
Xi Jinping is losing his grip on China— and Trump can give him a push
Last month I explained in these pages why Xi, China's 'Chairman of Everything' since 2012, might soon be out of power.
Critics scoffed — but on July 2 Beijing announced that Xi, for the first time, would miss this year's BRICS Summit in Brazil.
Xi had long used the annual BRICS meeting as a domestic showpiece for his international leadership, with every Chinese press organ reporting on his summit speeches and activities in multiple front-page stories.
The blanket coverage strengthened Xi's perceived power at home, so the chance that he volunteered to miss this year's BRICS Summit is next to none.
Furthermore, Xi's wife Peng Liyuan has not been seen in public for more than two months, and Ma Xingrui, one of Xi's closest senior allies, was recently 'assigned to another post,' according to state media — that is, removed from his position as Xinjiang Party Secretary.
Both added to a chain of senior Xi loyalists being deposed or dying mysteriously in recent months.
Dictators, like dictatorships, frequently appear unbreakable until they break.
The CIA infamously projected the USSR would hold firm for decades just months before its demise.
The signs were there, but after 70 years of the Soviet Union's survival, even expert analysts were hesitant to predict its imminent collapse.
Like the Soviet Politburo in the 1980s, the CCP's ruling elite now faces severe economic challenges.
A flagging economy, huge outflows of capital, unemployment rates in depression territory and completely unsustainable public and private debt levels are driving deep unrest and even public protests in various regions of China.
If a critical mass of CCP leaders believes their nation cannot afford any more upheaval, they may well be orchestrating a smooth exit for Xi to avoid a messy coup.
Xi, of course, is resisting his political departure — one more reason why Trump must keep up his economic pressure on China.
Trump's tariffs have helped push the Chinese economy into truly dire straits, weakening Xi while upping the odds that his replacement will be more favorable toward US interests.
Xi's disastrous economic, domestic and foreign-policy mistakes of the past few years make it likely that his successor will embrace a governance approach favoring collective leadership and reform, say political insiders in Beijing.
They point to the model of Deng Xiaoping, who followed a similar pattern when cleaning up the many disasters left to him by Mao Zedong.
A change in Chinese leadership could be an unalloyed benefit to the United States and our democratic allies worldwide — given that China today is by far the largest dual-use technology provider to Putin's war machine in Ukraine, the largest supporter of terrorist governments in Asia and the greatest global thief of US intellectual property.
There's little the United States can or should do directly to push Xi out of power — but Trump certainly can encourage positive change in China with several concrete actions.
First, he should get behind the Russian sanctions bill now pending in the Senate and sign it into law — and follow up on his threat to impose 100% 'secondary tariffs' on China and other countries that buy Russian energy.
Both measures would force China to choose between supporting Putin's Ukraine slaughter, or leaving Russia to its failed war and rejoining the civilized nations of our world.
Continuing to partner with Putin in the face of such crippling sanctions would be economic suicide for China, and the absolute end of Xi's regime.
In addition, Trump must escalate the fight against Chinese spies and industrial espionage in the United States and partner nations.
It's no accident that so many of China's newest weapons look and function exactly like their Western counterparts.
Finally, Trump should send clear signals that the United States will welcome new Chinese leadership committed to a peaceful foreign policy, the rule of law and more personal and economic freedoms for its people.
The president loves social media, and so do the Chinese people.
China's 'Great Fire Wall' dramatically limits their access to all but CCP-sponsored information — but it's not foolproof.
Powerful Truth Social posts, emphasizing Trump's deep respect for China's people while highlighting Xi's many failures, in combination with a concerted 'all channels' communications effort, will get through to the CCP elite and to well-educated future leaders.
With each week, the signs grow clearer: The Xi Jinping era is coming to an end.
The United States and our Western allies must prepare for the changes to come in the world's second-largest economy — which now undergirds our biggest global adversaries.
Gregory W. Slayton is a former senior US diplomat, chairman of Slayton Capital and author of 'Portraits of Ukraine a Nation at War.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
a few seconds ago
- News24
Trump administration seeks to release some of Epstein probe material
Trump vowed to sue the Wall Street Journal over a report linking him to Jeffrey Epstein and a raunchy 2003 letter. He ordered the Justice Department to seek the release of Epstein's grand jury testimony to appease his supporters. The controversy has sparked backlash among Trump's base, fuelling conspiracy theories around Epstein's client list. President Donald Trump attempted on Friday to control the storm triggered by a bombshell report on his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, ordering the Justice Department to seek the release of testimony from the prosecution of the late, alleged sex-trafficker-to-the-famous. Trump also vowed to sue 'the ass off' The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, after the newspaper said that in 2003, the future president wrote a raunchy letter to Epstein, referring to their shared 'secret.' 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.18.25 09:17 AM EST I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!! — Fan Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 18, 2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department would ask a court to unseal grand jury testimony from the case against Epstein, apparently in hopes of dampening fury among many of Trump's most loyal supporters over what they see as a White House cover-up. Epstein, a financier, was found hanging dead in his cell in New York in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges that he sexually exploited dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida. The case sparked conspiracy theories, especially among Trump's far-right voters, about an alleged international cabal of wealthy pedophiles. Epstein's death - declared a suicide - before he could face trial, super-charged the narrative. When Trump returned to power for a second term this January, his supporters clamored for revelations about Epstein's supposed list of clients. But Bondi issued an official memo in July declaring that there was no such list. The discontent in Trump's MAGA, or Make America Great Again, base poses a rare challenge to the 79-year-old Republican's control of the political narrative in America. It remained unclear whether a court would authorise the unsealing of what is usually highly secret grand jury testimony. Even if such material were made public, it was also unclear whether it would shed much, if any, light on the main questions raised in the conspiracy theories - particularly the existence and possible contents of an Epstein client list. Naked woman and signature Trump was friends with Epstein, and the two were photographed and videoed together at parties over the years, although there has never been evidence showing wrongdoing. The Wall Street Journal article published late on Thursday was damaging because it indicated a shared interest in sex. The Journal reported that Trump had wished Epstein a happy 50th birthday in 2003 with a letter featuring a hand-drawn naked woman and referring to their 'secrets.' The letter was reportedly among a slew of well-wishes from other wealthy and well-known figures for a birthday album. A furious Trump said on Truth Social that the purported letter was a 'Scam' and 'Fake.' Trump also said that the Journal's chief editor, Emma Tucker, had been told the letter was fake and that she shouldn't publish it. According to the Journal, the Trump letter contained the outline of a naked woman, apparently drawn with a marker pen, and had the future president's signature 'Donald' mimicking pubic hair. It ends, according to the newspaper, with 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump reacted in a series of furious social media posts, saying 'it's not my language. It's not my words.' 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he said.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why it's so challenging for Trump to fire Powell
A firing of Jerome Powell by President Trump would likely open up a legal war never before seen in the US, without any guarantee of a courtroom victory for the White House. That may be why Trump hasn't done so. Yet. Powell has made his intentions clear. He said earlier this year that he wouldn't leave if Trump tried to fire him and that his removal is 'not permitted by law.' Fed officials privately have been preparing for a legal battle as far back as Trump's first term, when the president also toyed with removing the chair, according to the Wall Street Journal. The strength of Powell's case is based on some protections of Fed autonomy already embedded in US statute. The Federal Reserve Act, which created the central bank in 1913 and was amended in 1935, states that each member of the Fed board shall hold office for 14 years "unless sooner removed for cause by the President." The intention of the "for cause" condition was to enhance the Fed's independence by making it more difficult for a president to fire its board members, who are appointed by the president. There are also signs that the Supreme Court would step in if Trump were to act, although the high court's views on the topic are unclear. In an ambiguous ruling earlier this year, Supreme Court justices allowed Trump to temporarily proceed with the firings of board members at two other independent agencies. In granting the administration's request, the court said that in its judgment, the government "is likely to show" that the fired board members exercised "considerable executive power," a view that suggests the president possesses broader power to remove the officials at will. Read more: How much control does the president have over the Fed and interest rates? Legal challenges from those board members are still playing out at an appeals court. But Powell got a good sign Thursday when a Washington, D.C., district court judge ruled that another Trump firing of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter was illegal and that she should be reappointed. The judge cited a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that limits the power of the president to dismiss independent agency board members except in cases of neglect or malfeasance. That precedent offers Powell a layer of protection. It was set in a 1935 case titled Humphrey's Executor v. US that challenged President Franklin Roosevelt's termination of the US Federal Trade Commissioner. The court held that the president's authority to terminate agency officials at will was limited to purely executive officers, and not those leading independent agencies that engage in regulation and adjudication. Congress, the court said, had power to limit the president's removal power over those officials "for cause" — then described that term to mean inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. Trump is challenging whether that precedent applies across various independent agencies, but the Supreme Court has not yet made a definitive ruling on whether it should stand. If the precedent falls and leaves no explicit protection for the central bank, a Powell firing could certainly be a lot easier to pull off. 'For cause' Powell does have one major vulnerability, however. That 'for cause' language embedded in the Federal Reserve Act hasn't really been defined or tested in court. The statute also doesn't have any language that specifically addresses the chair of the Board of Governors. And the White House has been using a new line of attack against Powell that could offer a path to a 'for cause' dismissal, as the president and his allies raise concerns about a $2.5 billion renovation of the central bank's headquarters. "I mean it's possible there's fraud involved with the $2.5 billion renovation," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, after saying earlier that the project "sort of is" a fireable offense. He said he wasn't planning to fire Powell but also left the door open, saying, "I don't rule out anything, but I think it's highly unlikely, unless he has to leave for fraud.' National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett — one of Powell's potential successors — said last Sunday on ABC News's "This Week" that whether the president has the legal authority to fire Powell before his term is up next May "is being looked into" and that "certainly, if there's cause, he does." But he also acknowledged it was a 'highly uncertain legal matter.' Politico reported that outside lawyers told the White House counsel's office it would likely lose a legal fight with Powell if Trump removed Powell solely over accusations that he mishandled renovations and that White House officials were also unsure whether it would work. Politico quoted one official who said, 'Whether or not it's illegal, I don't know. But is it a good thing to point out to damage this guy's image? Yeah.' The White House is certainly showing no signs of letting up on its pressure. They are seeking a site visit to see the Fed's renovations in person. Powell has asked the Fed's inspector general to review the costs involved. He also sent White House budget director Russ Vought a letter Thursday offering a point-by-point rebuttal of questions raised about the project and denying reports of a VIP elevator and VIP dining rooms. "We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources," he said, and "we have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen.' Case Western Reserve University business law professor Eric Chaffee said he thinks Powell would win any legal battle with the White House on the 'for cause' clause, but he doesn't think such a confrontation will come to pass given that Powell only has 10 months left as chair. "We're just so close to the end of the term that I think the Trump administration is very likely just to wait things out,' he said. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Engadget
29 minutes ago
- Engadget
Xi Jinping warns against China's overinvestment in EVs and AI
Chinese President Xi Jinping has bluntly questioned a nationwide rush of investment into the AI and EV industries. As deflation anxiety grows and Trump's trade war with China ramps up, the world's second largest economy is turning to fast-growth tech industries to remain competitive. But Xi appears to think that the strategy is flawed. As reported by the Financial Times , China's President sent out a pointed message about over-investment at the two-day Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing. "When it comes to projects, there are a few things — artificial intelligence, computing power and new energy vehicles," he said in a speech that made the front page of the People's Daily , the official newspaper of the Communist Party. "Do all provinces in the country have to develop industries in these directions?" The Financial Times reports that Xi went on to criticise officials who encourage hasty development but don't hang around to face the consequences. 'We should not only focus on how much GDP has grown and how many major projects have been built, but also on how much debt is owed,' Xi told conference attendees. "We should not let some people pass the buck and leave problems to future generations." For now though, there's no suggestion that China is shifting its focus away from the sectors Xi directly referenced. This week, NVIDIA was granted permission by the US government to resume selling its AI chips to China, with the company reportedly holding $8 billion in unshipped orders. It was initially blocked from selling the H20 AI GPU to China over concerns it could aid the nation's military. China is the global leader of the EV industry, and the country is taking on the US in the robotaxi race too. It was announced this week that Uber is partnering with Baidu to bring thousands of the Chinese company's Apollo Go autonomous vehicles onto the Uber network in mainland China and other non-US markets.