When bail becomes a ‘victory': Zimbabwe's dangerous war on journalism continues
Rather, it is likely a begrudging concession to local and international pressure by a regime bent on cowing journalists, and crushing any form of dissent and freedom of expression. It could even be an act sanctioned by an administration that believes that Mhlanga's long and unjustified incarceration has served its purpose of sufficiently intimidating other journalists and showing them the fate that awaits them should they ever diligently exercise their duties of covering and giving a platform to dissenting voices.
Mhlanga was arrested on 24 February 2025 and detained for a staggering 72 days. His supposed crime? Broadcasting his interview with ruling Zanu-PF party Central Committee member and war veteran Blessed Geza, who excoriated President Emmerson Mnangagwa for alleged corruption and gross violation of the constitution, and demanded his resignation. For simply giving a platform to dissenting views — a cornerstone of journalistic duty — Mhlanga was charged under the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act for allegedly 'inciting violence'. His case was investigated not just by the regular police, but by the Counter-Terrorism Unit — a worrisome escalation that reveals the paranoid Zimbabwean government's dangerous conflation of journalism with terrorism.
Why this is important
The context of his arrest is essential. Zimbabwe's government, under Mnangagwa, has steadily intensified its crackdown on dissent. Far from the reformist image he attempted to project after long-serving former president Robert Mugabe's unceremonious 2017 ouster, Mnangagwa has led a regime characterised by the weaponisation of law, suppression of opposition, and an unrelenting assault on press freedom. Mhlanga is just the latest in a long line of journalists subjected to arbitrary arrest, surveillance, physical attacks, and harassment. There is no reason to believe he will be the last.
It took three separate court appearances before Mhlanga was finally granted bail on Tuesday, 6 May 2025 by High Court Judge Gibson Mandaza.
In arriving at his decision, Justice Mandaza cited 'changed circumstances', including the completion of the docket against Mhlanga and the passage of time. Yet these factors existed or were foreseeable from the beginning. Why, then, was bail denied repeatedly beforehand? Why did the courts parrot state claims that his release would 'undermine peace and security' or lead to 'witness interference'?
The judiciary's role in Zimbabwe is increasingly controversial and suspect. Courts are supposed to be independent of other arms of the state. They ought to be bastions of justice and constitutional order. Yet many Zimbabweans now believe that they appear instead to operate as extensions of the executive. The opacity surrounding their decisions — especially in politically charged cases — erodes public trust. In Mhlanga's case, the lack of substantive reasoning behind both the initial bail denials and the eventual approval fuels suspicions of political interference. The timing of the bail, just three days after World Press Freedom Day commemorations, also suggests the regime and the courts may have bowed to rising international condemnation and local civil society pressure.
Abnormality of Zimbabwe's political environment
That Zimbabweans and press freedom advocates around the world must breathe a collective sigh of relief over bail being granted is a testament to the debasement and abnormality of Zimbabwe's legal and political environment. In any functioning democracy, bail is not a privilege to be celebrated — rather, it is a constitutional right. But under Mnangagwa, Zimbabwe has been reduced to a country where even basic liberties are luxuries dispensed by the state in dribs and drabs, very much like the state and its cronies distribute educational opportunities, farming inputs, healthcare and other essential services to a few chosen bootlickers.
Mhlanga is out on bail, but we remain very far from a resolution. This is because the unwarranted charges against him remain in place. The sword still dangles, and the chilling message to other journalists remains the same — do your job at your peril. The broader climate of fear, persecution and repression of journalists, human rights activists and ordinary citizens persists.
The government is not showing any signs of repenting from its nefarious agenda to frame independent journalism as a national security threat. By deploying the Counter-Terrorism Unit in Mhlanga's case, the state sent a loud signal that it no longer distinguishes between terrorism and journalism. This dangerous narrative undermines press freedom and the public's right to information and democratic participation.
Mhlanga's ordeal fits into a broader pattern. Laws such as the Patriotic Act, the Maintenance of Peace and Order Act, and various provisions of the Criminal Law Act are frequently deployed not to maintain order, but to sanitise the persecution of real and imagined dissenters. Unsurprisingly, Zimbabwe has become a nation wherein fear suppresses truth, and repression is enforced through a veneer of legality.
Palpable irony
In all the regime's machinations, there remains a palpable irony that cannot be ignored. Not too long ago, Mnangagwa immensely benefited from a courageous press. When he fell out of favour with Mugabe in 2017, it was the independent media — including Mhlanga — that provided him with a platform to air his views and remain politically relevant. Today, having entrenched himself in power, he has turned against the very institutions that once stood by him. This self-inflicted amnesia shows a leader and a government that is unwilling to tolerate accountability.
Mhlanga may be out of jail for now, but ordinary Zimbabweans, civil society, and media watchdogs must not allow themselves to be placated by this 'victory'. Bail is not freedom. The charges against Mhlanga remain, and they should not. There is no legitimate case to answer. Journalism is not a crime. Conducting interviews is not terrorism. Asking difficult questions or broadcasting dissenting views is not a sedition. To allow these charges to stand is to endorse the regime's dangerous narrative that independent journalism is a threat to national security.
We must remain vigilant because it is Not Yet Uhuru. We must continue the fight for justice. True justice will only be served when the charges against Mhlanga are dropped unconditionally. True justice will only be served when journalists can operate without fear of persecution, and when the legal system upholds its duty to protect, rather than punish, those who seek to inform the public. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
NPA addresses public misinformation in Welkom lawyer's rape case
The National Prosecuting Authority has snubbed out public claims that suggested 'nothing has happened in the matter' of a well-known Welkom lawyer who was convicted on charges of rape and sexual-related offences. Image: File The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has dispelled misinformation regarding the criminal proceedings against rape and sexual offences accused Jan Gysbert Maritz, a well-known attorney from Welkom. According to NPA spokesperson Mojalefa Senokoatsane, the recent 'dissemination of misinformation' was noted with concern and in a statement snubbed out public claims that suggested that 'nothing has happened in the matter' or that 'Maritz has not been found guilty'. In an effort to correct the public record, reinforce understanding of the criminal justice process, and protect the dignity and privacy of the victims, Senokoatsane confirmed that 57-year-old Maritz has, in fact, been convicted of multiple serious sexual offences, including rape, by the High Court of South Africa, Free State Division, Bloemfontein. 'Maritz was charged with 18 counts under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007, as well as an additional count of assault. The sexual offences occurred over a period of seven years, from 2007 to 2014, across the towns of Virginia, Welkom, and Odendaalsrus in the Free State Province. All victims of the sexual offences were under the age of 18 at the time the offences were committed. 'On 17 May 2021, Maritz initially pleaded not guilty. However, on 21 May 2021, he made formal admissions in terms of Section 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, which were accepted by the court. Based on these admissions, the high court convicted him on 16 counts, including three counts of rape and several other counts involving sexual offences against minors,' said Senokoatsane. Following his conviction, Maritz changed his legal representation and appointed Advocate Dawie Joubert SC, who launched two applications: An application for the recusal of the presiding judge, Judge Naidoo, on grounds of alleged bias; and An application to withdraw the Section 220 admissions, which had formed the basis of the conviction. The high court dismissed both applications, affirming that the trial had been conducted fairly and without prejudice. Maritz's recusal application was dismissed by the Supreme Court of Appeal, and subsequently, the Constitutional Court also declined to entertain the matter, effectively exhausting all avenues of appeal regarding the recusal. Maritz's efforts to withdraw his Section 220 admissions have also, to date, been unsuccessful. Maritz is expected to be sentenced on 6 October, in the High Court of South Africa, Free State Division. The court is set to consider imposing the prescribed minimum sentence of life imprisonment. 'The NPA condemns the deliberate spread of misinformation concerning this case. Such actions not only undermine public confidence in the criminal justice system but also risk inflicting further emotional harm and secondary trauma on survivors. The NPA urges all members of the public to refrain from making or disseminating inaccurate statements that may interfere with the proper administration of justice. 'The NPA remains resolute in its constitutional mandate to uphold the rule of law, ensure justice for victims of sexual and gender-based violence, and hold offenders accountable, regardless of their professional or social standing. The Authority will continue to prosecute all matters without fear, favour, or prejudice,' said Senokoatsane. In the denied recusal application, presiding Judge Somaganthie Naidoo refused to recuse herself from the criminal trial. According to the court record, after Maritz was convicted on his guilty plea he was released on bail with certain conditions, pending sentencing proceedings.
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
‘I was in only in grade 8' -Former illegal speaks out as illegal mining deepens in Barberton
BARBERTON - Godfrey Sithole from the National Association of Artisanal Miners was just 13 years old and still in Grade 8 when he first got involved in illegal mining. He says it was desperation that pushed him underground, and a lack of opportunities and jobs in the area. However, this issue, he says, has gone on for years. Sithole believes illegal mining in Barberton has been allowed to thrive for years and partly blames mine management, who he claims are supporting this activity. He says the answer lies in formalising artisanal mining. According to Sithole, that way they can have control of who is part of the activity and to do away with illegal operations. Illegal mining continues to become one of the country's major challenges. It threatens not only the formal mining industry but also economic stability and national security. An estimated 30,000 illegal miners are operating across the country. This raises concerns around law enforcement capacity and effectiveness. Mining analyst Peter Major says the surge in illegal mining activities can be attributed to two things: mainly a rise in gold prices. "The world is producing more gold than it ever has in the history of man, and because of that, the high gold price is driving supply," he said. Another contributing factor is the high unemployment rate. Operations like Vala Umgodi, a coordinated, NATJOINTS police-led initiative was established in 2023 to combat illegal mining and associated crimes across South Africa According to the fourth crime statistics between 2024 to 2025 financial year, 5,282 suspects, with the majority being illegal miners, were arrested through VALA Umgodi. These include 1,242 Zimbabweans, 1,141 Mozambicans, 1,097 South Africans and 658 Basotho nationals. Additionally, the statistics reveal that R2 million in cash and 90 illegal firearms were seized, while 43 trucks that were used in illegal mining operations were also confiscated. While there has been success, Major has little hope in the operation. He argues that instead of eradicating the problem, it drives activities elsewhere. Meanwhile Pan African Resources spokesperson Hethen Hira has noted claims of security guards working with syndicates to support this illegal activity. He says they will investigate that matter.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Trial of trio accused of feeding slain women to pigs stirs outrage for justice in South Africa
The gruesome murder trial of a white farmer and two of his workers accused of dumping the bodies of two women in a pigsty has reignited calls for justice and accountability across South African communities. This internationally watched case has been postponed until next week, and it has already sparked strong reactions from labour and human rights activists. This trial, which began on Monday at the Polokwane High Court, follows the discovery in August 2024 of the decomposed remains of Maria Makgato and Kudzai Ndlovu, found within a pig's enclosure on a farm in Sebayen. The two women were reportedly killed while searching for food on a farm near Polokwane, and their bodies were then allegedly fed to pigs in an attempt to destroy evidence. Their bodies were then alleged to have been given to pigs in an apparent attempt to dispose of the evidence. Pig farmer Zachariah Olivier, as well as farm employees Rudolf De Wet and William Musora, face charges of murder and attempted murder for shooting at Ndlovu's husband, who was with the women at the farm, as well as possession of an unlicensed firearm and obstructing justice. Musora, a Zimbabwean national, is also facing an additional charge under the Immigration Act for allegedly being in the country illegally. De Wet, a 20-year-old, turned State witness when the trial started on Monday, testified that Olivier was the one who shot and killed the two women. Mametlwe Sebei, president of the General Industries Workers Union of South Africa (Giwusa), said the union welcomes the start of the trial, despite the unjustifiable delays that have deepened the pain for the victims' families and farmworkers across the country. He further stated that the horrific crime, killing impoverished Black individuals scavenging for food and leaving their bodies for pigs to consume like refuse, exemplifies the ongoing dehumanisation faced by farmworkers. Sebei noted that this reflects a persistent system of white terror and severe exploitation still prevalent on farms. He emphasised that they are calling for the trial, along with a harsh sentence, to send a clear message that such brutality will not be tolerated in a democratic South Africa. Sebei warned that the case reveals ongoing failures to protect and support farmworkers in rural areas, who remain isolated and vulnerable due to weak government oversight, poor access to unions, and a legacy of exploitation. He stressed the need to address these issues to prevent future abuses. 'Many farmers operate as feudal lords, believing oversight won't reach them. There is a need to send a message and create conditions where this cannot be. 'The case also epitomises how racialised, exploitative labour practices persist 30 years into democracy. Although in this case the victims might not have been workers, the reign of terror they have fallen victim to directly points to the door of this parasitic system of primitive slavery.' Sebei added that while efforts to organise farmworkers, raise awareness of their rights, and provide legal assistance, these initiatives often encounter resistance from farmers who obstruct access to their farms. This challenge is further compounded by government policies that permit such obstructions. He said it' s crucial to build workers' confidence, and I believe this can be achieved through mass campaigns, rural rallies, and strong solidarity from the broader labour movement. The trial was postponed to next week. The Star [email protected]
