselves by speaking in Marathi in all public and official spaces. 'Wherever you go in Maharashtra, speak in Marathi — and make others speak it too,' he said. Taking a swipe at the BJP Godda (Jharkhand) MP's threat that 'Marathi logon ko hum yahan pe patak patak ke maarenge' [We will thrash Marathi people in our region], Mr. Thackeray strongly retaliated and said, 'I dare you come to Mumbai, and 'Mumbai ke samundar mein hum dubo dubo ke maarenge' [we will drown you in Mumbai's sea].' The rally, which comes days after MNS workers roughed up a shopkeeper for refusing to speak in Marathi, reflects rising tensions over language politics in the State and signals the party's intent to position itself at the forefront of the Marathi pride movement ahead of upcoming political battles.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
In a rare instance, Kolhapur villagers vote out directly elected sarpanch for ‘poor performance'
Kolhapur: Residents of a village in this western Maharashtra district voted out the sarpanch for his "unsatisfactory performances" and "tendency to take unilateral decisions" on Thursday, two years after they had elected him to the post. Officials on Friday confirmed that exercising the right to recall and remove a directly elected sarpanch by the villagers of Kasba Beed was a rare instance in the state. Kasba Beed gram panchayat members were not satisfied with sarpanch Uttam Varute's way of functioning and passed a resolution to move a no-confidence motion against him. In the 2022 election, Varute had won the post of sarpanch by 98 votes. A member of his panel had also successfully contested the poll. However, 10 members of the opposition panel won at the same time. "The opposition was angry with the fact that the post of the sarpanch went to the other panel. Despite this, I ensured that every member is consulted while making decisions over funds. The no-trust motion was politically triggered. They had offered me to resign respectfully, but I faced the motion as I did not do anything wrong," said Varute. Varute is a Shiv Sena worker, while the opposition panel is led by Patil, who is a Congress supporter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Lose Weight at Night – a Teaspoon is Enough Beauty Ideas Read More Undo The Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Amendment) Act, 2017, has a provision of a majority (not less than three-fourths of village panchayat members) can bring in such a resolution. The law states that the no-confidence motion can be brought only after the sarpanch completes two years in office. In accordance with the law, the resolution was passed at a special gram sabha meeting where every resident of the village was eligible to vote. The voting was held in the presence of an official deployed by the district collector. The no-confidence motion was passed with 1,041 people voting in favour of unseating the sarpanch, while 713 were against the motion. Satyajit Patil, who was the first directly elected sarpanch of the village, took the lead in moving the no-trust vote against Varute. He said: "Varute would not take into confidence the village panchayat members while utilising govt funds. This was one of the points of contention." . Subsequently, a section of the gram panchayat members wrote to the tehsildar about their intention to unseat the sarpanch. The meeting to pass the no-trust motion was introduced before the official. Subsequently, district collector Amol Yedge notified an election to get the motion to vote in the gram sabha. The election was accordingly held on Thursday. Datta Kakade, president of Sarpanch Parishad Maharashtra, said: "There are only a handful of cases where a directly elected sarpanch was ousted out of office by re-voting. One of the members from the elected members is chosen to become sarpanch for the remaining two-and-a-half years of the tenure. This provision was added to avoid direct election, which requires money and machinery. The process of direct election of sarpanch has more pros than cons. A directly elected sarpanch represents people's will and does not have to be at the mercy of the local legislator."