Congress devours Mahayuti Govt over serving 'meal in silver plates', asks where is farm loan waiver
Congress Legislature Party leader in Maharashtra Vijay Wadettiwar claimed on Wednesday (June 25, 2025) Estimate Committee members were served meal in silver plates at a conclave and called it 'extravagant spending' by the Mahayuti Government when the State's finances were under strain.
The former State Minister also targeted the BJP-led government over 'deteriorating' law and order situation in Maharashtra, and what he called 'internal contradictions' within the ruling coalition which consists of the BJP, the NCP and the Shiv Sena.
Speaking to reporters in Nagpur, Mr. Wadettiwar questioned the government's priorities, stating, 'When the State is virtually on the brink of bankruptcy, what was the need to serve meals in silver plates to members of the Estimate Committees in Mumbai?' He claimed each meal cost ₹5,000 and so much money was spent by the government at a time when farmers are being denied loan waivers, bonuses are not being paid, and large sections of tribal, social welfare, and Anganwadi schemes are allegedly facing budget cuts.
Mumbai hosted a two-day conference of the Estimates Committees of Parliament and States from June 23. The event, held at Vidhan Bhavan (legislative complex) in south Mumbai, saw participation of chairpersons and members of such panels of Parliament, States and Union Territory legislatures.
These financial committees, at the central and State/UT level, examine the expenditure estimates for each administrative department in respective budgets and also utilisation of funds.
'A majority of farmers in Vidarbha have been denied fresh crop loans. Anganwadi workers [who look after child care centres] aren't paid honorarium on time, and funds for schemes like the Sanjay Gandhi Niradhar Yojana remain pending. Yet, the government chooses to serve meals to estimates committee members in silver plates,' Mr. Wadettiwar said.
The Opposition legislator maintained this act was nothing, but an insult to the poor.
His party colleague and Maharashtra Congress president Harshwardhan Sapkal also hit out at the Mahayuti Government over the issue of 'meal in silver plates'.
'They [Estimates Committee delegation members] feasted on ₹5,000 meal served in ₹550 worth of silver plate each. Was the fund spent linked to the money found in the Dhule government guest house when the State Estimates Committee was touring?' the MPCC chief asked in Mumbai.
Last month, a huge amount of cash was recovered from a room in the government guest house in Dhule district ahead of the visit of State Estimates Committee members.
'They have no money for farmers' loan waivers or even ₹2,100 for a poor sister, but they have no shortage of funds for lavish banquets,' Mr. Sapkal remarked.
Citing an incident in Pune, where a BJP office-bearer allegedly molested a policewoman, CLP leader Wadettiwar questioned the Mahayuti Government's moral authority to uphold law and order.
'If even women police personnel are not safe, what does that say about law and order? The Chief Minister [who also holds the home portfolio] is from the BJP. Will women get justice when the BJP men are accused of such acts?' he asked.
Raising concerns over the recently approved Maharashtra Shaktipeeth Expressway, Mr. Wadettiwar pointed to growing opposition among farmers, whose lands are likely to be acquired for the mega project.
'Some Ministers in the Cabinet opposed the project, but that's not enough. If Hasan Mushrif and Prakash Abitkar [both Ministers] truly object to it, they should quit the government. Mere token dissent while clinging to power is hypocrisy,' the former Minister emphasised.
The 802-km-long expressway will link Pavnar in Wardha district (in Vidarbha) with Patradevi in Sindhudurg district on the Maharashtra-Goa border.
The Congress MLA accused the Mahayuti Government of indulging in 'double standards', saying it has no money for the poor, but at the same time the ruling coalition is showing no restraint in spending on political elites.
Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut, whose party is an ally of the Congress, also hit out at the State Government over the issue of corruption.
'The corruption taking place in Maharashtra cannot be compared to any scam in the world. It is a very high-level scam,' Mr. Raut alleged.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
24 minutes ago
- The Print
How VD Satheesan's leadership won Congress Nilambur, and silenced his detractors
'At present, there is no one in the Congress leadership who can take a strong stand. This is happening after a long gap, since K. Karunakaran. Neither the high command nor other leaders can ignore that,' state-based political analyst C.R. Neelakandan said. The victory has elevated popularity and stature of Satheesan, whom many in his own Congress party saw as 'arrogant', within the party. He is now being praised not just for strategising the campaign for the 19 June poll but also for taking tough decisions, something his party is often accused of lacking. Thiruvananthapuram : With MLAs and Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee members overseeing two to three booths each, and district unit presidents one each, the party's Nilambur byelection win is being credited as much to a tightly coordinated strategy as to strong stands taken by Leader of Opposition V.D. Satheesan in run-up to the bypoll. A loss in the Nilambur bypoll would have been a death knell of sorts for the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF), which has been out of power in the state since 2016. For the Congress, it wasn't a smooth sailing during the campaign, largely due to the controversies created by former MLA P.V. Anvar. Anvar, earlier an independent MLA backed by the Left Democratic Front (LDF), openly attacked Satheesan and Congress and UDF candidate Aryadan Shoukath after his attempts to join the UDF after resigning the seat didn't work out. In 2016, the LDF fielded Anvar and he defeated Shoukath by 11,504 votes. In the 2021 polls, Anvar was re-elected, this time defeating Congress' V.V. Prakash by 2,700 votes. But he resigned the seat in January—the resignation triggered the byelection—after a fallout with the LDF leadership, and declared an open war against Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. Though a section of Congress leaders and its ally Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) wanted to bring him into the UDF fold, Satheesan remained firm against this, forcing Anvar to contest as an independent. Meanwhile, the ruling CPI(M), which hadn't fielded a candidate on its own symbol since the 2006 assembly polls, chose one of its most popular faces and party state secretariat member M. Swaraj to contest the poll. This was break from the CPI(M) usual practice of supporting an independent in Nilambur. In the high-stakes contest, Congress candidate Aryadan Shoukath secured 77,737 votes, followed by CPI(M)'s M. Swaraj with 66,660 votes. Anvar came third with 19,760 votes. A Congress functionary based in Nilambur said Satheesan's popularity within the party has risen significantly after the bypoll results announced 23 June. 'He is generally considered arrogant, even within the Congress. But now everyone agrees that his stand benefited the party. If Anvar had been accommodated, he would have taken credit for the victory and interfered in party affairs,' the functionary said. He added the Congress youth wing, which has practically remained inactive in Nilambur, was reactivated during the campaign, and several popular young leaders joined the canvassing. 'Since top leaders directly monitored preparations, internal disagreements didn't flare up as they usually do,' the functionary said, but quickly added a caution, 'It may not be the case in the Assembly election.' He also noted the IUML had already agreed with the Congress to put up a united front in this election, as a defeat in the IUML's stronghold of Malappuram (the Nilambur constituency falls in the district) would have been a setback for the League. Political analyst P.J. Vincent said Satheesan has managed to project a strong persona of himself after the bypolls, a trait usually associated with rival leader and Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. 'Satheesan is the only leader in Congress today who can take firm stands. The party usually avoids confrontation and yields to public or ally pressure. Satheesan's role in the Anvar decision marks a shift,' Vincent told ThePrint, adding the results mean Satheesan now becomes the front-runner chief ministerial candidate from the Congress if the UDF wins the assembly polls next year. However, Vincent also pointed out that Congress' vote share had slightly dipped from the 2021 Assembly polls, when V.V. Prakash had polled 78,527 votes in Nilambur, indicating the party couldn't fully consolidate the anti-incumbency vote. He added that if Anvar were brought into the UDF, it would have still benefited the Opposition, as he remains one of the most vocal critics of the Pinarayi government. The rise of the leader 'When we win, it's a collective credit. But when something comes out negative, the entire responsibility will be on me, (and) it should be,' Satheesan said in an interview in the run-up to the bypolls. The leader was particularly talking about the flak he was receiving for not accommodating Anvar into the UDF. As for Anvar, after resigning from the Nilambur constituency, he met top Congress and IUML leaders in his attempt to join the UDF. However, it didn't happen as Anvar held a series of press conferences openly criticising the UDF's choice of fielding Aryadan Shoukath. He also attacked Satheesan for opposing his entry. 'Anvar's character is unpredictable. You can't trust him,' political analyst C.R. Neelakandan said. But, when the door was decisively shut on Anvar, many Congress and IUML leaders did express displeasure over Satheesan's decision. Hailing from Ernakulam district's Nettoor, Satheesan's political journey began with an unsuccessful candidature in the 1996 Kerala Assembly polls. But he won the 2001 elections from Paravur and has since emerged victorious from the seat in consecutive polls, the margin in the last two Assembly polls being more than 20,000 votes. Satheesan became the Leader of the Opposition, succeeding Ramesh Chennithala, in 2021, after the Congress suffered defeats in two successive Assembly polls. He was appointed nearly two weeks after the Youth Congress wrote to the All India Congress Committee, calling for a change in the party's leadership in the state. Following Satheesan's appointment, one of the party's young faces and then Palakkad MLA Shafi Parambil wrote a Facebook post welcoming the decision. Satheesan has stayed away from Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor's complaint that he wasn't invited to campaign in Nilambur, but has questioned the basis for his praise for the LDF government on the ease of doing business in the state. 'Satheesan has an upper hand in strategising elections, which was evident in Thrikkakara, Puthuppally, and Palakkad bypolls too. He also enjoys the support of Congress's youth leaders,' Neelakandan said. There have been bypolls to five seats—Thrikkakara, Puthuppally, Palakkad, Chelakkara and Nilambur—in the state since the 2021 elections. Except Thrissur's Chelakkara constituency, the UDF has won all four. Nilambur is also the first Congress win in a seat previously held by the LDF. A Congress functionary told ThePrint Satheesan has emerged as a star among party functionaries and cadres after the polls. 'It showed us that the party can take a stand and win without anybody's help. It will boost cadre morale heading into the upcoming local body elections,' he said. (Edited by Ajeet Tiwari) Also Read: Tharoor admits to 'difference of opinion' with Congress, says not asked to campaign in Nilambur
NDTV
27 minutes ago
- NDTV
Can't Ignore Hindi, But Don't Make It Compulsory From Class 1: Sharad Pawar
NCP (SP) chief Sharad Pawar on Thursday said that Hindi should not be made mandatory from Class 1 in Maharashtra, underscoring that if a new language is to be introduced, it should be done only after Class 5. "Hindi should not be made compulsory in primary education. There is no objection to Hindi being introduced after Class 5. A large section of the country speaks Hindi, and there is no reason to ignore the language completely," he said. However, burdening young students with additional languages at the primary level is not appropriate, said Mr Pawar. The octogenarian politician's remarks come amid a language row that erupted in Maharashtra after the state government last week issued an amended order, stating Hindi will generally be taught as the third language to students in Marathi and English medium schools from Classes 1 to 5. Mr Pawar emphasised the importance of the mother tongue in early education and said parents should have the right to decide whether their children need to learn Hindi after Class 5. It is also important to analyse how much language burden students can bear at the early stage, he said. "If we put the burden of another language on students and the mother tongue gets sidelined in the process, then that is not appropriate. The state government should give up its insistence on making Hindi compulsory from Class 1," he said. Mr Pawar said he supports the stand taken by Shiv Sena (UBT) president Uddhav Thackeray and his cousin and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray on the issue, adding that it is good if the Marathi-speaking population unites over the matter. The Thackeray cousins have accused the BJP-led state government of trying to create a divide among the people on the basis of language.
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Won't allow imposition of Hindi in Maharashtra, BJP trying to create language divide: Uddhav
Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray on Thursday (June 26, 2025) reaffirmed his strong Opposition to "imposition" of Hindi in Maharashtra and accused the BJP of trying to create a divide among people on the basis of language. Speaking to reporters, the former Maharashtra Chief Minister claimed the BJP, his former ally, is attempting to impose a 'language emergency' in the predominantly Marathi-speaking State. Mr. Thackeray insisted his party was not opposed to Hindi, but was certainly against its imposition. "We don't oppose or hate any language, but that doesn't mean we will allow imposition of any language. We oppose the imposition of Hindi and it will continue," he asserted amid the ongoing controversy over teaching Hindi to students of Classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and English medium schools. Also Read | How move to include Hindi from Class 1 has injected language politics into Maharashtra "The BJP is trying to create a divide among people on the basis of language. It is imposing a language emergency," the former CM claimed. Imposition of Hindi in Maharashtra, where the BJP heads the ruling coalition, is part of the national party's hidden agenda, he alleged. The contentious language issue can be resolved if Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis declares that Hindi will not be made compulsory in state schools, the opposition leader contended. He maintained that during his tenure as CM from 2019 to 2022, he had taken the decision to make Marathi a compulsory subject in all schools of Maharashtra. Thackeray declared the Shiv Sena (UBT) will take part in an agitation organised by civil society members at the Azad Maidan in south Mumbai on July 7 against the three-language formula in schools and imposition of Hindi. The BJP is trying to create a divide in Mumbai and Maharashtra where there is cohesiveness among Marathi speakers and others, he alleged. Taking a dig at his arch rival, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who heads the ruling coalition partner Shiv Sena, the former CM said "traitors" need to be told about the ideals of party founder late Bal Thackeray. Speaking on the controversy about a third language in the school curriculum, Chief Minister Fadnavis made it clear that Hindi is optional while Marathi is compulsory. The row erupted after the state government last week issued an amended order, stating Hindi will "generally" be taught as the third language to students in Marathi and English medium schools from Classes 1 to 5. According to the order, if 20 students per grade in a school wish to study any other Indian language, they can opt out of Hindi. If such a demand arises, either a teacher will be appointed or the language will be taught online.
